What did goldfein testify about? And it now seems he testified three times?
Was it 'experts testimony' about gitten? Was it about the $60,000 that he wired out?
Note: this immunity does not protect him from a: civil liability regarding AF vs TF and B: licensing matters regarding beating up an adversary and laundering money (the money was wired to two 501(c)s for a personal purpose.) And in pennsylvania, anybody (even not connected to a case, even a private citizen) can file such a complaint.)
He already admitted paying Mendel the money. He claims it was for other reasons, but there is a reason why the U.S. Attorney thought that he would have invoked the 5th.
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;
(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;
(e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; or
(f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law.
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;
(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;
(e) knowingly manifest by words or conduct when acting in a professional capacity bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status when such action is prejudicial to the administration of justice, provided, however, that legitimate advocacy is not a violation of this paragraph;
(f) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; or
(g) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law.
Why is he being forced to testify in the Wolmark case if Wolmark was sentenced yesterday?
ReplyDeleteWhat testimony did Goldfein give the court when he was under oath?
ReplyDeleteWhy is he still licensed to practice in three states?
ReplyDeleteIt seems ME got ten years. Awaiting confirmation and details.
ReplyDeleteWhat did goldfein testify about? And it now seems he testified three times?
ReplyDeleteWas it 'experts testimony' about gitten? Was it about the $60,000 that he wired out?
Note: this immunity does not protect him from a: civil liability regarding AF vs TF and B: licensing matters regarding beating up an adversary and laundering money (the money was wired to two 501(c)s for a personal purpose.) And in pennsylvania, anybody (even not connected to a case, even a private citizen) can file such a complaint.)
Confused...I thought he already testified. Wasn't he the one who admitted to Tamar's side paying 60k to Mendel Epstein?
ReplyDeleteLakewood rabbi sentenced to 10 years in prison for divorce kidnappings
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nj.com/ocean/index.ssf/2015/12/lakewood_rabbi_sentenced_to_10_years_in_prison_for.html
He is licensed in NY and Maryland, too.
ReplyDeleteHe already admitted paying Mendel the money. He claims it was for other reasons, but there is a reason why the U.S. Attorney thought that he would have invoked the 5th.
ReplyDeleteThat was for the trial, this was for the sentencing. He needs immunity because he likely violated the law when he made those payments.
ReplyDeletePennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct:
ReplyDeleteRule 8.4. Misconduct.
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;
(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;
(e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; or
(f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law.
Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct:
ReplyDeleteRULE 8.4. MISCONDUCT
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;
(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;
(e) knowingly manifest by words or conduct when acting in a professional capacity bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status when such action is prejudicial to the administration of justice, provided, however, that legitimate advocacy is not a violation of this paragraph;
(f) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; or
(g) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law.
He testified that he transferred 60,000.00 to Mendel to only HOLLER at Friedman to get a get...haha
ReplyDeleteHe does not have immunity from prosecution for perjury.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/consumers/complaint-forms/
ReplyDeleteIs this Frederic Goldfein?
ReplyDeleteIf so, he is a big a scumbag as Sholom Kaminetsky.
Makes perfect sense that he's involved in this shmutz.