Monday, October 26, 2026

Trump admin illegally fired Maurene Comey, judge rules

 https://www.politico.com/news/2026/10/26/maurene-comey-firing-ruling

A judge ruled Monday that the Trump administration broke the law when it fired Maurene Comey from her job as a federal prosecutor last year — sharply curbing the administration’s attempt to advance a “sweeping theory” of executive power.

Comey’s abrupt termination from her longtime job as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan wasn’t authorized by any statute and violated the Civil Service Reform Act, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman, an Obama appointee, wrote.

And he said the Justice Department’s argument that the Constitution's Article II, which outlines the powers of the president, bars Congress from regulating the removal of federal prosecutors “flies in the face of nearly two centuries of Supreme Court precedent.”

Judge rules James Comey’s daughter unlawfully fired as federal prosecutor

 https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/6172624-maurene-comey-justice-department-unlawful-firing/

A federal judge ruled Monday that the Department of Justice (DOJ) unlawfully fired and must provide back pay to Maurene Comey, former FBI Director James Comey’s daughter who was terminated as a prosecutor last year.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman rejected the Trump administration’s arguments that it had constitutional authority to fire her. 

“Defendants’ argument is contrary to an unbroken line of Supreme Court decisions dating back almost two centuries, and the Supreme Court itself has not formally overruled any of those decisions. That is sufficient, in itself, to reject the argument,” Furman wrote in his 55-page opinion.

Democrats Drop Major Report on Trump’s Alleged Ties to Epstein Crimes

 https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-drop-major-report-on-trumps-alleged-ties-to-epstein-crimes-12620119

House Judiciary Committee Democrats released a report Monday calling for an independent special counsel to investigate President Donald Trump’s relationship with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that accounts from women and records released in the Epstein case warrant further investigation into whether Trump committed wrongdoing.

The Democratic staff report, titled We Have Certain Things in Common, Jeffrey: The Case Against Donald Trump Emerging in the Epstein Files and DOJ’s Desperate Efforts to Cover it Up, examines accounts involving 11 women. According to the report, five directly accuse Trump of serious sexual misconduct in Epstein’s company or presence. The allegations are disputed and have not resulted in criminal findings against Trump.

The report also accuses the Department of Justice (DOJ) of improperly withholding some Epstein-related records and impeding investigative efforts. Those claims represent the conclusions of Democratic committee staff, rather than findings by the full House Judiciary Committee or a court.

Ohio Venues Cancel Vivek Ramaswamy Events as Backlash Grows

 https://www.newsweek.com/ohio-venues-cancel-vivek-ramaswamy-events-backlash-grows-midterms-amy-acton-12618375

Ohio venues are pulling out of hosting Republican campaign events featuring gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, as backlash grows over his advert featuring his Democratic opponent Amy Acton's estranged mother.

Ramaswamy has faced bipartisan criticism after his campaign produced an advert featuring his Democratic opponent's estranged mother, who called Acton "a liar."

Acton has said that she was sexually abused by her stepfather as a child, and has not seen her mother since she testified against him in court aged 12. She said that her stepfather was charged with rape before he fled the state with her mother.

Patent Medicines and the story of Coke

quote from "A History of the World in 6 Glasses

 "The rise of America, and the globalization of war, politics, trade, and communications during the twentieth century, are mirrored by the rise of Coca-Cola, consistently one of the world’s most valuable and widely recognized brands, which is universally regarded as the embodiment of America and its values. For those who approve of the United States, that means economic and political freedom of choice, consumerism and democracy, the American dream; for those who disapprove, it stands for ruthless global capitalism, the hegemony of global corporations and brands, and the dilution of local cultures and values into homogenized and Americanized mediocrity. Just as the story of Britain’s empire can be seen in a cup of tea, so the story of America’s rise to global preeminence is paralleled in the story of Coca-Cola, that brown, sweet, and fizzy beverage."

"In May 1886 John Pemberton, a pharmacist who lived in Atlanta, Georgia, invented a drink. According to the Coca-Cola Company’s official version of the story, he was a tinkerer who stumbled on the right combination of ingredients by accident, while trying to devise a cure for headaches. One afternoon he mixed various ingredients in a three-legged pot to create a caramel-colored liquid, which he then took to a nearby pharmacy, combining the liquid with soda water to create the sweet, fizzy, and invigorating drink—Coca-Cola—that would eventually reach nearly every corner of the world. The real story is rather more complicated, however. Pemberton was, in fact, an experienced maker of patent medicines, the quack remedies that were hugely popular in America in the late nineteenth century. These pills, balsams, syrups, creams, and oils were generally triumphs of advertising over pharmacology. Some were harmless, but many contained large amounts of alcohol, caffeine, opium, or morphine. They were sold through newspaper advertisements, and their production became a huge industry after the Civil War, as veterans took to dosing themselves. The popularity of patent medicines reflected a general distrust of conventional medicines, which were often expensive and ineffective. Patent medicines offered an alluring alternative, marketed as they often were on the basis of exotic ingredients or the medical knowledge of Native Americans, and under names with religious, patriotic, or mythological overtones: Munson’s Paw-Paw Pills to Coax Your Liver into Action, Dr. Morse’s Indian Root Pills, and so on. There was nothing to stop manufacturers of such medicines from making outrageous claims about their effectiveness. The Elixir of Life sold by a Dr. Kidd, for example, claimed to cure “every known ailment.… The lame have thrown away crutches and walked after two or three trials of the remedy.… Rheumatism, neuralgia, stomach, heart, liver, kidney, blood and skin diseases disappear as by magic.” The newspapers that printed such advertisements did not ask any questions. They welcomed the advertising revenues, which enabled the newspaper industry to expand enormously; by the end of the nineteenth century patent medicines accounted for more newspaper advertising than any other product. The makers of St. Jacob’s Oil, which was said to remedy “sore muscles,” spent five hundred thousand dollars on advertising in 1881, and some advertisers were spending more than one million dollars a year by 1895. The patent-medicine business was among the first to recognize the importance of trademarks and advertising, of slogans, logos, and hoardings. Since the remedies themselves usually cost very little to make, it made sense to spend money on marketing. With so many competing products on the market, however, only 2 percent of them made a profit, according to one estimate. But those that did succeed made fortunes for their inventors. One of the most famous was Lydia E. Pinkham’s Vegetable Compound. It was said to be “a positive cure for all those painful Complaints and Weaknesses so common to our best female population.… It removes faintness, flatulency, destroys all craving for stimulants, and relieves weakness of the stomach.” Customers were encouraged to write to Pinkham for medical advice, even after her death in 1883, which was kept quiet. They received form letters in return, invariably recommending the use of more of her compound. When analyzed in the early twentieth century, it was found to contain 15 to 20 percent alcohol. Ironically, women temperance campaigners were among its most fervent users. Pemberton’s own attempts to make patent medicines had met with mixed success. At times his remedies produced a solid income, but during the 1870s he had a run of bad luck. He was declared bankrupt in 1872, and his attempts to get back on his feet were hampered by two fires that destroyed his stock. But he continued to develop new patent medicines in the hope that one of them would make him rich. Finally, in 1884, he started to get somewhere, thanks to the popularity of a new patent-medicine ingredient: coca. The leaves of the coca plant had long been known among South American peoples for their stimulating effect; coca was known as “the divine plant of the Incas.” Chewing a small ball of the leaves releases tiny quantities of an alkaloid drug, cocaine. In small doses this sharpens the mind, much like caffeine, and suppresses the appetite, making possible long treks across the Andes with very little food or sleep. Cocaine was isolated from coca leaves in 1855, and it then became the subject of much interest among Western scientists and doctors, who thought it might help to cure opium addicts by providing an alternative. (They were unaware that cocaine was just as addictive.) Pemberton followed the discussion of coca in the medical journals closely, and by the 1880s he and other patent-medicine makers were incorporating it into their tablets, elixirs, and ointments. Pemberton’s contribution to this burgeoning field was a drink called French Wine Coca. As its name suggests, this was a coca-infused wine. In fact, it was just one of many attempts to imitate a particularly successful patent medicine called Vin Mariani, which consisted of French wine in which coca leaves had been steeped for six months. Vin Mariani was popular in Europe and the United States, thanks to its high cocaine content and the marketing prowess of its creator, a Corsican named Angelo Mariani. The letters of endorsement for his drink from celebrities and heads of state, including three popes, two American presidents, Queen Victoria, and the inventor Thomas Edison, were published as a book in thirteen volumes. Pemberton copied the coca-infused wine formula and added kola extract too. The nuts of the kola plant from West Africa were another supposed wonder-cure that had become known in the West at around the same time as coca, and also had an invigorating effect when chewed, since they contain about 2 percent caffeine. As with coca leaves in South America, kola nuts were valued as a stimulant by indigenous peoples in West Africa, from Senegal in the north to Angola in the south. They were used in religious ceremonies by the Yoruba people in Nigeria; the people of Sierra Leone wrongly believed that kola nuts cured malaria. In nineteenth-century America, coca and kola often ended up being lumped together in patent medicines due to the similarity of their effects. Just as he copied and slightly modified Mariani’s formula for the drink, Pemberton also borrowed from Mariani’s advertisements, claiming several celebrity endorsements as testimonials for his own drink. Sales of his French Wine Coca began to grow. But just when it seemed that Pemberton was on the right track, Atlanta and Fulton County voted to prohibit the sale of alcohol from July 1, 1886, for a two-year trial period. With the temperance movement gaining ground, Pemberton needed to produce a successful nonalcoholic remedy, and fast. He went back to his elaborate home laboratory and started work on a “temperance drink” containing coca and kola, with the bitterness of the two principal ingredients masked using sugar. This would be no ordinary patent medicine, though; he intended it to be dispensed as a medicinal soda-water flavoring. As he refined his formula, Pemberton sent batches of it to the neighborhood pharmacy, where it was offered to customers alongside the other flavorings. On occasion he would ask his nephew to loiter in the pharmacy to hear what other people had to say about the new drink’s taste."


Rabbi Zilberstein Rules Woman Must Vote for UTJ Even Against Husband’s Wishes

 https://vinnews.com/2026/10/26/rabbi-zilberstein-rules-woman-must-vote-for-utj-even-against-husbands-wishes/

Rabbi Yitzchak Zilberstein, one of Israel’s leading charedi rabbinical authorities, has ruled that a woman whose husband forbids her from voting for United Torah Judaism (UTJ) should nevertheless cast her ballot without informing him, describing the act as a sanctification of G-d’s name.

According to the question, the couple had traditionally voted for United Torah Judaism, following the instructions of prominent Lithuanian charedi leaders, including the late Rabbi Aharon Leib Shteinman and Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky, as well as the current leader of the Lithuanian charedi community, Rabbi Dov Lando.

However, the woman’s husband had become more modern in recent years and increasingly critical of leading rabbis. He eventually declared that neither he nor his wife would vote in the upcoming election.

The woman, meanwhile, remained committed to following Rabbi Lando’s instructions. She described seeing the elderly rabbi traveling from city to city, pleading with members of the charedi community to participate in the election and emphasizing the importance of the political struggle

Epstein Files quote from "Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump" by Haberman, Maggie; Swan, Jonathan -

Elon Musk and Donald Trump finally split up at the end of May 2025 with a shower of invective from one side and the shattered trust of a broken marriage. After a public meltdown about Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill, Musk escalated with another vicious serve against the President on June 5. Trump, Musk posted on X, was one of the villains he had been warning his base about for years. “Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!” In a follow-up, Musk wrote: “Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.” A month later, on July 7, the Department of Justice and the FBI released an unsigned one-and-a-half-page memo stating that after an exhaustive search of “its databases, hard drives, and network drives as well as physical searches of squad areas, locked cabinets, desks, closets, and other areas where responsive material may have been stored” and a corresponding review of more than three hundred gigabytes of evidence, the DOJ had concluded there was no evidence the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein had maintained a “client list.” The memo also reaffirmed the original official finding that Epstein’s death in 2019 had been a suicide. And with that, the memo indicated, the Trump administration would not be releasing further information regarding the Epstein case, and no further investigation of uncharged third parties was warranted. The memo was accompanied by the release of video footage from the federal prison in Manhattan where Epstein had died, footage that officials said supported the conclusion of suicide. Less than five months after Attorney General Pam Bondi had referred to a secret “client list” of high-profile predators, the case was closed. Or so it seemed. If the administration expected the memo would be the last word on the Epstein case, and that the President’s most ardent supporters would accept the purported conclusions of the Department of Justice simply because the department and its investigative agencies were now controlled by Donald Trump, they were sorely mistaken. The memo was an earthquake, and it was received by a portion of the MAGA base as a betrayal. It amounted to an abrupt disavowal of the sinister conspiracy theories that some of Trump’s closest confidants had hyped during the Biden presidency and that they had promised to expose once Trump was returned to power. On the Lex Fridman Podcast in September 2024, when asked about the “client list,” Trump had responded, “I’d certainly take a look at it…. I’d have no problem with it.” The list “probably will be” made public, he said, but he sounded half-hearted. Trump’s campaign allies and surrogates were far less circumspect. Donald Trump Jr. and JD Vance had invoked the Epstein files as a broader campaign message to argue that “powerful people” in the government were hiding the truth from Americans. Just weeks before the election, Vance told the podcast host Theo Von, “Seriously, we need to release the Epstein list. That is an important thing.” In the engine room of the MAGA movement during the 2024 campaign, the Epstein files were potent fuel. An Epstein information ecosystem of right-wing “influencers” had manned the coal shovel. Elon Musk had used his social media platform to repeatedly question why a “client list” had not been released. His posts reached hundreds of millions of users. The far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones used his Infowars platform to aggressively promote theories about a global pedophile ring. Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk had both insisted the government should release the documents and floated the idea that there was a massive cover-up in progress. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who had seemingly never met a conspiracy theory she did not embrace, spent much of her political capital lobbying for the release of the files. There were so many more. Laura Loomer, conservative activist Scott Presler, Chaya Raichik from Libs of TikTok. The Hodgetwins. But when it came to propagating the Epstein files as evidence of a “deep state” capable of evil, two podcasters were not to be outdone. On his own show Kash’s Corner, and in appearances on programs like Benny Johnson’s The Benny Show, Kash Patel—a National Security Council director for counterterrorism and Pentagon chief of staff in the first Trump era—had repeatedly claimed that the government was hiding Epstein’s “black book” or “client list” of pedophiles. In a 2023 interview, he challenged officials to “put on your big-boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are,” and he frequently asserted that the FBI was deliberately withholding names to protect the powerful. Patel promised a second Trump administration would release “everything” to restore public trust. On The Dan Bongino Show, Bongino’s background as a Secret Service agent had lent authority to his claims of a cover-up. “What the hell are they hiding with Jeffrey Epstein?” he’d asked his large audience. The release of the files would “rock the political world,” he promised. The “Washington swamp” was “not telling you the truth.” Now he and Patel—whose appointments to run the FBI had been greeted with righteous enthusiasm by Epstein files obsessives—were tightly connected to a memo that stated, in black and white, that while information in the government’s possession showed ample evidence of Epstein’s own wrongdoing, there was no evidence of a wider conspiracy. Both men had been raising alarms internally that the Epstein crisis was gathering momentum with the base. Bongino hated the memo. He told Patel it would in no way align with their promises of transparency after taking over the FBI, and he objected to putting the FBI seal on the letterhead. He was overruled. Patel privately shared many of Bongino’s concerns. But in an internal email on Wednesday, July 2, the FBI director gave his support. “Thanks for the edits, and I still believe this is the correct vehicle forward,” Patel wrote to a small group of colleagues, including Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. “I’m happy to add any additional sentences to compete [sic] the short fall. But I do think we addressed specifically why more can’t be released as it relates to specific topics ie court order, csam [child sexual abuse material], victim protections etc.” Bondi rarely used her Justice Department email and was not on the chain where they workshopped the memo that set off the crisis. She was aware of both the planned memo and the prison video release, but was not involved in editing the document. Inside the White House, Trump had no interest in releasing anything. And senior officials—including Susie Wiles and her deputy, James Blair—were initially skeptical about the reach of the Epstein crisis. They told colleagues that Republican voters didn’t care, and they had Tony Fabrizio’s polling to prove it. The Epstein brouhaha, in their view, was driven by fringe conspiracy theorists and amplified by noisy online influencers who didn’t represent a meaningful bloc of voters. Bongino told anyone who would listen that this was a grave mistake. “It’s not an online story. You don’t understand,” he told several White House advisors. Wiles, Blair, and others thought at the time that engaging with the Epstein situation would only enlarge it—putting an official stamp on the matter. Besides, Trump had weathered every storm imaginable for years. Why would this be any different?"


Start reading this book for free: https://read.amazon.com/kp/kshare?asin=B0FH2K4T1C&ref_=kar_wh_ca

The Most Violent Religion in History? The Data May Surprise You

Opposition rages at ‘corruption’ as PM filmed convincing small Haredi party to drop out of race

 https://www.timesofisrael.com/opposition-rages-at-corruption-as-pm-filmed-convincing-small-haredi-party-to-drop-out-of-race/

Opposition leaders raged Monday at what they alleged was “corruption” after a video surfaced of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu making a deal with Haim Yosef Abergel, a Haredi rabbi accused of sexual crimes against minors, to convince him to withdraw his fledgling Achi (My Brother) political party from the race ahead of the election, in exchange for a deputy ministerial position in the next government.

The deputy minister would advance the party’s ultra-Orthodox agenda from that position.

The conversation took place late last week, and its details were reported on Friday. It was led by Education Minister and senior Likud member Yoav Kisch, who was joined by Netanyahu over the phone.

Epstein files take back seat in midterms but experts say issue has not gone away

 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/24/epstein-files-midterms

As US voters head to the polls for crucial and fraught midterm elections, some survivors’ advocates in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have expressed concern that the scandal could recede into the background.

Political experts believe, however, the Epstein issue is not going away permanently and that many voters can balance day-to-day concerns such as affordability and AI with the scandal involving the late financier and accused sex trafficker whose social circle was widespread among America’s elite.

Political experts said that Epstein might get less attention from campaigning politicians and voters, but that it was probably a temporary dip, not a permanent drop-off.

Blanche on Alaska suit: 'There could be a crime'

 https://www.politico.com/news/2026/10/25/blanche-alaska-lawsuit-could-be-crime-01134861

Attorney General Todd Blanche on Sunday defended the Justice Department’s newly filed lawsuit to prevent Alaska state officials from certifying election results if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses in November.

“There could be a crime,” said Blanche. “But the real wrong here is that Alaskans are going to be confused and will not have their vote heard. So an Alaskan intends to vote for one candidate, but is confused because of a second candidate with exactly the same name who has voted Democrat his entire life, who donated money to the other Democrat opponent, is running.”

Still, it’s unclear how much the court can do about the Justice Department’s lawsuit. With ballots secret, it is virtually impossible for the Justice Department to identify specific voters and clarify which Sullivan candidate they meant to vote for.

Montreal man sues police after arrest for waving Israeli flag

 https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/435157

Montreal man seeks $86,301 in damages after being arrested while displaying an Israeli flag at a cycling race. The criminal charge was later withdrawn.

A Montreal man has filed a lawsuit against the city's police department after he was arrested while displaying an Israeli flag at an international cycling competition, alleging that officers used excessive force and provided an inaccurate account of the incident, CTV News reported.

The lawsuit comes against the backdrop of a rise in reported antisemitic incidents in Montreal following the Hamas massacre in Israel on October 7, 2023.

Trump Says He Doesn’t ‘Give A Damn’ About Gas Prices As US Making ‘Fortune’

 https://www.newsweek.com/trump-says-he-doesnt-give-a-damn-about-gas-prices-as-us-making-fortune-12615894

President Donald Trump has said he does not "give a damn" about potential criticism of his remarks boasting that the United States is making a "fortune" from high oil prices, as American motorists continue to face elevated gasoline costs.

Speaking at a rally in Georgia on Saturday, October 24, Trump said advisers had warned him against highlighting the financial gains associated with rising oil prices, suggesting the comments would invite criticism over the cost of fuel for ordinary Americans.

Sunday, October 25, 2026

FIERY WARNING: Hagaon HaRav Dov Landau Warns New Chareidi Party: “I Will Fight Against You With All The Strength I Have”

 https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/2614321/fiery-warning-hagaon-harav-dov-landau-warns-new-chareidi-party-i-will-fight-against-you-with-all-the-strength-i-have.html

HaGaon HaRav Dov Landau, Rosh Yeshivas Slabodka, has issued a blistering letter against the newly established HaTzibur HaChareidi party, warning that he will fight its activities with every resource at his disposal.

The unusually sharp letter, revealed by the Israeli publication L’Chatchila and reported by Kikar HaShabbat, was addressed to a Rav associated with the new party who had recently visited Rav Landau’s home to inquire about his position and subsequently spoke with the Rosh Yeshiva’s son.

In the letter, Rav Landau wrote:

“My son told me what you said, which is great foolishness, if not great wickedness.”

The Rosh Yeshiva then issued an unequivocal warning:

“I will fight against you with all the strength I have and even the strength I do not have, because you are causing great harm to Chareidi Judaism.”

Rav Landau concluded with an exceptionally severe comparison intended to emphasize his opposition to the party’s activities.

“Your actions are like eating forbidden fats on Yom Kippur and eating chametz on Seder night. I wrote this comparison to emphasize the severity of these matters. Retract, retract your actions, and do not cause harm.”

The letter comes just days before Israel’s Knesset elections, amid growing tensions surrounding the emergence of alternative Chareidi political parties challenging the established Chareidi factions