We are Ezekiel 8:Groups 12/13.
Question: Given the paucity of evidence - how would you defend Rabbi Tropper
Answer: Alleged paucity of publicly exposed evidence, that should be.
Tropper was advised to immediately retain an attorney for his defence-from/attack-against the allegedly 'vile' and 'defamatory' statements.
He could not and would not do so, because he knows only the tip of the iceburg is out there, he knows that the only reason we have refrained from splashing the whole fetid mess out into the 'velt' is reasons of tzniut and avoidance of chillul Hashem.
The only reason this much is exposed is due to the disgusting, filth-enabling erevRav misLeaders y"sh, who were approached and begged to merely demand the removal of Tropper and his wretched 'organisations' from our midst, and instead chose to follow their wallets, positions and 'glory' in most dispicable ways and means.
All of the uncensored evidence is admissible.
Every mitnaged to Troppers ouster, every defender and enabler of the abomination, has a clear motive which we have documented admissible proof of.
A logical one with common sense knows where this will lead, to whom and with what results. B'Ezrat Hashem Yitbarach:
We are not posting exagerations, defamations, slanders or falsehoods.
We are Ezekiel 8:Groups 12/13.
A fuller release will be posted in the comments sections of all serious blogs within 24 hours.
bobX@anonymousspeech.com