Wednesday, October 28, 2009

CNN questions Obama's attack on Fox

Baltimore Sun


  1. This CNN interview is pathetic on several levels.

    Who is Valerie Jarrett? One of Obama's Chicago cronies, almost all of whom are corrupt, having been indicted or under investigation.

    And just who is CNN?

    CNN Drops to Last Place Among Cable News Networks

  2. Recipients and PublicityOctober 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM

    The Obama regime is famous for its thin skin. They are actually afraid of what Fox news can do to them, after Fox news's Glenn Beck brought down Obama's Czar Van Jones by revealing his communist background and racism, and of hitting back and revealing Obama's "communications
    advisor" Anita Dunn praising Mao Tse Tung and his "philosophy"
    in front of US students.

    This is all shocking stuff, and while Valerie Jarrett lies and tries to spin things around and say that she is "speaking truth to power" it is the exact opposite when in reality the Fox network is speaking truth to Obama's dangerous misbegoten power.

    So they go bananas and start attacking a legitimate network that is functioning under freedom of speech and is not doing all that much just exposing Obama's faults rather than saying how great he is like the other networks are fawningly doing.

    The Fox network is not his psychophants because after all Obama is a confirmed narcisist and ego maniac of the highest order, he hates criticism.

    This is like that moshul that Rashi brings that when nations like Amalek attack, don't respond like a dog that bites the stick that hits it and does not realize that there is a power behind it.

    That is how the Obama people are coming across now, and not realizing that by attacking Fox news or mocking talk radio personality Rush Limbaugh they are acting like the proverbial dog who cannot do cheshbon hanefesh when he's being hit by a stick and imagines that he must bite the stick while not realizing that there are greater reasons why they are being attacked and outed by Fox as Communist or Maoist stalking horses.

    Valerie Jarrett is somehow connecting the spontaneous, deep and widespread town hall meetings that brought the roof down on them, so now they saying it's "Fox's fault" that people protested.

    Well for the "Fox" like proverbial "dog" in the analogy, is not the real issue really, the real issue is what is coming from the heart and soul of that sector of the American people who are genuinely afraid and opposed of where the Obama regime is headed and the way it wants to turn America into just another Communist-Maoist-Left Wing state, that will be happier with Cuba, North Vietnam, North Korea, Vladimir Putin and the left wing Scandinavian countries than with America's historic connection with Western Democracy, the Anglo-Saxon heritage and the Judeao-Christian legacy, as they dump all that and strike up new contacts with Islamic (Iran) and leftist (Venezuela) totalitarian regimes, that are all opposed to Israel and ultimately to the Jewish people.

    The Obama people are also very cynical and they probably are creating a smokescreen, red herring and scapegoat for their own mounting dithering and failures to produce anything of value to the American citizen except for Obama's almost daily and nightly appearances on TV that get nothing done as far as governing the country is concerned.

  3. Recipients and PublicityOctober 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM

    Having CNN "speak" for Fox is like having PRAVDA defend Voice of America, or in current terms it would be like having Al Jazeera defend Kol Yisrael, truly ridiculous.

    It's been estimated that if the "Time Warner CNN" news and media conglomerate would have required the Obama campaign to pay for all the free and glowing reporting and programming on all its shows it gave and still gives to the Obama regime since the time Obama started running for president, it would have cost untold trillions of dollars.

    But Time-Warner-CNN, while being in Obama's pocket, still has a shred of fear that with one false move they could be next in the Obama regime's gun-sights. What if one of their reporters or show hosts saays things against an Obama person, will they back their own reoprters or defend Obama? Interesting question, but their whole staff is cowed into silence and is mesmerized so they have nothing to fear. They should have asked Larry King or someone tougher to pose questions to Valerie Jarrett and not throw her soft ball do nothing non-questions where she gets to talk about other things off the point.

    They choose Valerie Jarrett, who according to The Obama File: "Jarrett hired Michelle Obama for a job in the Chicago mayor's office years ago, is one of the president-elect's closest friends and advisers. President George W. Bush's top political aide Karl Rove held the title.
    Jarrett has a background in real estate and politics in Chicago and is linked to a series of real estate scandals, including several housing projects operated by convicted felon and Obama fundraiser/friend Antoin "Tony" Rezko. According to the documents obtained by Judicial Watch from the Illinois Secretary of State, Valerie Jarrett served as a board member for several organizations that provided funding and support for Chicago housing projects operated by real estate developers and Obama financial backers Rezko and Allison Davis, Obama's former boss."

    why not ask her about her own scandals. No doubt Fox network will once they get through asking about the other dozens of Czars, Communists and Mao Tse Tung admirers in the Obama regime.

  4. Years ago people asked: Why did Saddam Hussein provoke the US like he did? Did he realize he was no match for the American army? It was so obvious to everyone else!
    The answer was: No, he didn't because whenever he sat down at a staff meeting and asked "Any chance we'd lose to the Americans in a fight" every general would say "Oh no, supreme leader, you would mop the floor with those pathetic mothers of all wimps!" They knew that an honest answer would get their heads chopped off.
    Obama is surrounded by syncophants and yes-men who know that telling him that he's not the new-age messiah will cost them their jobs and might result in a public smearing. They think he will be permanently ascendent and are riding his coattails to grab the benefits. I highly doubt anyone whose advice he values would tell him what he's doing is reminiscent of discredited dictatorial regimes. So no, he probably doesn't realize what's actually going on.

  5. I have heard that psychs who have observed Obama speak to the masses have pronounced him a narcissist & sociopath.

    There is also a tie in here to gerus. His chief of staff Rahm Emmanuel did not even get a sketchy EJF-style gerus for his wife or anything orthodox even in name, yet he is allowed to attend and get kibbudim at an OU affiliate shul in Chicago. Rahm used the rov in a political stunt on Rosh Hashana which the rov was a willing participant. He asked a "shayle" if he could be mechalel Yomtov by speaking to the White House on the phone. The rov, who I think is a tipesh, answered that White House economic policy which is what was nogea is "pikuach nefesh" and he is a talmid of "the Rav" who shtams from Beis Brisk who are machmir on pikuach nefesh.


please use either your real name or a pseudonym.