Saturday, July 1, 2023

Parental alienation in frum divorces

 https://mishpacha.com/two-part-harmony-2/

“I’m not saying that breaking apart a family is never an option. It happens, it sometimes has to happen, and Hashem Himself gave us the tool for it in the Torah,” Reb Yonasan clarifies. “But even when it comes to divorce, when there’s no other option, there is no reason for parents to lose their human dignity and turn on each other like predators, and there’s no greater damage to a child than one parent alienating the other.”

3 comments :

  1. “Parental alienation in frum divorces” I’m waiting for a ruling from NYS Court of Appeals on my mo. no. 398 return date June 5, 2023. Allow me my letter today:
    “4.TIAA manages all aspects my TIAA pension when I started teaching at Fordham University until today when TIAA paid me $995.89 on June 30, 2023 and paid Susan $1,217.20 on June 30, 2023. I claim that TIAA's payment to Susan June 30, 2023 \$1,217.20 belongs to me. I quote the Bible Exodus 22:8 The Sapirstein edition translation: For any sinful word --- for an ox, for a donkey, for a sheep, for a garment --- for any lost item about which he will say, it is this, to the judges shall come both their claims; whomever the court finds guilty shall pay two to his fellow. Yes I'm trying to recover my TIAA pension that TIAA is paying me 45% and Susan 55% with no end in sight. Allow me to put a question to both TIAA and to Susan. Where is the 1995 Rigler/Rothbart order of separation? May I see a copy? Supposedly an order of separation is the end of a separation action.
    5.TIAA 1s not allowed to pay Susan 55% of my pension. We are now before a court of judges to rule to whom belongs my TIAA pension.”

    Allow me to quote Hertz Chumash on Exodus 22:8: “trespass על כל דבר פשע. Here the equivalent of embezzlement. whereof one saith אשר יאמר: Either the owner or a witness comes forward and identifies something which is in the possession of the trusstee or the thief as the lost property. this is it כי הוא זה. The thing lost.”

    שמות פרשת משפטים פרק כב פסוק ח
    עַל כָּל דְּבַר פֶּשַׁע עַל שׁוֹר עַל חֲמוֹר עַל שֶׂה עַל שַׂלְמָה עַל כָּל אֲבֵדָה אֲשֶׁר יֹאמַר כִּי הוּא זֶה עַד הָאֱלֹהִים יָבֹא דְּבַר שְׁנֵיהֶם אֲשֶׁר יַרְשִׁיעֻן אֱלֹהִים יְשַׁלֵּם שְׁנַיִם לְרֵעֵהוּ:

    Baba Kama 63a “Why do I need all these terms of the specification [ox, ass, sheep or raiment] ? One to exclude real estate, a second to exclude slaves and the third to exclude bills; raiment to exclude articles which have no specification [According to Rashi it means that which has no distinguishing mark, but according to Tosaf, that which is not defined by measure, weight or number; see also Shebu. 42b and B.M. 47a.]”

    I have a god case, don't I, KA, IR, Garnel, Joe Orlow, and Rav Eidensohn?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Parental alienation in frum divorces. This is my case mo. no. 2023-398 NYS Court of Appeals. I have a Torah thought. I'm a Cohain, please don't remove my words. My letter today "4.TIAA manages all aspects my TIAA pension when I started teaching at Fordham University until today when TIAA paid me $995.89 on June 30, 2023 and paid Susan $1,217.20 on June 30, 2023. TIAA's payment to Susan June 30, 2023 $1,217.20 belongs to me. TIAA 1s not allowed to pay Susan 55% of my pension. This is embezzlement, stealing. I quote the Bible Exodus 22:8 "For every matter of trespass, whether it be for ox, for ass, for sheep, for raiment, or for any manner of lost thing, whereof one saith: 'This is it,' the cause of both parties shall come before God; he whom God shall condemn shall pay double unto his neighbour.'" Hertz Chumash on Exodus 22:8: "trespass Here the equivalent of embezzlement. whereof one saith Either the owner or a witness comes forward and identifies something which is in the possession of the trustee or the thief as the lost property. this is it The thing lost. condemn. Convict. If it is the trustee, he refunds the article and another of the same value. If the trustee is acquitted the witnesses who falsely accused him must pay him double the value of the lost article.''
    5.Susan was satisfied with all court's rulings on my TIAA pension. Susan falsely claimed that I abandoned her, the house and our six small children for my dream to live in Jerusalem. Susan was out to do me harm out of pique whatever, even to the extent of alienating our six children from me. I never intended to harm or to insult Susan. I never cared about money. We are now before a court of judges to rule to whom belongs my TIAA pension."

    Do I have a good case, KA, IR, Garnel, Joe Orlow, Rav Eidemnsohn?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Parental alienation in frum divorces. This is my case mo. no. 2023-398 NYS Court of Appeals. I have a Torah thought. I'm a Cohain, please don't remove my words. My letter today

    "4.TIAA manages all aspects my TIAA pension when I started teaching at Fordham University until today when TIAA paid me $995.89 on June 30, 2023 and paid Susan $1,217.20 on June 30, 2023. TIAA's payment to Susan June 30, 2023 $1,217.20 belongs to me. TIAA 1s not allowed to pay Susan 55% of my pension. This is embezzlement, stealing. I quote the Bible Exodus 22:8

    "For every matter of trespass, whether it be for ox, for ass, for sheep, for raiment, or for any manner of lost thing, whereof one saith: 'This is it,' the cause of both parties shall come before God; he whom God shall condemn shall pay double unto his neighbour.'"

    Hertz Chumash on Exodus 22:8: "trespass Here the equivalent of embezzlement. whereof one saith Either the owner or a witness comes forward and identifies something which is in the possession of the trustee or the thief as the lost property. this is it The thing lost. condemn. Convict. If it is the trustee, he refunds the article and another of the same value. If the trustee is acquitted the witnesses who falsely accused him must pay him double the value of the lost article.''

    5.Susan was satisfied with all court's rulings on my TIAA pension. Susan falsely claimed that I abandoned her, the house and our six small children for my dream to live in Jerusalem. Susan was out to do me harm out of pique whatever, even to the extent of alienating our six children from me. I never intended to harm or to insult Susan. I never cared about money. We are now before a court of judges to rule to whom belongs my TIAA pension."

    Do I have a good case, KA, IR, Garnel, Joe Orlow, Rav Eidensohn?

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.