Tuesday, July 5, 2022

RABBI ARYEH KAPLAN – THE MAN BEHIND THE BOOKS:

 https://www.kotzkblog.com/2019/10/247-rabbi-aryeh-kaplan-man-behind-books.html

R. Kaplan wrote that some medieval Kabbalists may have used psychedelic drugs[8] to achieve lofty states. Also, cannabis, known as k’nei bosem (sounds similar) was used in the anointing oil.[9]

41 comments :

  1. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 5, 2022 at 9:12 PM

    Balsam, not cannabis

    ReplyDelete
  2. Identification of kaneh bosem
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_anointing_oil
    Acorus calamus
    Most lexicographers, botanists, and biblical commentators translate keneh bosem as "cane balsam".[27][28] The Aramaic Targum Onkelos renders the Hebrew kaneh bosem in Aramaic as q'nei busma.[29] Ancient translations and sources identify this with the plant variously referred to as sweet cane, or sweet flag (nl. the Septuagint, the Rambam on Kerithoth 1:1, Saadia Gaon and Jonah ibn Janah). This plant is known to botanists as Acorus calamus.[30] According to Aryeh Kaplan in The Living Torah, "It appears that a similar species grew in the Holy Land, in the Hula region in ancient times (Theophrastus, History of Plants 9:7)."[31]

    Cymbopogon
    Maimonides, in contrast, indicates that it was the Indian plant, rosha grass (Cymbopogon martinii), which resembles red straw.[32] Many standard reference works on Bible plants by Michael Zohary (University of Jerusalem, Cambridge, 1985), James A. Duke (2010), and Hans Arne Jensen (Danish 2004, English translation 2012) support this conclusion, arguing that the plant was a variety of Cymbopogon. James A. Duke, quoting Zohary, notes that it is "hopeless to speculate" about the exact species, but that Cymbopogon citratus (Indian lemon-grass) and Cymbopogon schoenanthus are also possibilities.[33][34] Kaplan follows Maimonides in identifying it as the Cymbopogon martinii or palmarosa plant.[31][35]

    Cannabis
    Sula Benet in Early Diffusion and Folk Uses of Hemp (1967), identified it as cannabis.[36] Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan notes that "On the basis of cognate pronunciation and Septuagint readings, some identify Keneh bosem with the English and Greek cannabis, the hemp plant. Benet argued that equating Keneh Bosem with sweet cane could be traced to a mistranslation in the Septuagint, which mistook Keneh Bosem, later referred to as "cannabos" in the Talmud, as "kalabos", a common Egyptian marsh cane plant.[36]

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not under the influence

    ReplyDelete
  4. And therefore everything you say is true?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow you like "When did you stop beating your wife attacks!
    You have no facts just like slander

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 1:24 PM

    nope, that is nonsense
    you just produced a source that largely identifies Balsam, then you ask where my facts are?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 1:24 PM

    no, the reverse - when someone is under the influence, their claims should be taken with a lot a of salt.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 1:27 PM

    "When did you stop beating your wife attacks!"
    is used by Prof rabbi Gottlieb, when he says not all questions should be answered. Correct, but it is also overapplied - he says that asking him to define his terms is the "destruction of reason". Actually, some of his own claims are destruction of reason, eg the Neviim (other than Moshe) never made any predictions!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nope! you are claiming that someone was intoxicated and thus is an invalid source - but produced no evidence for your nonsense claims
    Then you claim my sources are supporting you - when they clearly indicate that the matter is subject to dispute
    So again what makes you THE or even an authority?

    ReplyDelete
  10. when someone is driven by hatred - their claims are invalid

    ReplyDelete
  11. Since when is your dislike of the Kuzari principle validate your nonsense claims?!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 2:27 PM

    when it is hatred of idolatry, as per the Rambam (which you recently posted), then not.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 2:30 PM

    Basmati rice is named so because of its fragrance








    EtymologyAccording to Oxford English Dictionary, the word "basmati" derives from Hindi बासमती, bāsmatī, literally meaning "fragrant",[7] from बास (bās, “fragrance”) + the word-forming suffix -मती (-matī).





    Ironcially, cannabis is reputedly a foul smelling plant, which is colloquially known by an expletive 4 lettered word which denotes faeces.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 2:32 PM

    aha, the above is not part of the Kuzari principle. it is separate argument altogether. "
    "When did you stop beating your wife" is a loaded question - which presupposes guilt.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 2:59 PM

    there are no meforshim who equate Kneh Bosem with cannabis


    There are meforshim who equate it with other plants or species. So do you now have a new rule of pesak , whcih you pulled out of your hat, that all previous authorities are rejected when moreinu adoneinu moshicheinu elokeinu Leonard kaplan comes up with some new nonsense and gets the book published and distributed widely?







    https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/82554/who-says-that-keneh-bosem-is-cannabis

    ReplyDelete
  16. Cannabis
    Sula Benet in Early Diffusion and Folk Uses of Hemp (1967), identified it as cannabis.[36] Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan notes that "On the basis of cognate pronunciation and Septuagint readings, some identify Keneh bosem with the English and Greek cannabis, the hemp plant. Benet argued that equating Keneh Bosem with sweet cane could be traced to a mistranslation in the Septuagint, which mistook Keneh Bosem, later referred to as "cannabos" in the Talmud, as "kalabos", a common Egyptian marsh cane plant.[36]

    ReplyDelete
  17. Nope! you have no evidence for AZ but you hate him anyway

    ReplyDelete
  18. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 4:30 PM

    bseder, no halachic sources.
    You need to be a rambam, rashi, rasag, Ibn Ezra, radak etc to learn Torah at this level, not some modern journalist or librarian.
    All of the rishonim disagree with him.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 4:32 PM

    The evidence I have produced previously, but you say since chassidim hold by this, it's acceptable.
    But he is not honest about it. He cites the Rambam's ikkarim, then says the opposite.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This seems interesting: https://www.amazon.ca/Cannabis-Chassidis-Ancient-Emerging-Torah/dp/157027262X

    ReplyDelete
  21. You have creative readings on lots of things - that is not scholarship or proof for anything except indicating you don't like Rabbi Kaplan

    ReplyDelete
  22. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 5:47 PM

    I am creative?

    ReplyDelete
  23. A lot of conjecture presented as if it were fact
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/were-europes-great-rabbis-a-bunch-of-potheads/

    ReplyDelete
  24. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 5:52 PM

    When you are antagonistic, you make the most unconvincing claims, which you would reject on a normal day.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Please find one clear statement that R Kaplan
    1) supported AZ
    2) advocated smoking marijuana
    stating that a certain word might be marijuana or that marijuana might have been used is not the same as saying it should be used!
    The burden of proof is on you and so far you have failed totally

    ReplyDelete
  26. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 7:38 PM

    1) AZ


    "Furthermore, God cannot be seen because there is no place empty of Him.








    The reason is very much like the reason that the air cannot be seen; it








    is an integral part of our environment, and this is all the more true of








    God. The reason we cannot see God is not because He is too








    transcendental, but because He is too immanent. The only time we are








    aware of the air is when the wind blows. Similarly, we are only aware of


    God when He acts to manifest His presence. This is why the same word, ruach, denotes both wind and spirit."




    https://aish.com/48942416/


    "From "The Handbook of Jewish Thought" (Vol. 1), Maznaim Publishing. Reprinted with permission "



    In fact, that book, which I have read several times, makes several pantheistic statements. Since in this article , he is citing Maimonides' Principles as fully binding, he is using sleight of hand, to contradict them.


    It is no different from Louis jacobs who claims to be both a belieer in torah min Hashamayim, and in the multiple authors of the Torah, chas vshalom!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 7:59 PM

    see also:














    "KABBALISTS AND MIND


    ALTERING SUBSTANCES:


    R. Kaplan wrote that some


    medieval Kabbalists may have used psychedelic drugs[8] to achieve


    lofty states. Also, cannabis, known as k’nei bosem (sounds similar) was


    used in the anointing oil.[9]" in https://www.kotzkblog.com/2019/10/247-rabbi-aryeh-kaplan-man-behind-books.html?m=0





    Whilst this is not hard proof, it implies that he dabbled in this as well.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Nope! Total nonsense

    It is more likely given your obsession with this that you dabble in this

    ReplyDelete
  29. Nope! even someone on your level of scholarship must be aware of what a pathetic argument you are making

    ReplyDelete
  30. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 6, 2022 at 9:41 PM

    nope, he is alleging that god is in the banana I just ate, and will also be in the finished product when the body expels waste food. it's just that we are not high enough to appreciate it. this is simply Baal peor , albeit couched in good English from someone with a masters degree in physics.
    It's part of hareidi doublethink. Secular education is so bad, but those rabbis who did achieve one are authorities on everything. Adultery is bad, except when done in bnei brak, and it's no big deal. 13 ikkarim are vital, except when we disagree, in which case they're not all they are cracked up to be.

    ReplyDelete
  31. what is it about pantheism that you don't understand?

    ReplyDelete
  32. You basically reject chassidiis and Kabbah - Rav Kaplan did not

    ReplyDelete
  33. the misNagdim had to apply this pressure to keep hassidism within halachic boundaries.
    Kabbalah was also under some pressure even by itself, until it exploded in the sabbatian heresy. Then again was repressed. Noda beyehuda tried to ban it outright. Even the highly rational Ramchal was was restricted by rav chagiz.

    ReplyDelete
  34. More nonsense - why can't you simply acknowledge you are talking above your pay scale ?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 7, 2022 at 2:28 PM

    Payscale fallacy. Who are yeshiva rabbis to discuss Talmud or Torah?


    See also;

    Not only was Isserles a renowned Talmudic and legal scholar, he was also learned in Kabbalah, and studied history, astronomy and philosophy. He taught that “the aim of man is to search for the cause and the meaning of things”.[4] He also held that "it is permissible to now and then study secular wisdom, provided that this excludes works of heresy... and that one [first] knows what is permissible and forbidden, and the rules and the mitzvot".[5] Maharshal reproached him for having based some of his decisions on Aristotle. His reply was that he studied Greek philosophy only from Maimonides’ Guide for the Perplexed, and then only on Shabbat and Yom Tov - and furthermore, it is better to occupy oneself with philosophy than to err through Kabbalah.[6]

    ReplyDelete
  36. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 7, 2022 at 4:07 PM

    Take a pay cut;
    Now, regarding the words of the Zohar, I do not wish to speak at length. How I am angered by those who study the book of the Zohar and the Kabbalistic literature in public. They remove the yolk of the revealed Torah from their necks, and chirp and make noises over the book of the Zohar, thus losing out on both, causing the Torah to be forgotten from Israel.

    Furthermore, since our generation has seen an increase in the heretics of the sect of Shabbatai Tzvi...it would be proper to mend a fence and prohibit the study of the Zohar and the Kabbalistic texts...in any case, we do not rule Halacha from the Zohar...I do not deal with hidden secrets but merely reflect on that which has been permitted to me.” [11]

    https://www.kotzkblog.com/2018/06/181-why-did-noda-biyehudah-ban-study-of.html?m=1

    ReplyDelete
  37. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 7, 2022 at 5:46 PM

    payscale:














    http://www.enramhal.com/Ramhal-Institute-1.html








    Despite this very clear declaration, on


    the insistence of Rabbi M. Haggiz, the Ramchal was coerced into signing an official document retracting his writing, in which he approved the following. "The duty of every Jew is to obey the orders of the Rabbis


    even if they say that the right hand is the left, and the left hand is the right. I will to stop writing in the language of the Zohar or in other language, about Kabbalah, in the name of the Maggid or any other


    Saintly Souls, in order to prevent quarrels amongst the learned men of


    Israel."

    ReplyDelete
  38. Kalonymus HaQatanJuly 8, 2022 at 1:23 AM

    time for me to take a break

    kol tuv

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.