"One other cause beckoned him: Zionism. Ironically, given his abhorrence of nationalism, Einstein embraced Zionism passionately, though not without reservation. Zionism soon mattered more to him than anything outside of science. It was a surprising turn of mind. Until he moved to Berlin in 1914, he had little interest in being Jewish. The Jews he met in Prague in 1911—Brod, Kafka, Hugo Bergmann—were committed Zionists, but they seem to have made little impression on him, at least in the short run: “I read the book [Brod's The Redemption of Tycho Brahe] with great interest,” he wrote to Hedwig Born in 1916. “Incidentally, I believe that I met him [Brod] in Prague. I think he belongs to a small circle there of philosophical and Zionist enthusiasts, which was loosely grouped around the university philosophers, a medieval-like band of unworldly people….”39 Einstein's Jewish colleagues in Berlin were another matter: Many had converted to Christianity to become as German as possible, often with an eye to career advancement. The proudly independent Einstein called this servile “mimicry.” After the war, Zionism must have seemed a logical alternative to assimilation: “Judaism owes a great debt of gratitude to Zionism,” he later said. “The Zionist movement has revived among Jews the sense of community.”40 He began to realize the utility of his fame as a scientist and as a Jew. Towards the end of the war, poor Jews fled Eastern Europe and poured into Berlin, crowding into an impoverished shantytown. To the dismay of assimilated, middle-class Jews, Einstein welcomed the refugees, but also urged them to look towards Palestine as the natural homeland of “free sons of the Jewish people.” He further riled assimilated Berlin Jews in 1920, when he castigated the Central Association of German Citizens of the Jewish Faith for the underlying message of its name, so suggestive of a “servile attitude” and so resistant to ethnic identity. “Not until we have the courage to see ourselves as a nation, not until we respect ourselves, can we acquire the respect of others.”41 In 1920, Chaim Weizmann, the driving force behind the Balfour Declaration of 1917 and its guarantee of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, became president of the World Zionist Organization. The following year, he set off on a trip to the United States to raise funds for a Hebrew University in Palestine. Einstein agreed to come along. “Naturally, I am needed not for my abilities but solely for my name, from whose publicity value a substantial effect is expected among the rich tribal companions in Dollaria.”42 For all his arch deprecation, he was proud to lend his name to the cause. Howls of outrage were hurled at him for taking such a public stand in favor of Zionism, and especially for setting foot on the soil of Germany's enemies (he stopped in England on the way home from the United States). Before setting out, Einstein heard from his colleague Fritz Haber: “If at this moment you demonstratively fraternize with the British and their friends, people in this country will see this as evidence of the disloyalty of the Jews.”43 Still, Einstein made the trip. He was greeted in the United States with such enthusiasm as would gratify a movie star. This was Einstein's first visit to the country, an exhausting, sometimes preposterous experience. The endless interviewing, hand-shaking, and touring, the crowds gaping to catch sight of him, reporters asking inane or sensationalizing questions, and he answering with “cheap jokes” taken seriously—Einstein said he felt like a “prize ox” being exhibited. In a spare moment, he made his first trip to Princeton as well, receiving an honorary degree from Princeton University and giving four lectures there on relativity (published as The Meaning of Relativity). Meanwhile, he dutifully worked for the Weimar Republic. He served on a committee to evaluate German war atrocities; he joined the League of Nations’ Commission on Intellectual Cooperation. He traveled widely, representing (despite his Swiss citizenship) German science and the democratic German government, in sometimes controversial efforts to overcome the animosities of the war. In the spring of 1922, the Collège de France asked him to lecture in Paris. After some hesitation, he accepted. He was the first German scientist to be invited, though many French scholars disapproved, and Einstein's German colleagues were equally unhappy.44 Increasingly certain of his commitment to internationalism, Einstein turned his fame into a pan-national passport."
Start reading this book for free: https://read.amazon.com/kp/
That's why hareidim hate him so much
ReplyDeleteas well as him being an Ilui and using his chochma in Maaseh Bereshit..
That's news to me. I've lived with chareidim for 60 years and mostly I hear joyful claims that Einstein believed in G-d. Which chareidim exactly dislike his Theories of Relativity?
ReplyDeleteAlbert Einstein did not believe in a personal God, and when he said "the mind of God" he meant the laws of physics. In 1929, Rabbi Herbert Goldstein (president of the OU, among other positions) cabled Einstein asking: "Do you believe in God?" and Einstein’s replied: "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings."
DeleteI've never heard anything from the haredi world about relativity, positive or negative, but wouldn't Einstein be too Zionist for them?
That's good news
Deleteperhaps they didn#t agree with this..
https://daattorah.blogspot.com/2026/10/secular-studies-harmful.html?m=0
I doubt many chareidim know he was a Zionist
DeleteSome Hareidim or their leadership, have become more extreme . On the other hand, there are some Chassidim who also have professors, it may be rare, but Rav Avraham Twerski was a professor of psychology or psychiatry. It is the Litvish and Satmar who see secular knowledge as such a threat. Gateshead/Ponovezh ideology..
DeleteEinstein has become a legendary figure with each group that invokes him taking a parent and declaring it to be the whole.
ReplyDeleteAnti-Zionists have a quote of his opposing Zionism from the 1910's and say, "Look! The brilliant Einstein was a proud Jew and opposed Zionism!" The Lubavitchers run with the Rebbe's misrepresentation of the theory of relativity and say, "Look! Einstein agrees that the sun reolves around the Earth!"
Why would the general Chareidi community care about his existence?
Was only a matter of time for your comment to come down
DeleteNo, it's a serious question. Chareidim don't care about basic science, let alone relativity. Einstein's work is irrelevant to their lives, he wasn't frum so what do they care?
DeleteI was referring to the comment you made about TDS on another post :)
DeleteWhy do you think the rebbe was wrong? Relativity posits that you can choose any frame of reference you want?
DeleteSuperficially yes.
DeleteBut gravitational laws cannot explain the sun's supposed orbit around the earth. Plus, the earth is actually rotating on an axis, and it gives the appearance of the sun rising and setting.
If you are sitting in traffic and a car next to you moves forward slowly, you can get the feeling that you are actually reversing.
It's psychological not real.
You are wrong and clearly not a physicist
DeleteAre you a physicist?
DeleteNo but I didn't posit a position with certainty just questioned yours
DeleteRelativity is a useful tool. Consider the following case:
DeleteA ball is falling towards the earth. Is it the ball moving towards the earth, or the earth moving up towards the ball? If you choose the latter as being equally viable, then what if someone in australia is making the same observation at the same time (assuming you accept the earth to be a sphere). IS the earth pulling in two opposite directions? Is it stretching? Or will it split?
The earth's poles, and those of all spinning planets, flatten due to the spin. So this evidence tips towards the idea that the earth is turning on its axis, and the sun is not revolving around us.
Your second point is strong, a static geocentric position is hard to defend
DeleteThere's relativity and then there's consequences.
DeleteFor example, the ball is falling towards the Earth but you could say the Earth is moving towards the ball. Fine. Who gets smashed into bits when they meet?
Then there's the problem of the rest of the solar system. It is quite clear that no planet revolves around Earth no matter how much you want to twist Einstein's work. They have independent paths and it's all around the Sun. As part of the Solar System then the Earth must be said to be moving around the Sun and not the other way around.
Garnel, I love the way you stamp all the chareidim in one mould. There are so many progressive, modern chareidim that UTJ is making special efforts to attract their vote and a new party has been formed to cater their needs.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is that the Chareidi community promotes itself as uniform and united. We all wear the same uniforms! We all follow our Gedolim! We all obey Daas Torah (the ideology, not this blog) Sameness, conformity, the Chareidi community blares out to the world that this is their primary value.
DeleteAnd when someone then tars them with one brush, oh suddenly we hear about variety and different approaches?
Haters are going to hate. If everyone recalls, when I called him out on this a few months ago, he insisted very strongly that he does not attack any Chareidi but rather just the leaders but of course he's showing his true colors now
DeleteThank you TC , because I remember you doing it with your regular name so now we know who you are 😊😁
DeleteI s'ppose there's an official hareidi position according to their papers such as yated. But there is much nuance.
I don't want to give away my regular name because I've also spoken about it there 😁
Well, Garnel, the chareidi politicians have now promised, to encourage the modern chareidim to vote gimel, that they will open chareidi chadorim providing proper secular education. The facade of unity has been cracking for a long time.
DeleteThat is a very good development Avraham, which I celebrate
DeleteThe politicians promised something?
DeleteSeriously, have you never heard this one? How can you tell if a politician is lying? He's speaking.