“Generally speaking, the Haredi parties in Knesset do not send delegates to the Zionist Congress, but this new [American] party, Eretz HaKodesh, is associated with the United Torah Judaism party, and they managed to win 25 out of 152 seats, a very strong showing for a new party. All of a sudden, the liberal movements became a minority for the first time, while Haredi Jews, who make up only about 5% of American Jewry, have more than 16% of the vote.”
Tuesday, February 11, 2025
How USAID Cuts Hand Big Win to China
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-usaid-cut-china-foreign-aid-political-influence-2028949
The Trump administration's recent efforts to dismantle USAID, the world's largest government foreign assistance provider, has created a void that China will be happy to fill, analysts say.
J. Brian Atwood, USAID director during the Clinton administration, told Newsweek: "China has been criticizing USAID programs for the last few years [...] Their goal was to undermine support for USAID in the U.S. and around the world. They will be delighted that the Trump administration wants to dismantle the agency and will move in quickly to replace the U.S. in many countries. This is a serious self-inflicted wound for the United States."
Roger Wicker, a Republican senator from Mississippi, told reporters last week: "I have felt for a long time that USAID is, is our way to combat the Belt and Road Initiative, which is China's effort to really gain influence around the world, including Africa and South America in the Western Hemisphere."
Francisco Bencosme, USAID China policy lead during the Biden administration, was quoted in Politico: "China is already reaching out to partners. They will fill in the void in places like Cambodia and Nepal, and those are just the places we know about."
Ukraine Refutes Tucker Carlson’s False Claims on Arms Sales to Mexican Cartels
American far-right, pro-Russian political commentator Tucker Carlson claimed on his show that Ukraine is selling 50% of the weapons provided by the US to Mexican cartels. According to Carlson, “this is not just a speculation, but a fact,” further alleging that American intelligence agencies “are fully aware of it and profiting from it.”
Carlson could not provide any evidence to support his claims, stating, “Can’t prove that, but I believe it.”
Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation (CCD), part of the National Security and Defense Council, refuted Carlson’s claim in a statement on Telegram.
“This is an old fake that Russian sources have been spreading since 2022, which the Center previously debunked in its analytical report The Black Market Weapons,” the statement read.
America's NATO Ally Urged to 'Buy California'
https://www.newsweek.com/us-denmark-trump-greenland-news-california-2028758
Around 198,000 people have signed the "Demarkification" petition, titled "Let's Buy California from Trump – Denmark's Next Big Adventure."
"Let's buy California from Donald Trump! Yes, you heard that right. California could be ours, and we need your help to make it happen," the petition reads,
The campaign says it seeks to crowdfund $1 trillion to purchase the U.S. state, which will bring "hygge to Hollywood", "bike lanes to Beverly Hills," and "organic smørrebrød to every street corner."
It also proposes renaming Disneyland to "Hans Christian Andersenland."
Obey even if they appear to be wrong
Devarim (17:11): According to the Torah which I will teach you and the laws which they will tell you, don’t turn from that which they say right or left. And the man who deliberately performs and act and [thereby] does not listen to the cohen who serves the L-rd your G-d or to the judge and performs an act - shall die and you should destroy the evil from Israel. and all the people should hear and fear and not transgress further
Rashi (Devarim 17:11): Even if they tell you that “right” is “left” and “left” is “right” and surely if they tell you that “right” is “right” and “left” is “left”.
Sifri (Devarim 154:11): Right and left - Even if it appears in your eyes that “right” is “left” and that “left” is “right” – you should obey them.
Torah Temima (Devarim 17:11.62): Don’t turn right or left … Even if your view and reasoning inclines the opposite of the view of the Sanhedrin and their reasoning. That is because it is well known that in all matters – people’s views and reasoning differ. This is mentioned in Berachos (58a), “When you see a crowd of Jews you should say the beracha, Blessed is He who discerns secrets. That is because the views of men are not the same.” We see that even in one halacha that there are strongly divergent views – some will declare it to be impure while others say it is pure, some say it is prohibited while others permit it. So even when it is obvious in your eyes that the truth is with you - since you know how to distinguish between right and left – nevertheless you should listen to the Sanhedrin in their ruling and reasoning. It is clear from this that you are only obligated to obey them concerning right and left only if seems that they are wrong. But if you in fact know that they are wrong e.g., they are permitting eating forbidden fats or allowing a marriage between prohibited partners – then it is prohibited to listen to them. This is stated explicitly in the Yerushalmi (Horios) that I mention in the previous drasha… However this understanding is contradicted by the Ramban who writes, “Even if you think in your heart that they are in error and it is obvious to you as your right and left – you should still follow what they say. Don’t be bothered by the fact that you are eating prohibited fats or that you will be executing a person you view as innocent – but you should say that is what G d has commanded me to do… according to their understanding the Torah was given to me – even if they err.” These words seem to teach that even if the Sanhedrin permits something which is absolutely forbidden by the Torah that you are obligated to obey them! However the words of the Yerushalmi (Horios) that I cited in the previous section explicitly refute such an understanding. Furthermore commonsense rejects this entirely… Therefore we are forced to explain that the intent of the Ramban is what we have written. It must be in a case where it is not definitely prohibited fats… but it merely seems to be that way based on their deduction and reasoning which you view as mistaken…
Michtav M’Eliyahu (1:75): The Talmudic sages (Chazal) have told us to obey the words of gedolim – even if they tell us that left is right. This expression isn’t meant to imply that we must obey them even when they have actually erred. But rather that we must listen to them even when we - with our lowly understanding – think that we definitely have observed that they have erred. That is because our senses are totally nothing as if they were the dust of the earth compared to the clarity of their intellect and the Heavenly support they have. Thus our belief that they have erred has no practical consequences since there is a rule that a beis din cannot nullify the ruling of another beis din unless it is greater in wisdom and number. Even without this rule it is clear that what we think is awareness or experience is only a figment of our imagination and unstable moods. This superiority is Daas Torah within the framework of emunas chachom (faith in our sages).
Abarbanel (Devarim 17:11):… Rashi wrote that even if the Sanhedrin tells you right is left or left is right and surely if they tell you right is right and left is left [you must obey them]. That means that what is stated in the Sifre that even if they tell you that right are left… means that this is merely the perception and understanding of the one asking the question to the Sanhedrin but not according to what the actual truth is. That is because the right of the Sanhedrin is always right and the left is always left. [i.e., they are infallible]. This is the correct understanding because the Sifre that Rashi cites actually says, “Even if it seems in your eyes that right is left… you must obey them.” The Ramban agrees with this explanation. However the Ran [Derashos HaRan #11] disagrees and says that left and right are to be understood literally and thus the Sanhedrin must be obeyed even if they err…. He also explains that even though a person is harmed by doing something against the Torah – but if this is done because of the mistaken ruling of Sanhedrin then the reward of listening to them compensates for the harm… G d forbid to say that that is the meaning of our Sages. The Torah does not rely on an illusion that one is spiritually pure when in fact he is impure or that something is permitted when in reality it is prohibited or that harm is permitted. Because the Torah is concerned with righteousness and G d is the G d of Truth and His Torah is True.
Ramban (Devarim 17:11): Left and Right. Rashi explains that even if the Sanhedrin tell you that right is left or left is right – [you must obey them]. Meaning that even if you are certain that the Sanhedrin has erred and it is as obvious to you as the difference between your right and left – you still must comply with their understanding of the Torah. In other words you can’t argue, “How can I eat that which is prohibited by the Torah or how can I execute this person when I know he has not transgressed?” Rather your attitude must be, “The absolute obedience to the rulings of the Sanhedrin is what G d has commanded me and I must observe the mitzvos exactly as the Sanhedrin (which is in G d’s presence in the Temple) says. The Torah was given to me according to their understanding – even if they err.” This is what happened when R’ Yehoshua had a dispute with the Sanhedrin as to what day was Yom Kippur. R’ Gamliel the head of the Sanhedrin ordered R’ Yehoshua to appear before him on the day that he thought was Yom Kippur (Rosh HaShanna 25a). The necessity for this mitzva is very great. That is because the Torah was given to us in writing and it is known that people don’t think identically in all matters. Therefore it would be natural for disputes over what the Torah means to continually multiply and it would end up that there would be many Torahs instead of one. That is why this verse tells you that one must obey the Sanhedrin which convenes in G d’s presence in the Temple – in everything they say concerning the understanding of the Torah. There is no difference in the requirement to obey whether this Torah understanding is part of the Tradition which goes back what G d told Moshe or what their understanding of the meaning or intent of a Torah verse. This requirement to accept their Torah understanding is because the Torah was in fact given to us according to their understanding. Therefore they must be obeyed even if their view contrasts with your understanding as left contrasts with right and surely if you agree with their understanding. That is because G d’s spirit is on those who serve in His Temple and He does not desert His pious ones. G d always protects them from error and mistake. The Sifri (Shoftim 154) says that you must obey them even if appears that they have reversed right with left and left with right.
Kuzari (3:41): Do not add to that which the members of the Sanhedrin have agreed to since they have special Divine assistance. In addition since their number is very great, it is illogical that they would agree to something which is against the Torah. Furthermore it is not expected that they would err since their wisdom is very great. Some of them have wisdom by what they were taught, others because they have natural brilliance, and some of developed it through their own efforts. According to our Tradition, the Sanhedrin mastered all the knowledge and wisdom that is available to man.
Rabbeinu Bachye (Devarim 17:9): And bring your halachic questions to the judge who is in your days… Your final authority is the judge who is in your days and therefore Yiftach in his generation has the same authority as Shmuel in his generation. That is the meaning of the expression “who is in your days.” Even if he doesn’t have as much wisdom as judges in previous generations – you still must listen to him. Even if he tells you that right is left and that left is right and surely if he tells you that right is right and left is left. The Ramban wrote, “the need for this mitzvah is great. That is because the Torah was given in written form and that there is a great diversity of opinions about new issues that arise. That leads to great disputes and consequently the Torah would become many Torahs. Therefore the Torah legislated for us that we must obey the Sanhedrin, which stands before G d in the Temple in all that they tell us in regards to the understanding of the Torah. Furthermore that we must view all that they say as if it were told us by Moshe as a messenger of G d. That is because the Torah was given based on their understanding. Consequently even if it appears in your eyes that their view is the opposite of your understanding just as the reversal of right and left - we must obey them. And surely we are to view that they are the possessors of truth and that ruach hakodesh rests on them to always determine the truth.
Riva (Devarim 17:11): Don’t deviate from what they tell you left or right – Rashi explains, “You must obey them even if they tell you right is left and left is right and surely if they tell you right is right and left is left.” This is an astounding statement. Are we really required to listen to a rabbi who tells you that something that is impure is pure or that something which is prohibited really permitted?! The answer is that this command does not concern Torah obligations but rather Rabbinic decrees. Thus “the right that is really left” is referring to decrees such as not doing the Torah mitzva of blowing shofar because of the concern of profaning Shabbos. The meaning of “the left that is really right” is referring to decrees such as prohibiting marriage to someone who is permitted by the Torah.
Sefer HaIkkarim (3:23): Since it is possible that there will be a dispute amongst the sages regarding a matter which has not been received by Tradition but has been generated by one of the 13 Hermeneutic Principles or someone other intellectual method – therefore the Divine Wisdom decided in order for G d’s Torah to be perfect and devoid of disputes to the degree possible – the principle of decision making was given to every generation i.e., to the majority of sages. That is why the Torah says, “follow after the majority” (Shemos 23:2) and “Do deviate from what they tell you right or left” (Devarim 17:11). Our Rabbis have commented that means that if even if they tell you that right is left and left is right. The Rabbis’ intent was that every man values his thoughts and understanding more than that of others - to the degree that we find that many fools, women and ignoramuses who insist that the sages are mistaken and their understanding is superior. Thus this verse is saying that even if it appears that the sages are saying the opposite of the truth - right is left and left is right – you should never disobey their words but accept that the final decision is always based on the view of the majority of sages. This is true even though it is possible that an individual can have greater knowledge and that he has a greater grasp of the truth then they – the halacha still follows the decision of the majority. An individual or minority is not allowed to act in disagreement with the majority. This was the issue in the dispute between Rabbi Yehoshua and Rabbi Eliezer (Bava Metzia 59b). Even though Rabbi Eliezer was clearly superior to the others in wisdom as we see that a Heavenly Voice announced that his disputants had no basis to disagree with him since the halacha was always in accord with him – but Rabbi Yehoshua stood up and declared that the halacha was not in heaven. In other words that even if the truth was in accord with the view of Rabbi Eliezar, the view of the majority could not be abandoned in deference to the minority since the Torah has stated that halacha is determined by the majority. Even if in a single matter we would follow the minority against the majority, it would create a major dispute in every generation. That is because it will set a precedent for allowing each individual to claim that he is right and allow him to follow his own views against the majority and this will cause a general collapse of the Torah system. Therefore we can’t allow exceptions to the rule of following the majority in order to accept a minority opinion. Of course the authority of the majority is only if they are sages and not the ignorant masses who are typically fools in these matters and their views are not trustworthy….
Chinuch (#496): We are enjoined not to dispute the authorities of the Oral Law, not to change their words and not even to avoid fulfilling their commands regarding any aspect of the Torah. Concerning this matter, the Torah (Devarim 17:11) says: You shall not turn aside from that which they tell you right or left. The Sifre (Devarim 154) explains: Not to turn aside - this is a Torah prohibition. The reason for this commandment is the fact that the views and understandings of people concerning issues are not identical. In other words, you will not find total agreement on an issue amongst a large group of people. G d knew that if everyone was given the authority to follow his own interpretation of the Torah, each person would understand the Torah differently and there would be a large number of disagreements between Jews. Consequently instead of having a single Torah there would be many Torahs. (This is similar to what I wrote concerning the need for the principle of majority rule Mishpatim #75). Therefore G d, the master of all wisdom, made our Torah of Truth complete by commanding us to obey the true understanding of our Sages. We are to obey not only our ancient sages but those of each generation. That is because the sages in each generation have received their words and drunk the water from their books and have toiled mightily day and night to understand the depths of their words and the wonder of their views. With this principle of agreement we have the path of truth to knowing the Torah, while without it we will be ensnared by our thoughts and poor understanding and not succeed at all. As an indication of the greatness and truthfulness of this mitzva, our sages (Sifre) have said that we are to obey our Torah authorities even if they say to you that right is left and the left is right. In other words, even if they are mistaken in one issue they are not to be disobeyed but their error must be followed. It is better to suffer from this one error in order to assure that everything is always under their authority. The alternative is that everyone follows his own opinion which will result in the destruction of the religion and anarchy and ultimately the complete loss of the entire people. Because of this the determination of the correct meaning of the Torah has been given to the Torah authorities and amongst these authorities the governing principle is that the minority must submit to the view of the majority for the same reason. And illustration of this principle is found in the astounding Bava Metzia (59b) concerning the dispute between R' Eliezar and the Oven of Achnai. It states that Eliyahu was asked what G d was doing during the dispute. He answered that He smiled and said My children have triumphed over me. G d was happy that His children followed the way of the Torah and its command to always obey majority rule. This that it says there My children have triumphed over Me obviously is not meant literally - Heaven forbid! The explanation is that in this dispute the truth was in fact with R' Eliezar as was testified to by the Heavenly Voice (bas kol). Therefore even though the truth was with R' Eliezar but since his thinking was too profound for them and they did not want to concede to him even after the bas kol. Their claim was that the Torah clearly establishes the requirement to listen to the majority always whether their position is true or they are mistaken. That is why G d said that My children triumphed over me. In other words since they have deviated from the path of the truth which R' Eliezar had determined and not them, they asserted their authority based upon the principle of majority rule. Therefore it had to be concede that in this case truth was vanquished and it was like the Master of Truth was vanquished.
Justice officials tell prosecutors to drop charges against N.Y. Mayor Eric Adams
The memo from acting deputy attorney general Emil Bove said the decision was not based on the evidence or theory of the case against Adams, who was indicted in September and accused of being under illegal foreign influence and accepting bribes through campaign donations and luxury travel perks.
Instead, Bove made the unusual argument that Adams — who has made a point of aligning himself with President Donald Trump in recent months — should be free “to devote full attention and resources” to addressing illegal immigration and violent crime in New York City.
He suggested, without citing evidence, that charges were brought under prior leadership in the U.S. attorney’s office for political reasons. And he said the case should be dropped in part because it was brought about nine months before the mayoral primary, according to a copy of the memo obtained by The Washington Post.
New York Law School legal historian and former state prosecutor Rebecca Roiphe said Bove’s directive leaves the impression that Adams will have to help Trump carry out his immigration policies in New York, a “sanctuary city,” to earn his way to a final resolution of his own legal case.
“Essentially what he’s doing is extorting New York City. … They’re holding over his head the possibility that he’ll be reindicted,” Roiphe said. She called the move “political boss-like activity” from a bygone era.
Congress should think twice about Kash Patel to lead the FBI
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/02/10/kash-patel-fbi-trust/
The Senate Judiciary Committee is poised to advance Kash Patel’s nomination to become director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on a party-line vote. Yet four Republican senators could still join with Democrats on the floor to block the confirmation — and prevent the considerable damage Patel stands to inflict on the country’s premier law enforcement agency.
Although presidents generally deserve deference on their nominees, Patel has repeatedly shown himself unfit to direct the FBI. He appears eager to seek retribution against President Donald Trump’s perceived enemies, including those inside the bureau, Republican critics, the news media and alumni from the first Trump administration. The 44-year-old has promised to “come after the people … who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections … whether it’s criminally or civilly.” He has called for shutting down FBI headquarters in Washington, reopening the building as a museum of the “deep state,” and dispersing investigators into the field.
What’s most concerning is Patel’s previously professed desire to target people such as Christopher A. Wray, whom he has unfairly accused of breaking the law. The former director, appointed by Trump in 2017, resigned last month rather than wait for Trump to fire him. At his confirmation hearing, Patel said: “I have no interest, no desire, and will not, if confirmed, go backwards.” But he left himself wiggle room: “If anyone commits a wrong in government service,” he said, “the American public deserve to know the absolute secular detail of that corrupt activity.”
Why the Gaza ceasefire is under growing strain
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd649p8yq16o
For relatives and friends of the hostages, the current impasse, and Trump's noisy intervention, is cause for fresh anxiety.
"Each of these statements or announcements, of course, make Hamas more stubborn," Dudi Zalmanovich told the BBC. His wife's nephew, Omer Shem Tov, is still being held by Hamas.
"I would prefer him to be less proactive," Mr Zalmanovich said of Trump.
Israel has its own suspicions about the rationale behind Hamas's threatened delay.
The spectacle of emaciated hostages being released at the weekend has raised fears that Hamas may not want the world to see others in even worse condition.
On top of the televised scenes of well-armed Hamas fighters parading in broad daylight, and warnings from the former US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, that the group has recruited as many soldiers as it's lost during the war, not all Israelis believe the ceasefire can – or even should – hold.
Hamas suspends hostage releases, blames Israel for 'breaches'
https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/02/10/hamas-suspends-hostage-releases-blames-israel-for-breaches/
Hamas' military wing spokesman Abu Obeida announced Monday that the terrorist organization would delay the scheduled release of hostages, citing alleged Israeli breaches of the hostage deal. This development comes as Israel prepares to move forward with the second phase of the deal, which should be implemented after the first phase elapses later this month.
Hamas said that Israeli violations and lack of commitment to the agreement terms have been manifested in it supposedly not allowing the return of displaced persons to northern Gaza, as well as IDF carrying out attacks in various areas of the Gaza Strip. It further blamed Israel for "not allowing supplies in as agreed upon – while Hamas has fulfilled all of its commitments." The terror organization said that further release of hostages would only take place once Israel remedies the "ongoing violations" of the deal.
Defense Minister Yisrael Katz issued a stern response, saying "Hamas' announcement of a halt to the release of Israeli hostages constitutes a complete violation of both the ceasefire agreement and the hostage release deal." He further warned that Israel was prepared with contingencies. "I have directed the IDF to maintain the highest state of readiness for any possible scenario in Gaza and for the defense of our communities. We will not allow a return to the reality of October 7."
Trump’s Justice Department Says Drop NY Mayor Eric Adams’ Corruption Case
The Justice Department told federal prosecutors Monday to drop corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams, alleging that the September 2024 indictment occurred too close to the 2025 Democratic mayoral primary and that it “unduly restricted Mayor Adams’ ability to devote full attention and resources to the illegal immigration and violent crime that escalated under the policies of the prior Administration.” The letter, signed by acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, a former personal attorney to Donald Trump, stated that the department wanted the case dismissed not due to any concerns about its merits. Adams himself had been speaking kindly of Trump, having even met with the then-president-elect in Florida and then attended his inauguration.
Trump, CBS, and ‘News Distortion’
President Trump has spent months howling that CBS should lose its broadcast license, because its editing of an interview with Kamala Harris amid the 2024 campaign was, as he put it Thursday, “quite simply, Election Fraud,” not to mention “the biggest Broadcasting SCANDAL in History!!!” Since CBS has now released the full tape and transcript, there’s no need to take his word.
What launched Mr. Trump in this direction last fall was that two CBS shows, “60 Minutes” and “Face the Nation,” aired Ms. Harris giving different answers to the same question. Here’s the Vice President’s full reply, when pressed by CBS’s Bill Whitaker about whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had shrugged off President Biden’s views on Gaza:
“Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region. And we’re not going to stop doing that. We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.”
The Truth About Trump’s Steel Tariffs
President Trump gave the economy another jolt of uncertainty on Monday when he signed executive orders imposing 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports. His advisers say these tariffs are economically “strategic” rather than a bargaining chip for some other goal. Is the strategy to harm U.S. manufacturers and workers?
That’s what his first-term tariffs did, and it’s worth revisiting the damage of that blunder as he threatens to repeat it. In March 2018, Mr. Trump announced 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminum under the pretext of protecting national security. Then, as now, most U.S. metal imports came from allies including Canada, Mexico, Europe, South Korea and Japan.
Mr. Trump said tariffs were needed to boost domestic steel and aluminum production. But U.S. production was already increasing amid a surge in capital investment unleashed by his deregulation and 2017 tax reform. U.S. steel capacity utilization climbed to 78.5% in March 2018 from 72.4% in December 2016.
Monday, February 10, 2025
Legal experts warn of ‘constitutional crisis' as JD Vance and Elon Musk question judges' authority over Trump
Rick Pildes, a professor at New York University’s Law School, also highlighted Vance’s use of the words “legitimate powers” in his post but pointed out that the judiciary is the branch with the power to decide what a president can “legitimately” do or not do.
"Under the rule of law and the Constitution, it is the courts that determine whether some use of the executive power is lawful or not. That is the critical point," Pildes said via email.
"The concern is that the vice president’s statement could be taken to suggest that the Executive Branch is prepared to refuse to comply with a court order based on the president’s own view that he has a power that the courts have concluded he does not," he added. "A president who orders his officials not to comply with court orders would be creating a constitutional crisis."
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)