President Trump campaigned on shrinking America’s role abroad. But since taking office, he has articulated a worldview that is at times closer to expansionism than isolationism.
Trump generated global shock waves Tuesday when he said the U.S. should take long-term control of Gaza, suggesting that Palestinians should be relocated while the enclave is rebuilt into the “Riviera of the Middle East.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on social media that Trump would “Make Gaza Beautiful Again.”
Members of Congress from both parties were stunned late Tuesday after President Trump announced plans for the US to “take over the Gaza Strip,” with lawmakers expressing skepticism about the unprecedented call for direct intervention in the decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Elder Republican statesmen in particular criticized Trump’s desire to “see a long-term ownership position” in the region, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) telling NBC News the proposal was “problematic at many, many levels.”
“We’ll see what the Arab world says,” he added.
https://en.yhb.org.il/revivim1002/
A story that Rabbi Riskin told about Rabbi Moshe Feinstein * Even after his wife the Rebbetzin begged him to rescind his halachic permit of artificial insemination due to the terror of the zealots who threatened it and burned his books, he refused to change his mind, due to concern for barren women * Even when a child does not walk in straight paths and respect his parents properly, he should not be deprived of the inheritance on an equal footing with the rest of his brothers
https://www.thedailybeast.com/sorry-shoppers-trumps-tariffs-mean-no-packages-from-china/
The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) announced Tuesday it would temporarily suspend all inbound packages from China and Hong Kong until “further notice.” “Temporary Service Disruption: Effective Feb. 4, the Postal Service will temporarily suspend only international package acceptance of inbound parcels from China and Hong Kong Posts until further notice,” the alert read.
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/rjabtslykl#autoplay
At times, the press conference felt surreal. Was Trump laying out an implausible fantasy, or was he, as his supporters believe, a visionary reshaping the Middle East? Whether his plan for Gaza is viable remains to be seen, but for now, his latest grand proposal has ignited global debate.
First. No Arab country has agreed to accept Palestinians from Gaza. Jordan, with its 2.39 million registered refugees, has no need or incentive to further burden itself with this historical headache (see: Black September). Egypt, for its part, neither wants nor likely has the ability to create a refugee crisis in Sinai, which could become a breeding ground for extremism and pose a threat to Israel across the border, and to the peace treaty itself.
Third. International law prohibits forcibly transferring a population unless there is a clear military necessity for a limited period (see: the IDF's evacuation of northern Gaza). It also prohibits changing the ethnic, religious, or racial composition of a population. Trump's plan envisions a permanent transfer. Even if there is a humanitarian aspect to the proposal, such as clearing unexploded ordnance and rebuilding infrastructure, it is doubtful whether the end goal, a permanent exodus that would turn Gaza into an international zone, justifies the means.
Seventh. On a related note, direct military involvement in Gaza would cost American taxpayers a fortune. Does the US currently have hundreds of billions of dollars available for this project? Has its economy suddenly become strong enough to withstand such an expense? This, after all, is the same economic vulnerability that helped propel Trump into the White House just three months ago.
https://time.com/7211200/usaid-foreign-aid-freeze-trump-rubio/
Most of the people TIME spoke to about USAID, both from within and outside the agency, agreed that it would benefit from a bit of a shake-up. "There's real reform needed in the sector," says the official at the NGO. "Many of us have been advocating for that." Programs are duplicated. Some initiatives have outlived their usefulness or have led to dependency rather than the development outcomes that were intended. There is waste, and oversight is often difficult. The system tends to favor bigger Western organizations and not smaller, more nimble local agencies. "If there was a process through which all of these programs could be reviewed, I think that everyone would be rolling up their sleeves to have the programs reviewed," says one former senior USAID official. "But there is no such process." Others were more damning. “There are certainly things that could be done to improve USAID," says Rieser, "but these people, who know next to nothing about USAID’s programs or dedicated personnel, are not the ones to do it.”
When I lived in Har Nof I met with Rav Ephraim Greenblatt in July 12 1990. I asked him questions regarding Rav Moshe and the Igros Moshe. He was very open with his comments. The question is whether I should publish them now. They might shock some while others will say this is well known or at least assumed. I have asked a posek and am waiting his decision.
I just received psak that I should publish the interview. which I will when I reformat it for greater readability.
---------------------------------------------------------
One of the most important issues arises in light of his almost universal acceptance as the posek – Was he Daas Torah? I was told that he had resolved a major dispute involving the Chassidic community by announcing with his ruling that it needed to be accepted because his view was Daas Torah! I asked Rav Dovid Feinstein about this. He replied that he had never heard his father voice the claim that his view had the authority of Daas Torah. In the Igros Moshe he wrote that it is not only possible to disagree with him but that there is nobody today that you can’t disagree with. He even said it was possible to disagree with the Chazon Ish and further sometimes even Rishonim concerning matters that their view has not gained wide acceptance. However I was told by a member of his family that when Rav Tendler his son in law proposed making a medical school to which Rav Moshe disapproved, he said "Since my view is accepted by the Jewish people and is Daas Torah I forbid it!"
While Rav Moshe did not claim he was Daas Torah or was infallible, where did his rulings come from. I once discussed this Rav Rottenberg who was a close student of Rav Moshe. He said “I once had a question regarding when to date the Kesuba. It was published in the Igros Moshe. Before the meeting with Rav Moshe I of course reviewed all the relevant sources. When I objected to Rav Moshe’s ruling he told me ‘if you review the sources you will see I am correct’ I of course had already done the review and I still disagreed. People claim that Rav Moshe poskened directly from the gemora. They are wrong, he poskened from Heaven.”
Reb Moshe - (Artscroll biography 2nd edition 2011): There are people who maintain that talmidei chachom are not qualified to decide political matters that gedolei Yisroel should limit themselves to Torah and Halacha. Such people cannot be considered within the Torah camp. One might well say disregarding the advice of a talmid chachom is far worse than violating a commandment. One who violates a commandment because he is too weak to resist temptation at least knows that his action is wrong. By contrast, one who ignores the advice of a talmid chachom denies that a Torah scholar’s wisdom is superior. This is a far more serious breach (page 224).
Igros Moshe volume 8) "Active involvement of gedolei Torah in politics also in Israel aroused his opposition. He used to say that greatness in Torah is not combined with expertise in politics"
Igros Moshe (O.C. 1:109): This that you apologize for disagreeing with me in a halachic issue – this is totally unnecessary. That is because this is the way of Torah that it is necessary to establish the truth. Chas v’shalom to silence one who disagrees with you – whether he is being more lenient or more strict. [While there is a discussion about disagreeing in a formal court session Sanhedrin 36 where the court is deciding on the guilt or innocence…] it is not a problem to disagree with the gadol (greatest scholar) when he is saying something in the course of teaching the material or even if he is making a practical halachic ruling but he is not part of a formal court. We see this in many places in the gemora where students question their teacher’s view. … It is obvious in these cases the rulings were not part of a formal court session. Furthermore it is apparent that there is no one today who has the status of gadol for this law that no one can disagree with him… Therefore even if you consider me to be a gadol – it is permitted to disagree with me and consequently it is required that you express your opinion and there is no need to apologize. Nevertheless regarding the halachic question that was raised, my view -that I wrote that it is prohibited - is the correct one.
Igros Moshe(Introduction): And therefore I also found it appropriate to publish my teshuvos, since I am merely clarifying the halacha and every talmid chachom and posek is able to examine my words and decide for himself whether to make halachic rulings in accord with my views. They can see that I did not blindly rely even on the writings of our great rabbis. I analyzed them with all my strength to understand their correctness - as we find stated by Rabbi Akiva Eiger. Similarly I request that all those who read my writings that they should carefully examine my words and only then [if they are acceptable] to make practical rulings in accord with them
