There is a video that shows the vehicle as it strikes the ICE agent. There is another video from an attorney going through relevant Minnesota law.
The ICE agent's actions were apparently in consonance with his training and with relevant state and federal laws.
Those who disagree can avail themselves of the legal system to bring their arguments before a judge. They can exercise their First Amendment right to free speech to publicize their perspective. But none of that necessarily makes them right.
This is typically the reason why there is am investigation which was prevented by Trump and his administation who paskened immediately that tha victim was simply a terrorist
There is a video that shows the vehicle as it strikes the ICE agent. There is another video from an attorney going through relevant Minnesota law.
ReplyDeleteThe ICE agent's actions were apparently in consonance with his training and with relevant state and federal laws.
Those who disagree can avail themselves of the legal system to bring their arguments before a judge. They can exercise their First Amendment right to free speech to publicize their perspective. But none of that necessarily makes them right.
What video shows him being struck
DeleteA video shown at 3:51 within this video.
Deletehttps://youtu.be/Y04ndAPynMk
Video doesnt conclude shooting was justified
DeleteSays you. The officer who thought someone would get run over obviously had a different opinion and, unlike you, he was there.
DeleteThis is typically the reason why there is am investigation which was prevented by Trump and his administation who paskened immediately that tha victim was simply a terrorist
Delete