The incoherence and disdain for facts that characterises Trump’s approach is seen again in his handling of Ukraine. He says he wants to end the war with Russia – a laudable aim that most people share. But instead of supporting impartial, independent mediation, the US president has turned against Ukraine’s leader, Volodymr Zelenskyy, labelling him a dictator, and falsely implying that he profits from the war. Such projection is revealing. Trump’s ire stems in large part from Zelenskyy’s rejection of a $500bn minerals deal Trump wants as “repayment” for US aid. He seemed at one point to issue a de facto ultimatum: “Give me the cash, or I’ll back Russia.” Facing a loss of US support, Kyiv is reconsidering the deal under duress. But the war is no closer to ending.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
The strategic response from Ukraine should be to accept or negotiate the minerals deal. The prices of the rare earth metal are artificially high because China has somewhat of a monopoly on them. One there are other sources available, then China will lower the price in order to destabilise the ther producers.
ReplyDelete