Wednesday, April 11, 2018

the law is coming, Mr Trump

Why don’t we take a step back and contemplate what Americans, and the world, are witnessing?
Early Monday morning, F.B.I. agents raided the New York office, home and hotel room of the personal lawyer for the president of the United States. They seized evidence of possible federal crimes — including bank fraud, wire fraud and campaign finance violations related to payoffs made to women, including a porn actress, who say they had affairs with the president before he took office and were paid off and intimidated into silence.
That evening the president surrounded himself with the top American military officials and launched unbidden into a tirade against the top American law enforcement officials — officials of his own government — accusing them of “an attack on our country.”
Oh, also: The Times reported Monday evening that investigators were examining a $150,000 donation to the president’s personal foundation from a Ukrainian steel magnate, given during the American presidential campaign in exchange for a 20-minute video appearance.


  1. See my comment to
    Posted In White House Says Trump Has Power to Fire Mueller
    Still, she said: “I think the president has been clear that he feels this has gone too far.”

    I agree. I live in Israel, a Netanyahu and Trump supporter. I quote Proverbs 6:25-26: “Do not lust for her beauty Or let her captivate you with her eyes. The last loaf of bread will go for a harlot; A married woman will snare a person of honor.” Seems Trump agreed to pay the harlot $130,000 October 2016, weeks before the election, for a 2006 incident, to keep the harlot from attacking Trump. Mueller’s actions were unnecessary and inappropriate---a cause to justify firing him. Trump’s actions were necessary and appropriate.

    Oh, today I wrote to Judge Prus etc:
    "3. I'm complaining today that Judge Prus and Susan choose silence on my requests for a copy of the (fake/fraudulent) 1995 Judge Rigler Order of Separation. Is there a prerogative for a judge and a plaintiff to refuse and to ignore me on my many requests over the years for a critical document? Judges have a judical obligation to grant access to defendants of critical documents a plaintiff provides only to the judge. I'm asking for a new number from the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct to look into my complaint...
    5. In the Talmud (shtika kehodaah) and common sense, choosing silence when faced with an accusation is an admission of guilt. Proverbs 6:26 "The last loaf of bread will go for a harlot..." "

    The wisdom of so fine... Don't lust for her beauty...

  2. Since the minute after the election there has been one investigation or another. And nothing to show for it. A year and a half later and nothing. Nada. Zip.
    Its all so tiresome. Do we really have to read about this until he wins re-election?

  3. Do you read the news? Nothing? Do you know how many people have pleaded guilty to actual crimes? Do you know that Trump's campaign manager is going to spend the rest of his life in jail?
    And most importantly, you have no idea what evidence the Mueller investigation has already uncovered.

  4. Yehoshua says “And most importantly, you have no idea what evidence the Mueller investigation has already uncovered.” Mueller overstepped his authority.

    “Dispute With Congress Adds to Pressure on Rosenstein
    GOP leaders have accused the Justice Department of stonewalling requested documents”
    I accuse Susan of stonewalling my request for a critical document. This is my letter today to Prus, NYS CT of Appeals, TIAA, Susan, and Commission on Judicial Conduct:

    “2.The NYS Court of Appeals writes me:

    “April 5, 2018 Gerald Aranoff 8 Miriam Haneviah Street Bnei Brak, Israel 51583 Dear Mr. Aranoff: Your papers dated April 1, 2018 are returned enclosed. It is not necessary or appropriate to send to this Court copies of documents filed with other courts. Very truly yours, John P. Asiello RMM:mg”
    3. It is necessary and appropriate for the NYS Court of Appeals, Susan, your honor Judge Eric I.\ Prus, the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct, and TIAA get a copy of the (fake/fraudulent) 1995 Judge Rigler Order of Separation and send me a copy. All the parties who do have a copy of this document, by rights, should print out a copy and send it to me. Why, not?”
    Daattorah, you’re on my side, right?

  5. Listen, I politely ignore it when you bring up your ex-wife in every post, ad nauseum. But please keep me out of it. In fact, if I were running this blog, I would just send any comment with the word "Susan" in it directly to the trash.

  6. “Why don’t we take a step back and contemplate what Americans, and the world, are witnessing?”


    “A judge scolded prosecutors during the trial for withholding exculpatory evidence…. Trump associates Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos were treated in unforgiving fashion for lies that may not have been lies, whereas the FBI practically conspired with Hillary Clinton and her aides to make sure their truth-shading was overlooked.”

    I expect a future judge to scold Judge Prus for withholding the fake/phony 1995 Rigler Order of Separation from me---critical document to justify the Rigler/Garson $25,000 against me, the award of my pension and house to Susan etc.

  7. Daattorah, you state on every page “Question: Regarding my posts about the terrible perversion of Torah and halacha that Rav Shmuel Kaminetsky has engineered with his produ...” Surely, we must all scold Rabbi Kaministky for withholding the fake/phony PhD psychology letter that Aaron is insane, the critical document justifying Tamar to remarry without a get from Aaron. ORA and Agunah International etc use the fake/phony PhD psychology letter that Aaron is insane to treat Aaron in an unforgiving fashion for not giving Tamar a get. Let us take a step back and see what we are witnessing. Surely we must all scold ORA and Agunah International etc for withholding the fake/phony PhD psychology letter that Aaron is insane,

  8. You're wasting your "breath". Even this long after Reagan's tenure (three decades!), conservatives seem blissfully unaware that well over a hundred members of his Administration were federally indicted. Very aguably, it was the most corrupt presidential administration in national history. Yet somehow Obama sits in their mind as the go-to example of presidential corruption. Funny how that works.

  9. “Why don’t we take a step back and contemplate what Americans, and the world, are witnessing?”
    See the brilliant Judge Mulcasey oped:
    “Who’d have dreamed that with all the horrors committed by Bashar Assad, Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un, the small change of American political discourse would be whether the attorney-client privilege is being used to conceal the source of hush payments to “actresses”? But here we are... The privilege has a limit, the crime-fraud exception. The privilege is not recognized if the client is using the lawyer to commit a crime…. After anthrax spores killed five people, infected 17 others, and showed up in envelopes mailed to U.S. senators and media organizations in 2001, the current special counsel, then director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, spent years chasing and destroying the reputation of a microbiologist named Steven Hatfill, zealous in the belief that Mr. Hatfill was the guilty party. Another zealot, James Comey, then deputy attorney general, said he was “absolutely certain” no mistake had been made. After Mr. Hatfill was exonerated—he received more than $5.5 million in damages from the government—Mr. Mueller then decided that another microbiologist, Bruce Ivins, was the culprit. When Ivins committed suicide, Mr. Mueller pronounced the case closed. A subsequent investigation by the National Academy of Sciences suggests Ivins too was innocent.”


please use either your real name or a pseudonym.