Sunday, December 7, 2014

Pearl Harbor Day: December 7, 1941


 
 This is an excerpt from Manchester's memoirs of his return to the battlefields of the Pacific in 1978 - taking a tour of Pearl Harbor
 
Manchester, William (2008-12-02). Goodbye, Darkness: A Memoir of the Pacific War (Kindle Locations 784-799). Little, Brown and Company. Kindle Edition
 
Historical shrines often become diminished by mundane surroundings. One thinks of Saint Peter's in Rome and Boston's Bunker Hill. Still , it is jarring, when driving to the port where the United States entered World War II, to find a prosaic green-and-white freeway sign, exactly like those on the American mainland, directing drivers to: 90 EAST PEARL HARBOR Following it, and instructions phoned to me at the Halekulani by CINCPAC, I come to a naval complex of moors and piers, fringed by palms warped by millennia of offshore winds. Elsewhere commercial launches leave hourly for tours of the harbor, but I am booked on a military VIP junket....

The movie, an NBC documentary, is suggestive of the March -of-Time style and was probably spliced from film clips shortly after the war. The narrator's voice is stentorian; the crashing score is by Richard Rodgers; there is a lot of Japanese footage captured after the war. Its chief interest is in what it omits. There isn't a single reference to U.S. bungling. Much is made of the fact that the Japs missed U.S. oil reserves, enough for two years, and dockyard repair facilities. At the end, with Rodgers's music soaring triumphantly, American warships steam out into the twilight to wreak vengeance on the deceitful enemy. As the lights are turned up, one almost feels that the Pearl Harbor raid was an American victory. Judging by their comments as we file out, the other VIPs are impressed. One recalls that the American navy has always been attentive to its reputation. Especially remembered is the alacrity with which , after the raid, the title of the commanding admiral here was changed to Commander in Chief, Pacific (CINCPAC), from Commander in Chief, United States (CINCUS)...
 
 ... But I jerk upright as we dart by one inlet. Moored there are the last ships I expected to see in Pearl Harbor — two spanking-new destroyers flying the Rising Sun battle ensign of the Empire of Japan . Ashore, I make inquiries and am told that , yes, I saw what I thought I saw. In fact, Japanese naval officers in dress whites are frequent guests at Pearl's officers' mess. And, my informant adds, they are very polite. Naturally. They always were. Except, of course, for that little interval there between 1941 and 1945. At 3: 00 A.M. in my comfortable Halekulani bed, my eyes pop open. The lean, hard, dreamland Sergeant in me has been leering sardonically, recalling the loudmouthed tourists , Hotel Street's smut, the navy's cover-up movie , and the welcome mat for Hirohito's seafarers. That will be the Sergeant's attitude every night — and he will come every night — during the early stages of my trip. If I rarely mention him, it is because his performance has become as unvaried as a cult rite. He gloats and glares and smirks cynically. I have begun to realize that it will take a great deal, a fire storm of passion, to exorcise him. In Honolulu the old man has no answer for the Sergeant . His experiences here have shaken him. Somehow Hawaii hasn't stirred memories of the blows inflicted on that distant day of infamy. And I think I know why. The answer, I believe, is that there was virtually no opposition to the Japanese, and therefore no fight. Like Fort Sumter, like Sarajevo, the disaster at Pearl is best remembered as a curtain raiser, largely irrelevant to the drama which followed. We were prepared to visit retribution on the enemy tenfold , but we didn't identify with the victims. Few had fought back. And as professionals they should have been ready to fight . Now we, the amateurs , had to do the job. And though we mourned them, the very brevity of the December 7 attack meant that there hadn't been time to hang breathless on their fate....

17 comments :

  1. why was this attack so awful that this is "A Date Which Will Live in Infamy"?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Manipulation by Roosevelt, who used that phrase in his speech to congress the next day seeking a declaration of war, which he got.

    Hashem's method of having the nazis destroyed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It was a sneak attack, without declaration of war, while falsely engaging in negotiations. It killed thousands of Americans, and decimated the fleet.

    ReplyDelete
  4. seems a bit ego centric. germany's attack on russia was worse. they had an actual treaty.

    ReplyDelete
  5. roosevelt using that phrase is fine. all is fair in love an war and PR. for us to use that phrase 60+ years later is too much (IMO).

    ReplyDelete
  6. Manipulation by Roosevelt?!? how so?

    What other response is there?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Are you for real? If Russia wishes to refer to the German attack as "a day that lives in infamy," all power to them. That in no way lessens the infamy of the Pearl Harbor attack for Americans. The national tragedy is not lessened because greater ones occurred elsewhere. And no, it's not egocentrism, it's patriotism, a laudable concern for and loyalty to one's own country.

    At first I didn't repsond, b/c your "question" was so obviously a setup to air your issue. But I was curious as to what your particular issue was, so I took the bait. Honestly, I thought you'd come up with something more compelling than this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I mean manipulation to have congress declare war.
    remember, the us was a very pacificistic country. the purpose of this speech was to egg congress (and the nation) to avenge the surprise attack
    this speech (together with Gettysburg address, JFK's inauguration speech ("ask not"), Nixon's acceptance of republican nomination (written by bill safire), Reagan's "morning in America", and some speech by the greek cicero) is considered one of the best speeches of all time.
    (note too, that history shows that FDR knew war was coming. he might not have known the details, when, where, how (actually, US cryptographers intercepted the telex to the japanese embassy to destroy documents, code for were going to war, Friday afternoon before December 7th, a sunday. a telegram was sent to pearl harbor, but western union was closed till monday.)

    ReplyDelete
  9. war was declared illegal in the 1920s and 1930s (kellog briand treaty, etc. technically, the US never accepted / ratified that particular treaty.)

    ReplyDelete
  10. the US was an isolationist! it was NEVER pacifistic. i wasn't there but IMO fdr could have just said "let's kill the bastards" and congress would have agreed.

    ReplyDelete
  11. OK so americans are having an ego trip, they can't see a meter (ha ha!) past their border, and call it "a day . . .", that's all your saying. no one else need take those words seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  12. i take this claim (a day . . .) about as seriously as i take phrases like "d-day was the beginning of the liberation of europe" or claims that the americans conquered the german army.

    ReplyDelete
  13. And I take your equating of patriotism with egocentrism even less seriously. Assigning everything the same importance is simply an excuse to ignore important things.

    ReplyDelete
  14. בבקשה!
    since i am looking this claim from a post modern perspective, i don't begrudge your anger.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm not angry. Just dismissive.

    ReplyDelete
  16. everything is groovy.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.