Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Pete Hegseth Faces a Skeptical Senate

 https://www.wsj.com/opinion/pete-hegseth-nomination-pentagon-defense-secretary-senate-armed-services-committee-51ff216f?mod=hp_opin_pos_5#cxrecs_s

It’s still puzzling that President-elect Trump chose Mr. Hegseth for such a senior post. Mr. Trump seems to want someone to take on the “woke” policies of the military under President Biden, and they are problems. But retired four-star Army Gen. Jack Keane says this can be quickly addressed. Give the order, and the brass will follow and so on down the chain of command.

There are larger and more urgent issues at the Pentagon, and the 44-year-old Mr. Hegseth lacks the experience typically required. He has never run an organization of any size, never mind a bureaucracy with as many snares as the Pentagon.

Monday, January 13, 2025

Call your Mother

 https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/call-your-mother/

Yesterday, we concluded the shiva mourning period for our beloved mother Beile Nutovic who passed away last week at the age of 86.

So many thoughts go through the minds of children when they bury their parents; so many beautiful memories, so many things we wish we had done differently.

One Foot in Front of the Other

 https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/one-foot-in-front-of-the-other/

Take one day at a time and know that God is there with you always. Our sages tell us that there are three partners in the creation of humans – God and the two parents. Well, if one partner is taken away, the two others just have to work that much harder to pick up the slack. Looking back at those years, as I often do, what keeps coming to mind is that somehow, some way, God was always there to propel us forward when there were steep hills to climb, and to nudge us in the right direction when we were faced with forks in the road.

Donald Trump’s empire of ego

 https://www.newstatesman.com/international-politics/2025/01/donald-trump-expansionism-greenland-canada-panama-canal

Accusing Trump of being “a fascist” was a tactical error from Kamala Harris’s team during the 2024 campaign. The decision to spend its final fortnight trying to scare people into voting against Trump didn’t account for the fact that the overuse of such words has stripped them of meaning to voters. Yet while calling Trump a fascist might be a foolish electoral strategy, it has no bearing on whether it is an accurate description. One of the most common arguments against the fascist thesis was that Trump was an isolationist who wanted to end wars, not launch military ventures to conquer territory. His newfound expansionism draws that into question.

MAGAfest Destiny? Trump flexes his muscles with repeated talk of American expansionism

 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/magafest-destiny-trump-flexes-his-muscles-repeated-talk-american-expansionism

"I think one of the basic propositions we brought to our work over the last four years is that we're stronger, we're more effective, we get better results when we're working closely with our allies. Not saying or doing things that may alienate them," Blinken said Wednesday at a news conference.

Blinken predicted that "the idea expressed about Greenland is obviously not a good one. But maybe more important, it's obviously one that's not going to happen. So we probably shouldn't waste a lot of time talking about it."

The Democratic National Committee accused Trump of having a "pathetic Napoleon complex" which it claimed "has left him more focused on invading Greenland than on lowering costs and growing the economy for the American people."

Grappling with Donald Trump’s new imperialism

 https://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2025/Jan/12/grappling-with-donald-trumps-new-imperialism

As the world awaits with trepidation for Donald Trump’s second presidency, allies and foes alike are aghast at his threat to redraw the map of the Western Hemisphere. Trump’s outrageous moves to ‘buy out’ Greenland, or to take over the Panama Canal is not just about making ‘Making America Great Again’; it is about reviving neo-colonialism. We thought imperialism was dead and gone. With Trump, it is back with a vengeance!

To make his aggressive, warlike foreign policy sound sensible, the external enemy has been identified. It is China, Iran and Russia – in that order – who are portrayed as seeking domination. Thus, the US has to take the battle to new frontiers. This has been the logic of dictators and tyrants through the ages – from Genghis Khan to Adolf Hitler – and it is being played out again.

There is little chance the future is going to unravel the way Donald Trump wants. Canada is not going to become the 51st state of the United States; and Greenland will not be bought by Trump. What is happening though is a rising climate of fear and a coming Cold War. Trump is aware of the limitations of this new frontier policy, but what he hopes to do is to solidify the MAGA ranks, and stoke up a new aggressive ‘American’ patriotism even if it means riding roughshod over the national sentiments of other nations. It is a dangerous policy in the long run. It will earn Donald Trump more enemies and it will make an unstable world even more unstable.

Common Law Marriage

Igros Moshe (EH I #76) We need to decide the status of a man and woman living together as a married couple. If it was in a place where religious Jews live who can be considered as witnessing both the yichud and sexual intimacy and thus their relationship is not considered fornication but actual marriage – then the marriage might be valid. . But this is only if he is aware that intercourse needs to be done as part of marriage. Those who go to Reform rabbis mistakenly think the marriage is caused by the ceremony and that the intercourse has no halachic significance, Thus they are not married and don’t require a Get. This is also true regarding the non religious who transgress all the Torah prohibitions Even an observant Jew who views the marriage solely dependent on the marriage ceremony, the intercourse would have no halachic significance.

'Jake Segal' pleads guilty to 12 counts of deceiving women

 https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-837272

Rabbi Yosef Paryzer, indicted for deceiving 30 women into simultaneous relationships under the persona of "Jake Segal," pleaded guilty to 12 counts of defrauding women on Sunday, according to a report by KAN News.

Paryzer is an American citizen in his 30s who worked at Yeshivat Ohr Yerushalayim.

Reform Marriage

Igros Moshe (EH I #76) Concerning a woman who was married by a Reform rabbi and all those who attended the ceremony were irreligious, Shabbos profaners and transgressors of other Torah mitzvos. The meal served unkosher meat and they all ate it. Later the husband deserted her and it is impossible to obtain a get from him. Can she get married now since she didn’t have a marriage according to the Torah? In my opinion the marriage performed by the Reform rabbi has no halachic significance. If it can be clearly established that no valid witnesses were present that witnessed the giving of the ring and the declaration of the man “you are betrothed to me” Even if there were two valid witnesses at a distance who didn’t see but the rabbi was valid and expert who conducted the ceremony, who mistakenly appointed relatives as witnesses according to Chasam Sofer it is a valid marriage. It is clear and obvious that the wicked Reform that perform the marriage do not have that validity even if the ring is given and the man says the words. Since all Reform rabbis make up additional acts which they claim is the marriage. It doesn’t even have status that is ascribed to that done by Kusim even if the ring was given properly and he said the right words. But in this case since there were no valid witnesses they clearly weren’t married and there is no concern.  

Contra-Gadols

https://yated.com/contra-gadols/ 

There were many quotes in the name of Rav Moshe, and I repeated some to my zaide, who responded to me in the early 1980s, “today, you can’t believe anything that they quote from Rav Moshe unless you heard it directly (m’pi kodsho) from his holy mouth.”

Estrangement

 https://mishpacha.com/estrangement/

Psychotherapy & Popular Media

These channels have spread the idea that estrangement can and should be used to end “toxic” relationships. They have taught that children “should have been” overtly loved, understood, validated, encouraged, supported, and otherwise embraced by their parents. Parents “should have” provided the model and security of a conflict-free and warm marriage, and both parents should have exuded a serene and positive attitude.

The modern thinking is that children who were exposed to less healthy models were as abused as those who were routinely yelled at, harshly punished, or hit.

This childhood abuse is seen as largely responsible for the adult child’s current states of anxiety, depression, illness, and relationship problems. Cultural wisdom suggests that the harm perpetrated by an imperfect home and imperfect parents is so intolerable that distancing oneself from it is an understandable and reasonable response and many individuals have chosen estrangement as a coping tool.

The cultural message that “you only live once” and the purpose of life is to enjoy it, prioritizes taking care of one’s own needs above all else. Concepts such as self-sacrifice, responsibility, duty, and obligation find themselves on the blacklist, along with martyrdom. Rather than being considered noble, elevating, and meaningful, all forms of self-negation are considered to be self-destructive. When relatives like siblings and parents lower one’s mood through inconsiderate, hurtful, or otherwise unpleasant behavior, it’s considered prudent to step aside.

While estrangement is appropriate when parents present a true threat to their kids, it must be reserved for the most serious of impending dangers. Cutting one’s parents out of one’s life when not absolutely necessary is harmful to oneself, compromising one’s own compassionate and humane nature, and robbing oneself of the opportunity to perform the mitzvah of honoring parents.

Autopsy?

 Igros Moshe (YD II #151) Is it permitted to do an autopsy in order to understand the disease better for educational purposes. This is analyzed by the Nodeh BeYehudah and he ruled that it is prohibited unless there is a living person be treated now with the same condition for which the knowledge gained might be needed to be cured. I add that even if there is a possibility of finding a cure there is no elimination of the prohibition of autopsy since there is no obligation to learn about medical cures. In fact we don’t find that there is an obligation to learn the knowledge of medicine in order to be able to cure the sick, we are only obligated to save others with what is available. In other words if he is already a doctor he has an obligation to cure the sick. Similarly if he knows how to swim, he has an obligation to save a person drowning in a river but he has no obligation to learn how to swim or how to cure the sick. Also a person is not obligated to become rich in order to give charity and save lives in that manner.  The Nodah Beyehudah also says since the autopsy requires the consent of the family but that is not correct since desecration of the corpse is a prohibition that applies to everyone. The only significance of the family is they should be the first to be consulted just as they have the initial obligation for burial but if they don’t do it then the obligation is on everyone else. However in my opinion if no cutting of the corpse is done to open the throat or abdomen, but a needle is inserted to remove fluid for examination concerning the illnesss – that would not be considered desecration of the corpse since this is often done to the living and is clearly permitted. It would also be permitted to take some blood by needle for examination. It would also be permitted to take x rays or other scanning since it doesn’t cause desecration. 

Trump’s words on Greenland and borders ring alarms in Europe, but officials have a measured response

 https://apnews.com/article/trump-greenland-europe-russia-ukraine-nato-arctic-79e085b0ac9ab405c4e74c47c1ba9dd4

Trump’s suggestions that international borders can be redrawn — by force if necessary — are particularly inflammatory in Europe. His words run contrary to the argument European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are trying to impress on Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Russia Draws Parallels Between Trump's Greenland Bid and Ukraine Annexation

 https://www.newsweek.com/russia-donald-trump-greenland-ukraine-regions-annexed-2012290

On Thursday, Peskov, Russian President Vladimir Putin's press secretary, responded to Trump's desire for the U.S. to acquire the island, which is strategically located in the Arctic Circle and has a population of about 56,000. It is also rich in natural resources.

The Kremlin spokesperson told reporters that Russia was "watching this rather dramatic development of the situation very closely" and suggested that the U.S. president-elect should take into account the opinions of those in Greenland, as Russia did for the residents of the "four new regions of the Russian Federation."

Peskov was referring to the illegal annexations of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.

Moscow held referendums on the annexations in the occupied territories, which Ukraine and Western nations deemed illegal—with the U.S. calling them a sham.