For the last seven weeks, Sash — an Orthodox feminist activist in Brooklyn known by her Instagram handle, Flatbush Girl — has led a team of activists, lawyers, and community leaders pursuing a “get,” or Jewish divorce document, for Berkowitz. Berkowitz’s husband, Volvy, is refusing to issue the get that would complete their divorce, making her what is known as an “agunah,” or “chained woman” who cannot remarry under Jewish law.
Wednesday, March 13, 2024
Tuesday, March 12, 2024
Aide tried to stop Trump praising Hitler – by telling him Mussolini was ‘great guy
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/mar/12/mussolini-trump-hitler-john-kelly-jim-sciutto-book
Donald Trump’s second White House chief of staff tried to stop him praising Adolf Hitler in part by trying to convince the then president Benito Mussolini, the Italian fascist dictator, was “a great guy in comparison”.
“He said, ‘Well, but Hitler did some good things,’” the retired marines general John Kelly told Jim Sciutto of CNN in an interview for a new book.
“I said, ‘Well, what?’ And he said, ‘Well, [Hitler] rebuilt the economy.’ But what did he do with that rebuilt economy? He turned it against his own people and against the world. And I said, ‘Sir, you can never say anything good about the guy. Nothing. I mean, Mussolini was a great guy in comparison.”
Kelly, a retired US Marine Corps general, was homeland security secretary in the Trump administration before becoming Trump’s second chief of staff. Resigning at the end of 2018, he eventually became a public opponent of his former boss.
US literary magazine retracts Israeli writer’s coexistence essay amid mass resignations
Emily Fox Kaplan, a Jewish writer who had shared the essay before it was retracted, wrote that she saw the criticism of Chen’s essay as part of a much wider dynamic.
“The problem, when it really comes down to it, is that it presents an Israeli as human,” she tweeted. “The people who are losing their minds about this want to believe that there are no civilians in Israel. They want a simple good guys/bad guys binary, and this creates cognitive dissonance.”
Some non-Jewish writers also lamented the piece’s retraction.
“Anyone who wants to seriously grapple with war had better be prepared for far more shocking opinions than are found in this thoughtful essay by a translator and writer living in Israel,” tweeted Phil Klay, a US military veteran whose writing draws on his war experiences. “Shame on @GuernicaMag for pulling it down.”
Honoring father brings him to sin
Sefer Chasidim (338) When it is time to do G-d's work nullify your Torah (Tehilim 19) Normally the son will do the work, even though the father is an ignoramas and let the father be free to do as he pleases. But if the son knows that when the father is sitting idle he is engaged in bad deeds, such as going after prostitutes, or getting involved in quarrels and gossip about others or other sins, the commandment is for the son to let his father work so that he does not sin at that time. However if the father tells his son “Go study Torah and I will keep busy by chopping wood or I will take over your job” then the son should study Torah.
Biden says he never meant to keep classified documents. Hur stands by report on president’s memory
While Biden fumbled some details in his interview, the full transcript could raise questions about Hur’s depiction of the 81-year-old president as having “significant limitations” on his memory. It paints a more textured picture of his discussions with prosecutors, filling out some of the gaps left by Hur’s accounting of the exchanges.
Fighting frumkeit with frumkeit
Yesterday I traveled to Beit Shemesh for Sheva Berachos with the Chasidic portion of the family
One of my nephews told me the following -
There was a very very pious Jew who was so frum that when he was on his first trip in an airplane the stewardess asked him if he wanted a drink - He was so upset hearing a female voice he threw up.
Later in life he had a job which required walking a short distance from the frum bus - through a block of Manhattan. He couldn't deal with the sights so he decided to ask his Rav for permission to stop work to preserve his holiness.
His Rav thought about the issue and said he could not give him permission.
The holy man asked for an explanation for refusing his request which was obviously needed
The Rav answered simple "It states clearly in Chovas Halevavos - that the foundation of all Prishus (asceticism) is to have an adequate job so that you are not a burden on others - Obviously I can not tell you to stop working."
Chovas HaLevavos (09:05)And likewise, you need to use your body for what will provide your livelihood, so that you will be saved from borrowing and stealing, and from needing the kindness of people to support you and to benefit you, thereby giving away to them your merits, and giving your piety to he who was pious towards you. Likewise, so that you won't be a burden on people, as one of the Sages said: "G-d will have great mercy on His servants who separate from this world, but only if his separation has not become a burden on his friends, because he engaged in a trade thereby freeing them from troubling themselves for him", as written: "For you shall eat the labor of your hands: happy shall you be, and it shall be well with you" (Tehilim 128:2). It has already been said: "the beginning of abstinence is the securing of a livelihood". And it was further stated: "the beginning of abstinence is to think properly on arranging the obtaining of one's needs", which means to work to secure one's needs.
Hannity’s Tale of Trump’s Jan. 6 National Guard Order Blows Up in His Face
For months, Fox News star Sean Hannity has led his network’s charge to push the flimsy claim that former President Donald Trump ordered thousands of National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol in the days leading up to the Jan. 6 insurrection. This assertion, meant to undermine the Jan. 6 House committee, was pushed by Hannity on his primetime TV show 43 times and his daily radio program 48 times, according to liberal watchdog Media Matters. The committee, however, refuted this claim when it shared testimony from former acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller saying Trump gave no such order. “I was never given any direction or order or knew of any plans of that nature,” Miller said in the video released on Tuesday. “There was no direct—there was no order from the President.” The ex-Trump official added: “We obviously had plans for activating more folks, but that was not anything more than contingency planning. There was no official message traffic or anything of that nature.” Trump, meanwhile, insisted just last month that he “suggested & offered” up to 20,000 National Guard troops be deployed. Other defense and security officials, however, have testified that Trump never asked for a law enforcement response to the attack.
Trump did not sign an order to deploy 20,000 troops on Jan. 6
Reached for comment, a spokesperson for the Department of Defense provided a timeline of the agency’s involvement in preparing for and responding to the attack on the Capitol. The timeline shows no such order, and notes only that on Jan. 3, the president concurred with activating the D.C. National Guard to support law enforcement at the behest of Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser. When the rioting started, Bowser requested more Guard help, on behalf of the Capitol Police. That request was made to Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, who then went to Miller, who approved it.
Neither Pelosi nor the House sergeant at arms could have stopped an ordered deployment of National Guard troops because Congress doesn’t control the National Guard, legal experts say. Guard troops are generally controlled by governors, though they can be federalized, said William C. Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University. The online claims “make no sense at all,” Banks said, adding, “The House sergeant at arms, he or she is not in the chain of command. Nor is Nancy Pelosi.”
Jan. 6 committee yet again debunks Trump claim of 10,000 troops
Trump and his defenders have repeatedly claimed that the violence at the Capitol two years ago would have been prevented if only his order for 10,000 troops had been heeded. We have explored this claim twice before and debunked it, each time awarding Four Pinocchios.
Trump, in his post, says he made a “recommendation for troops” and that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) failed to act on it. But the evidence shows Trump did not issue any formal request — so there was nothing for Pelosi to heed. The committee report says it found “no evidence” to support the claim that he ordered 10,000 troops.
Moreover, the committee said that when he referenced so many troops, it was not because he wanted to protect the Capitol. He “floated the idea of having 10,000 National Guardsmen deployed to protect him and his supporters from any supposed threats by left-wing counterprotesters,” the report said.
Trump White House aide points finger at Jan. 6 National Guard call-up in 14th Amendment tria
Patel, who was the chief of staff to acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller during the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, argued that it was instead D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser who delayed calls for the National Guard in the days before the riot.
“The authorization came in beforehand. It was relayed to the appropriate officials in D.C. and the Capitol Police. It was declined, and we acted when their request finally came in on January 6,” he continued.
Patel made the argument during the third day of the Colorado 14th Amendment hearings over whether Trump can be removed from the 2024 presidential ballot due to his involvement in the Jan. 6 attacks.
He said that Trump had authorized the deployment of 10,000 to 20,000 National Guard troops to support law enforcement in multiple meetings he witnessed.
But that claim contradicts findings from the House committee investigating Jan. 6, which was told by Trump administration Defense Secretary Christopher Miller that Trump never ordered troop deployments.
Monday, March 11, 2024
Sex Trafficking Survivor Says Sen. Britt’s SOTU Story Was Bogus
Romero also told the network that Sen. Britt got multiple elements of her story wrong. She was trafficked by a pimp who worked to force vulnerable girls into prostitution, Romero said, not Mexican drug cartels. She was also never trafficked inside the U.S.; while Britt did not explicitly say Romero had been trafficked in the U.S., some viewers may have got that impression from the senator’s phrase: “We wouldn’t be OK with this happening in a Third World country; this is the United States of America.”
Romero’s captivity also took place between 2004-08, during President George W. Bush’s second term. Again, Britt did not specifically say when Romero had been trafficked, but presented her story in the context of the “disgrace” of Biden’s border policies. Lastly, Romero confirmed she met Britt at an event on the border that was attended by multiple other government officials and anti-human trafficking activists—a detail that Britt omitted, making their meeting sound like a more private, personal encounter.
“‘Someone using my story and distorting it for political purposes,’ she told me, ‘Is not fair at all,’” Romo said Romero told him.
Profession is described by Chazal as a loving wife
Koheles (09:09) Live joyfully with the wife whom you love all the days of the life of your vanity, which he has given you under the sun, all the days of your vanity; for that is your portion in life, and in your labor in which you labor under the sun.
Maharal (Arachin 16b): A man should not change from the traditional occupation of his family because that is where he will be must successful. Our Sages (Sanhedrin 81a) described a man’s occupation “his wife” and stated that interfering with another’s livelihood is comparable to being involved with another man’s wife. Therefore they prohibited interfering with another’s livelihood since it is as unique to him as his wife. Furthermore just as a son has a unique relationship with his father he has a unique relationship with the occupation of his father since it is referred to as the wife of his father. Therefore a person should not change from the traditional occupation of his family…
Koheles Rabbah (09:08) ENJOY LIFE WITH THE WIFE WHOM THOU LOVEST (IX, 9). Rabbi [Judah ha-Nasi] said in the name of the holy brotherhood: Acquire a handicraft for yourself together with Torah.2 What is the reason [for this teaching]? ENJOY LIFE WITH THE WIFE WHOM THOU LOVEST. Why does he call them ' the holy brotherhood’? Because it included R. Jose b. Meshullam and R. Simeon b. Menasia who used to divide the day into three parts-a third for Torah, a third for prayer, and a third for work. Others declare that they labored in the Torah throughout the winter and in their work throughout the summer. R. Isaac b. Eleazar used to call R. Joshua b. R. Timi and R. Borkai ‘a holy brotherhood’, because they divided the day into three parts--a third for Torah, a third for prayer, and a third for work.
Rashi (Kesubos 5a) ללמדו אומנות - מצוה הוא דכתיב (קהלת ט׳:ט׳) ראה חיים עם אשה אשר אהבת למוד אומנות שתחיה הימנו עם התורה ואמרינן בקידושין (דף כט.) שאביו חייב ללמדו אומנות:
Rashi (Koheles 09:09) See life with the wife you love. See and understand to learn a skill by which to earn a livelihood, together with Torah study that you possess. That is your lot to be sustained in This World and the next. Because the struggle in both of them causes sin to be forgotten
Sanhedrin (81a) Neither hath defiled his neighbor's wife, indicating that he did not competitively enter his neighbor's profession; neither hath come near to a menstruous woman, meaning that he did not benefit from the charity fund.
Kiddushin (30b) ‘To teach him a craft.’ Whence do we know it? — Said Hezekiah: Scripture saith, See to a livelihood with the wife whom thou lovest. If ‘wife’ is literal, this teaches just as the father is bound to take a wife for him, so is he bound to teach him a craft for a livelihood; if it is a metaphor for Torah, then just as he is bound to teach him Torah, so is he bound to teach him a craft.‘And some say, He must teach him to swim in water too. What is the reason? — His life may depend on it.
Ribis is heresy
Alshech (Devarim 23:21) you can charge interest to non-Jews This verse reveals the reason for the prohibition of charging interest since it says G-d permitted charging idol worshippers interest. Our Sages strongly emphasize the seriousness of the prohibition of interest - even saying he denies the G-d of Israel as well as the redemption from Egypt. It is appropriate to try and understand this since it seems to be simply an example of hyperbole. However you must realize that the foundation upon the who Torah rests is the belief in Divine Providence. The Remption from Egypt is a clear example that was witnessed by the entire Jewish people as well as the whole world and reinforced the idea that G-d created the universe and that is why miracles occurred all over the world and were done for the sake of the Jews as was seen with the plagues. Clearly mazel was overcome. When a person engages in farming he has trust in G-d that that which he planted will grow and he will receive blessing. Similarly a person engaged in business has trust that G-d will send His blessings and such are considered Jews since they recognize the G-d of Israel just as they did at the redemption from Egypt. In contrast one who says I will profit from my money he is indicating that wealth is totally natural and not from G-d or mazel or other forces and thus the concept of beracha is limited. The reason one can charge interest to a nonJew is because they are controlled by natural processes so correspondingly you can utilize natural orocesses with him. In contrast a believing Jew who is dependendent on Divine Providence can not be charged interest.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)