https://www.newsweek.com/harvard-trump-admin-judges-takeaways-2124329
A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the Trump administration to reverse its cuts of more than $2.6 billion in funding for Harvard University.
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs ruled the cuts amounted to illegal retaliation for Harvard's rejection of the Trump administration's demands for changes to its governance and policies.
The Trump administration had tied the funding freezes to Harvard's delays in dealing with antisemitism. But Burroughs, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, said in her ruling that there was "little connection between the research affected by the grant terminations and antisemitism."
She wrote: "In fact, a review of the administrative record makes it difficult to conclude anything other than that (the government) used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country's premier universities."
Burroughs said it resulted in the government terminating Harvard's grants without complying with the law and retaliating against the school in violation of its free speech rights under the First Amendment.
Burroughs said that it was "clear, even based solely on Harvard's own admissions, that Harvard has been plagued by antisemitism in recent years and could (and should) have done a better job of dealing with the issue."
ReplyDelete“Harvard Beats Trump Admin—Judge's 5 Key Takeaways” Allow me Daf Hayomi today Tractate Horayos 7b:
MISHNAH. THE OBLIGATION [UPON THE COURT TO BRING A SACRIFICE] IS INCURRED ONLY WHERE IGNORANCE OF THE LAW WAS ACCOMPANIED BY ERROR IN ACTION, AND SO [IT IS WITH THE] ANOINTED HIGH PRIEST; NOR [DO THEY INCUR OBLIGATION] IN THE CASE OF IDOLATRY UNLESS IGNORANCE OF THE LAW WAS ACCOMPANIED BY ERROR IN ACTION.
My theory. Four cases of sinners in Leviticus 4: 1)3 anointed priest 2)13-14 sanhedrin 3) 3)22-23 ruler 4)27-28 layman.
This Mishnah rules that the Sanhedrin and the anointed priest bring a sacrifice with error in action and in law. Donald Trump bombed that boat from Venezuela with 12 on board was that an error in action? Were these simply 12 innocent fishmen fishing in open water? Was that an error in law? Did Donald Trump overreach his authority to bomb that boat? USA Congress makes the rules what a president can and cannot do, right?
Clearly Bravo Donald Trump acted correctly in action and in law, pekuach nefesh: Donald Trump neutralized an immediate danger to mainland USA acting within powers USA Congress granted over the years for the USA president to protect the country from immediate danger. God bless Donald Trump and America and Israel and the world.
So Harvard is a major cesspool of Jew hatred, promotes Jew hatred and fights for the right to allow Jew hatred openly on campus. But they fought Trump so you support them? Shame!
ReplyDeleteGarnel you think the law is not relevant and Trump can do anything as long as he says it is to fight antisemitism
DeleteAnd if Stalin, y"sh, came back from the grave and criticized Trump, you'd praise him.
DeleteThese people hate you but you're going to ignore that because you hate Trump more.
Let's review:
DeleteHarvard is ranked no 1 for both open Jew hatred and supression of speech and thought.
Trump tells Harvard that if they don't reign in the Jew hatred, he'll penalize them.
Harvard pushes back by saying they will not reign in the Jew hatred because they're dedicated to freedom of speech!
Trump follows through and cuts their funding.
Judge comes along and, despite all actual evidence to the contrary, announces that Jew-hatred has no connection to this and it's really just Trump being petty. Harvard gets its funding and its right to open Jew hatred back.
And you're supporting that.
Mamdani evasion is still going on, as I predicted
DeleteIf Trump assassinated the families of Harvard staff and said it was a penalty for not stopping antisemitism you obviously would say what a great idea
DeleteAs I said before you think the law does not apply to Trump and any action he does in the name of stopping antisemitism is ok with you
DeleteYep, anything done to protect me and the rest of the Jews is fine by me. I have no interest in being a virtuous martyr.
DeleteWow so anytime wants to use you as an excuse
DeleteWow
DeleteSo theoretically would you be voting for Mamdani because Trump hates him?
Trying to change topic?
DeleteYou are avoiding their questions which under the circumstances seem like fair questions
DeleteI see no virtue in rejecting a flawed ally given that everyone else out there is straight out our enemy.
DeleteWow so when Trump orders assassinations of Democrats as suggested by his attorney you will say so - he is flawed but better than everyone else!
DeleteI have no hesitation in choosing to survive. If the alternative is a "moral leader" who leaves us out for the Muslims to destroy, then Trump it is.
DeleteWow
DeleteSo when Mamdani yemach shmo, orders the rounding up of Jews or allows Hezbollah and Hamas to attack, you will say he's flawed but better than trump
That's the tragedy of Trump Derangement Syndrome
DeleteIt's not just trump tds. It's splitting, a severe psychological defence mechanism, where one side are all good, and another all bad.
DeleteAnd given his level of Torah knowledge, this is quite surprising. If any of us would appreciate nuance and approach a system in all its complexity, he's the one.
DeleteNope.
DeleteLearning doesn't give you immunity.
Mandani derangement syndrome. BTW Trump is the reason Mandani gets any attention. He merely claims he will save everyone from the disaster Trump created
DeleteNope
DeleteHe is an extreme terrorist, wants Israel gone. He's amalek
Again, DT would support the Nazis if they opposed Trump.
Delete"nope"
DeleteHe'd walk on a tightrope to neither confirm nor deny your assertion .
Does that in halacha as well when he doesn't want to admit his guys are wrong
Garnel you are simply naive you truly believe Trump's claims! Where do you store all your Trump merchandise when you need room for the bridge he sold you. Have you ever considered that he lies simply to get power from naive people like yourself. After all he said he would end the war in Ukraine and bring down prices eliminate inflation as well as end the conflict between Jews and Arabs etc etc
DeleteThis is your TDS in action. We're talking about how terrible Mamdani will be for the Jews. As for Trump's claims, yes I believe them. He HAS sent lots of weaponry to Israel, he HAS maintained firm support for Israel even as ever other ally has rushed to embrace Hamas, he HAS worked to defund jew hating institutions in the States and remove terrrorist supporters from the country. These aren't claims. They're facts.
Delete"nope" 😂
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDaf Hayomi today Tractate horayos English 9b:
ReplyDeleteאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: מוֹדֶה רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר שֶׁאֵין מֵבִיא אָשָׁם. תָּנֵי תַּנָּא קַמֵּיהּ דְּרַב שֵׁשֶׁת: אָשָׁם תָּלוּי בָּא עַל טוּמְאַת מִקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: דַּאֲמַר לָךְ מַנִּי? רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר הִיא, דְּאָמַר: הוֹאִיל וְנֶאֱמַר בּוֹ כָּרֵת כְּבִקְבוּעָה, מַיְיתֵי נָשִׂיא שָׂעִיר עָלֶיהָ. וְהָאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: מוֹדֶה רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר שֶׁאֵין מֵבִיא אָשָׁם תָּלוּי! קַשְׁיָא.
אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: מוֹדֶה רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר שֶׁאֵין מֵבִיא אָשָׁם. תָּנֵי תַּנָּא קַמֵּיהּ דְּרַב שֵׁשֶׁת: אָשָׁם תָּלוּי בָּא עַל טוּמְאַת מִקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: דַּאֲמַר לָךְ מַנִּי? רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר הִיא, דְּאָמַר: הוֹאִיל וְנֶאֱמַר בּוֹ כָּרֵת כְּבִקְבוּעָה, מַיְיתֵי נָשִׂיא שָׂעִיר עָלֶיהָ. וְהָאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: מוֹדֶה רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר שֶׁאֵין מֵבִיא אָשָׁם תָּלוּי! קַשְׁיָא.
Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Rabbi Eliezer concedes that a king does not bring a guilt-offering for the defiling of the Temple or its sacrificial foods. The tanna who recited mishnayot and baraitot in the study hall recited a baraita before Rav Sheshet: In the case of a king, a provisional guilt-offering comes for the defiling of the Temple or its sacrificial foods. Rav Sheshet said to him: Who said this to you? Is it Rabbi Eliezer, who said: Since karet is stated in its regard as it is stated in all matters where there is liability to bring a fixed sin-offering, a king brings a goat for the defiling of the Temple? Since the status of his offering is like that of a fixed sin-offering, in cases of uncertainty, he is liable to bring a provisional guilt-offering. Rav Sheshet asks: But didn’t Rabbi Yoḥanan say: Rabbi Eliezer concedes that a king does not bring a provisional guilt-offering? The Gemara concludes: Indeed, based on the statement of Rabbi Yoḥanan, the baraita is difficult.
Amazing Rabbi Yoḥanan said:
Rabbi Eliezer concedes that a king does not bring a guilt-offering for the defiling of the Temple or its sacrificial foods. This Baraita is not authoritative to claim the opposite: In the case of a king, a provisional guilt-offering comes for the defiling of the Temple or its sacrificial foods. No no no! In cases of uncertainty (whether the king erred or not) the king (ruler) cannot bring a Chatos Asham. Correct: But didn’t Rabbi Yoḥanan say: Rabbi Eliezer concedes that a king does not bring a provisional guilt-offering?
Beautiful. My theory. The Torah laws in Leviticus 4 for a ruler: 23 if his sin, wherein he hath sinned, be known to him, he shall bring for his offering a goat, a male without blemish. Wow the baraita is difficult, meaning not authoritative. Most interesting. The Talmud argues that the authoritative law from God is that the ruler brings a goat (a public embarrassment to him showing the ruler erred) only where there’s nop doubt ruler erred. Trump would only have to bring a chatos korban if he hath sinned, be known to him: meaning with no uncertainty!