https://www.newsweek.com/hunter-biden-laptop-twitter-files-1765395
Right-wing commentators criticized the reveal too. Sebastian Gorka, a former advisor to President, Donald Trump, said he was "deeply underwhelmed" by Taibbi's thread.
https://www.newsweek.com/hunter-biden-laptop-twitter-files-1765395
Right-wing commentators criticized the reveal too. Sebastian Gorka, a former advisor to President, Donald Trump, said he was "deeply underwhelmed" by Taibbi's thread.
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/07/10/us/woke-race-deconstructed-newsletter-reaj/index.html
By using the term “woke” however they want, conservatives have muddied its meaning, have obfuscated it to refer to anything having to do with progressivism they don’t like. The same goes for “critical race theory.” They’ve done it with so many terms. “Identity politics” is another one. One of the earliest usages of “identity politics” is in the Combahee River Collective Statement from 1977. It was a way of describing working to end Black women’s oppression – it was a political movement on the basis of identity. Really straightforward. Now, though, “identity politics” is often seen as this negative thing that people don’t want to participate in.
One of the things that gets paired with semantic pejoration is what’s called semantic bleaching. Semantic bleaching is another linguistic process whereby the denotative content of a word is stripped away. I think that “critical race theory” is a good example of that, along with “woke.” Once a word gets semantically bleached, it can come to mean anything. “Woke” has come to mean anything having to do with race or, more broadly, progressivism.
https://www.politico.com/story/2010/03/right-loves-to-hate-imitate-alinsky-034751
“You become a better organizer when you understand that there is nothing new under the sun,” Steinhauser said of his appreciation of Alinsky. “All the pitfalls, the problems, the disputes — this is the way human beings are. Politics is a human science and this guy understood that. He was practical. He understood how to get competing factions and interests and individuals to get in the same room and form what he called a ‘peoples’ organization’ and to move in the same direction to take on city hall.”
Ramban (Iyov Introduction) In the Book of Iyov we have an event involving Satan. It is known from our Tradition that Satan is an angel that was created to prosecute and harm Man and its name means “to oppose” . According to our Sages Satan is also the Angel of Death and the Evil Inclination. Our Sages connect these names to Satan along with their belief that he is actually an angel and not a force of nature as is clear from the events being related here in Iyov and in the beginning of Bava Basra and many other places in their words. In sum they are telling us thar Satan is an angel which was created for the purpose to prosecute and harm and from his power comes adversary to man because he is the cause to the stars of destruction and bloodshed, sword and war as well as wounds, disputes and dispute that are included withinin the influence of Mars and which our Sages say are inherent in the nation of Esau which is the people who have inherited the sword and war. Also in his portion are the demons which our Sages call mazikim while the Torah refers to them as satyrs. Thus Esau’s power is as an adversery and source of harm. He is also the Angel of Death which means he can take away a person’s soul. It seems that the view of our Sages is that death for creatures that talk is not simply the end of life but requires an action done by an angel since it involves the spiritual entity – the soul. Satan is also refererred to as the Evil Inclination because it is the source of power of the lusting Nefesh like a fiery star. It also seems from the verses that Satan as well as other Angels act solely according to the Will of G-d and thus there is nothing in Creation that is not done through an angel which has been activated bt G-d
https://www.newsweek.com/kushners-financial-link-qatar-ticking-time-bomb-biographer-1766537
The Kushner Company, a family business for which former President Donald Trump's son-in-law now serves as president, was facing a $1.4 billion debt payment in 2017 for a property at 666 Fifth Avenue in New York City. Around that time, Kushner—then working as a senior advisor to Trump with a focus on Middle Eastern matters—visited Qatar to discuss a blockade imposed against the country, alongside Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
Following the year, the Qatar blockade was lifted, with President Trump reversing his earlier support of his arrangement. Around the same time, according to The Real Deal, Brookfield Asset Management, paid $1.28 billion for a ground-floor lease at 666 Fifth, helping the company with its debt situation. The group's second-largest stakeholder at the time was the sovereign wealth fund of Qatar, leading some to accuse Kushner of trading favorable political maneuvers in order to help his family's business.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/hunter-biden-laptop-investigation.html
Hidden inside the laptop, according to those (almost exclusively on the right) who have reviewed the data or who trust the word of those who claim they have, is a corruption scandal that implicates not just Hunter but other members of the Biden family, including the president. The laptop details Hunter’s involvement with a Ukrainian natural-gas producer that paid him millions of dollars to serve on its board — the relationship at the center of Donald Trump’s first impeachment. It shows how a Chinese energy company directed millions of dollars in consulting fees to Hunter and his uncle. It reveals White House meetings and slush-fund dinners and wheeling and dealing, from Romania to Monte Carlo to Cafe Milano. Most important, these people claim the laptop contains proof that, despite his denials, Joe Biden — allegedly referred to in emails as “the big guy” — was fully aware of, and looking to profit from, his son’s business activities.
An Israeli radio station suspended a prominent host until further notice, after he said during an on-air rant Sunday that he hoped some ultra-Orthodox Jews would use ritual phylacteries to hang themselves, implying he was referring to Haredi lawmakers.
Natan Zahavi, known for his blunt style and frequent rants on various issues, made the remarks on Radio 103FM, while railing at Haredi political leadership.
Researching the current fad for being the biggest nebach i.e. victim. I would like to nominate the original red neck - Esau. Why do Orthodox Jews want to emulate him? Esau was deceived by his own mother and brother and forced to sell his birth right to save his life. He was later defeated in a cosmic wrestling match and cheated out of marrying Leah. The real problem is that Esau is the prototype of the goy - so why aspire to be like him? Yitzchok seemed to be his only champion and admirer According to Malbim Yitzchok envisioned a partnership between the worldly manly Esau and the delicate yeshiva avreich in Yaakov.
Does originalism — the theory of constitutional interpretation that conservatives have championed for the past 40 years — provide the conservative movement with the sort of intellectual ammunition that it needs to tear down half a century of liberal jurisprudence and rebuild American law on more conservative foundations? Or is it time, now that conservatives have secured a decisive majority on the Supreme Court, for the right to embrace a more aggressive and ideologically assertive legal theory?
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/11/23/how-trump-plays-the-victim-card-00070763
If it has, the designation of victim won’t be so appealing anymore; in fact, being a victim will regain its old association with seeming whiny and weak. This is certainly what Mike Pompeo was counting on when he tweeted the day after Trump’s announcement, “We need more seriousness, less noise, and leaders who are looking forward, not staring in the rearview mirror claiming victimhood.”
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-white-victimhood-fuels-republican-politics/
What could be fueling an increase in these views? Following Trump’s loss in 2020, the Republican Party leaned further into messages that paint Republicans and white people as victims of an overzealous movement for racial justice. For example, Fox News coverage of critical race theory — a decades-old framework for legal scholarship — surged during the Virginia gubernatorial campaign, according to a Newsweek analysis, only to quickly and starkly dip following Republican Glenn Youngkin’s win. And several pundits pointed to education and critical race theory as reasons for his success. Republicans have also found a seemingly successful political strategy in attacking and amplifying race-related buzzwords, such as “woke,” once used in activist circles. And as FiveThirtyEight contributors Hakeem Jefferson and Victor Ray pointed out on the anniversary of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol, the current narratives of victimization and the associated backlash to racial progress are some white people’s way of reckoning with the changing times.