Rambam(Chovel u’Mazik 8:10) An informer may be slain anywhere, even at the present time when Jewish courts do not try capital cases. It is permissible to slay him before he has informed
Shulchan Aruch (C M 388:12) All those who inform against the community and distress it can be given over to the government through non Jews even though they will be beaten and imprisoned but it is prohibited for the sake of the disress of an individual
Semah (30) but it is prohibited for the sake of the disress of an individual – this is prohibited only for general distressing. However If the informant is causing a monetary loss and surely if he is causing torture or physical punishment it is permitted
Aruch HaShulchan (CM 388:7) Historically it is well known that in previous ages in times of old in far away places, no person had any assurance in the safety of his life or money because of the pirates and bandits even with government assurances. It is known that this is true even today in some places in Africa where the government itself is corrupt. One should remind people of the kingdoms in Europe and particularly our ruler the Czar of Russia and his ancestors as well as the the kings of England, who spread their influence over many lands in order that people should have confidence in the security of their body and money. The wealthy no longer have to conceal themselves so that they will not be robbed or killed. The prohibition of informing in fact depends on the existence of lawlessness in the Talmud and poskim. In other words the prohibition is only not to inform on another to bandits which endangers that person's money and life but not to a just legal system. Bandits chase after the person's body and money
No comments :
Post a Comment
ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.