Tuesday, March 23, 2021

Can A Woman Initiate Jewish Divorce Proceedings?

 https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/can-a-woman-initiate-jewish-divorce-proceedings/

 But, it should be stressed that if the coercion used by the beit din, or the secular courts at the behest of the beit din, is not effective to force the husband to participate in the get process, the beit din itself can do nothing. Only the man can do the acts required for a valid Jewish divorce; the Jewish court has no more power to declare a man divorced against his will than it does to declare a man married against his will.

Divorce: The Halakhic Perspective

 https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/divorce-halakhic-perspective

Only a man can give a get, and that get must be given of his free will. A get which is given under duress or coercion (known as a get me’useh, a “forced divorce”) is void. The rabbis derive this rule from the same verse in Deuteronomy quoted above for the principle that a man could divorce his wife unilaterally. Since the husband has the unilateral power to divorce his wife, the rabbis maintain that the act of divorce can occur only if it complies with the husband’s discretion and free will.

The fact that rabbis derive the rule prohibiting the “forced divorce” from the Bible, and not from secular principles of contract, underscores the impact of this rule and distinguishes it from civil rules regarding coercion, force and duress. Because the rule against the forced divorce is attributed to the Bible and to God, the question of whether a husband has agreed to give his wife a get of his own free will is subject to strict scrutiny by rabbis.

Monday, March 22, 2021

Intro to Shulchan Aruch


 הקדמות לשולחן ערוך הקדמת השו"ע
אודה ה' מאוד בפי ובתוך רבים אהללנו ומשירי אהודנו. במה אקדם ה' אכף לאלקי מרום אשר ממעון קדשו מן השמים הופיע ברוב רחמיו וחסדיו והשפיע מטובו על שפל אנשים כמוני לחבר ספר הנותן אמרי שפר, החיבור הגדול שחברתי על הארבעה טורים אשר קראתיו "בית יוסף". אשר כללתי בו כל הדינים הנמצאים בכל הפוסקים חדשים גם ישנים, עם מקומות מושבותם בחצריהם ובטירותם בתלמוד בבלי ובתלמוד ירושלמי בתוספתא בספרא בספרי ובמכילתא, ודברי המפרשים והפוסקים ובעלי התשובות חדשים גם ישנים, ונתבאר שם כל דין ודין באר היטיב דבר דבור על אופניו, וארמון על משפטו ישב תלוי עליו כל שלטי הגבורים אנשי השם אשר מעולם.
ראיתי אני בלבי כי טוב ללקוט שושני ספירי אמריו בדרך קצרה בלשון צח וכולל יפה ונעים, למען תהיה תורת ה' תמימה שגורה בפי כל איש ישראל, כי כאשר ישאלו לת"ח דבר הלכה לא יגמגם בה אלא יאמר לחכמה אחותי את, כשם שברור לו שאחותו אסורה לו, כך יהיה ברור לו כל דין שישאל עליו הלכה למעשה בהיותו שגור בפיו ספר זה הבנוי לתלפיות תל שהכל פונים בו, לחלקו לחלקים שלשים ללמוד בו בכל יום חלק, ונמצא שבכל חדש הוא חוזר תלמודו ויאמר עליו אשרי מי שבא לכאן ותלמודו בידו.
זאת ועוד, התלמידים הקטנים יהגו בו תמיד וישננו לשונו על פה ותהיה גירסא דינקותא מסודרת בפיהם מקטנותם הלכה למעשה, וגם כי יזקינו לא יסורו ממנו, והמשכילים יזהירו כזוהר הרקיע בהניח להם מעצבם ויגיע כפים ישעשעו נפשם בהגותם בספר זה אשר כולו מחמדים הלכה פסוקה באין אומר ואין דברים.
וקראתי שם ספר זה "שלחן ערוך", כי בו ימצא ההוגה כל מיני מטעמים ערוכים בכל ושמורים סדורים וברורים. ומובטח אני בחסד עליון כי ע"י ספר זה תמלא הארץ דעה את ה' הקטנים עם הגדולים תלמיד עם מבין חכם חרשים ונבון לחש. ובכן אפרוש כפי אל ה' יעזרני על דבר כבוד שמו להיות ממצדיקי הרבים, ויזכני החל וגמור להיות מסודר כהלכתו מתוקן ומקובל וטוב ויפה. והנני מתחיל לעשות כאשר יעדתי וה' יהיה בעזרי
.

Get refusers - Severe halachic questions to using a hysteric mob

 There have been a number of recent mass demonstrations meant to force a husband to give his wife a get.

One in particular claims it was instigated by Rabbi Chaim Shabes- but no letter or evidence is produced to support this claim.

It is also claimed the husband is required to give a Get when the wife demands one or when a summons to appear in beis din is ignored- both of these claims are clearly false.

Perhaps more problematic is that forcing a get through lynch mob can only produce a get me'usa which is inherently invalid and if the wife subsequently marries - future children are mamzerim. As well as the horrible reality that the woman who remarries is committing adultery

While the people involved, clearly view themselves as righteous but the problem is that they are clearly ignorant of elementary halacha either willfully or because of poor education. Basically they are rebelling against halacha, since they can't get what they want by using the system even if they call themselves rabbis or Divorce experts

I am not claiming that a woman should be chained to a bad marriage. But the solution being used is simply stupid and counterproductive. Dropping an atom bomb because you are upset and feel the other side is morally wrong just doesn't always work. 

Rabbis or beis din can not issue a judgment after listening to only  one side. Unfortunately in recent years such illegitimate behavior has become more common

Israel-UAE relations & the Abraham Accords are not at risk under Biden

 https://www.gzeromedia.com/the-red-pen/israel-uae-relations-the-abraham-accords-are-not-at-risk-under-biden

In a Washington Post op-ed, commentator Hugh Hewitt states his concern that President Biden will continue his streak of policy reversals in the Middle East, specifically regarding the peace deals that Trump brokered in his final year in office. But in fact, Biden has consistently supported the Abraham Accords, even during the heat of the presidential campaign. Ian Bremmer and Eurasia Group analysts Jeffrey Wright and Sofia Meranto take out the Red Pen to point out that Hewitt may be overreacting to Biden's recent freeze on a fighter jet deal to the UAE.

 

Sunday, March 21, 2021

Biden’s Fall Ranks Among The Top Air Force One Gaffes — But It’s Not Number One

 https://www.forbes.com/sites/suzannerowankelleher/2021/03/20/bidens-fall-ranks-among-the-top-air-force-one-gaffes---but-its-not-number-one/?sh=3aafb5fb6be1

 Though yesterday’s incident ended with a routine salute, Joe Biden’s triple-trip while scaling the red-carpeted steps to Air Force One was nevertheless roundly scorned, especially by conservative media. Biden was taking a round-trip flight to Atlanta to meet with Asian-American community leaders in the wake of the massage parlor massacre.

 Last summer, Vice President Mike Pence had a moment remarkably similar to President Biden’s upward slip. The former veep was filmed running, then tripping, up the staircase of Air Force Two. Pence had almost reached the top of the stairs when he suddenly lunged forward, using his hands to break his fall. He quickly picked himself up, bounded up the remaining steps, straightened his jacket and tie, and offered a wave and a thumbs up before entering the plane. 

Rav Kook on women voting

 Rav Kook (Page 58 in Judge Elon’s Status of Women): The psychological reason for having women vote and for publicly calling voting by the name of “the right of women” is a consequence of the lowly state of women in the general population in these countries. If the condition of their families were truly tranquil and decent as we find in most of our families – then we would not have the women themselves, nor the academics or ethical authorities or idealists be trying to achieve what they call the “rights of voting for women.” It is something which in fact is likely to ruin the quality of family life. And this destruction of family life must of necessity lead to great destruction in the quality of communities as well as society in general. It is only because of the despair and psychological bitterness that results from the coarse conduct of men that secular family life has been ruined. Thus the secular society decided to try to improve the situation by means of giving more power to the community and to try with this to elevate the broken ruins of the family unit. But they have shown no concern for the negative side-effects and consequences from such a change since they already have so much breakdown in the family unit for other reasons. However, we in contrast have not descended to their lowly existence and we don’t wish to see our sisters in this degraded state. The home for us is even now a bastion of holiness.  G‑d forbid that we should degrade the brilliant light that exists in the life of our sisters and to create the possibility of embittering their lives by means of exposing them to the conflicting views and bitter disputes that are connected with the elections and the political issues concerning the nature of the country.

Saturday, March 20, 2021

Basherte means happiness in getting soul-mate?

Vayikra Rabbah (8:1) A Roman lady asked R. Jose b. Halafta: ‘In how many days did the Holy One, blessed be He, create His world?’ He answered: ‘In six days, as it is written, For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, etc.’ (Ex. 31, 17). She asked further: ‘And what has He been doing since that time?’ He answered: ‘He is joining couples proclaiming: "A's wife to be is allotted to A; A's daughter is allotted to B; (So-and-so's wealth is for So-and-so).’’’1 Said she: ‘This is a thing which I, too, am able to do. See how many male slaves and how many female slaves I have; I can make them consort together all at the same time.’ Said he: ‘If in your eyes it is an easy task, it is in His eyes as hard a task as the dividing of the Red Sea.’ He then went away and left her. What did she do? She sent for a thousand male slaves and a thousand female slaves, placed them in rows, and said to them: ‘Male A shall take to wife female B; C shall take D and so on.’ She let them consort together one night. In the morning they came to her; one had a head wounded, another had an eye taken out, another an elbow crushed, another a leg broken; one said: ‘I do not want this one as my husband,’ another said: ‘I do not want this one as my wife.’ Immediately she sent for R. Jose b. Halafta and said to him: ‘Rabbi, your Torah is true, fine and excellent; all you have said was well said.’Said he to her: ‘Have I not told you that if in your eyes it is an easy task, it is in His eyes a task as hard as the dividing of the Red Sea, as it is said, He maketh the solitary to dwell in a house, He bringeth out the prisoners into prosperity-ba-kosharoth (Ps. 68:7)?1 What does "ba-kosharoth" mean?-"Weeping (beki) and singing (shiroth)." He who is pleased with his match utters song, while he who is not pleased weeps. And what does God do when bringing about matches? He pairs them together despite themselves, without their good will.’

What is sarrah?

 I have have posted a discussion where Rav Moshe is asked whether a woman can be a masgiach.


The main problem is that the Rambam says women can not have Sarrah i.e. authority over others to tell them do do things they don't want to do.


Just came across a Rashi(Sanhedrin 16a where he states that a nasi and Cohen Gadol have Sarrah

He seems to be that they have status. Thus any status- even without authority should be problematic e.g.wife

רש"י מסכת סנהדרין דף טז עמוד א
דבריו של גדול - דינו של בעל שררה, כגון נשיא וכהן גדול.

Friday, March 19, 2021

Orthodox groups criticize 2 rabbis annulling marriages

 https://www.jweekly.com/1998/11/27/orthodox-groups-criticize-2-rabbis-annulling-marriages/

Rackman and Morgenstern, in interviews, said they annul marriages according to halachah, Jewish law, following formulas employed by great Orthodox rabbis of the past, including Rabbis Isaac Elchanan, Moshe Feinstein and Eliyahu Klotzkin.

 The Rackman-Morgenstern solution relies in part on the theory that abusive husbands suffer from mental illness, a position that the fervently religious Agudath Israel of America disputes.

 One of those is Rabbi Mordecai Tendler, a respected religious leader in the Orthodox enclave of Monsey, N.Y.

He told JTA that he has annulled hundreds of marriages over the last 30 years.

He applies the criteria mapped out by his grandfather, the late Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, who "freed" women whose husbands refused to grant them a Jewish divorce if the wedding itself was not Orthodox or if there had been some technical flaw in the ceremony.

He said he annuls a marriage under these circumstances only a couple of times a year and after months of research.

Rackman and Morgenstern, unlike others, will dissolve the union if a problem like abusiveness, which was not well established before the wedding, becomes apparent after the marriage.

"We can be much more liberal in our interpretation of conditions that would warrant annulment because of our deeper understanding of the problems of mental health than Rabbi Feinstein could have possessed," Rackman said.

Feds: Intel Shows Russia Tried To Help Trump Win Again | The 11th Hour | MSNBC

Report Shows Exact Opposite Of Trump Officials' Claims On China Election Intrusion | Rachel Maddow

Thursday, March 18, 2021

Must a son agree if his father wants to live with him?

Rav Sternbuch (2:444):  Question: The mitzva of honoring parents is different than all other mitzvos. On the one hand there is no obligation to spend money on this mitzva since the halacha is that honoring parents is on the father’s expense and not the son’s. In contrast all other mitzvos require payment up to a fifth of his wealth. On the other hand the positive command of honoring parents is more severe than all other mitzvos since the parent’s honor is equated to that of G‑d. Another question is why is it that will all other mitzvos we say that there is no obligation to do it if it causes great embarrassment since there is the principle that “human dignity if great since it allows avoiding in a passive way of any positive mitzva. The Achronim discuss that that great torment is equivalent to great embarrassment in that it exempts the obligation to do a positive mitzva and it doesn’t exhaust his wealth because he is only obligated to spend at most a fifth of his wealth. In contrast the mitzva of honoring parents is obligatory even when there is great torment and great embarrassment. We know that even if the father insults him verbally in public it is prohibited to respond. In the present case where the sun claims that if his father lives with him it will cause him great torment and he will be required to deal with him constantly and because of that it will totally destroy his relationship with his wife and family. He will end up totally occupied with his father’s needs. The son says that this will be extremely great torment that will require unlimited care for his father. In addition it will entail expenses that are much greater than a fifth of his wealth. Answer: In my opinion the son’s words are totally wrong because we are not talking about doing a mitzva on a single occasion but rather that his father will be dwelling with him and as a result he will have hundreds of opportunities to do the mitzva. The Ran at the end of Yoma has stated that even concerning two serious prohibition which involve stoning and here we have the mitzva of honoring parents which will occur many times  - it is impossible to push off the obligation and merit of such a mitzva. Therefore it is necessary to explain to his wife about the great merit that he will get from this as well as the great reward she will receive for assisting her father-in-law. In addition that he can not get out of doing this mitzva with the excuse that it will cost more than a fifth of his wealth. However if he is forced to send his father to a nursing home in order to get proper treatment it would seem that he has the obligation to pay if the father can’t afford it and he not deduct the expenses from his charity funds. The reason for this I once heard in the name of the Brisker Rav that this that we rule that the father is obligated to pay his expenses that is only for things which are he is not personally obligated to do. But if the son is personally obligated and he is paying in order to avoid personally taking of his father – then he must pay. That is because he isn’t paying for his father but rather to avoid having to do that which he is obligated to do. Thus we see that he is actually according to the law to pay since it isn’t for his father but simply to avoid personal involvement. Consequently in the present case where is is obligated according to the law to take his father into his house but he wants to avoid this obligation by sending his father to a nursing home – then he must pay out of his pocket in order to avoid doing the mitzva personally. However if the father has the money then according to the law then the son doesn’t have the personal obligation to take care of his father. That is because the father has the option of being in a nursing home at his own expense. Thus it seems that the father would then be obligated to pay. Nevertheless even if the father has the money but he is a miser and he is prepared to pay and he truly needs the services of the nursing home, it seems that the son should pay for his father and afterwards deduct it the inheritance that goes to the father’s heirs. It is correct to issue a notice first before 2 witnesses that he is not paying for the nursing home as a gift to his father but rather the father owes him the money and he will deduct it later.  Nonetheless it is prohibited to leave his father in a neglected condition. (There is a well known story regarding someone who asked Rav Chaim Brisker whether he was obligated to pay transportation costs to visit his father in Warsaw since the halacha is that honoring of parents is the father’s expense. Rav Chaim replied, that he was obligated to go to Warsaw by foot but if he didn’t want to walk he could pay for the fare to get there. Nevertheless it needs to be investigated whether he actually needs to walk to another city in order to fulfill the mitzva of honoring parents. See Moadim v’Zmaninm (1:4). I heard that Rav Chaim Brisker discussed with the Chazon Ish when they met in Minsk during the War whether the halacha requires going to another city in order to acquire a kosher esrog. See Moadim v’Zemanin (1:3) Nevertheless with the mitzva of honoring parents is a more stringent mitzva because it is associated with honoring G‑d. This requires further study.

IDF Law Enforcement or Crime Enforcement?

BS"D
¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥ ¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥
URGENT IDF DRAFT ARREST ALERT: 
¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥ ¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥

24-Year-Old Religious Woman Arrested - In Wake of a Secretarial Error 8 Years Ago

By Binyomin Feinberg

5 Nissan, 5781 °° March 18, '21  Parshas VaYikra

Breaking News from Ben Gurion Airport, Israel: At about 12AM Israeli time tonight, Wednesday night, a 24-year-old Breslover woman, Efrat, from a Chareidi family of Beitar, was arrested at Ben Gurion Airport by Civil Police. A clearly Chareidi Seminary graduate, she was arrested in the wake of what many would deem a trivial error by a high-school secretary about eight years ago.

According to an Israeli activist who spoke with her during her arrest process tonight, this young woman claims that, as most religious girls do, she obtained her religiosity certification ("Tatzhir Dat") from a Rabbinical court at age 16. Standard procedure had been that many schools would send the documentation in to the Israeli Army Draft Office, to secure religious exemptions for their students. (At that time, serious complications for religious girls were almost unheard of.)

At that time, someone in the office  apparently erred in delivering her "Tatzhir Dat" to the Army. About a month ago, in response to being alerted by the Draft Office about her unresolved draft status, Efrat spoke to the Jerusalem Draft Office personnel (on Rashi St.). Efrat reported that the response she received from the Draft Office (D.O.) was that "that this type of mix-up happens." They understood she's Chareidi, and legally entitled to a military service exemption. The D.O. thus directed her to simply redo her Tatzhir Dat.

However, in the wake of Corona-related complications, that didn't occur yet. Now, she had understood from the D.O. that resending her certification was nothing more than a technicality, and certainly not a major issue, even for the draft officers themselves. Therefore, she didn't abstain from travel. 

She was arrested tonight on her way to Uman, Ukraine. She, like many Breslover chassidim, travel to Uman, conditions permitting, to pray at the burial site of the world-revered Rav Nachman of Breslov OB"M. 

She is expected to have a military court hearing within a matter of hours. We hope a vibrant protest will grace the occasion.

The same government-collaborative Chareidi MKs who have been pandering for Breslover votes lately should never have allowed the draft crisis to get to this point. Let's see if they'll do anything useful for this young woman.

¥¥¥ Perspective: ¥¥¥

Tonight, Efrat embarked to the airport intending to serve HaShem by visiting Uman. Clearly, HaShem has other plans for her. For every hour she languishes in incarceration, her spiritual contribution to the Jewish People will likely surpass by far whatever she could have accomplished in Uman. For one, this arrest could draw attention to a number of burning issues pertaining to the ongoing escalation of military draft harassment of religious girls, which most of the media have been ignoring. These include various issues already covered by Israeli media (often censored by faux-news venues) such as:

1. The Israeli Army's declared goal of reaching 40% Army enlistment by Mizrachi-type (zionist-oriented) high-school girls;

2. the abuse of the "Rayon Dat" (religiosity interrogations) - to force or otherwise manipulate religious girls into enlisting in the Army;

3. the dramatically caustic effect of Army life on the religiosity of girls, recently reported by an Israeli government Statistics agency,  considered authoritative by the government itself; [This refutes the Army and Supreme Court contention that military service doesn't contradict a religious lifestyle for girls.]

4. the jump in reports of sexual abuse within the Army last year (Israel HaYom, Feb. 12, 21); [That jump - of over double the previous year - dispels the argument that these are just false accusations, because it's extremely unlikely that that massive jump could be attributed soley to a steep jump in false accusations.]

5. rampant immorality within the Army, and official IDF facilitation thereof, via free Army birth-control and abortion "services" geared toward perpetuating said prohibitions (issurei korais);

6. aggressive Israeli Army attempts to convince girls to forego their exemptions AFTER obtaining them;

7. "Aluma" and it's deceptive crusade to enlist religious girls in the military, under the veneer of operating as an organization ostensibly independent of the Israeli Army;

8. a multitude of individual cases of harassment, abuse and persecution of Jewish girls - perpetrated by the Israeli Army, Draft Office, military and civilian Police, Military Prisons, & Courts, many of which have been reported in The Jewish Press or in other pro-Israel venues;

9. IDF faking of statistics of female religious enlistment (as well as Chareidi male enlistment).

°°°
Regarding this particular incident, unless we're missing some major part of the story, there was apparently nothing here mandating an arrest. This situation didn't call for arresting a young woman at the airport, even according to the Israeli police standards. To arrest an unquestionably Chareidi woman - over what's essentially a technical error of a school secretary about eight years ago [clearly not her fault] - is aberrational. It may even be seen by some (accurately or not) as an opportunity to vent ascendant antireligious sentiment, festering around the election campaign. By others, this may be taken as a specific jab meant to target Breslover chassidim, who've lately complained vocally about unfair treatment from the government.

Whatever the case may be, the very occurrence of this type of  arrest reveals a systemic flaw that allows for many such over-the-top arrests of innocent girls and women - precisely where it's least needed and least appropriate.  What's far more important to highlight here is that this type of overdone law-enforcement is generally followed by robust crime-enforcement -- by Israeli military prison authorities.*

[* replete with abuses competitive with the human-rights paradigms of some of the other countries who similarly force girls to serve in the military (such as in vicinity of the Korean Peninsula).]

Those familiar with this column may recall multiple girls and young women who were subjected to all manner of physical, emotional, psychological, and physical abuse in Military Prison Four and Six, as well as at Tel HaShomer.

This incident also highlights another ongoing, national travesty. The Israeli Army refuses to safeguard the basic rights of Israeli citizens by requiring that the  Draft Office inform each and every girl if and when their military service exemptions are processed. If the Israeli government would employ even minimal concern for individual rights, this policy would be put into practice. It's not. Consequently, many Israeli women find themselves facing arrest and military prison in the wake of their religiosity certification documentation "not being received" by the Army Draft Office (or due to claims of such).

In this case, the primary injustice is not unjust or lopsided application or enforcement of the law; it's the inherent corruption of everyday Army policy that leads to many such incidents. This, and many, many other aberrational excesses, are manifestations of the secularist, statist orientation of Israeli Military. In the secularist- dominated State, individuals have few rights against overreach by the behemoths of the State.  This sense of entitlement extends to non-citizens as well; case in point: N.D., a volunteer from France, brutally betrayed by the Israeli Army, who is now persecuting her by keeping her captive in Israel, while illegally threatening her with arrest, see "IDF: Israeli Document Forgers?" (http://daattorah.blogspot.com/2021/03/idf-israeli-document-forgers.html).

Efrat's exact whereabouts at the moment aren't known. She could potentially be incarcerated in the new Military Prison Ten. Prison Ten is the state-of-the-art, 300-bed incarceration facility in the Netanya area, not far from Tel Aviv. This massive, very expensive prison was completed just recently.*

[* Apparently that "investment" was prioritized, despite the competing requirements to meet unprecedented threats the Israeli government is now facing from Corona, Iran, the North, cyber attacks, qualitatively escalating military technology - especially precision missile capacities - in enemy hands, and hundreds of thousands of rockets being pointed at Israel.]

One concern over this "Mega-Prison" is that it enables the antireligious elements of the Israeli government to up the ante of religious persecution against religious refusenik girls and supportive protestors. Will some agenda-driven elements of the Justice system feel more leeway to employ yet more cruelty in sentencing such types of "enemies of the People," now that logistics are barely an impediment?  In the recent past, there have generally been several dozen girls languishing in Israeli military prison at any given time. A substantial portion of those are incarcerated due to objections to serving in the Army. Do the powers-that-be have their sights set on elevating those terrible numbers?
###

Background:

The Israeli Army forces its female citizens to serve in the military. It's been doing so in flagrant violation of Torah law, for about 70 years. All leading Rabbis from across the spectrum prohibit girls and women from enlistment in the military. Leading Rabbis have even deemed refusal to enlist as Yaihoraig v'Al Ya'avor, a prohibition we're obligated to sacrifice our lives to avoid.

The Israeli Army is also known for abusive treatment of women and girls, for decades. Moreover, the Torah objects to more than just non-consensual misconduct. Sinful conduct between consenting adults is similarly liable for korais, or worse. 


According to the Torah, we ought to be advocating against the Israeli military draft for ALL women. Now it's more vital than ever to push to exempt all girls and women from being forced into military service, and making that case on Torah grounds - as well as military readiness reasons. Torah authorities that should be cited include the Brisker Rov ZT"L who opposed non-religious girls serving in the Army even more vociferously than religious girls doing so, as Rav Aharon Soloveichik ZT"L quotes him.

If we would actually follow through on this one approach, we'd diffuse much antireligious animus, while gaining important allies in undermining support for the female military draft. (Obviously, we'd automatically dispense with the entire Rayon Dat problem in one fell swoop, without succumbing to the desire to fix the unfixable.)

If someone argues that we ought not tinker with the status of nonreligious girls out of fear that the Army Establishment will pursue "our girls," they should be informed that the Establishment has been pursuing "our girls" well before we made a public issue of helping save nonreligious girls from military service. Their problem may lie in the Cantonist Syndrome, treating anyone not part of their clique as expendable, "collateral damage," if you will.
****
Some background on the escalating role of women in combat roles in the IDF:

"The IDF is one of the only armies in the {Western -BF} world in which women are drafted to military service by law. Women have served in the Israeli army ever since its establishment in 1948. At first they served mainly in administrative jobs or as instructors in a variety of fields, but they gradually moved into operational positions due to both a shortage in combat soldiers and demands of Israeli feminist groups. According to Ha'aretz, the number of female combatants has more than doubled in recent years. In 2012, 3 percent of women in the IDF served in combat positions. Four years later, in 2016, the percentage more than doubled to 7 percent—and it will likely continue to rise." (https://www.lawfareblog.com/female-service-idf-challenge-integrated-army)

Its important to identify the vital role played by radical leftists in America in compounding the Israeli female draft syndrome, by adding western "Equality" to the pre-existing female military draft milieu. The escalation of women enlisting in fighting units in Israel corresponds to the ascension of Equality lunacy in America under Obama. The Obama era saw the advance of the most extreme moral subversives, who did grave moral and material damage to the American Armed Forces, as they did to American society at large. This is not to absolve the amoral and immoral leftists of Likud - at all - over the worst escalation of drafting girls Israelis have ever seen, which they've perpetrated in recent years. However, they had a lot of help from leftists overseas.*

(* Of course, Divine Justice is "inclusive" enough to provide amply for all involved parties, who would each qualify for iniquity-specific manifestations of Divine intervention - in accordance with the timeless principle of "Measure for Measure.")

***********
feinbergbinyomin@gmail.com

"... the more lonely his stand, the greater the number of his adversaries, the more powerful is his word, the mightier his deed."

--  Rav Shamshon Raphael Hirsch OB"M (1808-1888), (writing on Pinchos, and those who follow his lead, in "Judaism Eternal," vol. 2, p. 293)

###