White nationalist leaders are praising Donald Trump's decision to name former Breitbart executive Steve Bannon as his chief strategist, telling CNN in interviews they view Bannon as an advocate in the White House for policies they favor.
The leaders of the white nationalist and so-called "alt-right" movement — all of whom vehemently oppose multiculturalism and share the belief in the supremacy of the white race and Western civilization — publicly backed Trump during his campaign for his hardline positions on Mexican immigration, Muslims, and refugee resettlement. Trump has at times disavowed their support. Bannon's hiring, they say, is a signal that Trump will follow through on some of his more controversial policy positions.
"I think that's excellent," former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke told CNN's KFile. "I think that anyone that helps complete the program and the policies that President-elect Trump has developed during the campaign is a very good thing, obviously. So it's good to see that he's sticking to the issues and the ideas that he proposed as a candidate. Now he's president-elect and he's sticking to it and he's reaffirming those issues."
Duke, who last week lost his longshot bid for the US Senate seat from Louisiana, said he plans on expanding his radio show and is hoping to launch a 24 hour online news show with a similar approach to Comedy Central's Daily Show. He argued Bannon's position was among the most important in the White House.
"You have an individual, Mr. Bannon, who's basically creating the ideological aspects of where we're going," added Duke. "And ideology ultimately is the most important aspect of any government."
Bannon, who was a Navy officer and Goldman Sachs investment banker years before taking over Breitbart, has called the site "the platform for the alt-right." Under Bannon, Breitbart has taken an increasingly hardline tone on issues such as terrorism and immigration, running a headline after the Paris attacks of November 2015 saying, "Paris Streets Turned Into Warzone By Violent Migrants." It also ran a headline in May 2016 calling anti-Trump, neoconservative commentator Bill Kristol a "Renegade Jew."[...]
Peter Brimelow, who runs the white nationalist site VDARE, praised Bannon's hiring, saying it gives Trump a connection to the alt-right movement online.
"I think it's amazing," Brimelow said of Trump's decision to tap Bannon. "Can you imagine Mitt Romney doing this? It's almost like Trump cares about ideas! Especially amazing because I would bet Trump doesn't read online. Few plutocrats do, they have efficient secretaries."
Brimelow added his site would continue to focus solely on their hardline position on immigration, saying he expects American whites to vote their interests similar to other minority groups.
"To the extent that the 'alt-right' articulates that interest, it will continue to grow," Brimelow said.
Brad Griffin, a blogger who runs the white nationalist website Occidental Dissent using the pseudonym "Hunter Wallace," said he thought Bannon's hiring showed Trump would be held to his campaign promises.
"It makes sense to me," he said. "Reince [Priebus] can certainly get more done on Capitol Hill. He will be an instrument of Trump's will, not the other way around. Bannon is better suited as chief strategist and looking at the big picture. I think he will hold Trump to the promises he has already made during the campaign. We endorse many of those promises like building the wall, deportations, ending refugee resettlement, preserving the Second Amendment, etc. There's a lot of stuff in there on which almost everyone on the right agrees."
Griffin added, "We're most excited though about the foreign policy implications of Bannon in the White House. We want to see our counterparts in Europe — starting in Austria and France — win their upcoming elections. We're hearing reports that Breitbart is expanding its operations in continental Europe and that is where our focus will be in 2017."
Jared Taylor, who runs the site American Renaissance, echoed those comments, saying Bannon would help hold Trump to his campaign rhetoric.[...]
This is an update from the ADL on President-elect Trump's appointee Steve Bannon
ReplyDeletehttp://www.adl.org/sp/stephen-bannon-backgrounder/bannon-backgrounder.html?referrer=https://www.google.co.il/#.WDCDvrJ950w
Just quoting the ADL: "While there is a long fact pattern of evidence that Breitbart served as a platform for a wide range of bigotry and there is some controversy related to statements from Mr. Bannon’s divorce proceedings in 2007, we are not aware of any anti-Semitic statements made by Bannon himself. In fact, Jewish employees of Breitbart have challenged the characterization of him and defended him from charges of anti-Semitism. Some have pointed out that Breitbart Jerusalem was launched during his tenure.
ReplyDeleteNevertheless, Bannon essentially has established himself as the chief curator for the alt right. Under his stewardship, Breitbart has emerged as the leading source for the extreme views of a vocal minority who peddle bigotry and promote hate."
More important, it seems to me, is General Mike Flynn, who is a strong supporter of Israel, and this will be different from Obama and previous administrations, where Israel was criticized for self defense.
ReplyDeleteA smear like so many others we've seen from the media this primary season:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wsj.com/articles/steve-bannon-on-politics-as-war-1479513161
https://pjmedia.com/spengler/2016/11/15/why-the-bie-lie-about-steve-bannon/
https://pjmedia.com/spengler/2016/11/15/why-the-bie-lie-about-steve-bannon/
They can't come to terms with the fact that they got beat like a red-headed stepchild.
Anti-Semitism in the Democratic party:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Column-One-The-Ellison-Challenge-472945
Somehow the media manage not to notice this.
The racism of the modern left:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/everyone-needs-to-stop-talking-about-white-people-trump/19008#.WDEDRX1yz4f
Here's what the ZOA head has to say about ADL's "character assassination" of Bannon:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/zoa-head-wants-adls-greenblatt-to-apologize-to-bannon/2016/11/15/
And here's the position the ADL head took on Trump's view of the Muslim threat:
http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/u-s-election-2016/1.753884
For the latter alone, I reject anything this guy says.
There are different methods of self-defense. Depending on time and place, some are more effective than others. Neither President Obama nor General Flynn nor you nor I are prophets. How do you know General Flynn's opinion is better for Israel than President Obama's?
ReplyDeleteWhat has General Flynn done for Israel?
ReplyDeleteIf the concerns raised about Steve Bannon's "white" nationalist propagandizing are justified, does the antisemitism of the modern "left" justify his appointment by the President-elect?
ReplyDeleteIt is not only the ADL that is "defaming" Steve Bannon.
ReplyDeleteThe republican John Weaver tweeted "The racist, fascist extreme right is represented footsteps from the Oval Office. Be very vigilant America." https://twitter.com/JWGOP/status/797918770136117248
His former employees are also "defaming" him:
Here’s my update on the Jewish Left fight against Bannon in today’s Jpost:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Conservative-Jewish-movement-compelled-not-to-remain-silent-on-Bannon-473056
Issuing a rare joint statement, the Rabbinical Assembly, United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, the Jewish Theological Seminary, the Cantors Assembly, Women’s League for Conservative Judaism and the Federation of Jewish Men’s Clubs said faith compels them “not to remain silent in the face of hate or the vilification of any group.”
Oh, what’s the Left’s source that Bannon is a scoundrel? It’s his ex-wife unsubstantiated smear in Bannon’s 2007 divorce proceedings. See in today’s Jpost
http://www.jpost.com/Us-Elections/Donald-Trump/Israeli-minister-throws-support-behind-controversial-Trump-adviser-Bannon-473109
In addition, during divorce proceedings, his ex-wife said Bannon did not want his daughters to attend a school that had many Jewish students. He denied this…. “My belief is that whatever else Steve Bannon is, he’s certainly a friend of Israel [who is being] falsely targeted as an antisemite with zero evidence, with the sole exception of something his wife said in divorce proceedings,” said Boteach.
We know that what angry wives say in divorce proceedings means almost nothing. Right---Jachter, Ralbag, Mende Epstein, Kameniysky-Greenblatt etc?
I'm showing where the real anti-Semitism is, among the progressive left, not the fake anti-Semitism that is just a continuaiton of the anti-Trump smear that we saw throughout the election. Read the sources I posted below. There is not the slightest evidence that Bannon is not an anti-Semite, and much evidence to the contrary. The left and their media mouthpieces no longer wish to discuss issues. They turn immediately and always to the personal attack. And it's always the same, tired attack. No longer even slightly credible.
ReplyDeleteYes, you found a never-trumper who drank the kool-aid. There are a number of those. Big deal. Anyone who reads Breitbart knows how incredibly pro-Israel the site is. This is just a continuation of the "racism" smear the press spread during the election. It was a lie then, and it's a lie now. You want to see real anti-Semitism in US politics? Look toward those whose name you proudly and foolishly wear: the progressives, BDSers, the anti-Israel BLMers, the Jew-hating Nation of Islam member who is being pushed as new head of the DNC. Real danger for Jews? Look toward the Democrats who seem to hold it's a great mitzvah to import millions of Muslim migrants from the most anti-Semitic strains of Islam. Like most Jewish lefties, you avert your eyes, stick your head deep in the sand.
ReplyDeleteNo doubt you will respond with more propaganda, but unless you have something more substantive than empty character smears, I will not be responding to you further on this issue.
Peggy Noonan:
ReplyDeleteMuch of the mainstream, legacy media continues its self-disgrace. Having failed to kill Donald Trump’s
candidacy they will now aim at his transition. Soon they will try to
kill his presidency.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/what-to-tell-your-children-about-trump-1479427835
That's what we're seeing here.
the only question is whether it deserves to be
ReplyDeletebut Trump does exactly the same thing. Or are you saying that since he has a vision of the "deep" truth that only he can do such things?
ReplyDeleteNot a question at all. What it deserves is to be given a chance. Let him assume office and see how he does. If there is a problem, speak up then. This is partisan politics being practiced by Democrat operatives posing as journalists, and there is no question that it is a) wrong, and b) a bad idea, one that has gotten us to where we are now. If you are alarmed about a President Trump, be aware that the media, with their dishonesty and bias, played a mighty role in electing him.
ReplyDeleteI haven't seen Trump accuse anyone of being anti-Semitic, which is what I am talking about.
ReplyDeleteIf you mean, he makes things personal, sure he does. It's a reaction to the wild lefty attacks on every Republican candidate ever. Bush was Hitler. Romney was Hitler. But they were genteel. What Trump realized was that you need to play the same game or lose. So he did. He played it better than them.
But that's not really relevant to this discussion, which is about racism and anti-Semitism. Which is being used as a smear by the press, and has been used this way for so long that people ignore it.
Anti-semitism among academics. In case you don't know, academia = the left:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2016/11/21/middle-east-scholars-group-moves-delete-nonpolitical-bylaws
B"H I am in academia and I live in Israel, and everyone around me is pro-Israel. But addressing your point. It is more easy to call out the hypocrisy of a "progressive" anti-Semite or racist than to do so to a "white" nationalist. What is a badge of shame to a "progressive" is a badge of honor to the latter. Rational arguments might work with a "progressive" but are less effective with dogmatic bigots.
ReplyDeleteHere in the States, academia are almost all leftists. I suspect the same is true in Israel too, maybe to a slightly lesser extent. Leftists here are not pro-Israel. I'm not convinced the ones in Israel are either, although they might think they are.
ReplyDeleteYour dog-whistling regarding how rational argument won't work with "nationalists' and "dogmatic bigots" is familiar. It's the old "conservatives are stupid morons" meme, slightly repackaged. Not worth responding to it.
I never implied "conservatives are stupid morons". My Rabbi is "conservative" (chareidi) and he is rational. His "conservatism" and "rationalism" are based on the values/teachings of the Torah. Therefore, I can have a rational discussion with him, when I disagree with him, and vice-versa. I only have a problem with "conservatism" that has no basis in Torah and reality, like that of "racial" nationalists. There is simply no basis to have a rational conversation.
ReplyDeleteThe question is not whether or not Bannon is anti-Semitic. The question is why Bannon (and Trump) seem so reluctant to offend the white nationalists. Think about it. Trump has tweeted ferociously against his opponents. Find me one "ferocious" tweet against white nationalists, at least as fierce as his critics against mexican immigrants, the hamilton cast, hillary clinton, etc.
ReplyDeleteWouldn't you have expected a speedy and fierce twitter attack against them, after their recent washinton, dc event?
Regarding muslim immigration. Christianity, Islam and atheism are all the same to me -they are all anti-Torah. If today, there are christians who can go against the anti-semitic teachings of Christianity (a miracle in my eyes), then why not also muslim immigrants as they integrate into western societies.
Regarding BDSers. Well they are aproblem but IMNSHO less so than white nationalists who are very likely to also be BDSers.
As Ronald Reagan said, they support me; I don't support them. And he did disavow them, a number of times. This whole thing is a non-story, invented by the liberal media. If you were really worried about anti-semitism, you would be worried about Keith Ellinson, the new head of the DNC who is an actual anti-semite.
ReplyDeleteKeith Ellinson is not the peotus. Trump is.
ReplyDeleteAnd lets be honest! His disavowal of white nationalists are timid and only forthcoming when pressed by the "left-wing" media, in contrast to his unprovoked verbal and twitter assault on others. For example his rants against muslim immigrants and a Mexican judge that oversaw a fraud case against trump university.
All he needs to do is to send out a tweet condemning his white nationalist supporters and explaining that their ideology has no place in his movement! That is something we all know he can do but he hasn't! Why?!
Ellinson is not the new head of the DNC. I know post-truth was the Oxford word of the year, but please at least try for some accuracy.
ReplyDeleteFor your reading pleasure.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/anti-defamation-league-keith-ellison-concerns-dnc-232071
They must have read my post, because it took them two weeks to come around.
ReplyDeleteDidn't you see (or listen to) the Sixty Minutes interview?
ReplyDeleteAnd let's be honest. No rational person who knows anything about Trump thinks that he supports anti-semites.
Sorry--candidate for DNC chair.
ReplyDelete