With the apparently successful boycott against Artscroll to have the father and uncle removed from their jobs because they supported R Avraham Meir Weiss - the question is what was the halachic justification?
We also turn to Artscroll (where his father and uncle who support him work) to protest against his family and to remove them from their positions, for it is not fitting that Torah should be transmitted through them.
There are a number of major problems with this statement. Their sin was to support the husband. The Kol Koreh claims that the husband is in nidoi and apparently they hold that those who support a person in niddoi should themselves be placed in niddoi. However the sources that are cited in the Kol Koreh to ostracize the husband (Y.D. 334) are 1) Refusing a summons of a beis din (CM 11). However that only applies if he refuses to go to beis din at all not even one of his own choosing (C.M. 14). That wasn't true here and he had a beis din nullify the seruv. 2) They claim he went to a secular court without permission (C.M. 26) - but he did get permission from a posek to do so.
Therefore if there is no justification to place the husband in niddoi - then obviously those who support him can not be placed in niddoi. Furthermore Rav Dovid Feinstein said even for those who believe that there had been justification for a seruv - it no longer applied in this case. That is because the husband had been working together with the Dodelson's to negotiate a binding agreement to give a Get.Therefore Rav Dovid Feinstein paskened that he was not guilty of being in contempt of bein din [Rabbi Greenwald's letter doesn't contract this and Rav Dovid Feinstein was fully aware of the nature of Rabbi Greenwald's efforts].
Therefore the campaign to fire the Weiss brothers seems to be a serious miscarriage of justice. I would appreciate enlightenment by those who think they have a justification for depriving the family of parnossa.