NY Times Some of the voices inside Caroline White’s head have been a lifelong comfort, as protective as a favorite aunt. It was the others — “you’re nothing, they’re out to get you, to kill you” — that led her down a rabbit hole of failed treatments and over a decade of hospitalizations, therapy and medications, all aimed at silencing those internal threats.
At a support group here for so-called voice-hearers, however, she tried something radically different. She allowed other members of the group to address the voice, directly:
What is it you want?
“After I thought about it, I realized that the voice valued my safety, wanted me to be respected and better supported by others,” said Ms. White, 34, who, since that session in late 2014, has become a leader in a growing alliance of such groups, called the Hearing Voices Network, or HVN.
At a time when Congress is debating measures to extend the reach of mainstream psychiatry — particularly to the severely psychotic, who often end up in prison or homeless — an alternative kind of mental health care is taking root that is very much anti-mainstream. It is largely nonmedical, focused on holistic recovery rather than symptom treatment, and increasingly accessible through an assortment of in-home services, residential centers and groups like the voices network Ms. White turned to, in which members help one another understand each voice, as a metaphor, rather than try to extinguish it.
For the first time in this country, experts say, psychiatry’s critics are mounting a sustained, broadly based effort to provide people with practical options, rather than solely alleging abuses like overmedication and involuntary restraint.
“The reason these programs are proliferating now is society’s shameful neglect of the severely ill, which creates a vacuum of great need,” said Dr. Allen Frances, a professor emeritus of psychiatry at Duke University.
Dr. Chris Gordon, who directs a program with an approach to treating psychosis called Open Dialogue at Advocates in Worcester, Mass., calls the alternative approaches a “collaborative pathway to recovery and a paradigm shift in care.” The Open Dialogue approach involves a team of mental health specialists who visit homes and discuss the crisis with the affected person — without resorting to diagnostic labels or medication, at least in the beginning.
Some psychiatrists are wary, they say, given that medication can be life-changing for many people with mental problems, and rigorous research on these alternatives is scarce.[....]
I was told by one psychiatrist at age 13 or 14 that if I didn’t take the meds, my brain would become more and more damaged,” said Ms. White, who began hearing voices in grade school. “Of course I believed it. And I became hopeless, because the drugs just made me feel worse.”
On a recent Tuesday, Ms. White and seven others who hear voices gathered at the Holyoke Center of the Western Massachusetts Recovery Learning Community, which hosts weekly 90-minute hearing voices groups, to talk about what happens in those sessions. The group meetings themselves, guided by a person who hears voices, sometimes accompanied by a therapist, are open to family members but closed to the news media.
The culture is explicitly nonpsychiatric: No one uses the word “patient” or refers to the sessions as “treatment.” [...]
Most of the people in the room had extensive experience being treated in the mainstream system. “I was told I was a ticking time bomb, that I’d never finish college, never have a job, never have kids, and always be on psychiatric medication,” said Sarah, a student at Mount Holyoke who for years has heard a voice — a child, crying — and in college started having suicidal thoughts. She was given diagnoses of borderline personality disorder and put on medications that had severe side effects. She asked that her last name not be used, to preserve her privacy.
In the group, other members prompted her to listen to the child’s cries, to ask whose they were, and why the crying? Those questions led, over a period of weeks, to a recollection of a frightening experience in her childhood, and an effort to soothe the child. This altered her relationship with the voice, she said, and sometimes the child now laughs, whispers, even sings.
“That is the way it works here,” said Sarah, who is set to graduate from college with honors. “In the group, everyone’s experience is real, and they make suggestions based on what has worked for them.”
Like many of the other alternative models of care, Hearing Voices Network is not explicitly anti-medication. Many people who regularly attend have prescriptions, but many have reduced dosages.[...]
I've been advocating for similar approaches to treat people who complain about voices they hear. My research was triggered by a psychology professor I had in college, Dr. Coursey.
ReplyDeleteCoursey and his colleagues had cured a man of hearing a voice -- or so they thought. Every time the patient they were working with reported he heard a voice, Coursey would yell, "Stop!" And eventually the patient began yelling "Stop!" Then they moved to speaking, not yelling. Finally the patient just thought, "Stop!" And the patient did stop hearing the voice.
After a month, the patient reported he heard the voice again. Coursey and his colleagues asked the patient what was going on. The patient replied, "The voice told me to stop saying 'Stop'".
I have tried to find out from people who hear voices the exact nature of the voices. In my admittedly limited experience, inevitably these afflicted people tune me out. My conclusion is that they are hearing themselves speak in some cases, since some mumble to themselves. But in another case, it was reported to me by someone that he heard a distinct voice speaking in his ear on one side. (Again, he didn't tell me this directly, but rather shouted out in annoyance to no one in particular that he had just heard a voice.) This indicated to me that the voice being heard was of the quality of a human voice, or that at a minimum the person was imagining or hallucinating that the voice was as loud and distinct as a human voice in the room with him.
This led to my theory that some of the people who report the voices are in a kind of dream state while being awake.
I tentatively concluded that the voices are then part of the thought stream and under some level of control of the people experiencing them.
It is interesting to learn that others have concluded similarly and are providing therapy that involves engaging the voices.
I should add that I have always been able to hear myself thinking. I have a high level of control over this, and can imagine, if I like, the thoughts of characters I make up, or the thoughts of what I think other people I know might say in a given situation. I can recall things others have said, and hear their voices. But the quality of these voices is clearly not the same as an actual voice.
They say Beethoven composed some of his greatest music without hearing. I assume that many other people are able to "see", "hear", "feel", "smell" and "taste" in their minds. Some people, however, may lose control for some reason over the flow of their thoughts. At that point they may perceive their thoughts as originating "outside" of themselves. If this persists long enough, a sensitivity to this annoying phenomenon may entail that makes the thought "real".
May Hashem have Mercy on those who suffer from this phenomenon.
I hope that none of the doctors involved will commit suicide, or die under suspicious circumstances. http://www.healthnutnews.com/recap-on-my-unintended-series-the-holistic-doctor-deaths/
ReplyDeletehttp://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2016/08/09/clinton-body-count-or-leftwing-conspiracy-three-with-ties-to-dnc-mysteriously-die-n2203000