The Supreme Court said Thursday that a defendant’s rights were not
violated when he was precluded from cross-examining the 3-year-old boy
he was accused of beating.
The court ruled unanimously that a lower court was right to
allow a teacher to testify at Darius Clark’s trial about what the child
had told her and that it did not violate Clark’s constitutional right
to confront his accuser, because he could not cross-examine the child.
A sad day for justice
ReplyDelete