The Attorney General seems to think ‘hate speech’ is illegal. Charlie Kirk knew better.
Is a basic understanding of the First Amendment too much to expect from the nation’s Attorney General? Progressives have spent years trying to create and define a category called “hate speech.” This misunderstanding of the First Amendment seems to have infiltrated the D.C. water supply because AG Pam Bondi repeated it Monday in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Discussing Kirk’s work on college campuses, Ms. Bondi mentioned the “disgusting” antisemitism on display at many universities, and so far so good. But wait. “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place—especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society,” the country’s top law enforcer told a podcast. “We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”
Oh the poor left. They invented all these weapons, never thinking they'd lose the elections and those weapons would be turned on them.
ReplyDeleteRemember Tim Walz complaining about the First Ammendent and wanting to do away with it? Remember all the nutbar activists screaming about hate speech and cancelling anyone they didn't like?
Goose, meet gander.
Charlie Kirk and other conservatives think your position is nonsense!
Delete