In a campaign built on who would best fight President Donald Trump, Bennet’s early advantage evaporated as Weiser argued the lawsuits he filed against the administration made him a better antagonist than an 18-year creature of Congress.
Friday, July 3, 2026
Thursday, July 2, 2026
17th of Tammuz
Beginning three weeks of mourning for the destruction of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem.
The 17th of Tammuz is a fast day commemorating the fall of Jerusalem, prior to the destruction of the Holy Temple. This also marks the beginning of a 3-week national period of mourning, leading up to Tisha B'Av.
The 17th of Tammuz is the first of four fast days mentioned in the prophets. The purpose of a fast day is to awaken our sense of loss over the destroyed Temple – and the subsequent Jewish journey into exile.
Agonizing over these events is meant to help us conquer those spiritual deficiencies which brought about these tragic events. Through the process of "Teshuva" – self-introspection and a commitment to improve – we have the power to transform tragedy into joy. In fact, the Talmud says that after the future redemption of Israel and the rebuilding of the Temple, these fast days will be re-dedicated as days of rejoicing and festivity. For as the prophet Zechariah says: the 17th of Tammuz will become a day of "joy to the House of Judah, and gladness and cheerful feasts."
Fast of the 17th of Tammuz: Historical Background & Customs
https://www.ou.org/holidays/the_17th_of_tammuz1/
The 17th day in the Jewish month of Tammuz, Jews the world over fast and lament to commemorate the many calamities that have befallen our people on this ominous day.
The purpose of such fasts in the Jewish calendar is, according to Rabbi Eliyahu Kitov’s Book of Our Heritage, “to awaken hearts towards repentance through recalling our forefathers’ misdeeds; misdeeds which led to calamities…”
Other interesting occurrences on this day include Noach sending out the first dove to see if the Flood waters had receded, (Bereishit 8:8) in 1650 (2100 BCE); Moshe Rabbeinu destroying the golden calf, (Shemot 32:20, Seder Olam 6, Taanit 30b – Rashi) and then ascending back up Har Sinai for the second time where he spent the next forty days pleading for forgiveness for the sin of the golden calf, (Shemot 33:11, Rashi).
17th of Tammuz: History, Laws and Customs
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/479885/jewish/The-17th-of-Tammuz.htm
The walls of Jerusalem were breached by the Romans, in 69 CE, after a lengthy siege. (Three weeks later, after the Jews put up a valiant struggle, the Romans destroyed the second Holy Temple on the 9th of Av.)
The Jerusalem Talmud maintains that this is also the date when the Babylonians breached the walls of Jerusalem on their way to destroying the first Temple.
The sages explain: “Every generation for which the Temple is not rebuilt, it is as though the Temple was destroyed for that generation.” A fast day is not only a sad day, but an opportune day. It’s a day when we are empowered to fix the cause of that destruction, so that our long exile will be ended and we will find ourselves living in messianic times; may that be very soon.
Trump’s wealth grew on a scale without modern presidential precedent
No past president has seen financial gains in office like those reported by President Donald Trump this week — not even Trump.
But Trump’s stock holdings are just a small piece of his record gains as president in his second term, according to the financial disclosures. Trump’s reported income increased by more than $1.6 billion last year, with most of that coming from his vast holdings in cryptocurrency and related ventures, even as his administration relaxed rules on crypto markets.
“Since he retook office, he’s making over a billion dollars a year off of crypto, while at the same time his administration is writing the rules of the road for how crypto will be regulated,” said Lee Reiners, a Duke University lecturer who warned earlier this year about Trump’s potential financial rewards from his cryptocurrency policies.
“Not only is this an unprecedented level of self-dealing and self-enrichment, the scale is really hard to wrap your head around.”
The Trump Family and ‘Honest Graft’
They are profiting off the Presidency in ways that demean the office.
Wednesday, July 1, 2026
Anti-Semitic Politicians in America Today
Patrick Little says he’s dedicating his life to exposing Jews who supposedly “control” the United States. He “woke up to the Jewish question” and has described himself as “counter-Semitic” who wants the United States to be “free from Jews.” Little is running for California’s U.S. Senate seat and defeat four-term Senator Diane Feinstein, whom Little describes as a “Zionist (expletive)”.
It’s long been a staple of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that Jews somehow manipulate global events. It was chilling to hear this anti-Jewish trope being parroted by an elected city official, and it was especially worrying to hear this old conspiracy theory in a bizarre new form: to blame Jews for a snowfall implies a hatred that’s visceral and extreme. It soon emerged that this was no momentary lapse, when reporters uncovered evidence that White had donated constituent funds to a Nation of Islam event at which anti-Jewish statements were made.
With so much hatred directed against Jews and other minorities in America today, it’s crucial to speak out against anti-Semitic speech, wherever it comes from. With elections looming across the country, and the Midterm Elections coming up soon, it can be tempting to put politics ahead of human decency and look for ways to dismiss candidates’ hateful rhetoric. Doing so would be a significant mistake.
Soul - One or Three?
Extra Soul
Or HaChaim (Devarim 20:10) Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai said in Zohar volume 2 page 62 that G-d sends man an additional soul to guide him on the right path and to save him from committing sins against Him. In our paragraph we may perceive G-d as addressing this additional soul telling it: "when you approach a city. The idea is that this soul is intended to save the body from the evil urge; it is in line with the verse in Kohelet 9,14 which continues,"against which a great king comes and lays siege to it, An insignificant looking wise man saves that small city from the onslaught of the great king using his wisdom" "and you call out to her: 'peace'." The meaning is that you do not immediately wade into the your evil urge and try to conquer it in one single frontal assault; rather you first suggest that it also give heaven its due, as a result of which it will experience great benefits. As a result the evil urge will allow that man has a duty also vis-a-vis heaven. After all, secular activities such as eating and drinking in this life also enable man to perform his spiritual tasks better. As a result of this accomodation with the evil urge one assures oneself of not losing one's hereafter altogether. "If she is not prepared to surrender peacefully," If the "city" does not accept the soul's proposal to allow heaven its due, or that even after man began to become a penitent he slid back into sin, then you have to make all out war against the evil urge.We know that once an attempt to become a penitent fails, the chances are that the forces of evil will redouble their efforts against any religious instincts a person has.
Tuesday, June 30, 2026
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/06/30/politics/live-news/supreme-court-cases-news
• Birthright citizenship upheld: In a big loss for President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, striking down his executive order. Chief Justice John Roberts, calling citizenship “the right to have rights,” wrote for the court that “the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land.’ We keep that promise today.” Read the full opinion.
Email NJ Reps NOW Vs. A2218/S2260
|
|
|
|
|
|
Will Schnall Vote Absent on A2218??
BS"D
Rabbi Noson Shmuel Leiter,
Executive Director,
Help Rescue Our Children
Email: nathanadvisors@gmail.
845.642.1679
Direct: 771.215.8892
Israeli Helpline: 03.721.3337
Presentations on New-Age dangers: 605-313-6831 ext. 2
Heard weekly on New Jersey's WSNR Radio 620AM, co-hosting the renowned Levin At Eleven program, every Thursday evening, 11pm to midnight (ET).
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
New Jersey’s Abortion Shield Bill Was Amended. So, Who Are They Really Protecting?
June 15, 2026
By Marie Tasy, Executive Director, New Jersey Right to Life
There is a particular frustration in watching a deeply flawed bill steamroll through the Legislature, driven by a blind and erratic obsession with so called “reproductive health” and with little regard for transparency, the Constitution, or the people it will affect. That is what occurred with NJ Bill A2218/S2260.
New Jersey Right to Life testified at multiple committee hearings. Throughout the process, amendments were repeatedly introduced at the last minute and withheld from the public until after testimony had concluded, preventing us the opportunity for meaningful public review and informed comment. We were even denied the ability to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the bill’s constitutionality by the committee chair.
On June 11, the bill was scheduled for an Assembly floor vote and was pulled due to constitutional concerns. Legislative leaders stripped out one of its most dangerous provisions entirely, the section that would have allowed lawsuits against individuals for causing reputational, financial, or emotional harm simply because of their connection to reproductive health care advocacy. Removing it outright was a clear admission that the objections to it were valid.
That is a win. But it is not enough.
The amended bill still creates a new crime of “interference with reproductive health care services” and still authorizes expansive criminal and civil lawsuits, punitive damages, injunctions, and attorney’s fees. It still uses language subject to interpretation, based on “feelings,” that leaves far too much room for selective enforcement against peaceful sidewalk counselors, prayer vigil participants, and others engaged in constitutionally protected activity. When asked during committee testimony by Assemblyman Jay Webber (R-26) to identify specific incidents of violence at New Jersey abortion facilities that would justify these new penalties, a Planned Parenthood representative could not name a single example.
Violence, threats, trespass, property damage, harassment, and obstruction are already illegal in New Jersey. The Legislature’s own Office of Legislative Services has confirmed the bill will increase costs for prosecutors, courts, and corrections to address a problem supporters have not documented.
Also still troubling are the immunity provisions:
• Professional licensing boards are prohibited from disciplining providers based solely on their reproductive health care activity.
• Insurance companies are barred from taking adverse action against providers who perform services on patients from states where those services are illegal.
• New Jersey law enforcement and courts are prohibited from cooperating with other states’ investigations or proceedings related to reproductive health care, even when minors are involved.
• Any law from another state seeking to prosecute someone for reproductive health care activity is declared against New Jersey public policy and cannot be applied in state courts.
These provisions raise serious concerns about accountability. New Jersey has already seen the consequences of weak cross state oversight. Steven Chase Brigham, a New Jersey abortionist, ran an illegal bi-state late term abortion operation. He would begin procedures in New Jersey and have patients drive to a secret facility in Maryland to complete them. After one botched procedure left an 18-year-old with a ruptured uterus, police discovered the bodies of 34 late term aborted babies in a freezer at the Maryland location. Brigham was charged with ten counts of murder. The charges were ultimately dropped on a jurisdictional technicality. A2218/S2260 would make exactly this kind of cross state accountability even harder.
Kermit Gosnell, the Philadelphia abortionist whom even the secular media called a serial killer, operated for years under lax oversight before his crimes were exposed. The lesson of both cases is the same: when accountability disappears, women and children pay the price.
So who is this bill really protecting? Not the women and young minor girls who will be exploited by traffickers, abusers, and unscrupulous providers who will use these protections to evade accountability both inside New Jersey and across state lines.
The bill raises serious questions about federalism, interstate cooperation, free speech, accountability, and the proper role of government. It deserves far more scrutiny than it has received.
The Legislature was forced to amend this bill repeatedly and ultimately remove one of its most controversial provisions after sustained public criticism. That does not happen when concerns lack merit. It happens when serious flaws are exposed.
At this point, the real question is why this legislation was introduced in the first place. New Jersey already has laws against violence, threats, trespass, harassment, and obstruction. Supporters have failed to demonstrate a need for these sweeping new protections and penalties.
New Jersey deserves laws that protect constitutional freedoms, respect accountability, and serve the public interest, not legislation designed to appease favored political constituencies and shield them from scrutiny, accountability, and make taxpayers bear the cost of enforcing new protections and penalties for a problem supporters have failed to document.
The Assembly should reject A2218/S2260 outright. This law protects no one who needs protection. It is built on definitions so deliberately broad that most New Jerseyans would be stunned to learn what they cover, and it uses those definitions to wall off an entire industry from professional discipline, legal scrutiny, and interstate accountability. When something goes wrong, and history tells us it will, there will be no cooperation, no consequences, and no one left to answer for it.
And that, for the women and children this bill leaves unprotected, is far more than a shame.
Israeli defense chief blames Trump for halting all-out Hezbollah push in Lebanon
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz blamed President Trump on Monday for stopping the Jewish state from eliminating all of Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Explaining to reporters that having a “partnership” with the US “has certain constraints,” Katz said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “stood bravely” against Trump’s demands that Israel Defense Forces leave Lebanon through four phone calls.
”Iran constantly pressured the United States to pressure Israel, in order to stop this,” he said, according to a translated transcript of the briefing obtained by The Post. “At that time, we were attacking all of Lebanon, I remind you.”
”I’m sorry for that connection [of the cease-fire extending to Lebanon,] but it was an American interest, that [Trump] really, really wanted to promote the possibility of negotiations with Iran, etc., and he saw this as an obstacle to it.”

