Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Tamar Epstein:Rav Shlomo Miller's view which is circulating Lakewood

Just verified that this is Rav Miller's view on the matter




132 comments :

  1. Lol, such idiotism from the rabbi who bans everything, from the kosher switch to the shabes and yomtov mode on stoves
    Looks to me like everyone else who hasn't written a letter views tamars marriage as kosher
    Miller and gestetner vs all the gedolei yisroel

    ReplyDelete
  2. The problem with this, even if it is true, is that he accepts the judgement of Gedolei Hora'ah. Hence, should RSK put pen to paper, it implies that the heter would be accepted.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why can rav nota Greenblatt not be relied upon
    No Beis din is needed, when reb Moshe feinstein was matir, all he did was wrote a teshuva
    No bet din convened
    It a halachick question, and rav Greenblatt is as qualified as rav miller

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why is the title hedging whether this is legitimate or a forgery by referring to it as "alleged"?

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Nathan - you have a lot of wishful thinking.

    Unfortunate for Tamar, the Kaminetskys and R Greenblatt It is simply not true that anyone who has so far not made a public comment approves

    Nor is it the fanatic right wing chareidim vs everyone else. There are many Center and Left wing Chareidim as well as Modern Orthodox rabbis who are also shocked by the realization that an eishes ish just got married without a Get with the mistaken guidance of those who should have known better.

    I heard that there should be a letter signed by others in another week.

    Please as your local Orthodox rabbi what he thinks and whether he is willing to sign a protest letter.

    ReplyDelete
  6. My rabbi says that rav nota Greenblatt can be relied upon, unless many mainstream poskim come out against him
    So far it hasn't happened

    ReplyDelete
  7. My sources indicate that Rav Miller is in fact against Tamar Epstein's remarriage without a Get.
    However this looks as if it were a transcript of an oral answer which someone photo-shopped a signature.

    So the word " alleged" is describing the physical letter - not the views expressed

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with your rabbi - but in fact many manistream poskim have objected to what Rabbi Greenblatt has done

    ReplyDelete
  9. Rav Greenblatt unfortunately relied on inaccurate information that was fed him and which he didn't bother investigating himself. He in fact has stated that it is chutzpah to question information provided by the Kaminestkys.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Can someone possibly call Rabbi Miller and verify whether it is forged or not?
    Presumably he is aware of the letter, and hasnt come out saying it is forged...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Eddie - writing a teshuva is not a heter - it merely provides a transparent window to observe what has happened and why.

    In this case seriously flawed information was accepted as true by the Kaminetskys and Rav Greenblatt accepted it because the Kaminestekys said it was true. Unfortunately for all concern it is not true. They all should have taken time to validate it with independent experts who consulted with both sides - elementary halacha - but they didnt'bother.

    ReplyDelete
  12. My understanding is that the letter above is genuine not because I saw it but because a prominent posek called me up and read part of it to me with his comments.


    At the time Rabbi Miller signed other very prominent rabbis signed as well, but it is all being held up because they want more signers. There are various groups of rabbis dealing with letters of protest, and because many rabbis are involved, and some of them are not available now, things are dragging on. One key rabbi is not available for a few weeks, but eventually, these letters will probably be released. I just spoke to a third rabbi who is working on a letter. But not tomorrow.


    But eventually I have been told letters will be released. In the meanwhile, I and my brother are busy and lonely, but let's hope that more public letters will be released soon.


    Again, I know that one of the groups already has some very powerful and internationally noted rabbis signing against Tamar's marriage. But they are waiting for even more to sign.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nathan,
    My brother is right. People of all levels of Orthodoxy are shocked and pained by what Tamar did. The anger is building. One prominent YU rabbi called me and when he talked about Tamar he began to sputter. Some people have called me and called for public demonstrations. The anger buiilds, and at this point, the anger is fueled by this blog and my own torahhalacha.blogspot.com . But things are moving and heating up. It is now after many hours of pressure and research clear that the entire premise of the remarriage was completely wrong, and even a lie. Also, Rabbi Shmuel Kaminetsky signed a letter not to support Tamar's remarriage, and now we find that Rabbi Greenblatt is claiming that Gedolim told him that Tamar is not married and may remarry. That means most likely Rabbi Shmuel Kaminetsky, because what other person he thinks is a Gadol signed about this?

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Come out against" does not equal "objected to."

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nathan,
    It has happened. One prominent rabbi told me that Tamar's new children will be mamzerim. One group alone has now about seven prominent signers but they are holding them until more signers can be reached and affixed.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well, it just got posted 45 minutes ago, so I wouldn't assume he has private investigators working that quick in finding things allegedly posted in his name.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Rofl, your logic is bopkes. They dug somewhere in the Negev near amudei Shlomo and found some copper wires, so it was established in Solomon's times they already had electricity. They also dug in gaza, but did not find any wires, therefore it is establaished that they had wireless with batteries.
    from the archives of Nathan's Hot Dogs

    ReplyDelete
  18. Which daas is it, Daas Nusen, Nuteh or Noite?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Where is his teshuva?

    ReplyDelete
  20. I didn't write a letter, does that mean I view it as kosher. Rabbi Heineman did not write this letter 2 weeks ago, does that mean he changed his mind? Those who did not write letters but are orally against this, are they liars or amnivalent? Learn some basic logic and then return to the adult conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Let's play it your way - if you want to compare to Reb Moshe, where is the written teshuva?

    ReplyDelete
  22. So I guess I'll rely on Nathan who said we could rely on his anonymous rabbi who said that we can rely on Rabbi Greenblatt ego days he's relying on an anonymous rabbi. Yeh, maybe I'll just wait.

    ReplyDelete
  23. It is a hetter
    The last 2 lines read as follows
    לאור האמור למעלה מותרת האשה תמר עפשטין לכל אדם אף בלי גט ואף לכהן

    ReplyDelete
  24. As soon as the negative proclamation come out, so will the teshuva

    ReplyDelete
  25. Reb moshes teshuva was publicized years after the story happened

    ReplyDelete
  26. I assume that the handwritten note at the end is from Rav Miller it is not clear

    Can I publish R Feldman's letter?

    ReplyDelete
  27. U can publish if he allows you to

    ReplyDelete
  28. Rav heiniman holds that based of the info he has , a hetter can be reached although he will not get involved

    ReplyDelete
  29. Is Adam Fleischer a kohen

    ReplyDelete
  30. Lol everyone know that rav miller has a agenda here, the he preside over any hetter
    He is so transparent
    He couldn't getbevem one other rabbi to sign with him
    As rabbi Blum said don't sign with him even on the aseret hadibrot

    ReplyDelete
  31. U keep on saying that there are others
    Let them come out and be counted or forever hold the peace

    ReplyDelete
  32. In Diplomacy language, it most certainly does.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Have u ever heard of the following Talmudic saying
    מדשתקי רבנן שמע מינה דניחא להו

    ReplyDelete
  34. Also, Rabbi Shmuel Kaminetsky signed a letter not to support Tamar's remarriage,

    R' Shmuel signed a letter against her remarriage? Huh? So are you now saying the remarriage was not based on R' Shmuel? Where is this supposed letter?

    ReplyDelete
  35. I received reliable information that it is in fact Rav Miller's view

    ReplyDelete
  36. Nathan - your information is not accurate

    ReplyDelete
  37. And have you ever heard expression of the Torah, Veim lo yagid venosso avono? Besides, מדשתקי
    רבנן שמע מינה דשקר היא. Veihave raya, harotse leshaker yarchik eduso. No such thing as Sod betoch Ta'alumo. If you have a reliable source, what have you got to hide?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Not the way it works. According to anyone who was at her first wedding, they all witnessed a man giving a ring to a woman saying the magic words. Then there were two people who witnessed them go into a yichud room together. Add in the fact that for several years, said woman was attempting to obtain a get, thus implicitly, if not explicitly, acknowledging the fact that she appeared to be married
    Fast forward ten years or so and a Rabbi marries this same woman to another man. Clearly according to halacha, said woman cannot be with a second man while still with the first.
    So unless the marrying rabbi has "something" (i.e. a psak or a tshuva) that allows him to counter what appeared to the world as a valid marriage, then the Rabbi has the obligation to make public his basis for doing so. He has that obligation whether or not a negative proclamation comes out because of the public appearances.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Didn't he recluse himself not to support this issue anymore?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Your going to have to explain the line "Rabbi Shmuel Kaminetsky signed a letter not to support Tamar's remarriage, and now we find that Rabbi Greenblatt is claiming that Gedolim told him that Tamar is not married and may remarry"

    ReplyDelete
  41. They don't take orders, only Give orders. Don't be doche et hakeits.

    ReplyDelete
  42. No it doesn't. Private objections transmitted to individuals will have no impact on how the public views the issue. Only once prominent rabbonim publicly state their positions will it begin to have an impact.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Nathan,
    There is money and power involved in this case. That must be noted too.
    Even the Baltimor beis-din did not issue a Siruv against Tamar for refusing to attend. They may be the only party which acted fairly but they were unable to take such a basic step against her.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Seriously, these are dvorim haomdim berumo shel olam. Don't believe for one moment that he is not objective in this issue of Eishes ish and Mamzeirus. He does not have a horse in this race, no negius, no shoshvinus, no Yeshiva donations in the past, present or future. As has been mentioned, he said this orally, and his signature was affixated as boser shelo pogu. There is power in numbers, and the Tsunami of category 5 is in the mail!

    ReplyDelete
  45. No idea. Where's that info coming from?

    Recuse not recluse.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Test balloons of kole delo posek, have been released to the public atmosphere by a viable Posek. Anyone short of being a BD musmach or BD meforsem, need not apply. Veyovo baal hashor veyaamid al shoro.

    ReplyDelete
  47. On this blog, blogs ago.

    ReplyDelete
  48. לאור האמור למעלה. Huh What has been written lemala?

    ReplyDelete
  49. Nathan,
    You will forgive me but I know who signed with Rabbi Miller and they are top of the line. I don't know if they are on your level but maybe that is because they don't live in Gaza.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I talk to these people regularly and I am happy with my knowledge. You can imagine that nobody disagrees with this hideous episode, but I speak to people every day who are getting angrier and angrier. They want to do this and that, and by now, everyone knows the whole facts and that the whole thing is an invention and a lie. But you are right, that surely a faster response was called for, and I know the stories of the delay, but I am happy that people are fighting every day for hours to get things organized. I am not waiting for anyone, but I put out my material on my blog torahhalacha.blogspotl.com and I have mainly the halacha sources that shows that there is no way at all that any knowing Rov can permit Tamar to remarry. The material is on my website. Others came along and found out the insane claims of Shalom Kaminetsky how this and that person said that Aharon was insane. You have to be insane to believe any of this. But everyone involved in this mess had faith in the power of "Gedolim" to escape critiism. But they were wrong, big time. I am going to announce when Tamar has a child that the child is a mamzer, and I have asked the question to serioius rabbonim and poskim who completely agree.

    ReplyDelete
  51. First of all it has happened. There are now three groups that I know of who are working furiously to produce signatures of the senior rabbonim in several countries to declare that Tamar is living in sin and her children to be will be mamzerim. I hear various dates but I know one case where an unavoidable delay of twenty days occurred on the exact day they wanted to wrap things up. That happens.


    Second of all, I don't rely on anybody when I know that the Shulchan Aruch and the poskim disagree. Ask Rabbi Greenblatt his source for this remarriage as I did. His response, "Gedolim" approved it. Who? Rabbi Kaminetsky. I know that Rabbi Kaminetsky is not an expert in Gittin, because he once asked me where in Shulchan Aruch it talks about how to write a name in a GET, something every Rosh Yeshiva should know beause they write kesubose. I have been quarreling with him for years about his statements to torment husbands that he never spoke to because he wanted to do a favor for their wives. He is far removed from Daas Torah. And who else is Rabbi Greenblatt's Gadol? Those working on this can't find anyone else. And they know all of the rabbis who are prone to these inventions, and they are not Gedolim.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Wow. Once you go for the hocus pocus magical heter, you may as well marry a Kohen. Neat.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Nosson Ha'azati alleges to have seen the "hetter" from the mysterious Shatz. If he's able to share the last line, maybe he can tell us more about the content?

    ReplyDelete
  54. A Freudian slip, מותרת האשה תמר עפשטין. How about Habetula, HaAlma? Maybe SHE was mekayem the mitzvo kmo shene'emar 'Vehoyiso meshugo mimareh einecho' and doesn't even know from Adam, toleh kileloso beacherim style.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I will post a short version of the hetter later tonight

    ReplyDelete
  56. this is an ugly mess, and I am going to try to refrain from any further comments because of the severity of the problem of eshes ish and mamzerut.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Tamar Epstein is muttar to any "Adam" (Fleisher). What about to Tom, Dick, and Harry?

    ReplyDelete
  58. I will post a short version of the hetter later tonight


    Nu, has later tonight come yet?


    lol

    ReplyDelete
  59. Nathan is hiding in a tunnel in Gaza, and he doesn't realize that it's midday in Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Vehinei pesher hadovor. Lulei chorashtem be'eglosi, lo motsosem chidosi. The last two lines contain the conditions of Kibla heter miBD mforsam and haskomos gedolei hoiro'oh according to noson hoazes ponim miAza they have been met . As for bichsav, since it is besod and dvorim shebaal peh i ato reshoim lekosvom bichsav.


    Operation Nachshon veShimshon

    ReplyDelete
  61. Why only a short version? What's hidden in the long version? We're big boys. We know how to handle materials in long version.

    ReplyDelete
  62. It wasn't publc knowledge at thetime, like this case is.

    ReplyDelete
  63. The one who was maatik the hetter for me is a bochur in the yeshiva of memfis
    He got cold feet and dosnt want me to put it up , I'm still working on it

    ReplyDelete
  64. Because even r rackman did not allow a cohen (not that the wife (or the next husband) really cared. (He wrote a get in his cases. Zikui or something.)

    ReplyDelete
  65. I happen to know who the wife is in reb moshes teshuva

    ReplyDelete
  66. Did he tell you any details about it? Who wrote it? Who signed it?

    ReplyDelete
  67. Bet you dollars to doughnuts, that you are mimicking, monkey see monkey do, ma'asse kof bealma. As the saying goes, lech leAza. You sound like the Kat, and not the kind the gazans chew on. BTW while at it, why don't you tell your friend from 'mem' 'fis', he has no fis to stand on, cold or otherwise. What a meatball!

    ReplyDelete
  68. Af al pi roisi, veaf al gav lo roisi. Translation: A nose above the mouth I have seen, however, a nose on the shoulder I haven't seen. Leor haomur lemaala.... Translation: a nose without a Get and a nose on a Kohen. Nussele, you are visioning S.Z.'s chezyonot. U R A Fraud like nussen hoazosi.

    ReplyDelete
  69. I have seen the others, but they are nechbo el hakelim. Overnight, I will try to convince them to come out of their kelim lol. Yeah' right, overnight Kugel Or was it morgen noch'n Kugel.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Nussen, haksav, vehamichtov lo hoyo velo nivro. There are no details, nor body of any letter. Meshateh hu bochem. We just finished perek assoro yochsin, how did nussen pop back up again? Oloh mibavel veyorad leAza.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Which case of Rav Moshe are we referring to? What were the details of the case and what was his psak.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Call me a meatball from today till tomorrow
    But I happen to be the man in the know
    Monkey see monkey do
    It dosnt mean its not true
    This union is here to stay
    And miller should stay at bay
    Teshuva will come soon
    Maybe even by the morrow noon

    ReplyDelete
  73. They may be nechba
    But they begot no kelim
    And I hope tht there children marry these holy offspring

    ReplyDelete
  74. I feel bad for any bachur who decided to go learn in Memphis. He is now stuck between a rock and a hard place.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Ehud, if ud like to see chezyonot, meet me on west 79th outside the carlebach shul, 9pm tonight

    ReplyDelete
  76. The teshuva is relying on information which is false. Garbage in Garbage out.

    ReplyDelete
  77. So says you
    Wait till you read the teshuva
    Also maybe try find out who the eidim were

    ReplyDelete
  78. Part of the hetter
    והנה קיבלנו מסמכים ממומחה שטיפל בו שנתיים קודם חתונתם מטעם שהיה נוגע אז, ושם כתוב שבעל סובל מאי זה דיסארדער, והאשה לא ידעה כלום מזה, כי הבעל העלים זאת, וכל בעיותיה בשלום בית נבעה ממחלתו זאת, לפי דעת המומחים,
    ומיד שנודע להאשה ממחלתו זו אמרה שלעולם לא תחזור לבעלה, כי יודעת שלמחלה זו אין שום רפואה ואין לה לקוות לשלום בית אתה, וכשנשאלו עשרה נשים יהודיות, היודעם בטיב המחלה אם היה נושאים בעל שיש לו דיסאדער זו, כולם אמרו בודאי שלא......

    ReplyDelete
  79. If the halacha she insists on contestin'
    I hope for the kid's sake she's using progestin.

    ReplyDelete
  80. As I said the information that was relied on is false and has been verifed to be false by people directly involved as well as outside psychiatrists that weren't biased against the husband.

    The heter is not valid according to any of the poskim who have been questioned.

    As I have mentioned before this is the crux of the matter. Kiddushei taos requires that the husband have a prexisting condition - unknown to the wife before marriage - that is so horrible that most women could not live with it.

    That is absolutely not true regarding Aharon Friedman. In fact it is so clear that Aharon could easily sue all those involved for libel and there is no question that he would win.

    Is Rabbi Greenblatt prepared for a multimillion lawsuit against him? Are the Kaminetsky's? Perhaps Tamar and family won't be bothered paying 10 million dollars for the damage they have caused.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Finally we see a logical hetter
    And daas Torah, do u think rav Greenblatt is afraid of a lawsuit, he's a 90 year old gadol, and untouchable
    All that is left to say is
    שהזווג יעלה יפה, ויזכו לדורות ישרים מבורכים
    And arhon Friedman can eat his get

    ReplyDelete
  82. The yarzeit was last nite (and today, till 6pm EDT). Make sure your shul uses his 'mimkomcha' for shabbat morning kedusha.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Assodi - true it is logical but it is false.

    If the information they claim is the basis for the heter is talse - which it is - then the heter is no good.

    Rabbi Greenblatt is not untouchable nor are the Kaminetskys

    It doesn't realy matter who is afraid of a lawsuit but it does matter what the Judge thinks of this mess that they created by not following elementary halachic procedure.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Hmmm... Just a few questions my friend. Why does this letter NEED
    translation, why not in the original, and why not in it's entirety, is it also
    possible that it is in midst of fabrication hot of the press, and why does a mum godol need a
    heter more than what's written in the partial, was that mumche treating him for
    2 years before their wedding a ROFEH, and how come after not having sholom bayis
    for so many years no other mumcheh was able to diagnose that particular disorder
    from her while telling her side of the story, will all other mumchim that AF
    shall go to as of now - suppose ten NEUTRAL ONES agree with the original
    mumche's diagnosis, does this original mumche that has dealt with
    his disorder labeled it as such yet back then, why was/is this kept a secret,
    why is this no more a secret, why is there a meilits beinoisom as with habucher
    hazetser mimemfiss, why aren't we privileged to see the dates on this letter,
    've'im ken' 'why haven't those relevant parties responded to this AF saga before
    the kol kore's? And can you please explain the meaning of


    מטעם
    שהיה נוגע אז...?



    Would you mind if we ask AF whether these allegations and statements are
    true? Why when they were shopping around for signatures to sign the Heter AS IS,
    why didn't they want to disclose the witnesses/ mumchim and all? Veze rak
    miktsas shvocho befonov, and before we move on yovo baal hashor veyaamod al shoro,
    then we talk. And oh yes, just one more before we go, were those klep smitten by
    those hired KKK's an attempt to exercise exorcism to beat the devil/ruach ro'oh
    out of him as a last resort to heal him from this secret disorder?

    ReplyDelete
  85. Who were the rabbonim signed on the bottom?

    ReplyDelete
  86. Aharon doesn't need a Get, but he might give Tamar one, if she becomes more reasonable with visitation rights. My guess is that he will apply for a "hetter 100 rabbanim", and will be able to move on with his life. Meanwhile Tamar is really messed up. תצא מזה ומזה is no laughing matter!

    Just a quick question. Would you allow your child to marry any of her future offspring from AF? It's interesting that you use the nickname "Ashdodi". It reminds me of the verse in Zechariah (9:6) וישב ממזר באשדוד.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Is that a threat? Me Shimshon, You Gazan?

    ReplyDelete
  88. אהוד היקר נ"י
    עד שיעמדו הרבנים לאורים ותומים ויאמרו דעתם ,מתפלל אני שיתערבו זרים בזרע פסול

    ReplyDelete
  89. Is this the best shliach BD they can put forth? Is this bochur the nosse kelim and safra dedayna. If he cannot even spell right, how did he get this job? And such gedolim call her ISHA? Didn't they just come up with a gevaldovne chidush of mekach lekach hetach petach back in time vehi batul?

    ReplyDelete
  90. They aren't afraid of a civil judge, they are afraid of the שופט כל הארץ only

    ReplyDelete
  91. Israel reader we have a zakary expert on the team, how nice

    ReplyDelete
  92. Well said ashdodi

    ReplyDelete
  93. You can rap cra. but cannot deliver the goods,
    'bli tesha shittin' TF can do nottin,
    you release the letter tippin tippin,
    because you cannot even bekir mashtin,
    mezuyaf mitocho umigabo,
    why is she called HAISHO? Huh

    ReplyDelete
  94. To the claim that the husband is insane.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Tfilas shav. Maybe if they keep their peace, they can marry chetsyom medabrim ashdoidis. Do you think after all these public notices, it can be kivan denitmeu nitmeu? BTW AF doesn't eat goat food.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Ur really freakin
    It's 12 not 9 shittin

    ReplyDelete
  97. Vehashofet kol ho'orets ya'amid bamishpot! Why are they afraid to open up the letter lifnei kol ha'am? Don't they a spine to stand up?

    ReplyDelete
  98. Ad matay ata marbeh ba'alei mumim, psulim umamzerim beyisrael? Vein lonu lo Kohen godol, velo urim velo tumim ad sheyovo Eliyohu. Show us the goods, the letter in it's entirety!

    ReplyDelete
  99. Lichora this would be in the category of shuma and we'd go basar rov dei'os, not eidim (even if that is what he's referring to).

    ReplyDelete
  100. I cant tell you if they're afraid of the One above. Only He knows that. But from the fact that this "hetter" is being hidden from the public, I can tell you that they're afraid of the בעלי הלכה of the generation, and how they will be skewered in the court of public opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  101. It wasn't a threat. He just wanted to share with you some of the stuff that he's been smoking lekavod the rebbe's yahrtzeit. L-rd Get me high....
    http://video.yehudim.net/play.php?vid=234

    ReplyDelete
  102. He is chewing Gazan Kat.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Since your'e chewing Kat, beafariki tat shtayim,
    umitchalfot bePat paamayim,
    you disclosed us from the letter only shurot shtayim,
    vehabucher hazetzer in yeshiva with 'kollel' is 12,
    wallah, vehineh treiser, tnanash, esrei ushtayim,
    vagam metzaltzel bemetzaltayim.
    If it still doesn't add up, eat another piece of Kugel biyedayim

    ReplyDelete
  104. Don't work too hard, just post the whole thing. Whats'a matter, you afraido? Mostly, when people put up walls of firefighters isolating themselves, is for stalling for time and remain with an option the butler said it. Where is this, in Jewland? The butler did it:)

    ReplyDelete
  105. Very sad to read your blog Rabbi Eidensohn. What is clear is that you don't know who Rav Nota is and are not giving him the proper respect. Asking time and time again who is his gadol-daas torah- shows u have never met him. He is considered one of the biggest poskim in the dor especially even haezer. has dealt with these sort shaylos since the sixties, with Rav Moshe. Please do some research before writing unintelligent thing

    ReplyDelete
  106. הרבנים יושבים בחיבוק ידים, כי צריכים להתארגן להמלוה מלכות הבאים עלינו, וא"א לצפות שהם יעשו דבר, הם כקבוצה הכי רחוקים מהתורה ובעלי מידות רעות ומגונות , וקשה לעמוד לידם מריח הקשה של גאוה שנודף מהם, והם פוסעים על ראשי עם קודש, והלואי שיאבד זכרם,

    ReplyDelete
  107. Go argue with him, not me.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Lubmen - you don't have the competence to reject what I have written. I am not questioning Rav Nota's greatness. That was never an issue.

    It is Rav Nota himself who claimed that he was relying on unnamed gedolim. He takes no responsibility for the accuracy of the facts he paskened (and yes he is the source of the heter).

    But he has made an elementary error in dealing with this case. He has relied totally on the information provided by the Kaminetskys without either independently investigating or even talking to Aharon Friedman before trashing him and labeling a person who is incapable of having a legitimate marriage. My objection is not mine alone but is the consensus of poskim who have been consulted in this matter.

    His response has been that it is chutzpa to question the information and conclusion of the Kaminetskys. However what they provide him is a halacha issue but a psychological one.

    Neither he nor the Kaminetskys understand modern psychology and the deep seated issues connected with its validity. This is a question of metzius - and they are wrong.

    Are you claiming he is infallible? Not even Rav Moshe claimed infallibility.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Nathan - I don't understand why you are dribbling this "document" out - a couple lines at a time. Please simply photograph it and send me the jpg file. I will be glad to give it a separate post and give you full credit.

    ReplyDelete
  110. OK Abie Natan from the coastal waters meal sfat hayam, I offer you a peace deal you cannot refuse. We bring you 10 separate letters from ten (10) independent mumchim, a Clean bill of health for R' Aharon F. You disclose us in it's entirety (no piece meal) the letter of Hetter FREE FREE, the name(s) of 'who' ukvar horah hazoken might be, the letter of hetter nisuin with signatures, the shver and your (yuhr) eidim who they might be, the name of the alleged diagnosing treating Mumche, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.


    You are sitting on the edge port city in gaza of yoshvei ploshes, your friend from port city of Ashdod, your yeshiva bucher friend sitting in the cold down and under arboim feet (mem fiss) in Memphis, blowing soap bubbles filled with hot air into the wind, but you yet have to give din vecheshbon from whence a heter if any to this saga came from. Vehi yosheves Alon Bochis tachas tamar (Taam-mar) Devorah bimrirut taam, umi yodea im laes kazos ukreisa kvar bein shineho, vatehom kol ha'ir, hazos Naomi... (can't she do any better)? Try to send some bubbles to Port Said, Tsor vechor, veTsidon along other coasts maybe they can help. Night has already passed, Morrow and Noon have also come by, oso boiker vegam loylo, ve'ein oineh. Your'e running out of time, we are running out of breath, in the meantime everybody is sitting on edge, but life has to move on my friend. If you have something to say, say it now, or forever hold your peace.

    ReplyDelete
  111. And where was Dr. David Epstein A"H all that time. He never noticed anything peculiar about the prospect, or thereafter?

    ReplyDelete
  112. in that case, did she remarry? to whom, an observant person, or an OO type (or similar; there was no OO in those days.) was she considered "damaged goods" cause of the suspicious heter?
    by now, did her subsequent children marry? same questions. did the yeshiva they went to accept them openly, or was there hesitancy? (you wouldn't know unless you were family and / or in the school administration.
    did he remarry? or did he go OTD?
    did he subsequently give her a get? what were the terms?

    ReplyDelete
  113. but it is obvious from comments that rav Greenblatt knew the details (or at least the "filtered" details that came from philadephia) about the husband's supposed "disorder" and wife's non knowledge of it. and the husband's not being allowed to be part of this proceeding.

    ReplyDelete
  114. you have the joke all wrong.

    and they didn't have batteries, they had Israeli electricity that they don't pay for.

    ReplyDelete
  115. I don't know why you call me incompetent. You don't know me. All I wrote is that your blog is a typical blog with no real content. You keep on saying "consensus" of posim without names. You suddenly call rav miller from Toronto a huge posek etc, you probably haven't heard of him till now. A typical rabble rouser. I did a little research about you and all said " der eideonsohn hut a Sach tzeit" it seems they weren't shocked at your business " taking care " of kallah yisroels a problem. What's interesting is that no one called you a scholar. Funny though that you take this into your own hands.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Lubmen

    It is clear that if the public will accept this heter then the next heter will pass even quicker and more rabonim will issue these heterim, it will not take long and every rov who is dishonest enough will be willing to issue baseless heterim.

    This aspect must be taken into account and the need of one wealthy woman is not more important than to cause many false heterim.

    This case is clearly strange because they first went to beis-din and then when she did not get her way she went elsewhere, then the basis of the heter was not challanged properly. There is apparently friendship between her family and a yeshiva etc. In short, it looks suspecious and even if there is a basis for this psak it has not been proven at all.

    ReplyDelete
  117. I have a letter from reb zalman nechemia thtt will blow ur mind

    ReplyDelete
  118. Nathan - please stop the jokes.

    Have I got a bridge to sell you!

    If you have something to share please share it - but dropping names without supporting evidence is nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Rofl, they did the digging at night when there was a "kurtzschluss" hasva'ah, in Timnos where they found karka besulo since the days of Shimshon way before Atzmaut. What they did find was 70 besulus for those that escorted Sheik Yassin in his wheelchair blown into smitherines.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Also not a problem. They can hire R' G any time witholding privileged information no questions asked and will perform an exorcism and mafkir the biah, hefker BD hefker. Kosher top kosher lefel.

    ReplyDelete
  121. SOS to Nosson hoAzosi. Promises promises. You are all talk but no action. Where is the letter, where is the hetter, forget about the translation. We will suffice with the original. Psach lonu sha'ar lifnei neilas sha'ar, kvar osso boiker vegam loylo vehineh boishesh lovo vehayeled einenu. This was the last call. Al daas hakohol, veal daas torah veal daas noiteh veal daas lekol mi sheyesh bo daas, ein kaan lo Heter, vein kaan lo Letter, avol yesh kaan issur Eishes ish, ukeshem shaossrin beBD shel maalo kach yihyu assurin beBD shel Mato. Nosson H. you are a fraud, fake, and a fony'. We recommend they should part company before matters get more complicated KeDas Moshe veYisrael.

    ReplyDelete
  122. While it is true that he has failed to deliver the goods, the same can be said of the moderator, who has been claiming for weeks that there will soon be a letter signed by many gedolim about the matter. Perhaps all should refrain from repeatedly telling of what they will soon post, and just post whatever they get when they get it.

    ReplyDelete
  123. Yehoshua - your advice is ridiculous as is your comparison. I exist. I have been bringing up issues for years and I have a good track record that what I say is true and supportable.

    When I say I have seen and heard clear proof that a wide range of poskim are against this heter - there is a good reason to accept that based on my passed performance alone - even without seeing documentation.

    Nathan here has no track record, is unknown and therefore there is no reason to accept anything he says until he produces the goods.

    Therefore it is absurd foryou to assert that I should keep quiet and not inform the public of the seriousness of the matter until I can fully document my claims. If you really don't see the difference I would suggest you can spend your time more profitablly reading fairy tales

    ReplyDelete
  124. First of all, if anyone ever accuses you of being a rude and overbearing bully, you need only to look back at this comment of yours to have an understanding of what they mean.

    Second of all, I did not say that you or anyone else should stop talking about this topic, keep quiet, or inform the public of the seriousness of the matter. I referred to the tiresome habit of constantly making references to documents that will soon be released, and then leaving the tzibbur hanging for weeks on end with no hint of such documents. If you didn't see that the first time, here you go again:
    "Perhaps all should refrain from repeatedly telling of what they will soon post, and just post whatever they get when they get it."

    Nothing about not commenting, informing, or keeping quiet about the larger issue.

    ReplyDelete
  125. We have already seen 2 letters of Dayonim mumchim, whom nosson doesn't consider them arozim, but you can rest assure that arozim are on the way of which the above mentioned dayonmim are aware. Most likely the timing is political as you yourself have mentioned. In the meantime, it is better to hold 'one' bird in your hand than two in the bush, especially, while the bush is not even visible, and the eggs haven't yet hatched.

    ReplyDelete
  126. First of all, if anyone ever accuses you of being a rude and overbearing
    bully, you need only to look back at this comment of yours to have an
    understanding of what they mean



    Pot, kettle. Except in this case, the kettle's not black, only the pot. I.e. you.

    ReplyDelete
  127. You keep on saying "consensus" of posim without names. You suddenly call
    rav miller from Toronto a huge posek etc, you probably haven't heard of
    him till now.


    You're joking, right? He's extremely well-known and well-respected.

    ReplyDelete
  128. הרבנים יושבים בחיבוק ידים, כי צריכים להתארגן להמלוה מלכות הבאים עלינו, וא"א לצפות שהם יעשו דבר

    . True, but you got it all backwards. It is those leaders of Matir Assurim of Eishes Ish that twist the hands of the Protesting Rabbanim not to come out publicly against them, at least before they convene lest they will be dismissed from the convention.

    Hoy, Oy vey, manhigim olecho Yisrael. Ein lonu lo Kohen godol, velo urim vetumim, velo nossi, aval yesh lonu Asher yechto nossi.

    Avinu malkenu, chamol olenu veal olalenu vetapenu.

    ReplyDelete
  129. " והנה קיבלנו מסמכים ממומחה שטיפל בו "

    And where is the Shver? Seriously, who are the eidim, and where are the clowns? If you received the original mismachim, what are the eidim for

    ?

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.