Friday, November 15, 2013

Weiss-Dodelson: A pragmatic resolution to their conflict

Update See Solution below

Everyone acknowledges that the battle between Gital and Avraham Meir has gone on far too long and is now seriously harming the Jewish community.

Two young people – amongst our best and brightest - are losing the best years of their  lives in a war of attrition that neither is winning and can continue for many years. The wake up call came with three recent developments. 1) The chilul haShem that has been generated by Gital's article in the New York Post that she says was written out of desperation for her freedom and 2) His father and uncle lost their jobs to prevent Artscroll from being destroyed by a consumer boycott. 3) The threat to destroy Rav Reuven Feinstein's yeshiva for his support of his grandson.

Various people have suggested that it is time for everyone to stop fighting over who is right and focus on providing a realistic proposal that will be acceptable to both sides and bring an end to this ma'aseh Satan. I have a  friend whose son was deceived into marrying a mentally ill woman by important rabbis. When the son asked for a divorce, the schizophrenic woman demanded full custody and financial compensation. Our friend told his son not to fight, but to sacrifice their child and get on with his life. Even though he lost his son, he now has a new family and is doing well.

In a similar vein, one gadol has stated that even though it is clear to him that Avraham Meir is right in every detail - he won't fight for him. "If I succeed in defending Avraham Meir I will have to destroy the reputation of many important rabbis and institutions that are critical for our community. I would rather sacrifice Avraham Meir than destroy the Jewish community."

This post then will be devoted to understanding the critical issues from both sides and suggesting a solution satisfactory to both sides - based on pragmatism and not principle. First let me present what I think their pragmatic and psychological concerns are and then offer a solution that addresses them.

Gital's view: 

1)  She doesn't want to be married to Avraham Meir and wants a Get to be able to marry a "stepfather for her son."

2) She wants more control over their son and in fact she and her family want to reduce Avraham Meir's right to access and involvement with her son that had been mandated by the court custody agreement. She and her family don't think that Avraham Meir is a good parent and want to minimize their child's attachment and love for him. Ideally they would like Gital's next husband to be recognized by the  child as Tatty.

3) She refuses to pay any compensation for the severe financial loss of the Weiss Family resulting from the legal fees in this battle. In fact she feels they owe her for causing her to legally defend to that which is rightfully hers. She feels that Avraham Meir is only the sperm donor and her son is totally hers. She feels she should not have to pay for the Weiss'  being obstinate and fighting her for custody of her child but rather they should have simply given up when she moved out and took him away. She was willing to be fair and generous in allowing him to see her son. She saw no need to go to court for custody rights. Consequently she doesn't feel so generous after the court battles.

4) She wants to be acknowledged as rightfully fighting not only for own freedom but that of other Orthodox women who are being held captive by laws that are out of step with modern values of individual freedom. She readily points to the many great rabbis who have supported her and have called for her husband to be ostracized until he gives into her demands. She also feels that her experience indicates a significant change needs to be brought about dating and marriage in the Orthodox community. She thinks women - especially those who are the breadwinners should have greater financial control in the marriage.  She also feels that women should able to obtain a Get on demand for those who are unhappy with their marriage, and have final say over child custody. 

5) Gital is used to getting her way and this fight with Avraham Meir has been traumatic. It is important that she regain control over her life and well as to recover psychologically from what she  views as a demeaning relationship with Avraham Meir. Even though he tried improving their relationship - it was too late because she could never trust him again. Her need for a get is much more than freedom to find a "stepfather for her son." The get also means retrieveing her life from being controlled by Avraham Meir.

6) This fear of being controlled and thus the compensatory need to be in control extends to other aspect of Gital's life - especially in relationship to other people. It played a role in a previous relationship that didn't work out. Thus these last four years have been  torture for her, while the sense of power from intimidating the Weiss' and Feinstein's has been exilarating.

Thus whatever settlement Gital obtains has to not only include receiving the Get - but also clearly establishing that Avraham Meir and his family did not win and that they don't dictate the terms. This view is also shared by her mother and therefore is non negotiable.

Avraham Meir view: 

1). He entered marriage viewing it with the normative view presented in the gemora and poskim that the husband is the boss - but found out the hard way that his wife (like many frum women today) wasn't interested in that approach. His eventual willingness to change his view to his wife's view of equality  was rejected as coming too late. Thus he now has a much more realistic and flexible understanding of women then when he got married.

2) When his wife simply left him with their child it was a major shock. He wasn't used to this helpless state - especially in regards to his own child - whom he loves dearly. Initially he tried simply accepting it as a test and relied on her sense of fairness. However he realized that the good faith relationship was not working out and that in reality she was in total control of his ability to see their child and she was using that power to keep his son from him. Thefore he decided that he needed to formalize in enforceable secular law his access to their son - something that went very much against his training as a frum Jew. Again he learned to act pragmatically rather than what was maximally ideal.

3) His initial belief in rationality - if you are logical - than the other side will eventually agree has been shattered. When his wife agreed to go to therapy, he thought they could work things out and he would give up what ever needed to hold the marriage and family together. When she quit therapy with the therapist she chose - after four session - despite the therapist saying that the marriage was fixable, he realized that rationality in these matters is not much use.

4) His education in pragmatism - and the emotional rather than intellectual approach of women - was only the start of his education in real life. He discovered that going to court cost money - lots of money and that the Dodelson's could play the court system better than his family. As his family was driven into bankruptcy and the stress was severely impacting all members of his family - he became focused on regaining this money that he had been forced to spend to retain access to his son.  He views it as an non-negotiable point to regain if not all - at least a significant amount of money that his wife forced him to spend. It is not just a question of pride. He doesn't want to live the rest of his life paying off the hundreds of thousands of dollars spent - nor does he want his family to have to deal with it.

Bottom line. Avraham Meir is much more mature and realistic about life. His minimum requirements for a get are 1) guaranteed custody rights from a consent agreement ratified by the judge which will ensure that the Dodelson's don't try to take his son away from him. 2) Financial compensation for the lawyers fees that he had to shell out in order to obtain the elementary human right to be with his son. He doesn't have the psycholgical need to win - but he and his family have suffered major public shaming. He doesn't want revenge but he does want the settlement to convey a public message that he and family are not the evil psychopathic creatures that the Dodelson's have successfully conveyed to the public.

Suggested settlement: 

After listening and engaging in discussion on this topic for countless hours I think the outline of a resolution to this disaster has become obvious. The halachic issues have been fully discussed regarding his right to give a get and the requirement to avoid a get me'usa. Her excrutiating pain from being kept in a marriage for 4 years has also been fully and clearly described. I have allowed posts from both sides that I normally would not because of the to'eles that both sides need to know that their pain and indignation  and rage has been heard by the whole world – especially the other side.

There are actually two viable solutions - not one.

1) Reconciliation: I know most people will respond that this proves that psychologists are all crazy – but this is really the best solution. I am not saying this merely as an armchair observer. Gital had agreed to go to marriage therapy contingent on a number of conditions 1) The choice would be hers 2) He had to be a non-Jew 3) He had to live outside their community 4) She would only go for 4 sessions. The therapist told them that the marriage could be saved. Gital wasn't interested and never went back.

 It is clear that returning to a marriage that can be repaired with the person with whom she had a child – is infinitely better than hoping to find someone new. She has already struck out twice – there is no reason to believe that marriage to a 3rd person would not end the same way. Her legitimate objections to Avraham Meir can readily be dealt with by an agreed upon rav that will guide them through future conflicts. Likewise the rav can help Avraham Meir to be more sensitive and accommodating to her psychological and religious needs. It really isn't rocket science.

Rabbi Avraham Blumencrantz once mentioned that he advised all couples to move far away and minimize contact with their families at least during the first year of marriage. He observed that many if not most disputes came about through "good advice" from concerned mothers and fathers. Chazal tell us that when a woman marries it equivalent to be captured by a foreign nation. She needs to understand that marriage doesn't make the husband an extension of her family – but that she and her husband are forming a new family with alliances to relatives. This advice applies equally to Avraham Meir. 

Avraham Meir needs to be fully aware that the ideal of marriage described in the rabbinic literature – needs to be modified according to the nature of the wife. He needs a wise rav who they both respect to guide him in making appropriate accommodation. I have seen too many avreichim who cite Shulchan Aruch and stories of tzadikim when they come for shalom bayis session. As the Steipler put it – he has to understand his wife is not a shtender.

They both have to know the welfare of their son is best served if he has the two parents living as husband and wife in harmony rather than living in two alienated families. Even with the best psychologist and the best intentions their son will be harmed by divorce. In reality divorced couples are not known for their rational loving attitude towards each other – and they convey that clearly to the detriment of their child.

2) Divorce: If the thought of reconciliation makes them want to vomit then here are the outlines of a fair divorce settlement. It is clear that despite all the yelling and screaming about extortion – money is not the main issue for either of them. Baruch haShem, Gital's parents are very wealthy and will not suffer in any way from a financial settlement. They do not however want to give it on principle. However since this is a pragmatic solution which has a single goal – that Gital should obtain her Get – we must ignore who is right or wrong. 

First step: $350,000 should be put in escrow according to both their lawyers advice. Giving of the money to Avraham Meir is to be contingent on his giving a get of his own free will. This step is really the simple one

Second step: This is really the issue that divides them. They are both concerned that the other side will harm the child and therefore satisfactory guarantees need to be provided. The Dodelson's have consulted with a psychologist who has emphasized the need for the child to have one home where he can feel secure. He noted that by having divided custody, the child really does not have a home or identity. Therefore the Dodelson's want a reduction from the court ordered custody arrangement. They also don't want their grandson to be too attached to his father and are hoping that when Gital remarries the child will accept his stepfather as his Tatty.

Awareness of the Dodelson's goal is the reason that Avraham Meir is fighting so hard for a consent agreement which will guarantee that he doesn't have to constantly worry that he will be summoned back to court to fight for his relationship to his son. In addition to the stress, he does not have the money or the time for this fight and he feels this tension is bad for his son – as well as his whole family. He doesn't want his son to be poisoned against him – which is a realistic worry.

I would suggest the formation of a committee of several rabbis respected by both side working in consultation with psychologists who are respected by both sides. I would suggest that Rav Matisyahu Solomon, Rabbi Yakov Horowitz, Rabbi Aaron Kotler and Rabbi Ronnie Greenwald form this group with psychologists of their choosing. I would suggest that both Avraham Meir and Gital agree in advance to whatever decision the committee unanimously agrees to. The issue of custody should not be left to a secular court, nor it should be decided on the basis of advice by a psychologist hired by one side nor should it be the source of ongoing tension. It needs to be decided now. (However if in the future one side feels a need for modification, the committee should meet again and decide the issue.)

If these two issues are dealt with as described, there is absolutely no reason why a get will not be given promptly. Gital and Avraham Meir with then be able to live again – and peace will be restored in Clall Yisroel.

Weiss-Dodelson: A Dodelson supporter calls for collectively finding a solution - not ad hominem attacks

The following is a post written by one the participants to the discussion as an articulate and sensitive supporter of the Dodelson side.  We have been carrying on off the blog discussion and he asked if I would post this Only on the condition that comments will be approved if they have solutions and not ad hominem attacks. which I agree.

I agree fully with what he has written.

=====================================================
Guest post by A Concerned Jew

This sad parsha causes people to behave irrationally. Most of you guys are just interested in belittling others & not, as Rabbi Eidenson calls for, finding a pragmatic solution. Name calling doesn't help anyone, & repeating things that one side says that the other side says are lies doesn't help anyone. How about you look at the two sides as presented by Rabbi Eidenson, or how you understand them to be, & instead of fighting out who is "right" or "wrong" try coming up with a solution that both sides would accept, even the side that is wrong(whichever side you think that is). Don't fight over who did or didn't do what when, that stage of this story is already in the rear view mirror. 
 
Bottom line is, there is tangible suffering in this parsha now for everyone involved. There is the girl who wants to be free of a marriage that has been over for years (doesn't matter whose fault that was) & feels like her only recourse is to go very public with her story, & there is the boys family, where the father & uncle are now without employment & the grandfathers yeshiva is the focus of a PR campaign. 
 
And last but not least, there is the child, who is being deprived of any stability in his young & formative years, as his parents are fighting with each other in a very public way, & both sides are using him as a bargaining chip to use against the other. There is no way anyone can justify the long term damage being done to this child- from either side.
 
I've asked Rabbi Eidenson to carefully moderate the comments in this guest post. There will be no he said/she said here, you can do that in other posts. No attacks, only proposals for a final agreement that can be palatable for Weiss & Dodelson.

Thank you.

The need to give a Get: A father, husband and ex-husband

Guest Post







R’ Eidensohn

 I apologize for having added to your pile of e-mail, but I am in a somewhat unique position in all this.  I am a proudly “modern orthodox” Jew who learns and lives by halacha and attempts to hew to R’ Soleveitchik’s hashkafa and derech halimud – which is important only in as much as I am not chareidi and have no particular attachment to either the Dodelson or Weiss families.  (Full disclosure: if anything, I have some connection to the Weiss family, as R’ Moshe Meir Weiss, who knows my in-laws, spoke beautifully at my chuppa . . . more on that in a moment).

 I have also had the “pleasure” of going through the divorce process.  I have children – three wonderful, amazing young kids who I would absolutely die for. I worked out custody with my ex-wife cooperatively (though we don’t do much cooperatively these days); she has them during the week, and I get them 3 weekends out of every 4.  That works out to 6 days with my children out of every 4 weeks, less than the 12 every 4 weeks that Mr. Weiss gets with his son on the “every other weekend plus 2 days a week” schedule the Court ordered (I decided I did not want to seek mid-week custody, as the children need the stability of being in one home for periods of time, rather than being shuttled back and forth every other day).  I am, unfortunately, fully conversant with the pain of not being with my children every day, of not being able to tuck them into bed every night, of aching to see them more than I can, and of hearing them cry on the phone because they miss me.  It is a torment I would not wish on anyone.

I also have the pleasure of being remarried to a wonderful eishes chayil; a tremendous human being who the children look to as a third parent.  (Yes, third.  One of the first things they asked me and my ex when we told them we were divorcing was “what happens if you marry someone else.”  Without having talked about it beforehand, we simply said “well, now you have an Abba who loves you and a Mommy who loves you. If Abba gets remarried, then you’ll have a Mommy who loves you, an Abba who loves you, and an Ima who loves you.  If Mommy gets married again, you’ll have an Abba who loves you, a Mommy who loves you, and a Daddy who loves you.”  There is room in a child’s heart for 3 or 4 parents, and the introduction of a step-parent into a relationship does not inherently imply that step-parent is “taking the place” of the ex in the child’s heart).  The joy of that relationship, which began after I gave my ex-wife a get  but before the terms of our civil divorce were worked out, sustains me through the most difficult moments of being away from my children. 

 It is from that perspective, and with all of my heart and soul, that I say to you: “Avraham Meir must give Gital the get.  Without conditions, without delay, without demands.

I say this for two reasons.First, regardless of what his halachic “rights” might be, refusal to give a get after a marriage has irredeemably broken is never justified.  We are all well aware of the principle of “m’nuval b’rshus haTorah” – that one can act unethically while scrupulously adhering to Halacha.  I can think of no greater example of this than a willingness to withhold a Get in order to receive financial reimbursement even for money halachically owed (assuming that it was halachically owed).  The very act of doing so is a proclamation that “my financial benefit is of greater concern to me than your emotional torment.”  Prizing repayment over another’s emotional well-being – let alone the mother of your child, whose emotional state will impact the child – is reflective of warped priorities.  I am well aware that money is critical to many things, and of the stress that comes from its lack.  (My own divorce is financially onerous).  Still; unless the money will make the difference between privation and survival, that is irrelevant.  Give the get.

Second, for Avraham Meir’s own sake, and divorced (pun intended) from any benefit to Gital, he must give the get and move on.  Staying in this stage of limbo is doing him no good.  Fighting to “win” is only causing him more misery.  Give the get, and let everyone move on.  Please.

A father, husband, and ex-husband

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Car Mechanic Dreams Up a Tool to Ease Births

NY Times   The idea came to Jorge Odón as he slept. Somehow, he said, his unconscious made the leap from a YouTube video he had just seen on extracting a lost cork from a wine bottle to the realization that the same parlor trick could save a baby stuck in the birth canal. 

Mr. Odón, 59, an Argentine car mechanic, built his first prototype in his kitchen, using a glass jar for a womb, his daughter’s doll for the trapped baby, and a fabric bag and sleeve sewn by his wife as his lifesaving device. 

Unlikely as it seems, the idea that took shape on his counter has won the enthusiastic endorsement of the World Health Organization and major donors, and an American medical technology company has just licensed it for production.[...]

 Doctors say it has enormous potential to save babies in poor countries, and perhaps to reduce cesarean section births in rich ones.

Weiss Dodelson: Gital threatens to destroy Rav Reuven Feinstein's yeshiva for supporting her husband

Times of Israel   Gital Dodelson is quite likely America’s most famous agunah. In recent weeks, the 25-year-old Orthodox law student has jumped to the headlines of major media outlets because of her struggle to force her ex-husband, Avrohom Meir Weiss, to give her a Jewish divorce, or get. On Tuesday, Dodelson’s enthusiastic and increasingly well-mobilized supporters noted a key victory as ArtScroll Publishing confirmed that Weiss’s father and uncle had taken unpaid leaves of absence from the prestigious publishing house. On the heels of their successful public pressure campaign, Dodelson’s supporters are now turning their sights toward the prestigious Yeshiva of Staten Island, publicly shunning the yeshiva’s leadership for allowing Weiss to continue to study there.[...]

Dodelson’s backers have taken extreme measures as well. In recent months, over 2,000 people signed on to an Internet petition calling on ArtScroll to fire Weiss’s father and uncle who both serve as editors at the publishing house. On Tuesday, an organization established to advocate for Dodelson’s right to receive a get published an email confirmation that Weiss’s father and uncle had taken leave of absence from the ArtScroll Publishing House under intense public pressure. [...]

“We have confirmation from a trusted party that the ArtScroll board heard us loud and clear, and they did exactly what we asked of them,” wrote one of the activists who run the “Free Gital” Facebook page. “It’s now time to move on from ArtScroll and put our focus on the Yeshiva of Staten Island, where Avrohom Meir Weiss is in Kollel, despite the Kol Koreh stating that he should not be allowed.” [...]

 Now, Dodelson’s supporters are calling the Staten Island Yeshiva to ask for Weiss’s removal — a difficult request for a yeshiva run by his mother’s family. As an additional step, supporters are being encouraged via Facebook to work to disinvite the yeshiva’s head from guest appearances at local synagogues. Supporters have already contacted a Highland Park, New Jersey, synagogue that is expected to host Feinstein this Saturday night, asking it to withdraw its invitation to Feinstein. [...]

Weiss-Dodelson: Why don't you want to hear lashon harah about Gital and her family?

I am being flooded by hundreds of emails and comments dealing with the Weiss -Dodelson case. While there clearly are halachic issues that intelligent and sincere people can disagree with - there is the incredible problem of the information people are relying on to form their opinion. In particular, the extremely one sided and distorted collection of misinformation that appeared in Gital's interview with the N.Y. Post. While everyone nods their head and says in divorce cases there is the wife's version, the husband's version and then there is truth - in reality most people are simply accepting Gital's account as being objective and true.

I was at a chasuna last night in Mitzpe Yericho. It was truly a beautiful chasuna in a beautiful setting overlooking the Jordan Valley. I was talking with an old friend when a rosh yeshiva came over with one of his talmidim and asked me, "Could you explain the Weiss-Dodelson case to him? He read the NY Post article and doesn't understand how anybody could be so abusive and controlling and consider himself a Jew." I spent about 15 minutes going over the issues and the rosh yeshiva backed up my understanding of the halachic issues. The bachur kept repeating, "but she says he did...".  At the end, I told him that it was clear that he had accepted her view without hearing the other side - a clear violation of halacha.  I asked him, "I have received many emails describing Gital and much negative information about her and her family. Would you like to hear the lashon harah?" He was shocked at my suggestion that he listen to lashon harah and he walked away. He totally missed the point that hearing lashon harah from me about her - was the same as reading lashon harah or motzi shem rah from the NY Post about him.

So I ask you - "Would you like to hear the lashon harah about Gital and her family that Avraham Meir could have said if he had responded to the N.Y. Post's request for his side of the story? I hope the answer is no. Their son will grow up loving both his parents  - and one day he will have to face what his mother said about his father. It is time to stop trying to prove who was wrong - and get on with life.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Rav Dovid Tzvi Hoffman: Was Hebrew the first language?


update:Guest post: YD Rosenberg Translation added November 13, 2013
 

“Therefore, [t]he[y] called its name Bavel, for there Hashem confused the language of the entire earth, and from there Hashem scattered them upon the face of the entire earth.”
Genesis 11:9

קָרָא [lit.] he called” means “they would call its name 'Babel'”  *(See Radak for similar peirush.)
שְׁמָהּ “its name” – i.e. the name of the city.
בָּבֶל – [to be understood as] מבלבל - confused. [i.e. With an added מ and ל] like the word קיקלון = מקלקלון in Chabakuk 2:16.
וּמִשָּׁם הֱפִיצָם “and from there He scattered them”.  This was an outcome of “there He confused”.
   
[i.e. This 'scattering' was an outcome of the mixing-up of languages related in the verse.]
The coming into being of different languages, then, was not an occurrence caused by an incidental "going of separate ways" of the people. Rather, it was an act of Heavenly Divine Providence that brought about this dispersion, which in turn bought in its wake the formation of different languages.

Now, Scripture is not relating to us the nature of the first language, i.e. the most ancient one to ever exist. The Authors of the Aggadah, however, do [express a definite view on this subject] in Br. R. 18:4, and maintain that this original language was L’shon HaKodesh

Yet, even if the modern researchers of linguistics maintain that this first language was a different one, we shall take no issue with it.

Furthermore, as a related point, even if the Babylonians would have constructed the name of their city from the words 'BaB' & 'BaL', or 'Beith' & 'BaL', or – according to [the sounds as they are] written – BaB - EL; behold, even then, the Scriptural explanation [that Bavel is named for the jumbling-up of languages] would be justified unequivocally. For so, too, is the name of the city an act of Divine Providence!  — in order that Yisrael remember the confounding of languages that took place there and the Blessed One’s intervention in nature, so as to educate humanity and save them for the future.
============================================ 
Someone directed me to a section [see English translation above] from Rabbi Dovid Zvi Hoffman's commentary to Bereishis 11:9 where he says something along the lines of, "If someone will prove that Adom HaRishon spoke Sumarian, it will not be a problem." 

Here's how I understood his commentary:

Point #1: The formation of the multiplicity of languages comes from Divine providence and not from evolutionary happenstance.
Point #2: The baalei aggadah maintain that the original language was L'shon HaKodesh. Current academia maintains that the original language was something else (e.g. Indo-European), but this is insignificant.
(I understood this to mean that to prove or disprove the identity of the Original Language has no bearing whatsoever on the veracity of the Torah since the Biblical account deals only with the dispersion of languages at Bavel but never says anywhere that L'shon HaKodesh was that original language. My question on this is: Why isn't there a problem of casting aspersions on the baalei aggadah? [Perhaps I partially answered this in the e-mail?])
Point #3: The inhabitants of Bavel didn't necessarily have in mind the Torah's meaning of "Bavel" at the time they named their country. Rather, hashgachoh directed that they would give it this name.
Point #4: Rav Hoffman seems to hold that the mixing-up of language didn't have to be a one-time event or something that was noticeably a result of Divine intervention or retribution. (This point emerges from how he explains points #1 and #3.)
----------------------
Comment #1: I noticed one small typo. I put red parentheses around the letter that I think is a mistake —
עַל־כֵּן קָרָא שְׁמָהּ בָּבֶל כִּי־שָׁם בָּלַל יְיָ שְׂפַת כָּל־הָאָרֶץ וּמִשָּׁם הֱפִיצָם יְיָ עַל־פְּנֵי כָּל־הָאָֽרֶץ:

קָרָא, פירוש היו קוראים. — שְׁמָהּ, כלומר שם העיר. — בָּבֶל מבלבל, כמו "קיקלון" מקלקלון. — וּמִשָּׁם הֱפִיצָם. זו היתה התוצאה של " שָׁמ(ה) בָּלַל"....

Comment #2: The following two statements seem to be a contradiction:
א] וּמִשָּׁם הֱפִיצָם. זו היתה התוצאה של " שָׁמ(ה) בָּלַל".
ב] ...אלא מעשה ההשגחה העליונה הוא שהביא לידי התפזרות זו, שבעקבותיה התהוו הלשונות השונות....
Statement א tells us that the dispersion was a result of the confusion of languages; statement ב says that it was the dispersion that brought about a multiplicity of languages. Statement א seems to fit better with the possuk:  כִּי־שָׁם בָּלַלthere the languages were mixed up. (i.e. it did not happen only after they were dispersed, but right there.)
----------------------
I know that Rav Hoffman, zt"l, was appealing to a specific audience, but it's definitely a point that the Torah doesn't identify the Original Language. To complicate matters, one opinion in the Yerushalmi holds that all 70 languages were spoken even before the Tower of Babel. Maybe I’ll try to send you more info on that soon. Would you like that?

update for additional information:  "The Holy Tongue and How It Changed the Course of History" by Benjamin Gross, PhD discussed the two approaches in the Rishonim on the issue of the Divinity of L'shon HaKodesh. (Chapter 4 [p. 45] continuing into Chapter 5) e.g. Kuzari, Rambam... Here's the link: http://www.amazon.com/Holy-Tongue-Changed-Course-History/dp/1934440019