Implanting a false memory, it turns out, is alarmingly easy to do.
Shaw, a Canadian now living in London, was in Toronto to promote her new book, The Memory Illusion. In it, she describes how false memories can be deliberately placed in people’s brains—leading to false police confessions that could send the wrong person to jail, or detailed accounts of alien abductions that (almost certainly) never happened.
“A memory is a network of brain cells,” Shaw explained to me. That network, which stretches across different regions of the brain, is constantly being updated. It’s an important function that allows us humans to learn new things and to problem-solve, among other skills. But as a result, it “can be manipulated,” she continued. “Each time you tell a story, you change the memory,” maybe dropping in new details, weaving in tidbits you really heard from somebody else, or forging new, and possibly inaccurate or misleading, connections.
For example: If you think you remember anything before you were about two-and-a-half years old, Shaw said, that’s a false memory. (Before then, our brains aren’t developed enough to store memories, a phenomenon called childhood or infantile amnesia.) A memory from earlier that “was either given to you through photos, you saw a picture, or maybe your parents told you a story,” she explained. “You can internalize them quite readily.”
The fact that memories are so changeable has important implications for, among other things, the criminal justice system, Shaw pointed out—and that’s the focus of much of her work. “In the lab, I convince people through memory hacking that they committed crimes that never happened,” said Shaw, senior lecturer and researcher in the Department of Law and Social Sciences at London South Bank University. “I do it to show that the interrogation process can really distort memories, in consistent ways.”
To implant a false memory, “you try to get someone to confuse their imagination with their memory,” she said. “That’s it: Get them to repeatedly picture it happening.”
She’ll start off by letting them know they committed a crime, and then claim to have insider information. For example: “Your parents told me that, when you were 14, you stole something, and the police were involved,” she said, adding that she’ll say she called the parents, and give details of their talk, “and then you believe me. You know I contacted your parents, and you trust them,” she continued. That gives her credibility.
She’ll keep going and layer in detail—the person’s age, hometown, the name of their childhood best friend, and get them to repeatedly imagine the crime happening, over and over again, even if they never did it. Over the course of a couple of weeks, maybe even a shorter timespan than that, “it gets harder to decipher imagination, versus a memory coming back,” Shaw said. “By the end, it’s easy to think, this actually happened.” [...]
“Shaw, a Canadian now living in London, was in Toronto to promote her new book, The Memory Illusion. In it, she describes how false memories can be deliberately placed in people’s brains—leading to false police confessions that could send the wrong person to jail, or detailed accounts of alien abductions that (almost certainly) never happened.”
ReplyDeleteFascinating. I suspect Susan, my ex-wife whom I divorced on her initiative 2/15/1993 placed false memories in the brains of herself, our children, my brother and sister-in-law etc. Could Tamar Epstein’s psychologist, family, friends, etc have placed false memories in brains of Tamar and her supporters??
It’s so important that all the facts come out. Example, I wrote last week to my pension company, TIAA, who is paying Susan $825 monthly from my pension with copy to Susan and her supporters:
“On the advice of Ian Anderson, I appeared and spoke before Judge Rigler August 1992. I showed Judge Rigler copies of 22 letters I sent from Israel begging Susan to drop her foolishness of seeking a divorce and reconcile with me. Susan never answered in writing. She told me on the phone that “That's the ticket!” She'll agree to reconcile if I grant her a NYS divorce. She said that since I'm religious, a NYS civil divorce means nothing to me. The rabbis in Jerusalem advised me to send Susan a get and see if she accepts it. Susan accepted the get before witnesses in Rabbi Ralbag's Brooklyn court 2/15/1993. I married Yemima 5/9/1993.”
Well, when mothers question their children over and over again for months on end as was done in Nachlaot, along with being told by other parents that their children were also molested, of course the children will eventually say what the parents expect to hear. Along with some respected bloggers that seem fixated on child abuse, we have the makings of mass memory distortion. I once asked someone if she was concerned since her name was also on the list of Christian Cult enablers and she replied that she made a donation for the children that were molested by the terrible Nachlaot cult.
ReplyDelete