Thursday, January 16, 2020

Exclusive: ‘You Jews Vote for Trump’: 3 Teens Berate Jewish Girl on Subway

https://boropark24.com/exclusive-you-jews-vote-for-trump-3-teens-berate-jewish-girl-on-subway/

 Yelling obscenities and anti-Semitic remarks, three youths confronted a Jewish girl riding on the subway in Manhattan Tuesday afternoon and threatened to harm her.
To the victim’s shock, transit police refused to file anything more than a harassment report, despite the repeated references to “you Jews” in the attackers’ ten-minute-long tirade.
“It made me feel very uncomfortable,” her father told boropark24.com. “I didn’t go down there to Manhattan to just file a harassment report.”
 

Republican leader in Delaware ousted after blaming Jews for Trump impeachment

https://www.timesofisrael.com/republican-leader-in-delaware-ousted-after-blaming-jews-for-trump-impeachment/

 A Republican Party leader in Delaware was fired after Facebook posts that were criticized as anti-Semitic. The Sussex County Republican Party voted on Monday to oust its vice chair, Nelly Jordan, the Dover Post reported. Her Facebook comments singling out Jews as responsible for the impeachment of US President Donald Trump came to light on December 31, according to Delaware State News.
 

ANOTHER DAY ANOTHER TRUMP LIE Trump Says Migrants Getting Stuck Climbing New Border Wall Is A 'Beautiful Sight'—And Proof It Works

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-border-wall-migrants-stuck-top-cbp-1482253

Speaking to a packed crowd, Trump told supporters that "two days ago, illegal aliens with drugs on their back were climbing the wall" and "couldn't get off."

While it is true that three migrants did recently get arrested after getting stuck trying to climb over the border wall, that incident unfolded more than a week ago on January 5, and there is no evidence to suggest that the migrants were carrying drugs.
 
Appearing to describe that incident during his rally, Trump said: "They go to the top, you know, that panel on top is called a 'climb resister.' It's very slippery and very hot. It's very hot," Trump said. "And they got stuck on the wall, they couldn't get off the wall. You see that?"

Trump Says U.S. Troops Stayed in Syria 'Because I Kept the Oil'

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-us-troops-syria-oil-bashar-al-assad-kurds-wisconsin-rally-1482250

"People said to me, 'Why are you staying in Syria,'" Trump said Tuesday. "Because I kept the oil, which frankly we should have done in Iraq," he added, to cheers and applause from the audience. The president has previously criticized his predecessors for not profiting off Iraqi oil wells.
"So they say, 'Trump's in Syria,' I didn't pull out—I did pull out," the president continued. "We have the oil, really secure. We'll see what happens with it."
Trump's Middle East policy has been erratic, in few places more so than Syria. The president has repeatedly voiced his desire to bring U.S. troops home and disengage from another unwinnable, long-running, low-intensity conflict there.
The president abruptly ordered the withdrawal of U.S. forces from positions in northeastern Syria near the border with Turkey in October.

 

Lev Parnas Hits the Airwaves on the Eve of Trump's Impeachment Trial

https://time.com/5766061/lev-parnas-trump-impeachment/

Speaking publicly for the first time since the impeachment inquiry made him a household name last fall, Ukrainian-American businessman Lev Parnas alleged in a television interview that the President “knew exactly what was going on” in the campaign to pressure Ukraine to investigate Trump’s 2020 rival Joe Biden.
“He was aware of all of my movements,” Parnas told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow. “I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani or the president.”

 

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Tamar Epstein: Is Rabbi Hersehl Schachter making a farce of his own halachic positions?

Guest Post

Epstein-Flesicher, a coerced get, (and also kiddushai ta'us?): Is Rabbi Hershel Schachter making a farce of his own halachic positions?

An earlier post explained how Rabbi Hershel Schachter’s actions in the Epstein-Friedman case are contrary to halacha.  Daas Torah Blog

But Rabbi Schachter's actions in the case are also completely contrary to his own publicly stated halachic positions on the matters involved in the case. Rabbi Schachter encouraged public pressure and demonstrations against Friedman even though the Baltimore Beis Din to which the parties brought the matter and which held hearings with the participation of both parties refused Epstein's demands for a get. Rabbi Schachter and ORA, of which he serves as posek, insisted on demonstrating against Friedman despite the Baltimore Beis Din's statement that such demonstrations were wrong. For good measure, they also demonstrated against the Washington Beis Din for refusing to intervene against Friedman. Rabbi Schachter even went so far as to call for violence against Friedman to obtain a get. But a get obtained through public presssure or coercion not sanctioned by the beis din with jurisdiciton would be inavlid.

Eventually Rabbi Schachter and his accomplices in the matter signed a purported "seruv" against Friedman.

On Tisha Ba'av in 2012, Friedman was attacked and beaten, in an attempted kidnapping as he dropped off the child at Epstein's house, an attack that endangered the lives of both Friedman and the young child. One of Rabbi Schachter's co-signatories on the “seruv” was Rabbi Mordechai Wolmark, who was alleged by the FBI to lead a so-called beis din together with Rabbi Mendel Epstein, that was actually a criminal gang which, amongst other criminal activities, attempted a kidnapping and beating of a non-existent man in order to obtain a get with regard to a non-existent marriage. Rabbi Wolmark and several co-conspirators pled guilty. Other co-conspirators, including Rabbi Epstein, were found guilty at a trial at which the attack on Friedman was alleged to be part of the Epstein-Wolmark gang’s criminal conspiracy. At least two of Rabbi Schachter's other co- signatories were alleged by the FBI to be part of the Epstein-Wolmark gang's criminal conspiracy, but, along with Rabbi Schachter, have not yet been charged.

Although Epstein consistently engaged in outrageous behavior, including abducting the parties' child, violating the orders of the Baltimore Beis Din in order to have her abduction of the child treated as a fait accompli in civil court, getting most of the child's time with Friedman rendered moot because he is shomer shabbos, and filing a contempt motion seeking to limit the child's time with Friedman to "supervised visitation," Rabbi Schachter and ORA did not just argue that Epstein should be given a get. Instead, ORA specifically argued that Epstein had acted completely properly throughout the entire matter. Furthermore, Rabbi Schachter himself appeared with Tamar at an ORA panel, at which Tamar was hailed as a heroine.

Rabbi Schachter's actions in the Epstein-Friedman case so directly contradict his earlier statement on the halachic aspects of these matters that it almost appears as if his earlier statement was specifically intended to protest against the very actions in which Rabbi Schachter himself would later engage.

"What is important to keep in mind is that whoever is chalashing for [wants]... a get must consult with rabbonim... with respect to issues of pressuring the other to give the get. You have to go to batai dinim and everything has to be done with a legitimate beis din. Sometimes people will go to criminals. Unfortunately there are criminals in every field. There are rabbis that are criminals also. Unfortunately, the husband or the wife will go to a Beis Din that has an awful reputation, and they will recommend things that are against halacha. You have to go to a reputable Beis Din and the Beis Din should give proper advice....

The Batai Dinim have a special obligation, the role of the Beis Din b'zman haze, is to maintain law and order. That people shouldn’t skin each other alive and that people should act decently towards each other."


Rabbi Schachter has not made public his position on Epstein's annulment and remarriage, although ORA, of which Rabbi Schachter serves as posek, declared that Epstien is free. Although the use of kiddushei ta'us in this case would be contrary to halacha according to Rabbi Schachter, his endorsing the annulment and remarriage of Epstein-Fliescher would be consistent with his actions in the Epstein-Friedman matter thus far in consistently contradicting, and thus making a farce of, of his own halachic positions.

Rav Herschel Schacter: Kiddushei Ta'us - Making a Farce of the Halacha

Torah Web

The Ramban writes (in the introduction to his sefer Milchamos Hashem) that the study of Talmud is not like mathematics. In Talmud study, a halachic analysis is not a geometric proof and its validity need not be contingent upon accurate application of hard logic to unassailable axioms; nor is a halachic analysis deemed invalid only upon demonstration of incontrovertible logical errors or fallacious assumptions. What is significant in halacha is the approval or disapproval of halachic experts, implying the reasonableness or unreasonableness of the argument. One must have a strong tradition in psak halacha (rendering of legal decisions) or one can float so far off as to develop the most ridiculous ideas, all in the name of halacha.

The Torah prescribes the divorce procedure such that the husband must participate voluntarily. When he refuses to participate, his wife has no other means to be free of her husband, and while she remains legally married to him she may not marry another man. This situation, though unfair and tragic for the wife, is essentially the creation of a man who has shown himself to be an evil criminal, and is abusing his wife in this contemptible way. He has made her a virtual agunah as the husband alone has the authority to free her. Over the many years of our history the rabbis have done whatever they could for any woman so trapped in this lamentable predicament. Unfortunately, no categorical or general solution to the problem emerged.

About forty years ago an Orthodox individual proposed a solution. He reasoned that the woman requires a divorce only if she is married. Although annulment is not an option, it may be possible to find cause to invalidate her marriage by finding a fatal flaw in her wedding. For example, the wedding requires that the groom give the bride an object of sufficient value, one that the groom is entitled to give, while declaring his intent to thereby marry her, without deceit in any of the particulars, all under the watchful eyes of legitimate witnesses. If any of these conditions are not met then the wedding is fatally flawed. Likewise, if the bride or groom deceives the other in a material way, the other may legitimately claim that the entire wedding was under false pretenses and thus void. Thinking along these lines, the individual referred to above argues that if the bride and groom had realized that their personalities were incompatible, they would never have agreed to get married. Hence, the marriage was effected in error, lacking the requisite da'as (awareness) for a wedding, and no Get is needed to separate them because they were never married. At the time, Rav Yosef Dov Soloveitchik declared this suggestion ridiculous. As the years went by, the ridiculous has become the sublime.[...]

To declare a marriage a kiddushei ta'us because the wife didn't realize that the husband would be unsuccessful in holding down a job and earning a living is simply unacceptable. To invalidate a kiddushin due to ta'us the halacha requires an extraordinary mum gadol (very significant defect), with a very obviousumdana d'muchach (compelling assumption) that no reasonable woman would agree to marry such a man (see Teshuvos Beis Halevi, vol. 3, pg. 23). [...]

Not only is it a mere impropriety on the part of any beis din to permit a woman to remarry based on such flimsy grounds; even bidieved- if a beis din granted a married woman permission to marry on these grounds- the ruling is ignored, and such a "heter nisuin" issued to the woman is meaningless. Only in the case of a neder do the rabbis have "power" to nullify a commitment by rendering it as a neder b'ta'us, even if it was not manifestly taken in error, as described above. However, in all other areas of halacha- particularly those of marriage and divorce- either the kiddushin falls apart by itself because there was a "mum gadol" and an umdenah demuchach that there was no da'as; or the marriage remains - notwithstanding what any rabbi or any beis din says. The special halachah of "hatarat nedarim" that empowers the beis din to undo a neder retroactively by proclaiming the da'as as a taus only applies in the area of "hafla'ah".

Moreover, even in the case of a sale that was canceled because of a mum, the Rambam wrote (Mechira 15:3) that if the purchaser continued to use the item after having discovered the mum, he cannot later claim mekach taus. Continued use of the item indicates that the level of the ta'us is insufficient to warrant voiding the transaction. Likewise, it is transmitted in the name of Hagaon Rav Moshe Feinstein zt"l, that even in the rare case of an unusual mum gadol, through which the wife would be able to remarry without a get because of the ta'us on her part at the time of the wedding, if the woman didn't walk away from the marriage immediately upon discovering the mum, the halacha of ta'us cannot be applied. [...]

It certainly is a great mitzva to help an aguna escape her plight, but issuing a heter nissuin (permission to get married) to a woman along the lines of heter nedarim is simply a farce. Let us not make a joke out of the Halacha.

Important letter from Rav Hershel Schachter, Rav Gedalia Dov Schwartz, Rav Nota Greenblatt, Rav Avrohom Union, and Rav Menachem Mendel Senderovitz regarding the "International Beit Din"(2015)

Religious Persecution of Ethiopian Girl

BS"D


18 Teves, 5780 °° Jan.15, '20

Religious Ethiopian Girl Being Persecuted for Fidelity to the Torah


By Binyomin Feinberg,
FeinbergBinyomin@gmail.com

~~~~~~~~~~~

To check for updates, on first view of this article, as well as throughout the week,  please visit Updates for month of Teves '80:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LDLjvECWQExYoGjqIrbZtWALp6MpkHq22ihNz2BLuYM/edit?usp=sharing


~~~~~~~~~ 

Ziva bas Mazal of Ashkelon is a religious 19 y/o Ethiopian girl who was recently was jailed for about three weeks - ending over three months ago, on Erev Yom Kippur - all for her refusal to enlist in the Army. Despite being incontrovertibly religious, the Army insisted that she first serve three months, and only then would they determine if she's exempt on basis
of her religiosity. In honorable compliance with Torah Law, Ziva refused. Just last week, she received notice from Maitav (the IDF Draft Office) that the government rejected her appeal of the Army's intial rejection of her petition for a religious exemption. And again, the Army Draft Office failed to provide even a veneer of legal justification for seeking to draft a religious girl. Since shortly after her release from military prison on 9 Tishrei 5780, she's been valiantly braving the threat of arrest and long term incarceration over her refusal to enlist in the Army, and continues to do so. 

Additionally, on 11 Tishrei, when Ziva went to the Draft Offices to  inform them of her ongoing refusal to enlist, she was reportedly directed to sign a document on the pretext that it was merely certification of her showing up at the draft offices ("hit'yatzvut", which she did do). Afterwards it was revealed that in fact she has been duped into signing onto a document of enlistment ("hit'gay'sut") into the military, something to which she's been in unwavering opposition to, from the very outset of her process.

#####

Public Advisory: 

1.  Do not sign anything without knowing from reliable, independent sources what you're doing. And with regard to the Army Draft Office, the general advice is not to sign anything.

2.  Moreover, it's both prohibited and dangerous for girls to even enter the Draft Offices altogether.

######

What makes this persecutory treatment even worse is that Ziva's elderly parents, and especially her father, are not in good health, and this ongoing torment exacerbates their condition. This writer is personally familiar with about a half dozen similar cases, in which religious girls with close family members who are seriously ill, have been targeted for draft- related harassment and worse.

BasCohen Resists Hegmonist Draft

BS"D

Intolerable: A Religious Bas-Cohen Imprisoned For Her Refusal to Enlist in the Army


18 Teves, 5780  °°  Jan. 15, '20

By Binyomin Feinberg,
FeinbergBinyomin@gmail.com

~~~~~~~~~~~

To check for updates, on first view of this article, as well as throughout the week,  please visit Updates for month of Teves '80:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LDLjvECWQExYoGjqIrbZtWALp6MpkHq22ihNz2BLuYM/edit?usp=sharing

~~~~~~~~~

Although Chanukah has passed,  Maitav (the Israeli Army Draft Office) refuses to allow concerned Jews to forget the timeless mesiras nefesh [selflessness] of Yehudis, and her heroic brothers, even 21 centuries afterwards. In yet another trans-generational reverberation of the righteousness of Yehudis, on Monday Jan. 13, another religious Bas-Cohen, Lital bas Miriam, of Tel Aviv, 26, was arrested at Ben Gurion Airport, for not enlisting in the Army. 

She sent in her religiosity-certification about nine years ago. She was then summoned for a Rayon Dat (Religious Interview/ Interrogation).  However, apparently, she never got a clear indication of her legal draft status one way or the other. Before she set out to the airport to travel abroad on Monday, she reportedly asked the Border Police if she would be allowed to travel without any legal complications over her draft status. They informed her that it was ok. However, on arrival she was arrested, and is now in incarcerated in military prison for her refusal to enlist in the military. Enlistment in the Army is prohibited for all girls (regardless of level of religiosity) - according to leading Rabbis across the spectrum. 

Her hearing has been postponed, and they're planning on keeping her in prison at least till then.  This callous extension of incarceration traces a recently-established pattern of military prison treatment of religious Refusenik girls and women over the past couple of months. They tend to keep girls (e.g. Orpaz Ora bas Aliza) in jail on the pretext that - for some reason - they are "unable" to arrange a hearing. This apparent charade can continue indefinitely.  Thereby, they punish and pressure the young women to submit to enlist. B"H, they are often unsuccessful, due to the fortitude of these special individuals and their advocates.

In legal systems that venerate G-d-granted individual liberties, non-violent infractions such as late submission of documentation (not to mention simple failure to answer arcane questions about religious observance) would not be grounds for arrest, much less incarceration, and much less extended jail time due to delays in the initial hearing. But the protocols of Maitav apparently  diverge from constitutional norms, standards which we in America unfortunately tend to take for granted. 


It now appears that she's sitting in Military Prison simply because she didn't answer one question correctly in her Rayon Dat nine years ago, pertaining to Kriyas HaTorah (the weekly reading of portions of the Torah). According to Jewish Law, women are generally exempt from Kriyas HaTorah (except for the reading of the Remembrance of the Obliterating of Amalek... and, according to some, Parshas Parah). To question her religiosity over such an issue is ludicrous. To arrest her over that should be criminal, but apparently raises no eyebrows.

Thank G-d, she's in contact with competent guidance, the Shomrei Torah organization, which is quite proficient at the providing quality information necessary to properly alert the public to the plight of incarcerated girls.

What makes this all even more outrageous is that her brother is suffering a severe health condition, and this unwarranted persecution  doesn't help that. In fact, the presence of a severe illness in the immediate family is a statistically significant factor present in a number of cases with which we are familiar. It appears that having an immediate family member severely ill tends to flag girls for arrest, incarceration and persecutory treatment by Maitav.

### Public Advisory: ###

A)  Anyone who has questions about his or her legal draft-status should NOT rely on verbal statements of government staff - including law enforcement officers.

B)  Anyone who's draft status is questionable should not assume it's resolved until obtaining confirmation.

C)  Those unsure of their draft status who have serious illness in the immediate family should exercise additional caution, because they can least afford complications, and because they  may be more susceptible to being flagged for arrest by Maitav, if the opportunity presents itself. That also means: drive extra carefully to avoid being pulled over, even if you think you're not doing anything dangerous.

D)  Again, do NOT enter the Draft Offices for any reason, even if you imagine that you'll "just be in and out" with your petur (exemption certification) -- even if you see other girls who do manage to enter and exit quickly with their exemptions. For all those girls who manage to avoid complications, many others don't - some of whom tragically succumb to the immense pressure to enlist in the Army.

Iran Air Flight 655

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

 Iran Air Flight 655 was a scheduled passenger flight from Tehran to Dubai via Bandar Abbas that was shot down on 3 July 1988 by an SM-2MR surface-to-air missile fired from USS Vincennes, a guided-missile cruiser of the United States Navy. The aircraft, an Airbus A300, was destroyed and all 290 people on board were killed.[1] The jet was hit while flying over Iran's territorial waters in the Persian Gulf, along the flight's usual route, shortly after departing Bandar Abbas International Airport, the flight's stopover location. The incident occurred during the final stages of the Iran–Iraq War, which had been ongoing for nearly eight years. Vincennes had entered Iranian territory after one of its helicopters drew warning fire from Iranian speedboats operating within Iranian territorial limits.[2][3][4][5][6][7]
 

Trump vs. Iran: What Now?


Trump's 'Phase One' Trade Deal With China Won't Stop Trade Wars From Being the New Normal

https://time.com/5764359/phase-one-us-china-trade-deal-war/


And so while a truce in the trade war suits both sides at the moment, it won’t be long before that political calculation changes. The U.S. is still demanding that China reforms its state-dominated economy despite many of the subsidies Beijing provides firms also offered by the U.S. Amazon, for example, was offered $3 billion in tax breaks and other incentives to relocate to New York City before the deal collapsed.
 

Heter to sin?

Chagiga (16a) R. Elai the elder said: If a man sees that his [evil] inclination is prevailing upon him, let him go to a place where he is not known, and put on black garments,20 and wrap himself up21 in black garments, and let him do what his heart desires;22 but let him not profane the Name of Heaven publicly!


ספר אורחות צדיקים שער התשובה
אמר רבי אבהו משום רבי חנינא (קידושין מ א): נוח לו לאדם שיעברו עבירה בסתר ואל יחלל שם שמים בפרהסיא, פירוש, שלא ילמדו בני אדם ממעשיו. ואמר רבי אלעאי הזקן: אם רואה אדם שיצרו מתגבר עליו, ילך למקום שאין מכירים אותו, וילבש שחורים ויתעטף שחורים, ויעשה מה שלבו חפץ, ואל יחלל שם שמים בפרהסיא. ופירש רבינו חננאל: חס ושלום שהותר לו לעבור עבירה, אלא החכמים עמדו נגד יצר הרע שאינו מתאווה אלא אל האיסור ולמלאות תאוותו, וכיון שהולך למרחוק ולובש שחורים, אז לבו יישבר ויימנע מן החטא. אבל לעשות איסורים - כלל וכלל לא! אך מעשים הללו משברים רוע יצר הרע ומונעים אותו מלעבור, כדאמר רבי אילעי, כי יגיעת דרכים ואכסניות ולבישת שחורים משברות יצר הרע ומונעות את האדם מן העבירה.