Friday, February 27, 2026

As popular YouTuber targets US Orthodox communities, the right grapples with antisemitism

 https://www.timesofisrael.com/as-popular-youtuber-targets-us-orthodox-communities-the-right-grapples-with-antisemitism/

Tyler Oliveira releases ‘exposés’ about Haredi locales Lakewood and Kiryas Joel, relying on selective interviews, amplifying antisemitic tropes, and garnering millions of views

That’s when he uploaded his latest video, titled, “I Exposed New Jersey’s Jewish Invasion…” It features man-on-the-street encounters and selective interviews that frame local disputes over welfare, land use and political influence as evidence of a broader “Jewish invasion.” Through loaded narration, ominous editing and repeated references to ethnic separatism, he amplifies antisemitic tropes while casting Orthodox Jewish communities as fraudulent drains on public resources. The video quickly reached more than 2.2 million views.

Oliveira portrayed Lakewood as rife with fraud by citing allegations involving Jewish officials in recent years, including a rabbi who was indicted in 2017 on charges of stealing public funds from a school he founded — charges that were later dismissed. He also highlighted the large family sizes common among Lakewood’s Orthodox Jewish residents, a factor that has contributed to the township’s high birth rate relative to the rest of the state.

“There’s a major financial incentive to be an antisemite, whether it’s expressed as anti-Israel or explicitly as anti-Jewish,” Roberts said. “Tucker, Candace [Owens] and Nick Fuentes … they’re all profiting on it with no conscience that they’re spreading falsehoods.”

How US envoy Kushner’s ‘incomprehension’ of diplomacy stunned France

 https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/27/europe/us-envoy-kushner-diplomacy-stuns-france-intl

French Foreign Ministry spokesperson Pascal Confavreux said the US ambassador had now provided assurances he had not meant to interfere in “the internal sphere of France.” As to Kushner’s initial no-show when summoned, Confavreux made allowances for the American real-estate magnate, who only took up his functions as ambassador to Paris in July, being relatively new to the more genteel world of diplomacy.

Yet beyond the ruffling of French feathers by a lack of diplomatic niceties lies the deeper question of how to handle increasingly obvious American attempts to interfere in European domestic matters
 – often using the very public platform X.

All three cases demonstrate at once a break with traditional diplomatic form, the use of social media rather than back channels, and a new willingness on the part of Washington to involve itself more aggressively in the judicial or political processes of other countries, and specifically European ones.

Dying Last Words

 This is a story from a true insider

There was a godol who was dying and he was basically alone. When he asked why his closest students hadn't come he was told they were in the yeshiva giving their regular shiur. He responded there was one other similar situation. Yakov was wrestling with the Angel of Esau. When it became dawn he told Yakov he needed to leave because he needed to sing Shirim"

Trump's favorite Mayor

 


Nature After the Flood

Sforno (Bereishis 08:22) Nature will not cease to function dependably as it had prior to the deluge. The sun will orbit predictably, its orbit will be subject to calculation in advance, so will be its position relative to other phenomena in the sky. All the time periods mentioned in this verse will somehow be related to the position of the sun at different times during the year. It would be different from before the deluge. Whereas prior to the deluge the sun had remained at a fixed distance relative to the earth all year round, its orbit being circular, resulting in eternal spring in the populated parts of the earth, now there would be all these changes, though at predetermined intervals, resulting in alternating seasons of relative warmth and cold due to the elliptical nature of the sun’s orbit until such time as G-d would correct this deterioration in living conditions on earth due to the effect of the deluge. This “correction” is what the prophet Isaiah 66,22 had in mind when he spoke of the “the new earth which I am going to make.” In that future foreseen by the prophet, the sun will once more orbit like a circle instead of like an ellipsis, a configuration responsible for the uneven temperatures on earth during different parts of the year. At that time, the whole vegetation on earth will undergo an upgrading, the curse earth experienced both after Adam’s sin and after Kayin’s murder of his brother Hevel being lifted. Conditions of length of human life will revert to what they had been before the deluge, as the prophet said that , a youth, if he dies at a hundred years old will be considered as having died in his adolescence and more verses there describing this future. This is also what David referred “You make the lands of sunrise and sunset shout for joy.”

As measles spreads, these 9 vaccine-preventable diseases could be next

 https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw/?trackId=6491713851bc4a6b17b98750&s=69a0de86c5a72e73930e4318&utm_source=newsletter&wpsirc=nl_wellbeing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=wp_wellbeing&linknum=4&linktot=53

There are more than 900 confirmed measles cases in the United States, as of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s most recent weekly count. It’s less than two months into the year, “and we already have over a quarter of [the measles cases] we had all of 2025, so things are not great,” said Katrine Wallace, an epidemiologist and adjunct assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health.

When it comes to infectious diseases, measles is “the canary in the coal mine,” according to Wallace.

“Measles is the most contagious disease that we have, period,” Wallace told writer Kathleen Felton. “So as soon as we start to see measles, we know that the [vaccination] rates in that county or state are starting to drop, and so other diseases will follow on to that, but they just take longer to rip through the communities.”

Trump Keeps Railing Against Non-Citizen Voting. Research Shows It’s Extremely Rare

 https://time.com/7381495/trump-non-citizen-voter-fraud-claims-research-immigration/

President Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted that non-citizen voting is a widespread and pressing issue in U.S. elections, a claim he has returned to in his recent push for stricter voter ID requirements.

In the past, Trump has baselessly claimed that thousands, if not millions, of undocumented immigrants voted against him in his presidential bids. Following the 2016 election, Trump claimed that between 3 million and 5 million “illegal votes” caused him to lose the popular vote to Hillary Clinton. When he lost the 2020 election to President Joe Biden four years later, he alleged that Biden won in key states due to tens of thousands of non-citizen votes.

It’s already illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal U.S. elections, however, and research and recent state investigations have shown that noncitizen registration and voting occurs only very rarely, accounting for just a sliver of registered voters and an even more miniscule fraction of ballots cast.

The preliminary results of recent investigations into potential non-citizen voting that have been conducted in multiple states have yielded numbers that are a fraction of a fraction of those Trump has claimed.

Pesach How long were they in Egypt? by A.B.

210, 400, Or 430?

One of the best known questions regarding Pesach regards the duration of the Egyptian galus. Multiple variables appear in Chumash – 210, 400, and 430. How can they be reconciled?

In the Bris Bein Habesarim, Hashem reveals to Avraham the future awaiting his descendants and states: “Know with certainty that your offspring shall be strangers in a land not theirs, and they shall enslave them and afflict them four hundred years"(Breishis 15:13)

By contrast, when the Torah describes the leaving from Egypt, it gives a different figure, saying:

"And the dwelling of the Bnei Yisroel who dwelt in Egypt was thirty years and four hundred years. And it came to pass at the end of thirty years and four hundred years, on that very day, all the hosts of Hashem went out from the land of Egypt" (Shemos 12:40–41)

A simple reading of the second possuk might suggest that Klal Yisroel remained in Egypt itself for four hundred and thirty years. Yet Chazal explicitly ruled that this was not the case, and that the actual stay in Egypt was far shorter. From this starting point emerged one of the best-known chronological calculations.

Chazal established that the count of 430 years does not begin with Yaakov’s descent to Egypt, nor even with the beginning of the enslavement, but already with the moment when the decree of exile was pronounced to Abraham in Bris Bain Habesarim. This is stated explicitly in the Mechilta:

“‘And the dwelling of Klal Yisroel Israel who dwelt in Egypt was thirty years and four hundred years.’ But did they dwell in Egypt for four hundred and thirty years? Surely they dwelt in Egypt only two hundred and ten years!

“Rather, from the time the decree was decreed at the Bris Bein Habesarim until Yisroel went out from Egypt was four hundred and thirty years. And just as the decree was decreed upon Avraham at the Bris Bein Habesarim, so it was fulfilled through Yitzchok and Yaakov and their descendants" (Mechilta Shel Rabi Yishmael, Messechta Depischa, section 14).

The same appears in the Gemara (Megillah 9a) in the name of Rabi Yochanan.

The Seder Olam Rabbah (chapter 3) says likewise, but also including but also an answer to the contradiction between 400 and 430 years: "From Avraham Avinu until yetzias Mitzrayim were four hundred and thirty years. From the birth of Yitzchak until Yetzias Mitzrayim were four hundred years. From the time Yaakov descended to Egypt until Yisroel went out from Egypt were two hundred and ten years."

Thus, the 430 years are counted from the decree given to Avraham at the Bris Bein Habesarim, the 400 years from the birth of Yitzchok, the beginning of “your offspring shall be strangers,” and only 210 of those years were actually spent in Egypt.

This understanding becomes even clearer in the Aramaic translation of Onkelos, which translates the possuk in Shemos (12:40) that speaks of 430 years in a way that provides the answer given earlier: "And the dwelling of Bnei Yisroel who dwelt in Egypt and in the land of Canaan was four hundred and thirty years" (Targum Onkelos, Exodus 12:40).

Shemos Rabbas (section 1), Rashi, the Ibn Ezra (Shemos 12:40), Ramban (ibid), and Rabeinu Bechaye (ibid), the Abarbenel (ibid), and the Sforno discuss the contradictions mentioned above in similar vein.

The Kli Yakar (Bereishis 15:13) emphasizes that the entire period was not one of suffering. Commenting on the possuk, "For your offspring shall be strangers in a land not theirs four hundred years,” he notes, “It does not say 'and they shall afflict them four hundred years,' for the entire time was not one of affliction."

The Shloh Hakodesh (Masseches Pesachim, Peirush Hahagadah) says that the 30 extra years began not before the Bris Bein Habesarim, as explained earlier, but after the Bris Bein Habesarim. He reasons as follows:

“We must say that because the tribes sinned by selling Yosef, an extra 30 years was decreed upon them, because the 30 years of Yosef Hatzaddik’s suffering hat he endured from his birth until he stood before Pharaoh were not counted in the reckoning of the years of exile.

“In other words, if not for this, the years of exile would have begun from the Bris Bein Habesarim and they would have been in exile for only 400 years. But because they sinned by selling Yosef, the years of exile were only reckoned 30 years after the Bris Bein Habesarim, that is, from the birth of Yitzchok, and they had to be in exile for 430 years.”

I have an unresolved difficulty with the Sheloh Hakadosh’s explanation. Since the brothers only began afflicting Yosef years after his birth, why was Klal Yisroel punished for the full 30 years from his birth until he stood before Pharaoh?

So far, we have learned that the 30 extra years were at the beginning of the balus, either from the Bris Bein Habesarim, or from Yitzchok’s birth.

The Ramban (Shemos 12:42), however, offers an opposite approach, attaching the 30 years not before the 400 years but after they were already completed.

Noting that “no promise is secure against being nullified by sin except one that is given with an oath,” the Ramban notes that Klal Yisroel in Egypt were wicked to a great degree and even neglected bris milah as it says of Galus Mitzrayim in Sefer Yechezkel (20:8), “But they rebelled against Me and would not listen to Me; no man cast away the detestable things of his eyes, nor did they forsake the idols of Egypt. Then I said I would pour out My wrath upon them in the midst of the land of Egypt.” Likewise, Yehoshua told the people (24:14), “Remove the gods which your fathers served beyond the river and in Egypt, and serve Hashem.”

“Therefore, their exile was lengthened by thirty years,” the Ramban writes, saying that “it would have been fitting for it to be lengthened even more, except that they cried out and multiplied their prayers,” as the possuk says (Shemos 2:23-24), “They groaned because of the labor and cried out, and their cry rose up, and Hashem heard their groaning.”

“For they were not worthy of redemption merely because the appointed time had come, but He accepted their cry and their groaning because of the great suffering they endured,” the Ramban writes, adding, “And why should it be difficult for the earlier commentators to explain that their exile was extended thirty years beyond the appointed time? For it was extended forty years because of the sin of the spies. All those forty years were a period of affliction for them, as it says, ‘And you shall remember all the way that Hashem your G-d led you these forty years in the wilderness, in order to afflict you’ (Devorim 8:2).’”

“They also had a complete exile in a land not theirs, exposed to serpent, fiery serpent, and scorpion,” the Ramban writes. “Nor was fulfilled for them, ‘And the fourth generation shall return here,’ for within forty years that generation was certainly replaced, since another generation had already been born. But the sins caused everything.”

The Ramban concludes that this may be why the Bnei Efrayim left thirty years before the arrival of Moshe Rabeinu as Chazal say (Sanhedrin 92), “for they counted correctly and did not err, but ‘the wicked is caught by his own sins’” (Mishlei 5:22).

Taking all the sources are placed side by side, it becomes clear that the Torah’s various numbers represent varying degrees of suffering in our first galus, or extra periods of galus for Klal Yisroel’s wrongdoings.

Tucker Carlson pushes DNA tests for Jews: the ‘Khazar’ theory that antisemites can’t shake

 https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-888178

During Tucker Carlson’s interview last week with Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, both men made considerable waves with their takes on history and theology.

But Carlson’s own interpretation of Israeli sovereignty was also notable, as the far-right pundit insisted that Israelis should undergo genetic testing to determine if they have a rightful claim to the land.

“Why don’t we do genetic testing on everybody in the land and find out who Abram’s descendants are?” Carlson asked Huckabee at one point, using the name Abraham used before he made a covenant with God to become the first Jew. “It’s really simple. We’ve cracked the human genome. We can do that. Why don’t we do that?”

No matter how it happened, the theory goes, Jews who trace their genetics to Eastern Europe should not be considered rightful heirs of Israel, and should instead claim the Caucasus as their ancestral home.

Thursday, February 26, 2026

The Measles Surge Is Just the Beginning

 https://time.com/7380102/rfk-jr-vaccine-schedule-measles-rsv/

This winter, the U.S. is experiencing a surge in measles cases. South Carolina is the epicenter of the outbreak, with over 960 confirmed cases, and the virus continues to spread, with 26 states reporting new cases this year. Last year, two children in the U.S. died from measles. Both were unvaccinated. We are seeing the consequences of declining vaccination rates, and, due to recent federal policy changes, parents need to brace for more disease risks for children.

Trump, seeking executive power over elections, is urged to declare emergency

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/02/26/trump-elections-executive-order-activists/

Pro-Trump activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a 17-page draft executive order that claims China interfered in the 2020 election as a basis to declare a national emergency that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting.

The idea of claiming emergency executive powers based on allegations of foreign interference attaches new significance to the administration’s actions to reinvestigate the 2020 election. Trump has never accepted defeat, while never finding evidence of widespread fraud. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is leading a review of election security that officials said focuses on foreign influence.

A 2021 intelligence review concluded that China considered efforts to influence the election but did not go through with them

Eruv in Switzerland draws antisemitic accusations from Senator

 https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/423029

In one statement, Poggia criticized Israel and referred to a range of unrelated events, including the fatal avalanche incident at the Crans-Montana ski resort, the Octber 7th massacre, and the war in Gaza. In a separate statement focused on the eruv, he said he was “shocked" by the initiative, arguing that it could result in a visibly demarcated Jewish residential area, which he described as a form of “voluntary ghetto."

Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt, president of the Conference of European Rabbis and Av Beit Din of Switzerland, said it was inappropriate to link unrelated tragedies to a local religious arrangement. He stated that portraying an eruv as coercive or exclusionary distorts both Jewish law and historical reality, and undermines efforts to foster respectful coexistence.

Polls show increasing concerns about Trump’s mental acuity

 https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/26/politics/donald-trump-mental-fitness-polls?cid=android_app

President Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential race after his initial opponent, then-President Joe Biden, withdrew over worries about his age and mental sharpness.

But a year-plus into Trump’s four-year term, polls suggest the American people aren’t just increasingly unhappy with his job performance; they’re increasingly concerned about his mental capacity as well.

The Reuters-Ipsos poll showed 61% of Americans agreed that Trump has “become erratic with age.” Even 30% of Republicans agreed with that sentiment.

The Reuters-Ipsos poll also showed a decrease in the percentage of Americans who say Trump is “mentally sharp and able to deal with challenges.” That number has dropped from 54% in September 2023 to 45% today.

Other polls echo these findings, including one from CNN last month.

Rav Emden Abortion 1 43

 ששאלת אם יש איסור לקלקל עובר בבטן אמו שזינתה. בין פנויה בין א"א. 

תשובה בס' חות יאיר (אחר סי' ל"א) מצאתי שנשאל הרב בעל הס' על אשת איש הרה לזנונים: ואחר המעשה נתחרטה כו' אם רשאה לגמוע דבר מאבקת רוכל לשלשל זרע המקולל אשר בקרבה. וז"ל הרב בעל התשובה ואחשבה כי תכונת השאלה בא"א דבר בדוי הוא לא היה כו' כאשר בתשובתי על השאלה אין חילוק בין היות המעוברת נשואה וכשירה בנשים. או ממזר מא"א שהרי לא נפלאת היא דדין ממזר לכל דבר כישראל כשר וכו' עכ"ל: 

ואני הצעיר אומר לענ"ד חילוק גדול יש בדבר. ויש לדון השואל ההוא לזכות שבדקדוק ובכיוון שאל שאלתו בא"א. אף אם אולי מעשה שהיה לא כך היה. נכון לומר עליו שאלת החכם חצי תשובה. דבפנויה וכ"ש בנשואה מעוברת מבעלה. לא קמיבעיא ליה. דוודאי ולד הוא. כי איך שיהיה אף שאין חייבין עליו. ודאי איסורא איכא מיהת. מכמה טעמים שקצת מהם באו בדברי הרב בתשובתו הנז'. ומגמרא דעירכין שהביא אין ראיה כלל כמו שדחה הוא ז"ל בעצמו. ואני אוסיף לקח בעז"ה בסמוך: 

עובר הנוצר באיסור יש לומר שמותר להשחיתו בבטן אמו גם ולד כשר היכא דסייע בעברה שיש בה מיתה ושמא אע"פ שאין לו חלק בחטא דלא עדיף מהיא גופה דאינה בכלל מאבד' עצמה לדעת בענין זה

אמנם נדון השואל בא"א שזינתה שאלה הגונה היא. וקרוב בעיני להתירה אם הייתי כדאי. כי נ"ל שיש מקום להקל כיון שניאפה זאת ודם בידיה. מעתה בת קטלא היא מדין תורה. אף שאין דמה מסור בידינו להורגה. מכל מקום חייבת מיתה בדין שמים. מאחר שעשתה במזיד ביודעת שחטאה בזדון. ואע"ג דד"מ בטלו דין ד"מ לא בטלו. ומפורש גם בדברי קבלה אדם עשוק בדם נפש עד בור ינוס וגו'. וזה בנין אב לכל חייבי מיתות. דהוא הדין בדכותיה בעריות. ואפי' למ"ד חבר צריך התראה. נ"מ אם התרו בה. ואפי' בזמן הזה שאין דנין דיני נפשות. כיון דמדינא בת קטלא היא. אע"ג דממזר כשיצא לאויר העולם. דינו ככשר שחייבין על הריגתו. מיהת השתא דירך אמו הוא. ואילו היה דינה מסור בידינו. היינו ממיתים אותה ואת פרי בטנה. דדמי ממש להאי דערכין דאין ממתינין לה. ועדיף מינה. דהתם אפי' בוולד כשר מיירי. והכא הוולד נוצר באיסור. שעליו נגמר דינה למיתה. פשיטא דאין חוששין לו. ונהרג על ידי אמו: 

על כן היה נ"ל פשוט שאין איסור גם כן בהשחתתו. אע"פ שאימא קיימת. כי נלע"ד ג"כ פשוט שאפי' היא בעצמה אף שלא נגמר דינה להריגה. מחמת שאין דבר זה בידינו עכשיו. אעפ"כ אינה בכלל ואת דמכם לנפשותיכם אדרוש. ואינה נענשת אם המיתה ואיבדה עצמה לדעת. שעל כיוצא בזה אמרו בספרי יכול כשאול. ואדרבא נראה שזכות הוא לה. וכמה מעשיות בש"ס ומדרשות יוכיחו (עיין במ"ר ע"פ וירח את ריח בגדיו) שספרו מבעלי תשובה שדנו דין הריגה בעצמן. וקילסום שזכו לחיי העוה"ב (וגדולה מזו מצינו באשכבתיה דר' בההוא כובס שאיבד עצמו לדעת מחמת צער שלא זכה להיות נטפל לעושי מצוה. ותחשב לו לצדקה וזו קשה ביותר וצ"ע) וכל שכן הולד שבקרבה שדמו מותר ואינו נדרש ממנה. אם קלקלתו בחדרי בטנה. שאע"פ שלא חטא. אפ"ה משמיא לא רחמו עליה. והרי אמרו ממזר לא חיי אפי' שקנה חיות שכבר יצא לאויר העולם. ק"ו לעובר כזה שלא חסה עליו תורה. ותו מאן יימר דולד גמור יהיה. שמא תעשה עוברה סנדל (אע"ג דבעלמא אזלינן בתר רובא דנשים דולד מעליא ילדן.) וכיוצא בו שאינו ולד. והאיכא ספיקי טובא. וא"כ לפ"ז פשיטא דבנ"ד מותר לכתחלה ואפשר מצוה קעבדה. וכנז'. (ולענין מעוברת עצמה ודכוותה כל חייבי מיתה בי"ש אם מותר להצילן מן המיתה. עמ"ש בס"ד במ"א על ענין רוצח שנתפס בדיני או"ה והוצרך להשבע לשקר. ועיין בתשו' הרב בחו"י סי' קמ"ו): 

אך לקחת במוחלט הראיה הנ"ל מערכין. כדס"ד דהרב ז"ל דלא שני ליה. לא נהירא כלל מלבד שדחאה הוא ז"ל בעצמו. אין משם ראיה דהתם משום דעובר ירך אמו הוא. ויש לו חלק בחטא. כדאמרינן דכוותה בבהמה שנגחה היא וולדה נגחו. דמה"ט הולד פסול להקרבה. דדיינינן העובר כאלו גם בו נעשה מעשה העבירה. הוא הדין הכא כל זמן שהוא חשוב כאחד מאיבריה. גם הוא חטא. אע"פ שאין בו שייכות חטא. הרי הוא כירכה שחטא. ונלקה עמה כמו אחד מאיבריה. לכן אפשר הותר להמיתו אפי' לא הי' סופו למות ע"י אמו. אבל להוכיח משם היתר היכא דלא עזר העובר בחטא כנדון דידיה אין לנו. כיון שאמו אינה בת מיתה לדעת הרב. דלא ס"ל הכי (ואזיל לשטתיה ולטעמיה בספרו סקמ"ו.) דילמא כה"ג לא שרי להשחיתו אפי' בסופו למות. כגון שעתידה ליהרג בדיניהם. לכן צריכין אנו לטעם שלנו כנז'. ודו"ק כי קצרתי ונ"ל נכון מאד: 

חידוש דין שאיסור הוצאת שז"ל הותר מכללו אצל צורך מצוה

ובמה שהתעסק הרב ז"ל בתשו' הנז' להראות פנים לאיסור. ללמדו מעון הוצאת ש"ז לבטלה. יש לדחות דאיכא למימר דלאו היינו טעמא. אלא משום דמערה לאשפה ומוסיף בכחות הטומאה ומכחיש בפמליא של מעלה. כידוע מטעם חכמי האמת בעלי הקבלה. שעל כרחנו אנו צריכין לדבריהם בענין עון זה. ותדע משלש נשים המשמשות במוך. ויתרה עליהם הזקנה. שבכולן אין איסור לנושאן. אע"פ שמוציא זרעו לבטלה. אלא ודאי לא מיקרי לבטלה כי אם כששחת ארצה ומטעם הנז'. אע"פ שאין הזרע ראוי להווצר ממנו ולד. וא"כ בעובר כיון דלאו ולד הוא. וספק אם יבוא לכלל ולד גמור כנז'. עדיין הספק במקומו עומד. וגם בעובר כשר היה צד להקל לצורך גדול. כל כמה דלא עקר. אפי' אינו משום פקוח נפש אמו. אלא להציל לה מרעתו. שגורם לה כאב גדול וצ"ע. אמנם דעת לנבון נקל שעכ"פ יש איסור לכתחלה בהשחתתו מפשטא דתלמודא אף שאינו חייב על העוברין. וכן להשחית זרע שנקלט במעי אשה אע"פ שעדיין לא נתעברה ממנו. ודאי אסור שלא לצורך. כדמוכח מדלא שרי לשמש במוך. אלא לג' נשים דווקא. ואיברא לצורך. אף להוציא זרע לבטלה להשחיתו על הארץ שרי. כדאשכחן לענין בדיקת הניקב בגובתא דש"ז דמותבינן ליה אבי פוקרי. ש"מ דאיסור חמור זה הותר מכללו אצל צורך מצוה. כמ"ש במ"א בס"ד ואין להאריך: 

לבד ראה זה מצאתי ריש זוהר שמות דמוכח בהדיא שדבר זה אסור הוא לישראל אף לאחר מתן תורה יעוין שם. וא"כ לדברינו ודאי בעלמא (ר"ל בעובר כשר) איסורא איכא להשחית עובר. חוץ מנדון השאלה בא"א שקלקלה הגדתי היום דעתי הקלה שמותר. ואולי קרוב לשכר מצוה דלא כמ"ש הרב בעל תשו' הנ"ל. דלא נחית לפלוגי בין א"א לכשרה. ואע"ג דממזר כישראל כשר לכל הדברים שזכר הרב. מ"מ עובר ממזר אין לנו לדונו כעובר כשר. שהתורה התירתו לעובר העוברת. עם שלא סייע בעברה כנ"ד. שאין מענין דינה של זו להצילו. כיון דירך אמו הוא והרי הוא כמושחת ועומד. ולכן אין מקום לחלק עדיין בין זנתה עם ישראל או עם הגוי. שאע"פ שנכרי הבא על בת ישראל הולד כשר. מ"מ מאחר שהיא חייבת מית

Trump’s atypical surgeon general pick faces Senate scrutiny: Key takeaways

 https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5755656-casey-means-senate-confirmation-hearing-takeaways/

After months of delay, President Trump’s nominee for U.S. surgeon general, Casey Means, appeared before the Senate, facing intense questions over her qualifications, personal health care practices and career as a social media influencer.

Means would be an unprecedented pick, not having completed her medical residency or having an active medical license. She is the sister of White House senior adviser Calley Means, one of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s top advisers, and a prominent “Make America Healthy Again” influencer in her own right.

As with many of Trump’s health nominees, senators on both sides of the aisle zeroed in on Means’s views on vaccinations. Means sought to characterize her previous rhetoric about vaccines to be more about informed consent rather than questioning vaccine efficacy.

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chair of the HELP Committee, asked whether Means would encourage mothers to get their children vaccinated against measles, given the ongoing measles outbreaks across the country and the U.S. poised to lose its measles elimination status.

When pressed by Cassidy, however, Means declined to say if she’d encourage other mothers to get their children vaccinated against measles.

Wednesday, February 25, 2026

Donald Trump’s SOTU Speech Fact-Checked

 https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-sotu-speech-fact-checked-11579247

In an appeal to the lawmakers present at his speech, Trump said that the SAVE America Act—enforcing stricter ID requirements on voters—was necessary to address “rampant” cheating in U.S. elections.

There is currently no evidence of widespread fraud in U.S. elections, as Trump asserts, with analysis from several think tanks—including the conservative Heritage Foundation—indicating that instances of ballot fraud represent only a tiny share of votes cast.

Around one hour into his address, Trump said that the 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska, who was fatally stabbed in August while aboard a train in North Carolina, had been killed by someone who “came in through open borders.”

The suspect in the murder, 34-year-old DeCarlos Brown Jr., is a U.S. citizen who was born in Charlotte, according to local media reports and his own social media profiles.

Trump 'OFFERED VERY LITTLE' despite speech's length

Suicide & Teshuva:Shevus Yaakov - rejected by Rav M. Feinstein & R O Yosef

Igros Moshe(C.M. 2:69.4): ... Also this view (Yaavetz 1:43) that someone who has deliberately transgressed a sin that is liable to the death penalty and he commits suicide that he is not only not punished but it is also a meritorious act – is clearly prohibited even if he had been halachically warned not to do the crime. It is a shameful thing that Rav Yaakov Emden stated and his view on this matter should be totally disregarded.

    Rav Obadiya Yosef (Yabiyah Omer Y.D. 2:24.8)… In fact this issue is very confusing in my opinion. How is it possible that the mitzva of repentance can be done by means of the major sin of suicide? Our Sages have said that a person who deliberately commits suicide has no portion in the World to Come… This matter is an explicit verse (Yechezkeil 33:11): “Say to them, As I live, says the L‑rd G‑d, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked should turn from his way and live; turn, turn from your evil ways; for why will you die?” And there is nothing that repentance doesn’t help. So why would anyone think R’ Chiya's attempt to kill himself in response to what he thought was a sin with a prostitute - was according to the halacha (Kiddushin 81b)?  But look at Sefer Chasidim (#674) …How could he tell his students to do teshuva in a manner that caused them to be killed? It would seem that the Sefer Chasidim is a major support for the Shevus Yaakov. This is a very difficult issue that requires study. Nevertheless in my opinion one can not learn halacha from stories such as these. Therefore it is prohibited to kill oneself – even for the sake of repentance. I also saw this point in Shevet Shimon (345) which expresses great astonishment at this Shevus Yaakov and he concludes that the halacha is in accord with the Yafas To’ar [and not the Shevus Yaakov]. This is also the conclusion of the Chida in Birchei Yosef (345:3), that even though normally the Shevus Yaakov is more authoritative but logic is in agreement with the Yafas To’ar. [There are many other sources that come to this conclusion and reject this Shevus Yaakov]…

Suicide – Violate Shabbos to Save attempted Suicide

Igros Moshe (OC I #127) Question: You are uncertain about the question of a whether Shabbos can be profaned to save the life of a person who caused the danger by attempting suicide. You cite the Magen Avraham that it is prohibited to profane Shabbos to save his life. Answer In my humble opinion it is impossible to say that because such a distinction is not to be found anywhere in the halachic sources. And there is an established principle that nothing stands in the way of saving life including Shabbos even if the danger was brought about by the person’s own actions. 

Igros Moshe (YD III #90) That which I wrote that one is obligated to even violate Shabbos to save life of one who attempted suicide – there is no question that that is correct and your questions from the Mishneh Berura and Rema are not relevant. The point is that one needs to do what he can to save the life of his fellow .  

Suicide & teshuva: Shevus Yaakov II

Shevus Yaakov(2:111): Question: Someone who has committed adultery and as an act of repentance to comply with the capital punishment he deserves, drowns himself in a river which is equivalent to the punishment of strangulation – is he considered as if he committed suicide or is it considered a positive act of repentance and thus he has the status of one who died a natural death? Answer: … a proof can be brought from Kiddushin (81b) which describes R’ Chiya bar Ashi putting himself in an oven as an act of repentance… Thus we see clearly that it is permitted to repent a sin by suicide… Another proof is found in Bereishis Rabbah (65:22) in which a man died by subjecting himself to punishment which involved the equivalent of all 4 death sentences and it was declared that this allowed him to merit the World to Come… He did this as an act of repentance and thus it was not considered as a forbidden act of suicide… We similarly see the case of the washer man in Kesubos (113b) who jumped off the roof when Rebbe Yehuda HaNasi died and a heavenly voice praised him. Thus it was considered a proper action. The Maharit in his commentary to Kesubos said that he killed himself as an act of repentance…We see then from these sources that if a person kills himself for the sake of repentance it is not considered as suicide and he merits the World to Come. That is because in the place where a baal teshuva stands, a complete tzadik is not able to stand.

=====================
I received the following comment:

Maybe it's because I'm an American, but for some reason, I find this teshuvah extremely troubling. I also wonder how many Rabbanei Kehillos in the US, if one of their mispallelim confesses to something like this, would have the courage (or perhaps the insensitivity) to counsel this course.

Having once or twice been boel my wife b'niddah b'ratzon, I wonder whether I'm mechuyav to follow this course myself.

G'mar chasima tovah and God help us all.
==============================

The Shevus Yaakov, and also the gemora in Kiddushin 40a, Kesubos (113a) as well as the Iyun Yaakov (Kiddushin 81b) and the Yaavetz (1:43) as well as Rav Ovadiya Yosef (Y.O. 2:24.8)- are not recommending suicide. What these sources are saying is that if a person afflicts himself, including death - it can in fact bring about atonement. Without this we would say that a suicide is either a wicked or crazy person. These sources  legitimize our saying that he is a baal teshuva.

Nevertheless the positive view that the above sources express is in disagreement with the view of Rav Moshe Feinstein (C.M. II 69.4) who strongly rejects this view which he saw in the Yaavetz. I am posting it because it gives a person a deeper understanding of the seriousness of sin and correspondingly the importance of repentance. Thus to answer the above comment - it is clearly not required for a sinner to commit suicide or for a rabbi to recommend such a course and in fact the sinner should be advised not to take such a course of action and all means should be used to stop a person from doing so. It is however the basis for viewing a suicide victim as not being evil or mentally ill but at least a baal tshuva. So l'chatchila it is definitely prohibited but if someone did it for the sake of teshuva it is understandable and a minority would say it is even a legitimate action.

Tshuva by suicide?

 Rav Ovadia Yosef (Yabiya Omer Y.D. 2:24.8)… In fact this issue is very confusing in my opinion. How is it possible that the mitzva of repentance can be done by means of the major sin of suicide? Our Sages have said that a person who deliberately commits suicide has no portion in the World to Come… This matter is an explicit verse (Yechezkeil 33:11): “Say to them, As I live, says the L‑rd G‑d, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked should turn from his way and live; turn, turn from your evil ways; for why will you die?” And there is nothing that repentance doesn’t help. So why would anyone think R’ Chiya attempt to kill himself in response to what he thought was a sin with an unmarried prostitute - was according to the halacha (Kiddushin 81b)? Look at Sefer Chasidim (#674) …How could he tell his students to do teshuva in a manner that caused them to be killed? It would seem that the Sefer Chasidim is a major support for the Shevus Yaakov. This is a very difficult issue that requires study. Nevertheless in my opinion one cannot learn halacha from stories such as these. Therefore it is prohibited to kill oneself – even for the sake of repentance. I also saw this point in Shevet Shimon (345) which expresses great astonishment at this Shevus Yaakov and he concludes that the halacha is in accord with the Yafos To’ar [and not the Shevus Yaakov]. This is also the conclusion of the Chida in Birchei Yosef (345:3), that even though normally the Shevus Yaakov is more authoritative but logic is in agreement with the Yafos To’ar. [There are many other sources that come to this conclusion and reject this Shevus Yaakov]…

 Igros Moshe (C.M. 2:69.4): Also this view (Yaavetz 1:43) that someone who has deliberately transgressed a sin that is liable to the death penalty and he commits suicide that he is not only not punished but it is also a meritorious act – is clearly prohibited even if he had been halachically warned not to do the crime. It is a shameful thing that Rav Yaakov Emden stated and his view on this matter should be totally disregarded.

   Kiddushin (40a): Rav Kahana was selling workbaskets. A matron asked him to have intercourse. He said that he first had to get dressed properly.  He went up on the roof and jumped. However Eliyahu came and caught him. Eliyahu criticized Rav Kahana for having forced him to travel 400 parsangs to rescue him. Rav Kahana said that the reason that the incident happened was that his poverty forced him to go among women to sell his wares.  Eliyahu gave him a purse of money.

Kiddushin (40a): Mighty of strength that do His word listening to the voice of His world (Tehilim 103:20). This is illustrated by R’ Tzadok and his companions.  R’ Tzadok was asked to have intercourse by a certain matron.  He said he couldn’t do it because his heart was faint – perhaps she had some food for him eat. She replied that she had some unkosher food. He replied that it would seem that those who engage in sexual immorality could eat unkosher food.  She lit the oven and placed the unkosher food in it. He then climbed in the oven and sat in it. She asked what he was doing. He replied that anyone who was involved in immorality falls into the fires of Hell. She replied that if she had known that what she had asked him to do was so terrible she wouldn’t have upset him.  

Rabbeinu Bachye (Shemos 3): ...Concerning prophecy Moshe was told to remove his sandals which meant to remove physicality which is described as sandals. That is because physicality clings to the body just as a sandal clings to the foot. And just as it is possible for a person to remove his sandal from his foot – so is it possible for him to remove attachments from physicality in order to be prepared for prophecy and therefore be ready to clear to the light of the intellect. Yehoshua was also told to remove a sandal (Yehoshua 4:15) but that was a partial removal of physicality and not all. This was the advantage of Moshe over Yehoshua – that he was more removed from the physicality. This can be seen by the fact that Moshe separated from his wife – something which is not said concerning Yehoshua. 

Rambam (Hilchos Ishus 15:3): Anyone whose soul desires Torah constantly, and learns like Ben Azzai and clings to the Torah his whole life – and yet doesn’t get married – has not committed a sin. That is true as long as his yetzer harah doesn’t overcome him. However if his yetzer harah overcomes him, he is obligated to get married. This is required even if he already has children - because he might come to sexual thoughts.

Iyun Yaakov (Kiddushin 81b): [And after his wife revealed that the person he thought was a prostitute that he wanted to sin with was really her] he went and he sat in the oven – Rashi explains that he did this to kill himself. From this we can learn that in the case where he is killing himself for the sake of repentance it is not considered suicide. And this is true even if the sin that he did was not liable to the death penalty - even assuming that he actually did the deed that he intended. This is certainly so since his intent was just to have relations with an unmarried prostitute. And especially according to the implications of the gemora it would seem that he didn’t actually do the deed [Nevertheless he attempted to kill himself to do repentance]. Gra (Mishlei 1:2):  To know wisdom and instruction; to understand wise sayings – because even if a person can break his evil inclination and lusts – he must break them according to the rules of Torah and he should not be a greater tzadik from that which is prescribed in the Torah. For example he should not fast the entire week including Shabbos and similar things. The three parts of this verse correspond to the 3 types of intellect found in man – the analytical, the conceptual and the practical. The analytical deals with things like astronomy – the movement of the stars and constellations. The conceptual is to conduct oneself according to principles. The practical is to intelligent live in this world. These 3 correspond to chukim (statutes), mishpatim (rational laws) and mitzvos. Chukim are divine laws (Job 38), mishpatim are rational laws connected with earthly human reasoning while mitzvos join the Heaven and Earth and are the basis for Heaven and Earth and man who joins them. They are also the foundation of Torah and mitzvos and personality traits... 

Kiddushin (81b): Whenever R’ Chiya bar Ashi said the tachanun prayer he would say, “The Merciful save us from the yetzer harah (evil inclination).” One day his wife overheard him. She said to herself, “It has been many years that we have not been intimate, so why does he have a need to pray for this – [he obviously doesn’t have a strong sex drive]?” One day he was studying in his garden and she dressed up and repeatedly walked past him. He asked who she was. She replied that she was Harusa (a well-known prostitute) who had just returned. He desired her. She told him to first bring the pomegranate to her from the top of the tree. He jumped up and brought it to her. He came into his house and his wife was firing the oven. He climbed in it [to kill himself – Rashi]. His wife asked him what was the meaning of this? He told her what had happened. She replied that she was the woman involved. However he paid no attention to her until she gave proof with the pomegranate. He said, “Nevertheless my intention was to sin.” For the rest of his life he fasted – until he died from the fasting. Yevamos (63b): It was taught: R’ Eliezar said that one who doesn’t engage in producing children is as if he shed blood… R’ Yaakov said it is as if he diminished the Divine Image…Ben Azzai said that it is as if he shed blood and diminished the Divine Image…They said to Ben Azzai, There are those who preach and also fulfill what they say, others keep but don’t preach – you however preach but don’t do what you say? Ben Azzai, “What can I do since my soul longs for Torah, it is possible that the world can be sustained by others who have children.”

Daas Zekenim of Baalei Tosfos (Bereishis 9:4): And surely your blood of your lives will I require… - This is a prohibition against committing suicide. Bereishis Rabbah asks, “You might mistakenly think that this prohibition applies to cases such as Chananiya, Mishael and Azariah – therefore it says “ach” (and surely). That means that you might think that even in this case where people are dying to glorify G d’s name that one is not allowed to bring about one’s death - even if he is afraid he cannot withstand the pressure to violate the Torah. Therefore the Torah says ‘ach’ to teach that in times of pressure to violate the Torah - that it is permitted to commit suicide. Similarly concerning Shaul who committed suicide to avoid being tortured – an exception is made to allow suicide in such cases where a person doesn’t think he can withstand the torture. This analysis is used to justify killing children during times of religious persecution to make sure they are not converted...

Bamidbar Rabbah (9:3):.. There was an incident with a woman to whom a man made advances. She asked him where he wanted to have their meeting. [After he told her] she went and told his wife. His wife went to that place and they had intercourse. He was very upset when he found out what had happened and prayed for death. His wife told him, “But it was your own bread that you ate from and it was from your own cup you drank.” She said that the cause of his trouble was that he thought that he was better than other men. The solution was to view himself as the equal of other men.

Ritva (Avoda Zara 18a): It says in agada that when R’ Chanina ben Tradyon was being burnt alive by the Roman he refused to open his mouth so that he would die faster from the fire - because he considered it as committing suicide. However Gilyonei Hatosfos quotes Rabbeinu Tam that in a situation where a person is afraid of being forced to violate religious prohibitions that it is permitted to commit suicide. This is also stated in Bereishis Rabbah (34:14): That the prohibition against suicide is Bereishis (9:5), “I will hold you responsible to take care of your life. This teaches that it is prohibited to commit suicide. I might think that suicide is prohibited even in a case like Shaul who killed himself because he was afraid of being forced to violate religious prohibitions – therefore the verse says ‘ach’ to allow suicide in those cases. From here we learn that it is permitted to kill our children during the Crusades because we are afraid that they will be forced to violate religious law.” These words  require further study and much investigation but the ruling has already been given by Gilyonei Hatosfos. In addition I heard that the major authorities of France also permitted this as practical halacha. (However see Daas Zekeinim of the Baalei Tosfos to Bereishis 9:5).

Rashi (Avoda Zara 18b): Some say that R’ Meir left Israel for Babylonia because of the incident with his wife Beruria.  That is referring to the time that Beruria scoffed at the statement of our Sages (Kiddushin 80b): Women are light-minded. Her husband R’ Meir objected and told her that eventually she would come to acknowledge the validity of the Sages words. He commanded one of his students to try and seduce her. After trying for many days she eventually agreed. She committed suicide from shame. R’ Meir fled Israel out of shame.

Rabbi Akiva Eiger (Y.D. 345:1):  A person who commits suicide  - See Besamim Rosh (345). Whether it is allowed to commit suicide when overwhelmed with lust and unable to avoid sin see Beis Yosef (Y.D. 157) and Berchai Yosef (Shem haGedolim 10:27). The Ritva (Avoda Zara 18) writes that it is allowed to do so. Therefore if it is permitted it would not be considered suicide. See Shevus Yaakov (2:111) regarding person killing himself in order to repent

Shevus Yaakov (2:111): Question: Someone who has committed adultery and as an act of repentance to comply with the capital punishment he deserves, drowns himself in a river which is equivalent to the punishment of strangulation – is he considered as if he committed suicide or is it considered a positive act of repentance and thus he has the status of one who died a natural death? Answer: … a proof can be brought from Kiddushin (81b) which describes R’ Chiya bar Ashi putting himself in an oven as an act of repentance… Thus we see clearly that it is permitted to repent a sin by suicide… Another proof is found in Bereishis Rabbah (65:22) in which a man died by subjecting himself to punishment which involved the equivalent of all 4 death sentences and it was declared that this allowed him to merit the World to Come… He did this as an act of repentance and thus it was not considered as a forbidden act of suicide… We similarly see the case of the washer man in Kesubos (113b) who jumped off the roof when Rebbe Yehuda HaNasi died and a heavenly voice praised him. Thus it was considered a proper action. The Maharit in his commentary to Kesubos said that he killed himself as an act of repentance…We see then from these sources that if a person kills himself for the sake of repentance it is not considered as suicide and he merits the World to Come. That is because in the place where a baal teshuva stands, a complete tzadik is not able to stand.