Monday, September 7, 2026

‘We intended to be away for 2 years, it’s been 4’: why Israeli doctors are staying abroad

 https://www.ynetnews.com/health_science/article/hkxobxhofg?tbref=hp

Nearly 1,400 physicians left Israel between 2023 and 2025; doctors abroad cite war, politics, education and career prospects, while senior specialists warn the loss of experienced physicians could weaken Israeli medicine for years

In August 2023, just two months before the outbreak of the war, Dr. Roi Sar-El, 43, and Dr. Muriel Sar-El, 41, left Israel with their three children and moved to Boston. Roi, a psychiatrist who worked at Ichilov Hospital, and Muriel, a dermatologist, moved to the United States as part of a planned step — both wanted to specialize in fields that are less developed in Israel, and today they work at hospitals affiliated with Harvard University. Unlike many who have left Israel in recent years, their decision was not driven by the war or the political climate. But life has a rhythm of its own. Their stay, which was supposed to last two years, has so far stretched to four — and the situation in Israel, they say, played a part.

“We left without any connection to the national situation, but as part of long-term career planning,” Roi told ynet and Yedioth Ahronoth. “But here we are, already in our fourth year. The period was extended, and of course the complex situation in Israel played a role in that. There was a sense that we were giving the children more time to grow up in a quiet and protected environment, knowing that afterward we would return to a full life in Israel, and that this was an opportunity that might not come again.”

Adidas apologizes for ‘offense’ over promotion featuring ex-IDF soldier who lost leg in 2021

 https://www.timesofisrael.com/adidas-apologizes-for-offense-over-promotion-featuring-ex-idf-soldier-who-lost-leg-in-2021/

Adidas apologized on Monday for any “offense” it caused by featuring a wounded Israel Defense Forces veteran in its promotional campaign for a service enabling amputee athletes to buy just one running shoe.

The posters featuring Biton were only used in Israel and not as part of a global campaign. The Hebrew-language video that sparked the controversy made no mention of his army service or how he lost his leg.

Pro-Palestinian activists, however, panned the company for working with Biton, citing the high number of amputees in the Strip, and in particular children, as a result of the recent war there.

Much of the criticism falsely claimed that Biton was involved in the recent fighting in Gaza and accused him of having participated in “genocide,” or that he had lost his leg while serving in Gaza in 2021.

The 10 biggest reasons why Trump is so unpopular

Is Complaining to Trump Mesira?

 Garnel Ironheart September 6, 2026 at 4:22 AM

Here's the question of the week

How is multiple Chasidic rebbes going to Trump and demanding that he prevent Israel from drafting chareidim not mesirah?

AI answers

In classical Jewish law, complaining about the Israeli government to Donald Trump—or any foreign leader—generally does not constitute mesira (the forbidden act of informing on a fellow Jew to hostile non-Jewish authorities).

Why It Is Not Mesira

1. Democratic and Diplomatic Context: The prohibition of mesira was historically codified to prevent individuals from handing over a fellow Jew or Jewish property to lawless, predatory, or antisemitic rulers who would act extrajudicially. Reporting or complaining to a democratically elected leader of a friendly, allied nation—especially the United States—does not fall under this category.

2. Public Officials and Sovereign Entities: Halachic authorities overwhelmingly rule that the prohibition of mesira applies to private individuals and their personal property. It does not apply to open political criticism, diplomatic lobbying, or disagreements regarding public officials and state governance.

3. Transparency of Public Records: Mesira inherently involves exposing hidden or private actions to an authority. Because the actions, policies, and budgets of the Israeli government are entirely public information, discussing or complaining about them to foreign officials does not expose "secret" information to cause arbitrary harm.

Halachic Perspectives

Modern halachic consensus maintains that citizens, politicians, and organizations have the right to lobby or voice dissatisfaction regarding government policies to foreign allies. While some far-right or extremist groups occasionally weaponize the term "moser" (informer) against political opponents or NGOs that brief foreign governments, mainstream authorities reject this application, viewing it as standard political discourse rather than a violation of Jewish law.

Jews saved from Impure Place by G-d

 Shemos Rabbah (15:05) Great was the love God showed to Israel in that He revealed Himself in a place of idol-worship, immorality, and uncleanness in order to redeem them. He was like a priest whose terumah had fallen into a cemetery, and who said to himself: ‘What shall I do? To make myself unclean is impossible, and to leave the terumah there is also impossible. Better for me to make myself unclean once and then purify myself again, so that I do not lose my terumah altogether.’ Our forefathers were God's terumah, as it says:Israel is the Lord's hallowed portion, His first-fruits of the increase. They were among graves, for it says: For there was not a house where there was not one dead, and also While the Egyptians were burying them. God said: ' How can I redeem them? To leave them there is impossible, better that I should go down and deliver them, as it says: And I am come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians. As soon as He brought them out, He called Aaron and He purified him, as it says: And he shall make atonement for the most holy place

Sleep and Tumah

 Zohar (01 10b)  For while a man is asleep his soul departs from him and an impure spirit comes forth and settles on his hands and defiles them: hence one may not pronounce a blessing without first washing them. Why then, one may ask, is it forbidden, after one has been in a privy, to pronounce a blessing or to read even one word of the Torah, even in the daytime, without washing the hands, although one has not been asleep, so that one's soul did not depart, and one's hands have not been defiled by an evil spirit? Why is it forbidden even if one's hands are quite clean? The answer is: woe to those who pay no heed to the majesty of their Master, and do not realise on what this world is founded. There is in every privy a spirit which feasts on filth and excrement, and settles forthwith on the fingers of a man's hands.’

Zohar (1:53b) When men sleep on their beds at night-time and night spreads her wings over the world, they are having a foretaste of death, and in consequence the unclean spirit is let loose in the world, carrying pollution. In particular it rests upon a man's hands and defiles them, so that when he wakes up and his soul is restored to him, everything which he touches with his hands is rendered unclean. Hence a man should be careful when dressing not to take his garments from a person who has not washed his hands, because in this way he draws upon himself the unclean spirit and becomes defiled. This spirit is authorised to settle in every place where there is the merest trace of the side from which it issues. Hence a man should not let water be poured over his hands by one who has not yet washed his own hands, because in this way he draws on himself the unclean spirit, from contact with the one who pours water over him.

Shabbos (108b) If the hand be put to the eye, let it be cut off; the hand to the nose, let it be cut off: the hand to the mouth, let it be cut off; the hand to the ear, let it be cut off; the hand to the vein opened for blood letting, let it be cut off; the hand to the membrum, let it be cut off; the hand to the anus, let it be cut off; the hand to the vat, let it be cut off: because the unwashed hand leads to blindness, the hand leads to deafness, the hand causes a polypus. It was taught, R. Nathan said: It is a free agent, and insists on remaining on the hands until one washes his hands three times. 

Shabbos (109a) It is a free agent, and insists on remaining on the hands until one washes his hands three times. R. Johanan said: Stibium removes cures the Princess, stops the tears, and promotes the growth of the eye-lashes. It was taught likewise, R. Jose said: Stibium removes the Princess, stops the tears, and promotes the growth of the eye-lashes.

9-year-old in serious condition after contracting 'brain-eating amoeba' in Sea of Galilee

 https://www.israelhayom.com/2026/09/06/9-year-old-in-serious-condition-after-contracting-brain-eating-amoeba-in-sea-of-galilee/

Following the case, the Health Ministry reiterated its recommendations for precautions when swimming in warm freshwater, chiefly avoiding getting water in the nose as much as possible, particularly when diving, jumping into the water or submerging the head. Swimmers can also use nose clips or hold their noses closed. The ministry also recommended avoiding digging into or stirring up sediment in shallow water, where higher concentrations of the amoeba may be present.

Regarding symptoms, the ministry said that anyone who has recently been exposed to warm freshwater and suddenly develops a fever, severe headache, nausea or vomiting should pay close attention to their condition. If those symptoms are followed by a stiff neck, confusion, unusual drowsiness or changes in consciousness, urgent medical attention is required, and the patient or family should explicitly tell medical staff about the freshwater exposure, as the disease can progress extremely rapidly.

Gafni’s ouster marks a changing era for Israel’s haredi parties - and for Netanyahu - analysis

 https://www.jpost.com/israel-election-2026/article-907743

By pushing Gafni out of the next Knesset, the party's rabbinic leadership has served notice that Netanyahu will have to win the haredim back rather than simply count them in.

There is a considerable irony here. As a longtime MK and seemingly permanent chairman of the powerful Knesset Finance Committee, Gafni was perhaps the most accomplished parliamentary tactician in haredi politics. He mastered the political system, knew how to work its levers, and succeeded in channeling tremendous budgets to his constituents.

Yet all that parliamentary mastery could not deliver the one result his community – or at least its most respected rabbis – considered essential. And that raises a broader question: Has the traditional haredi method of working within the parliamentary system to protect and preserve the yeshiva world run its course?

Sunday, September 6, 2026

Cardiac Circumcision vs. Cardiac Transplant: A Rejoinder to R. Aharon Lichtenstein     by Rav Shalom C. Spira

    Last week, we read: "Ha-Shem, Your G-d, will circumcise your heart and the heart of your seed" (Deut. 30:6). Mishnah Berurah, Orach Chaim 581, intro, observes that the Hebrew words et levavkha ve-et levav spell by way of acronym "Elul," the current month that is devoted to cardiac circumcision (a metaphor for repentance).
    As I have previously argued at Halakhic Bioethic | PDF | Talmud | Judaism, such cardiac circumcision requires abjuring cardiac transplantation. Since a brain dead patient is potentially alive according to Torah law, the obligatory mitzvah of piku'ach nefesh requires us to rescue the comatose patient and a fortiori to avoid harvesting organs from him/her. One of the sources I incorporated into this essay is a statement I heard from R. Aharon Lichtenstein during the summer of 5760 (corresponding to 2000 on the secular calendar) publicly declaring that the words of Me'iri must be followed le-chumra [and not le-kula]; see text accompanying footnote 92.
    Yet, the newly released Tradition 58:3 (Summer 2026) showcases an essay posthumously ascribed to the very same R. Aharon Lichtenstein [reportedly authored in 2013], which allows the family of a brain dead patient to choose to donate the patient's organs. [Available here: 🔓Tears of the Afflicted: Reflections on a Current Proposal Regarding Organ Donation | Tradition Online] When read back-to-back with my own essay, this would imply that Rabbi Lichtenstein reversed course in the period between 2000 and 2013. Indeed, in footnote 4, the editors of Rabbi Lichtenstein's posthumous essay acknowledge "we believe it is probable that R. Lichtenstein's position on this topic evolved over the years." [The editors then refer to a YouTube video whose link is unfortunately broken and hence cannot be accessed for verification.]
    As a matter of practical Halakhah, this essay posthumously ascribed to Rabbi Lichtenstein cannot justify donating organs, due to the following seven considerations:

  1. On pp. 8-9, the author claims he is inclined to allow donating organs from the brain dead patient because it is estimated that 100 patients in Eretz Yisrael die annually of organ failure, not to speak of countless parallel cases in the Diaspora. Alas, this is an appeal to human emotions to attempt to override Torah law. Rambam, Hilkhot Yesodei ha-Torah 5:5 , followed by Rema to Shulchan Arukh Yoreh De'ah 157:1, clearly rule that we cannot sacrifice one innocent life even to save an entire community. [For further discussion, see SURVEY OF RECENT HALAKHIC LITERATURE: Rescue Dilemmas | Tradition Online.] Moreover, well known in yeshivah circles is the inference drawn from Rambam, Hilkhot Yesodei ha-Torah 5:1 ("The entire House of Israel is commanded regarding sanctification of this Great Name") that even if the entire Jewish People would be (Heaven forbid) in danger, it still is forbidden to sacrifice one innocent life in order to rescue the entire Jewish People.
  2. On p. 10, the author critiques the RCA Vaad Halacha study on brain death [released by R. Asher Bush in 5770, and which argues in favour of considering the brain dead patient to be alive] for assigning primacy "to the parameters which limit life-saving rather than to measures which enhance its prospects." Alas, that accusation overlooks the argument [of R. J. David Bleich, Bioethical Dilemmas Vol. 1, ch. 4] that the life of a comatose patient also has philosophical value. Rabbi Bleich compares humanity to a musical orchestra where every player contributes to the visual magnificence of the performance. Some musicians have to be silent to fulfill their role, but they are still accomplishing their purpose even when they are quiescent. [Likewise, the comatose patient silently contributes to the perceived Majesty of the Creator, simply by the comatose patient existing in his/her hospital bed.] Ergo, from the perspective of the comatose patient, the RCA Vaad Halacha is indeed enhancing the prospects of life-saving.
    [Parenthetically, the RCA link to the Vaad Halacha study, cited in footnote 1 of my essay, has been recently disabled by the RCA for unspecified reasons. The interested reader can nevertheless find a facsimile of it on the HODS website at Vaad Halacha Teshuvah on Brain Death and Organ Transplantation: Consolidated. I will take the present opportunity to congratulate HODS for offering the public this service, a meaningful gesture of cardiac circumcision given the reality that HODS is the target of the RCA Vaad Halacha study's attack.]
  3. On pp. 10-11, the author claims that failing to transplant an organ into a patient who needs the organ to survive is an act of overt murder, based on the Gemara, Sanhedrin 76b-77b regarding metzamtzem. Hence, for the author, the only way to avoid the charge of overt murder is to advocate donating organs from brain dead patients. Alas, this is a misreading of Sanhedrin 76b-77b. The Gemara refers to tying down a person trying to escape mortal danger. By contradistinction, mere passive failure to provide medical care for a patient in organ failure [while assuredly a serious transgression of Leviticus 19:16] is certainly not an overt act of murder.
    Now, it is true that in a somewhat related context, viz. Daas Torah - Issues of Jewish Identity: Celebrating the Siyum on Sotah: Managing Brain Dead Patients by Rabbi Shalom C. Spira, I did cite R. Shlomo Yosef Zevin as inferring from Sotah 45b that passive euthanasia is tantamount to murder. However, "tantamount" is not the same as legal equivalence. To that effect, Rabbi Zevin is condemning passive euthanasia where the bystander could have accomplished more but refused and thereby violated Leviticus 19:16. Here, by contradistinction, in the case of organ donation, the bystander cannot actually accomplish anymore without risking the prospect of active murder. Hence, the bystander would be shielded from violation of Leviticus 19:16 by virtue of the principle anoose Rachamana patreih (Nedarim 27a).
  4. On p. 12, the author rebukes the RCA Vaad Halacha study by exclaiming "have we subliminally forgotten that we are, possibly, signing death warrants seriatim [since the recipient will not receive the organ required to save his life]!" Alas, this rebuke is a non sequitur. By the author of the posthumous essay encouraging organ donation, he is also possibly signing death warrants seriatim, since comatose patients will now be potentially murdered.
  5. On p. 13, the author claims that the doubt regarding brain death is subjective and therefore every posek can rule as he sits fit. Alas, as R. Chaim Zimmerman explains in his introduction to Agan ha-Sahar [regarding the international dateline], Orthodox Judaism believes that Torah law is objective and not subjective. [Available here: אגן הסהר - צימרמן, אהרן חיים (page 2 of 508)]. The same point is reiterated by R. Joseph Ber Soloveitchik in his 1975 "Gerus and Mesorah" lecture repudiating R. Emanuel Rackman who fraudulently advocated "rescuing" agunot by allowing them to plead kiddushei ta'ut. [Available here: YUTorah Online] And the same point is further reinforced by R. J. David Bleich in his introduction to Contemporary Halakhic Problems Vol. 4.
  6. On p. 18, the author focuses on the controversy that erupted in 1986 when the Israeli Chief Rabbinate allowed harvesting organs from brain dead patients. The posthumous essay claims that the RCA Vaad Halacha study [of R. Asher Bush] contends that the 1986 controversy was based on the allegation that the Israeli Chief Rabbinate was relying on a forged responsum of R. Moshe Feinstein. To this allegation, the posthumous essay remonstrates with a cri de coeur: "Yet, do the authors of the study truly expect the average observant family to stake the life of a child or a spouse on the result of a debate regarding the possible fabrication of this teshuvah? And how would we respond if the family wanted to know whether the teshuvah was directed to a particular concrete case, and its anguish effectively discounted, or had been composed as an abstract directive?"
    Alas, the posthumous essay is confused here, and clarity should optimally be restored by a careful review of the facts, as follows: (a) The allegation of forgery raised by Rabbi Bush (on p. 55 of the study) specifically relates to the Bondi letter, which was only first published in 1992, several years after the Israeli Chief Rabbinate already issued its 1986 verdict. [The Bondi letter was then republished in the posthumously published eighth volume of Iggerot Mosheh, which thereby ensured that the eighth volume of Iggerot Mosheh was surrounded by polemic.] By contradistinction, the Israeli Chief Rabbinate verdict of 1986 was based [not on the Bondi letter, but rather] on a disputed interpretation of Iggerot Mosheh, Yoreh De'ah, III, no. 132 [published in 1982 when R. Moshe Feinstein was already ill and not available to clarify his words to the public], and it is this disputed interpretation which caused many poskim to protest against the Israeli Chief Rabbinate. See Rabbi Bleich's 1989 survey of these poskim [when the Bondi letter had not yet been published and so was yet unknown] at Of Cerebral, Respiratory and Cardiac Death | Tradition Online. (b) Although Rabbi Bush never himself raises a claim of forgery regarding Iggerot Mosheh, III, Yoreh De'ah no. 132, it is indeed the case that two other scholars [as distinct from Rabbi Bush] have accused the sixth volume of Iggerot Mosheh [which contains YD 3:132] of being marred by forgery. Specifically, as reported by R. Yonatan Roseman, Petichat ha-Iggerot, p. 489 and again on p. 664, R. David Feinstein (son of Reb Moshe) alleges that YD 3:48 was never written by Reb Moshe. [Available here: פתיחת האגרות - יונתן רוזמן (page 543 of 854) and פתיחת האגרות - יונתן רוזמן (page 726 of 854)]. And R. Menasheh Klein, Teshuvot Mishneh Halakhot, XII, no. 214, has accused YD 3:114 of being forged. However, Rabbi Klein subsequently retracts that accusation in Teshuvot Mishneh Halakhot, XVI, no. 102. (c) Regarding the seventh volume of Iggerot Mosheh, published in 1985 when Reb Moshe was incapacitated, there are indeed those who accuse it of forgery [perhaps greater in number and stature than those who attacked the sixth volume], as documented in footnote 239 of Halakhic Bioethic | PDF | Talmud | Judaism. However, such an accusation was never levelled by Rabbi Bush himself [and, ironically, levelling such an accusation would have the effect of cancelling one of the arguments to consider brain dead patients as being alive, as elucidated in the aforementioned footnote 239]. (d) R. Moshe Feinstein, first volume of Iggerot Mosheh (which is certainly authentic), intro (final two paragraphs), asks the reader not to rely on any of his responsa unless the reader independently investigates and concurs with the conclusion. Thus, to respond to the cri de coeur of [the posthumous essay ascribed to] Rabbi Lichtenstein, we certainly will never "stake the life of a child or a spouse" on a responsum within Iggerot Mosheh (whether authentic or forged) before independently investigating  it using proper methods of the Oral Torah, as Reb Moshe himself demanded of us. And my essay has endeavoured to accomplish that [be-ezrat Ha-Shem Yitbarakh], concluding that the brain dead patient is potentially alive. On this I would argue with a clean conscience that we are indeed allowed-and-obligated to stake the life of a child or a spouse.
  7. Rabbi Lichtenstein is not the sole Israeli decisor whose responsum on brain death has been posthumously published. In Chut Shani on the Days of Awe (Bnei Brak, 5781), p. 544, letters posthumously ascribed to R. Shmuel ha-Levi Wosner, R. Nissim Karelitz and R. Joseph Shalom Eliashiv appear in response to the question of the secular Knesset legislating recognition of brain death. All three of them announce that a brain dead patient is alive and that organs may never be harvested from him/her. [Available at חוט שני - ראש השנה, יום כיפור, סוכות, חנוכה, פורים, תשובה, תוכחה, לשון הרע - קרליץ, שמריהו יוסף נסים בן נחום מאיר ("הגאב"ד") 1926-2019 - הוכמן, חיים אריה הלוי (עורך) (page 548 of 572) ] In the case of these three decisors, their posthumous decision is fully consistent with what they already announced during their lifetime [unlike the situation of Rabbi Lichtenstein, where his view changed from what was announced during his lifetime to what was announced posthumously, as noted earlier]. This should further assuage our conscience that it is halakhically correct to treat the brain dead patient as being alive.

     [End of seven considerations]

    At the same time, a different halakhic issue is raised by the posthumous essay attributed to Rabbi Lichtenstein, and here the evidence supports him. Namely, the posthumous essay (pp. 15-16) decries the asymmetrical ethic of forbidding organ donation but allowing organ reception. And on this, the posthumous essay is vindicated by footnote 309 of Halakhic Bioethic | PDF | Talmud | Judaism. Indeed, my own father [who was in heart failure for 10.5 years] heroically gave his life al Kiddush Ha-Shem rather than accept a cardiac transplant [which he was repeatedly offered, yet he refused as a matter of conscience because he realized one cannot murder one patient in order to rescue a different patient], as explained in my eulogy for him at Daas Torah - Issues of Jewish Identity:  A Eulogy for my Father   by Rav Shalom C. Spira. Even here, though, I do not feel that the healthcare profession should caricaturize Orthodox Jews for discrimination. Organ failure and brain death are not phenomena that were engineered by Orthodox Jews. Rather, all human beings are commanded by the Noahide Code to refrain from murder, and so no human being should ever be willing to orchestrate an organ harvest on a brain dead patient, even for so noble a purpose as rescuing another patient from organ failure. 
    As Rosh ha-Shanah approaches, I wish all readers of the Daas Torah website that we should be blessed with much "brain life" and indeed be inscribed in the Book of Life.


    Rabbi Spira works as the Editor of Manuscripts and Grants at the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research [a Pavillion of the Jewish General Hospital] in Montreal, Canada.

Haredi shakeup: Gafni, Maklev reportedly ousted from Degel HaTorah slate

 https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/432745

Degel HaTorah party officials on Saturday night claimed that MKs Moshe Gafni and Uri Maklev will not be included on the party's slate in the upcoming elections.

Gafni and Maklev have attempted in recent days to fight the decision to remove them from the Knesset. Despite their efforts, the sources claim that the decision has already been made.

If the move goes ahead, it would bring Gafni's lengthy Knesset career to an end, 38 years after he was first elected. Maklev, also one of Degel HaTorah's veteran representatives in the Knesset, is likewise expected to be left off the slate, according to the officials.

Toronto rabbis spark backlash with burial ban over assisted dying

 https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/432656

A decision by Toronto's Orthodox rabbis' council has sparked a heated religious and public debate across Canada over how Jewish communities should respond when a patient chooses physician-assisted death. According to CJN, the council recently adopted a strict policy opposing the practice, including significant restrictions on the religious services available to patients who die through assisted dying.

Under the policy, the council's rabbis will not participate in the funerals of patients who chose euthanasia and will generally refuse permission for such individuals to be buried in cemetery sections affiliated with Orthodox synagogues. The decision comes amid a significant increase in the use of medical assistance in dying in Canada. According to Canadian health data cited in the report, approximately 5,000 Ontario residents chose medical assistance in dying in 2023. Since Canada legalized the procedure roughly a decade ago, more than 75,000 people have chosen it, and assisted deaths now account for more than 5% of all deaths in the country.

The Orthodox rabbis' council described the practice as "euthanasia by doctors" and said its policy was intended to prevent what it considers an impermissible practice from becoming normalized within the Jewish community. Rabbi Yosef Uziel, the council's spokesman, said the decision followed extensive discussions intended to uphold Jewish law while maintaining sensitivity toward those involved.

Friday, September 4, 2026

Former Air Force secretary: Hegseth’s Pentagon ‘dysfunctional’

 https://thehill.com/policy/defense/6068287-former-air-force-secretary-hegeseths-pentagon-dysfunctional/

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins asked Kendall, who served under the Biden and Obama administrations, for his assessment of Hegseth’s handling of the military and the Pentagon. The former secretary accused the Pentagon chief of doing “active harm” to the department.

“In a word, it’s dysfunctional,” Kendall continued. “I’ve worked with and had a chance to work for maybe a dozen secretaries of Defense. He’s doing active harm to the Department of Defense. It’s not passive. It’s active harm.”

The ex-official said the “enormous damage” to the department will take several years “or decades to go repair this and restore the type of system that we have had traditionally.”

LevinAt11: BlockVote-Manipulators @WH

 בס"ד

ע"ש פרשת נצבים-וילך, כ"ב אלול, תשפו

Linked below is this week's LevinAt11 radio broadcast Sept. 3, '26.*


תכנית ראדיו רב יהודה לעוין, שליט"א, נצבים-וילך תשפו

Topics - for those unafraid of hearing the unpopular truth ... Torah-predicated perspectives not reported in Yaffed Ne'eman...

White House Meeting:

כל מקום שיש חילול השם אין חולקים כבוד לרב - סנהדרין פ"ב, סוף עמוד א.

This week's topic was today's White House meeting. The meeting was held with some prominent community figures, most of whom happen to be known recidivist block-vote "leaders," who consistently exploit their religious positions to mislead major (more insular) Orthodox communities into voting for anti-Torah, antilife, anti-morality candidates.  These include subversive judicial candidates (often Democratic), who will be addressing legal issues raised by the LGBT-led assault on Jewish Education in NY State by NY State government.

Recidivist LGBTQ and abortion-proponent Rep. Mike Lawler (NY 17, Log Cabinite), seen as a major beneficiary of the meeting, was also present at the WH meeting.  Lawler, who leads the LGBT societal sabotage within the NY GOP community, grandstands to his Orthodox base as being our savior from the aforementioned NYS assault of Education/ Chinuch.  He does this while skillfully maintaining a straight face (pardon the pun) - while that very assault is being perpetrated by his fellow LGBTQ devotees -- of the Democratic variant.  Now, how exactly Lawler expects to defend us against NY State - given his limitations, operating on the federal, not state level - remains to be seen.  In any case, any sort of federal "protections" Lawler would ostensibly obtain may prove far more damaging than helpful, given his recidivist LGBT advocacy.

The Administration presumably wants Orthodox support for Lawler - to try to hold the House.  It's not clear, however, why we should care so much about the GOP holding the House - if, when it comes to any truly crucial vote - Lawler will probably vote with the Dems anyway, as he's wont to do.  It's also not clear if keeping Log-Cabin Lawler will even succeed in keeping the GOP in control of the House - given the predicament the GOP is currently in, pursuant to their insistence on pursuing the proxy war against Russia in Ukraine (pushing Russia ever closer to Iran), while simultaneously trying to ostensibly defeat the current Iranian government (benefiting from Russian "payback" for US involvement in Ukraine).

See below for Matzav post.

• Delegation of Rebbes Holds Historic White House Meeting With President Trump - Belaaz News:

~~~
• Related news - some of the latest morality- related developments from Cana'an - matters that don't seem to concern some of those pretending to care about the negative spiritual fallout being endured by those in the IDF:


(See the most recent emailer of Chotam for more.)
~~~~
last week's program:  כי תבוא


• previous week's program:  כי תצא


Good Shabbos, and have a Kesivah Vechasimah Tovah,

Rabbi Noson Shmuel Leiter,

Executive Director,

Help Rescue Our Children

Email:  torahjewsfordecency@gmail.com

845.642.1679

Direct: 771.215.8892

Israeli Helpline: 03.721.3337

Heard weekly on New Jersey's WSNR Radio 620AM, co-hosting the renowned Levin At Eleven program, every Thursday evening, 11pm to midnight (ET).

~~~~~~    ~~~~~~   ~~~~~~ 

# Fair Use # 

Emphasis added here - ed.

More Details from the Historic White House Gathering as President Trump Meets Rabbonim Ahead of Rosh Hashanah

September 3, 2026 at 6:15 pm
2386

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump welcomed a delegation of rabbonim to the White House on Thursday ... ...

The gathering, which had been organized over the course of several months, was described by those involved as an opportunity for the president and senior administration officials to meet directly with representatives of major Chassidishe and yeshiva communities, exchange New Year greetings, and hear concerns affecting the Orthodox Jewish community. Reports ahead of the meeting described an Oval Office gathering of this particular composition as exceedingly rare.

The delegation represented a small cross-section of the frum community. Participants included Rav Malkiel Kotler, the only Litvishe Rosh Yeshiva invited; the Satmar Rebbe, Rav Zalman Leib Teitelbaum of Williamsburg; his brother, the Satmar Rebbe, Rav Aharon Teitelbaum of Kiryas Yoel; the Bobover Rebbe; the Vizhnitzer Rebbe of Monsey; and Rav Aharon Mendel Twersky, son of the Skverer Rebbe, who attended on his father’s behalf. The Skverer Rebbe had initially been invited personally but ultimately did not make the trip.

In the Oval Office seating arrangement, Rav Malkiel was seated first, followed by the Satmar Rebbe Rav Zalman Leib and then his brother, the Satmar Rebbe Rav Aharon.

One of the most unique moments of the day occurred when the two Satmar Rebbes arrived. The brothers, who lead the two branches of Satmar and have been estranged for decades, greeted one another warmly and exchanged brachos. Rav Aharon also wished Rav Zalman Leib mazel tov on the engagement of a grandchild that had been finalized the previous night.

President Trump, apparently intrigued by the resemblance between the brothers, asked, “Are you twins?” They explained that they are brothers.

The gathering had been spearheaded by White House Jewish liaison Martin Marks, who personally contacted the rabbinic leaders and spent months working on the arrangements. The stated purpose was to provide an opportunity ahead of Rosh Hashanah to convey appreciation for the administration’s support of Orthodox Jewish institutions and to allow Trump to extend New Year greetings to major segments of the frum community.

Before meeting with Trump, members of the delegation gathered with senior administration officials. Marks opened the session, followed by remarks from White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf. Earlier reports had indicated that the delegation would first meet administration officials in the Roosevelt Room before proceeding to the Oval Office.

During the discussion, several communal representatives raised issues of particular concern to the frum community. Yoeli Rosenfeld of Bobov, Reb Gedalya Segedin of Satmar, New Square Mayor Yisroel Moshe Spitzer and others participated in presenting those concerns.

Among the matters receiving significant attention was the situation of Jewish inmates in federal and state correctional facilities around the country. The participants discussed religious and other difficulties confronting frum prisoners and efforts to ensure that their needs and rights are properly accommodated.

The independence of yeshivos and mosdos in New York was another significant concern surrounding the gathering. In recent years, the state’s attempts to impose educational requirements on private religious schools have generated a sustained battle over the ability of yeshivos to maintain their traditional derech halimud and educational structure without government interference. Reports ahead of Thursday’s meeting indicated that protecting the autonomy of Chareidi education was expected to be among the issues raised with the administration.

The inclusion of Satmar in the delegation had generated criticism in some strongly pro-Israel circles before Thursday’s meeting because of Satmar’s longstanding anti-Zionist ideology. Some Trump supporters publicly objected to giving the Satmar leadership access to the president.

Vice President JD Vance joined the gathering midway through the proceedings and personally greeted those seated around the table. Vance spoke warmly about the Orthodox community’s emphasis on family and education, saying that both subjects were particularly close to him.

The vice president also displayed curiosity about some of the differences in Chassidishe dress. At one point, Vance asked why the Rebbes were wearing different-colored bekitches. Mr. Yossi Gestetner jokingly responded that “it depends on their bank account balance,” drawing laughter from those gathered in the room.

Rep. Mike Lawler of New York was also present for the historic visit, as was Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law. Lawler had been seen arriving at the White House ahead of the delegation, and reports before the meeting said he had been involved in efforts surrounding the gathering.

The Vizhnitzer Rebbe of Monsey arrived somewhat later than the other participants and consequently was not present for the official White House group photograph.

The day also included a more private encounter between President Trump and Rav Aharon Teitelbaum. The Satmar Rebbe met privately with the president for approximately 10 minutes together with Kushner before the remaining rabbonim were brought into the Oval Office.

During the encounter, Rav Aharon gave President Trump a bracha, which Reb Gedalya Segedin translated into English for the president.

Thursday’s gathering followed a morning of complicated travel arrangements for some of the participants. Several of the Rebbes traveled to Washington aboard private aircraft, with delays affecting some of the flights. Rav Malkiel Kotler arrived at the White House while other members of the delegation were still making their way to Washington. Contemporary reports and photographs documented the arrival of Rav Malkiel and the various Chassidishe delegations at the White House throughout the afternoon.

The Skverer Rebbe, who did not attend personally, sent his son Rav Aharon Mendel Twersky in his place. The Rebbe also entrusted his son with a letter for President Trump expressing appreciation for actions taken by the administration on behalf of the Jewish community, along with a personal New Year brocha.

{Matzav.com}

------  ---------

Broadcast over: Davidzon Radio: davidzonradio.com 718) 303-8000

Faith-Emuna

Kuzari (2:66): Shlomo spoke with Divine power and his great intellect and natural talents concerning all types of knowledge. From the ends of the earth, people came to him to hear his knowledge and to transmit it to the world - even as far as India. In truth the root of all wisdom and its principles was copied from the Jews - first by the Chaldeans and afterwards the Persians and Medes. Afterwards this knowledge went to the Greeks and Romans. However, because these events are distant in time and the many intermediaries in the process it has not been mentioned in the books of science and wisdom that it was taken originally from the Jews. These books mention only that they originated in Greek and Roman sources. …

Moreh Nevuchim (01:71): You should know that the many sciences which had existed in our community to validate these theological matters have been lost in the passage of time because of our being dominated by foolish nations and because these matters were not permitted to be divulged to all the people. In fact, the only thing that can be divulged to all people is the text of the books…

Maharetz Chajes (Introduction to the Talmud chapter 17): We have no doubt that all the Sages’ words concerning the foundations of religion and the principles of the Torah were received by them by oral tradition from Sinai. Only occasionally did our Sages use the hermeneutic principles to associate these principles with the verses so that they would be remembered well. However, there is absolutely no question that everything was received from G d through Moshe. It is only logical. If we see that concerning the practical observance of the mitzvos - which are only an introduction to the purification of religion - that they had halacha which was transmitted from Sinai as to how to do the mitzvos… then surely this is true concerning principles of faith and religion….

 Michtav M’Eliyahu (3:177): Proper emuna is acquired step after step as a consequence of deep immersion in Torah study and not by abstract intellectual analysis of theological issues. It is a mistake to think that it is possible to acquire genuine emuna by means of intellectual analysis and philosophy. The intellect is biased by many factors that prevent it from being objective. Personal desires twist and distort thought to conform to it. When a person turns to his intellect and wants that it be the final judge on issues of Emuna  -  that is a clear sign that the person doesn’t really want to have emuna and that is why he is turning to the corrupt judge to make decisions according to his desires. Not only is the intellect inherently biased but it is also limited since it is based upon material imagery which itself is finite. In contrast, emuna which originates inside a person is not restricted by these limitations. Rav Nachman of Breslov noted that emuna starts at the limits of intellect. In fact, we are obligated to clarify emuna with our intellects as the Chovas HaLevavos says in his introduction. The attitude is not “whatever I can make sense of I will accept and otherwise I will reject it” - G d forbid! 

Meiri (Avos Introduction): There is a strong emphasis and constant warning in the Torah to stay far away from idol worship since there has always been a strong attachment to it generation after generation. An intelligent person would naturally ask why this error of idol worship has repeated itself generation after generation? The answer is that the average person more readily believes that which he can perceive and comprehend than that which is intangible and abstract. Therefore, a person’s nature draws him to idol worship.

Rav Elchonon Wasserman (Essay on Emuna 2): … It is known that the issues of religious faith are things which are exceedingly obvious and don’t require wisdom and philosophy to ascertain. They are in fact evident first principles as the Chovas HaLevavos (1:6) explained. The creation of a book gives testimony about the existence of the author. Only an insane person would think that the book was created by accident by someone spilling ink on paper… The overall principle is that every activity is done to accomplish some purpose. Thus, it is self evident that when G d created man it was to accomplish some specific purpose. … It is obvious that when G d created man it was in order that he does His will. The obvious problem is how is man supposed to know what G d wants if he wasn’t told….? This question contains its own answer. It is obvious that G d revealed to man what He expects of him. This is Torah from Heaven.

Rav Saadiya Gaon (Introduction 6): Since all matters of religious belief which G d has informed us can also be ascertained by investigation and rational analysis, what is the reason that G d transmitted them to us by means of prophecy and validated them by means of miraculous signs - rather than by intellectual proofs? I would suggest that this was done since G d was fully aware that that establishing truth through intellectual proofs required an extended period of time. Consequently, if He left us to establish the validity through intellectual speculation we would be bereft of proper spiritual guidance until the effort was completed. Obviously many people would never finish the analysis because of errors in their reasoning or lack of patience and they would remain with doubts and confusion. Therefore, G d saved us from these pitfalls by direct revelation supported by proofs which would eliminate all uncertainty and confusion… 

Netanyahu warns Winter’s party could ‘bring down’ his bloc; Winter: Need new leaders, untainted by Oct. 7

 https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-warns-winters-party-could-bring-down-his-coalition-urges-meeting/

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday again warned that Ofer Winter’s new People of Israel party could cost the outgoing right-wing coalition essential seats if it runs alone in the upcoming election, urging Winter to meet with him and address the issue.

Number of lies we heard was unconscionable': INSTANT REACTION to Vance's 'mind-boggling' briefing

Toronto rabbis spark backlash with burial ban over assisted dying

 https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/432656

An Orthodox rabbis’ council has barred funerals and restricted burial for Jews who die through physician-assisted death, triggering a fierce backlash from other rabbis and community leaders.

Under the policy, the council's rabbis will not participate in the funerals of patients who chose euthanasia and will generally refuse permission for such individuals to be buried in cemetery sections affiliated with Orthodox synagogues. The decision comes amid a significant increase in the use of medical assistance in dying in Canada. According to Canadian health data cited in the report, approximately 5,000 Ontario residents chose medical assistance in dying in 2023. Since Canada legalized the procedure roughly a decade ago, more than 75,000 people have chosen it, and assisted deaths now account for more than 5% of all deaths in the country.

The policy quickly drew criticism from other Jewish organizations. The Toronto Council of Rabbis, which includes 56 rabbis representing different Jewish denominations and movements, issued a response calling the Orthodox council's decision "surprising" and "too harsh." While the council said it does not support euthanasia from a Jewish legal perspective, it said its rabbis would continue to provide spiritual support to families, conduct funerals, and participate in shiva.

Thursday, September 3, 2026

The Devilish Legacy of Roy Cohn

 https://www.thefp.com/p/roy-cohn-trump-james-kirchick-american-scoundrel

The infamous lawyer and fixer for mobsters, Joe McCarthy, and a young Donald Trump heralded a new kind of American politics.

“Where’s my Roy Cohn?” President Donald Trump demanded in March 2017, barely two months into his first administration. Trump was just given the unwelcome news that his attorney general had recused himself from the Justice Department investigation into his campaign’s alleged collusion with Russia, and he needed someone to rescue him.

The plaintive cry—later adopted by director Matt Tyrnauer as the title for his revelatory 2019 documentary about Cohn—spoke to the singular importance that the late lawyer and political fixer held in Trump’s life. Like many powerful men of dubious morality, Trump had relied on Cohn to extricate him from messes of his own making. During his heyday as a real-estate tycoon, Trump kept a framed photograph of Cohn in his office; during contentious meetings, he would point to it and ask—not so much as a question but as a threat—“Would you rather deal with him?”

Hegseth faces GOP BACKLASH for ‘massive’ Pentagon purge |

Low testosterone is a real problem, but don’t forget this major cause

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/08/31/testosterone-treatment-heres-better-idea-hegseth/

In July, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a mandatory program to test all service members 30 and older for low testosterone and to offer voluntary testosterone replacement therapy to those who test low. The mandate appears to include women. Hegseth has put forth some out-there beliefs, such as when he promoted a church leader who has advocated the abolition of women’s right to vote. Is this another one of those weird ideas?

Not necessarily. Men rely on testosterone for drive and motivation, for the will to win. When testosterone levels fall, men’s motivation falls — though the same is not true for women.

And testosterone levels in men are in fact dropping. Between 1999 and 2016, the average testosterone level among young men fell by 25 percent. In 1999, only 4 percent of men had low testosterone. In 2016, more than 20 percent of men did — a fivefold increase in less than 20 years. These findings were confirmed in a more recent review, which found no taper in that trend line: Not only are testosterone levels continuing to drop among men, but the pace of the decline appears to be accelerating.

More testosterone won’t make a better soldier or a tougher man – aggression and strength drive T levels, not the other way around

 https://theconversation.com/more-testosterone-wont-make-a-better-soldier-or-a-tougher-man-aggression-and-strength-drive-t-levels-not-the-other-way-around-287828

How low is too low when it comes to testosterone levels? When Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced in July 2026 that U.S. service members ages 30 and older will have their testosterone tested every year, neither he nor the Pentagon specified what level of the hormone would be considered “low” enough to require treatment – a telling omission, since where “low” begins depends on the lab conducting the test and the guidelines your doctor follows.

The announcement lands amid a national testosterone craze: Prescriptions have climbed to nearly 12 million in 2025, up 154% since 2020, and fastest among men in their late 30s and 40s. Online clinics that sell testosterone as a lifestyle upgrade have largely driven this rise in prescriptions.

As a psychologist who studies masculinity, I’m certain that while the idea that more testosterone makes a man tougher and more fit to fight seems intuitive, it’s also mostly wrong.