BS"D
U.S. Congress: Making Enemy Sexual Assault Great Again
DON'T DRAFT OUR DAUGHTERS - EVER!
July 12, '22 / 13 Tammuz, 5782 / Bolok (25:4)
by Binyomin Feinberg, former contributor, The Jewish Press
American congressmen of both parties are currently seeking to oblige young women to register for Selective Service, in preparation for a future Draft. A vote in the U.S. House of Representatives' Rules Committee is scheduled for today, Tues., on various amendments to the Defense budget, NDAA23.
One of the noxious amendments that needs to be defeated is 457, by Rep. Jackie Speier (D, CA). Speier apparently isn't satisfied with the Trump cave-in to the subversive Transgender movement, running the military as it were founded to serve as federal caretakers for those claiming gender dysphoria. (The Army has nothing better to do?) She wants to restore the Obama-era LGBT regime, wherein "Private Parts Don't Matter" altogether. However, in addition to that, there are other objections to 457. One is the fact that, in the hands of abusive politicians, her legislation will almost certainly be manipulated to advance expansion of Selective Service to women. And that's a concern that may actually have a chance of garnering the Democratic opposition vital to its defeat - if the Republicans don't snatch defeat from the hands of victory.
Floor votes in the House start this Wednesday, presumably continuing through Thursday. The public is advised to reach out to all Representatives, with somewhat of a priority given to those who sit on the Armed Services Committee (whose views may carry more weight by some people). I don't know the Senate schedule yet.
Specifically, concerned citizens would be advised to urge their own Congressman, and then their Senator, TODAY [and certainly by Wednesday], as follows:
"Please do everything in your power to stop ANY expansion of Selective Service to women. And, specifically, vote against the "Speier" Defense Budget Amendment - number 457, and anything at all similar."
"We will definitely score ANY vote to expand Selective Service to women in ANY WAY - even within the Defense Budget - as a vote for America's enemies to rape America's mothers, daughters, and granddaughters."
"The current Selective Service system was instituted in 1980 President Carter to support the Mujhadeen in Afghanistan, which ultimately backfired. If we don't eliminate Selective Service altogether - we certainly should not expand it to women."
There are decent prospects of success, if enough Republicans realize that the public recognizes that Selective Service is, in reality, the obsolete, toxic, and wasteful legacy of the most favored U.S. President of the Afghan Mujhadeen, Jimmy Carter (https://www.
As one organization articulated, "if it comes down to it - kill Selective Service - not our daughters."
~~~
The House Rules Committee members are:
Jim McGovern, Massachusetts, Chair
Norma Torres, California
Ed Perlmutter, Colorado
Jamie Raskin, Maryland
Mary Gay Scanlon, Pennsylvania
Joseph Morelle, New York
Mark DeSaulnier, California, Vice-Chair
Deborah K. Ross, North Carolina
Joe Neguse, Colorado (sinceMay 12, 2021)
Tom Cole, Oklahoma, Ranking Member
Michael C. Burgess, Texas
Guy Reschenthaler, Pennsylvania
Michelle Fischbach, Minnesota
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Congressional Switchboard:
202-224-3121
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Q) Why shouldn't America draft women - Israel does it!
A) That's precisely why. The sign of an idiot is someone who repeats the same actions, expecting different results. The quintessentially anti-Torah Israeli female military draft has been a disaster for Israeli society, and for the military itself, especially since the Obama-era integration of women into mixed units with men. [These concerns are based largely on reportage of facts in pro-Israeli venues, both religious and secular sources.]
~~~
Related articles:
On Israel's female military draft:
Another illustrative resource:
The following is a link to a Guidebook ("pocketbook") provided by the pro-Israel organization "Chotam." It's an English guide for religious girls to avoid enlistment in the IDF:
This very publication is a stinging indictment of the Israeli Army Draft Office, and the antireligious Establishment behind its escalating crusade to rob religious (and traditional) girls of their legal entitlement to a religious exemption from military service. The very need to publish such a guide speaks volumes of the danger posed to the next generation of Jewish mothers by "fellow Jews." The professional, psychological warfare techniques that these 16- and 17-year-old girls need to be trained to defend against, all alone - without even legal counsel or a family member - are almost as outrageous as they are anti-Torah. These techniques indicate how intent the Israeli military is on drafting increasing numbers of religious girls, and to what depths they're willing to stoop to do so. Thus, unrelenting vigilance is required in identifying developing trends in the encroachment of the female draft on religious communities. Moreover, we need to undo the entire female draft ASAP, for ALL girls, not only those the Draft Office deigns to sanction as religious enough to be exempt from the "Mizron Tzahali" (="IDF Mattress") treatment. No other path will solve the problem.
###
“DON'T DRAFT OUR DAUGHTERS - EVER!” Bravo Binyomin Feinberg. Biden/Harris drafting women would be a good example of judicial overreach. Judicial overreach is when the judiciary starts interfering with the proper functioning of the legislative or executive organs of the government, i.e., the judiciary crosses its own function. Judicial overreach is considered undesirable in a democracy. It also goes against the principle of separation of powers. Tamar in marrying without a get did judicial overreach for Rabbi Kamenetesky to support the annulment with the garbage K-G heter. Susan in Aranoff v Aranoff did judicial overreach to freeze my TIAA pension 100% early 1994 till late 1997. Allow me my letter to today to the NYS Court of Appeals:
ReplyDelete“1.I request permission to submit these papers concerning my motion number 2022-460 return date June 27, 2022. I'm attaching an affidavit of service proving I mailed by UPS a true copy to Susan, to TIAA and to the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct. I attach: Exhibit A: Appeal from Judge Rigler Decided on April 29, 1996 and Exhibit B: Papers Rejection Notice 1995-08938 1997-10813 05/09/2022.
4.Judicial overreach is when the judiciary starts interfering with the proper functioning of the legislative or executive organs of the government, i.e., the judiciary crosses its own function. Judicial overreach is considered undesirable in a democracy. It also goes against the principle of separation of powers. TIAA was paying me 100% of my pension throughout 1993 about $750 monthly. I claim judicial overreach Judge Rigler froze my TIAA pension 100\% from early 1994 and approved a QDRO late 1997 over my objections. Throughout 1998 till now with no end in sight TIAA pays Susan 55% of my pension and me 45%. Did Judge Rigler have authority to freeze my TIAA pension early 1994? No. Judge Rigler did judicial overreach. I suffer today from Judge Rigler's judicial overreach early 1994 with no end in sight.”