URGENT WARNING !! LIFE ENDING DRUG MIDAZOLAM TO BE GIVEN TO 0-5 YEAR OLDS STARTING JAN 2022 !!
AJ DEPRIEST UNCOVERS THE ENORMOUS COVID BRIBES TO SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS FROM THE US GOVERNMENT
"EVERYONE WHO DIED WITH COVID SHOULD BE CONSIDERED MURDERED" NURSE MORGAN WALLACE
SON TRIES TO TAKE FATHER HOME FROM NHS HOSPITAL - MET WITH ANGRY NURSES, SECURITY & POLICE
COVID VAX VARIABILITY BETWEEN LOTS - INDEPENDENT RESEARCH BY INTERNATIONAL TEAM
DR. MIKE YEADON SAYS 90% OF VACCINE SIDE EFFECTS CAME FROM LESS THAN 10% OF THE BATCHES
DEADLY PFIZER SWISS VAX BATCH NUMBER :"EJ6796" SAD!
My 87 year old father and my stepmother were injected with this Pfizer lot number " EJ6796" for both doses in Jan and Feb. of 2021, in Glis, Switzerland. They both died in August of 2021.
Reports have recently surfaced to show that a mere 5% of all batch numbers were responsible for 100% of the 20,000 or so deaths reported to VAERS as of Dec. 2021. Sadly, my father and stepmother were apparently in this tragic 5% deadly batch group. This Pfizer vax batch-- EJ6796 -- had 115 deaths reported to VAERS, while the majority of batches had 0 deaths. Harvard has revealed that less 5% of all adverse events including death are actually reported to VAERS, so that the 115 total deaths shown for batch EJ 6796 may be far higher. I did not report their deaths to VAERS.
As a small boy, my father survived the blitz in England.
Rest In Peace --- all who died tragically from this poison batch!!
Note: I do not know why foreign deaths appear in VAERS.
‘I AM NOT MISINFORMATION’ DOCUMENTARY | REAL PEOPLE, REAL STORIES, REAL VACCINE INJURIES
GERMAN DOCTORS FIND ASTONISHING THINGS IN VAX? VIALS - TRANSLATED PRESS CONFERENCE
Severe Damage to unborn and giant uptick in miscarriages
Thank you for posting all this garbage on your website.
ReplyDeleteIn my experience over the last 2 years, I have tried to reinforce my approach to outing the mis-leaders from the leaders.
So, here are a couple of suggestions for pointing you to genuine and authentic scientists":
1. If this person sometimes presents the alternative opinion to theirs or sometimes says:
"I don't know"; or
"I'll ask a colleague"; or
"It's too early to say, we need more data".
2. Or they explain the science, and after 30 seconds your eyes start glazing over.
Both these could be סמנים, that this person is not a Quack. But yes, it's very difficult to judge.
However, the more and more Quacks that you listen to, the easier it becomes. And we sure have plenty on which to practice.