Wednesday, May 27, 2020
White House defends watchdog firings, but does not offer explanation
https://www.timesofisrael.com/white-house-defends-watchdog-firings-but-does-not-offer-explanation/
A White House letter issued in response to concerns from a prominent
Republican senator does little to explain the decision-making behind
Trump’s recent upheaval of the inspector general community. It is
unlikely to quell outrage from Democrats and good-government groups who
fear the president is moving to dismantle a post-Watergate network of
watchdogs meant to root out corruption, fraud and other problems inside
federal agencies.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, Republican of Iowa — a longtime, self-appointed
defender of inspectors general and congressional oversight — requested
that the White House explain the basis for the firings in April and May
of the inspectors general for the intelligence community and the US
State Department.
The response Tuesday from White House counsel Pat Cipollone does not
provide those details, instead making the points that Trump has the
authority to remove inspectors general, that he appropriately alerted
Congress and that he selected qualified officials as replacements.
The human cost of virus misinformation
https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-52731624
A BBC team tracking coronavirus misinformation has found
links to assaults, arsons and deaths. And experts say the potential for
indirect harm caused by rumours, conspiracy theories and bad health
information could be much bigger.
Lori Klausutis death: Twitter will not remove Trump's 'horrifying lies'
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52810661
At a Rose Garden news conference on healthcare on Tuesday afternoon, Mr Trump was asked if he had seen the widower's letter.
"Yeah, I have," he said. "I'm sure that ultimately they want to get to the bottom of it and it's a very serious situation."
He added: "It's a very suspicious thing and I hope somebody gets to the bottom of it. It would be a very good thing.
"As you know there's no statute of limitations."
White
House spokesperson Kayleigh McEnany said earlier on Tuesday when asked
about Mr Klausutis' appeal: "I don't know if [Mr Trump] has seen the
letter, but I do know that our hearts are with Lori's family at this
time."
Buenos Aires: Jewish bride, groom and rabbi arrested at wedding
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/280931
Eight people, including the bride, groom, and officiating rabbi, arrested at Jewish wedding in Argentina.
Twitter labeled Trump tweets with a fact check for the first time
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/26/tech/twitter-trump-fact-check/index.html
For the first time, Twitter called tweets from Donald Trump "potentially
misleading" — a decision that prompted the president to accuse the
social media platform of election meddling.
On Tuesday, Twitter
highlighted two of Trump's tweets that falsely claimed mail-in ballots
would lead to widespread voter fraud, appending a message the company has introduced to combat misinformation and disputed or unverified claims.
"Get the facts about mail-in ballots," read the message beneath each tweet. It linked to a curated fact-check page the platform had created filled with further links and summaries of news articles debunking the assertion.
Twitter said the move was aimed at
providing "context" around Trump's remarks. But Twitter's unprecedented
decision is likely to raise further questions
about its willingness to consistently apply the label to other Trump
tweets that have been deemed misleading by third parties, particularly
as the president has lobbed baseless allegations against former Rep. Joe
Scarborough regarding the death of a congressional staffer years ago.
Shortly after the labels were applied, Trump took to Twitter to claim the company "is interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election" and "stifling FREE SPEECH." He added that he "will not allow it to happen!"
Twitter's actions quickly led to criticism from some of its users,
however, who said the measures did not go far enough. Some faulted
Twitter for not explicitly saying in the label that Trump's tweets
contained false information; other users said the company should have
used a larger font size.
Rolling out mass hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis for covid-19 in India’s slums risks eroding public trust
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/05/01/rolling-out-mass-hydroxychloroquine-prophylaxis-for-covid-19-in-indias-slums-risks-public-trust/
The municipal corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC) has decided to roll
out a seven-week-long course of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine
(HCQ) mass community prophylaxis for the people living in slums [7].
The decision is apparently backed by the announcement of the Indian
Council of Medical Research (ICMR) dated 22nd of March, for the
prophylaxis of asymptomatic healthcare workers involved in the care of
suspected or confirmed cases of covid-19 and asymptomatic household
contacts of confirmed cases [8].
This is a baffling decision for while some of the studies suggest
these antimalarial drugs may be effective [9–12] as well as safe
[13,14], there are also concerns [15,16] that the evidence is not robust
and adverse effects will be likely if the drugs are rolled out
indiscriminately for mass prophylaxis, without rigorous monitoring [17].
Contradictory statements have been issued about ongoing studies and
trials for CQ and HCQ prophylaxis in India [15] and concern expressed
about promoting its use as a prophylactic therapy on the basis of
insufficient evidence [17]. Muddled and contradictory messages about the
benefits and risk of using antimalarials for mass prophylaxis to the
marginalised communities in the slums are fuelling confusion and
mistrust.
Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis for high-risk COVID-19 contacts in India: a prudent approach
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30430-8/fulltext
We read with interest the Correspondence from Sahaj Rathi and colleagues1
on hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis for COVID-19 contacts in India. The
authors see the decision by the Indian Council of Medical Research,
under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, to recommend
chemoprophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine in select groups of contacts at
high risk as an abandonment of scientific reasoning in desperate times.
We present our counterview on this issue.
The criticisms made by Rathi and
colleagues overlook the fact that prophylactic hydroxychloroquine would
be targeted to individuals at high risk rather than the general
population. Projection of adverse events to the population level causes
unjustified alarm. The advisory from the Indian Council of Medical
Research includes a section of key considerations that address all such
concerns, which have been ignored by Rathi and colleagues. In addition,
the argument that there will be a shortage of the drug is not tenable.
Production has been ramped up and the Government of India is supplying
hydroxychloroquine to more than 50 countries, which has received
widespread appreciation.
Tuesday, May 26, 2020
המכתב נגד הרב ברלנד; הגר"מ שפרן מצטרף: "הנני לחזק דבריהם"
https://www.bhol.co.il/news/1103980
המאבק וההוקעה של הרב ברלנד נמשך. הערב מצרף הדיין המפורסם הגר"מ שפרן את
חתימת ידו למכתב הדיינים משלושה בתי דין נגד הרב ברלנד ומוסיף כי הוא בא
לחזק את דבריהם | לצד זאת, מערכת 'קול הלשון' הסירה את כל שיעוריו של הרב
ברלנד ותלמידיו משחר ההיסטוריה
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)