Wednesday, October 28, 2015
New Square Firebomber resentenced as youthful offender - to go free afer 3.5 years of 7 year sentence
Shaul Spitzer convinced Judge William Kelly Tuesday to give him
youthful offender status and release him after serving 3 1/2 years in
prison for seriously burning a New Square dissident while trying to
torch the man's house in 2011.
Kelly told the packed courtroom —
including more than 40 New Square supporters and victim Aron Rottenberg —
that he started the day thinking he would deny Spitzer early release
from a seven-year prison term.
But Kelly said he thought over what
Spitzer had told him in court Tuesday morning and changed his
mind during the lunch break in the resentencing proceedings.
Kelly
said he came away convinced that prison life had matured Spitzer and
his attack on the Rottenberg family spurred from immaturity, being
naive and a bid to impress the New Square Hasidic Jewish leadership and
grand rabbi David Twersky. Spitzer was working and living in Twersky's
home as a butler at the time. [..]
Rottenberg asked Kelly on Tuesday to keep Spitzer in jail,
saying he can't use his right arm effectively after skin grafts and
other operations to treat his burns. He said his family, which was
inside the home at the time, still suffers from the pain of the attack.
Spitzer told Kelly that "I know what I did was inexcusable. I know that 3 1/2 years ago I was immature."[...[
Charedim as Catalysts for Political Change in Israel: The Coming Collapse of the Latest Netanyahu Government
Guest Post by RaP
Israel is in a very precarious situation at the
present time. Beset by surrounding Arab "states" that either no longer exist or
are held together by threads as chaos and civil war reign in their midst,
with foreign military intervention by Russia and its allies near Israel's
borders, and by a widespread internal insurrection by Israeli Arabs, and with a
governing coalition with only a 61 seat majority in a Knesset of 120, if one
looks very closely, one sees the cracks in the unstable governing coalition
opening up.
The last two plus years of Israeli political life
have revolved around the huge growing Charedi population. The prior government
was an outright anti-Charedi coalition that set about to change the "status quo"
between the religious and secular worlds in Israel. Openly rejecting any Charedi
parties from sitting in it, the government went on a "war-footing" against the
Charedim. Decrees were promulgated against Charedi Jews cutting off funding to
their institutions and communities, threatening them to forcibly sign
up for army service, undermining traditional Torah education and institutions,
destruction of rabbinical courts and financially strangling the
yeshivas.
At the same time, the Arabs seemed to "sense blood"
and started a campaign of terrorizing unarmed Israeli citizens who wore any type
of Kippa or Yarmulka. Who can forget the kidnapping and murder of the three
religious Israel teens that sparked an Israeli invasion of Gaza against Hamas
recently, and then the brutal attack against the Charedi rabbis praying at the
Har Nof synagogue in the heart of a Jerusalem Charedi neighborhood that sparked
so much anger among all Israeli Jews, and many other such acts of terrorism and
barbarism directed at any Jews caught off guard.
Soon thereafter, the anti-religious governing
coalition collapsed, and quickly in its stead a new governing coalition was put
together with all the Charedi parties being included in the new government,
commencing a roll-back of the anti-Charedi decrees and edicts. The three major
Charedi political parties SHAS, AGUDA, and DEGEL, all got important
posts.
But then, recently over this past Sukkos at the end
of September, barely six months into its new term, the latest coalition seems to
be in trouble judging by current events, although tentative, but clearly
indicating the first rumbles before an earthquake
What seems to have triggered this latest
political unease and evident in-fighting again likely revolves around the fate
of religious Jews in Israel stemming from the preponderance of religious and
Charedi Jewish victims of the latest round of Arab violence. Stabbings, stonings
and terror are seemingly being directed at the Jewish religious populations in
Israel with Charedim fearing for their lives more than most as word leaks out
that they are obvious easy targets being that they stand out and are unarmed and
do not have military training.
There is also a dimension to the Arab uprising that is evidently
directed at the Jewish religious sites such as the Kosel, with the Kosel area
now becoming a "fear zone", Kever Rochel is under increased armed
guard, Kever Yosef burned down yet again, while Jewish holy places are
being claimed as belonging to the Muslims "only" with Israel now on the
defensive, all yet again.
There are more political rumblings, as a leading SHAS minister resigns from
his position as Minister of Economics, without citing good enough reasons, and
in this climate indicating perhaps an act of protest. Another Minister from a
non-religious party declares he is willing to resign to make way for the Labor
leader to join in, and the Labor leader issues a statement, no not about the
"matzav" but rather criticizing the Jewish religious sector!
Jews are being knifed and bombed in the streets of Israel, and its
obvious the people are angry and want to be protected and want action, but the
government responds by talking about "revoking citizenship" and building more
walls which is already a disaster because it makes Israel look like one long
"DMZ" line as in North Korea or the hated Berlin Wall. All this is not good and
there is a somber mood as if the next big step is being contemplated.
Jews are now under siege and many are nervous to venture outdoors for fear
of sudden stabbings. This is no way to live and will have serious political and
other consequences as the Jewish public's fear and frustration will force
change to happen one way or another.
A house divided against itself cannot stand long and likewise a government
that includes Charedim in it but does not swing into action to protect not just
Charedi and religious Jews but all Israeli Jews cannot go on for much longer as
it loses the faith of its citizens in it to protect them from harm.
And sadly, it would seem that it is not to the Rabbinical or Charedi or
Orthodox voices that Netanyahu is turning but yet again he is being pulled in
the direction of bringing in members from the Left to prop up his coalition.
This cannot go on for much longer as Jewish blood runs in the streets of Israel
and one can only conclude that change is coming soon, hopefully for the better,
it is only a question of how soon and who will lead it.
May we hear only good news and may the Geulah Sheleimah come very soon!
Sunday, October 25, 2015
Rav Sadiya Gaon: Mistaken imperative to surrender to love for personal growth and to serve G-d
We have discussed the issue of marriages breaking up because the husband or wife has fallen in love with someone else or has fallen out of love with one's spouse. We have discussed the issue of extramarital affairs, pedophila, pedastry, bestiality and homosexual relations. In modern times all these are justified by the imperative to follow one's heart as the supreme value.
There is a mistaken notion that the idea that love conquers all and that it justifies all - originated with Hollywood. Some think it originated in the Middle Ages. In fact it goes back to the Greeks. In the following essay from Rav Sadiya Gaon, he attacks those who feel that submitting to love is the royal road to spiritual refinement as well as a necessity in learning to serve G-d. It also seems to be an attack on marriage based on a predestined - beshert or knowing it's the right person because you are in love.
Rav Saadia Gaon (Emuna v’De’os 10:7.4 –Cheshech/romantic love):Even though it is repulsive to discuss sexual desire [outside of marriage] - the topic of this chapter - but it is not more repulsive than discussing the views of kofrim (those who deny Judaism). So just as we discussed the views of kofrim in order to refute them and protect people from having doubts – therefore we will discuss extramarital sexual desire in order to refute improper views and to protect people from error.
There are people who view sexual desire and love – without regard to its object - as the most important activity that man can be involved in. They mistakenly believe that any strong love refines the spirit and improves the personality until it becomes exquisitely sensitive and responsive from this great refinement.
They claim that this refinement process of love is extremely delicate as a result of the natural processes. It involves a substance which is created by the look of the eyes which is poured into the heart which arouses desire which becomes strengthened with the addition of other elements until it becomes firmly established.
They reinforce their view of the power of love by claiming that it involves the influence of the stars. Thus they claim that if two people were born under certain astrological events it is inevitable that there should be love and affection between them.
They further reinforce this theory of love by claiming that the love is ultimately caused by G d. They claim that when G-d created the souls, He made them as spheres which He divided into two. He then placed the 2 halves into two people. Because of this division of the soul into two parts, when the soul of one person finds its missing half in another person, the first person becomes strongly attracted to the second person.
They further reinforce the power of this theory of absolute love by claiming that it is an obligation to surrender to passion and its consequences. They claim that surrendering to the attraction of love to all others is a test to teach submission to G d and serving Him.
[Prof Rosenblatt translation]
[Prof Rosenblatt translation]
Now the advocates of all that has been mentioned above are
really thoughtless and without intelligence. I, therefore, deem it proper in
this chapter, first of all, effectively to refute the spurious doctrines propounded
by them. After that, I shall demonstrate the very opposite of the theories
to which they cling to be true.
I say then, that so far as the thing they ascribe to our Lord,
magnified and exalted be He, is concerned, it is inconceivable that He should
use as a means of trial something that has been prohibited by Him. Indeed, it
is as Scripture has said: God imputeth not 31 unseemliness (Job 24: 12), and
also: For Thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness; evil shall not
sojourn with Thee (Ps. 5: 5). As for the doctrine of the division of the
spheres to which they cling so tenaciously, since we have already refuted that
in our refutation of the theory of uncreated spiritual <296> beings,32
making it clear that the soul of every human being is created simultaneously
with the perfection of his form33 this theory has become completely null and
void. 296>
As for their allegation in regard to the influence of the stars
and the tallying of the two parts of the love-match, as well as of the
constellations, if it were really as they say, it could never happen that Zeid
should love Arnr without Arnr's reciprocation, seeing that they are both equal.
We do not, however, find the matter to be so.
As for their assertion, again, that this emotion originates
from a look, after which desire is generated in the heart, I say that it was
precisely on that account that our Lord, exalted and magnified be He, commanded
us to devote both our eyes and our hearts to His service, as Scripture says: My
son, give me thy heart, and let thine eyes observe my ways (Prov. 23: 26). He
also forbade us to employ them in rebellion against him, when He said: And go
not about after your own heart and your own eyes, after which ye use to go
astray (Num. I5: 39).
This latter warning was issued against the consolidation of
this state in the heart to the point where it would hold the subject in its
grip and have such dominance over him that he would cut down on his eating and
drinking and all other functions basic to his well-being. The consequence [of
such a course] would be that his flesh would waste away and his body fall off
and maladies would make their inroads on him in all their severity. And what
about the inflammation and the fainting and the heart throbs and the worry and
the excitement and the agitation, of which Scripture says: For they have made
ready their heart like an oven, while they lie in wait? (Hos. 7: 6.)
These effects are sometimes carried to the brain, weakening the
faculties of imagination, reflection, and memory, and sometimes even destroying
the powers of sensation and motion. It m:Iy also happen that, upon catching
sight of his beloved, the lover should swoon away and fall into a dead faint,
his spirit leaving his body for twenty-four hours,34 so that he would be thought
dead and be carried out and buried.f" Again it is possible that upon
seeing his beloved or hearing him mentioned, the lover might emit a rattle and
really die, thus proving the truth of the parable coined by the proverbist: For
she hath cast down many wounded; yea, a mighty host are all her slain (Prov. 7:
26).
How now can a person allow himself and his reason to be taken
prisoner [by his passion] to the point where he will not know that he has a
Master, nor any strength, nor <297> this world nor the next, outside of
that passion, as Scripture has put it: But they that are godless in heart lay
up anger; they cry not for help when He bin detli them? (Job 36: I3.) And what
about the slavish submissiveness to the object of one's passion and to his retinue,
and the sitting at the gates and waiting upon him everywhere, as Scripture
expresses it: Lift up thine eyes unto the high hills, and see: Where hast thou
not been lain with? By the ways hast thou sat for them? (Ier .. 1: 2.) And what
about the vigils at night and the rising at dawn and the secrecy practiced so
as not to be surprised in the act, and the deaths one dies whenever one is
discovered in one's shame? 297>
It is just as Scripture has expressed it: The eye also of the
adulterer waiteth for the twilight, saying: "No eye shall see me";
and he putteth a covering on his face (Job 24: 15)' And what about the murder
of the lover or the beloved or of one of their retinue or of both them and
those attached to them and of a great many human beings together with them that
often results from being madly in love, as Scripture says: Because they are
adulteresses, and blood is in their hands? (Ezek. 23: 45.)
Again, if he should one day be successful in attaining the
object of his quest and realize in adequate measure that for which his soul has
made such strenuous efforts, he might be filled with remorse and hate what he
had loved to an even greater degree than he had loved it, as Scripture remarks:
And Amnon hated her with exceeding great hatred; for the hatred wherewith he
hated her was greater than the love wherewith he had loved /W' (II Sam. 13: 15)
It should, therefore, be clear to a person that he has sold his
soul and his religion and all his senses, as well as his reason, once this
arrow has been released that cannot be taken back by him any more, as has also
been expressed by Scripture in its remark: Till an arrow strike through his
liver; as II bird hasteneth to the snare (Prov. 7: 23). This emotional state,
therefore, has its appropriate place only in the relationship between husband
and wife. They should be affectionate to each other for the sake of the
maintenance of the world, as Scripture says: A lovely hind and a graceful doe,
let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; with her love be thou ravished always
(Prov. 5: J9). A husband should give vent to his desire for his wife in
accordance with the dictates of reason and religion and to the extent required
in order to bind them closely together but restrain it vigorously and
forcefully beyond that point.
Lech Lecha; Milah & Periah- What are they? & How should they be done?
Caution - some might find the video too graphic. A number of years ago a friend of mine was teaching mila in a yeshiva for baalei teshuva (i.e., they all had college backgrounds). One day the rosh yeshiva came to him and told him he had gotten complaints about his teaching because of number of the students complained about it being too graphic. When he asked what exactly was the problem since this was a class about mila - the rosh yeshiva said "You use the word penis".
by Rabbi Shlomo Pollak
The Subject is...
"To perform the Mitzvah of Milah, we have to do two parts, Milah & Periah (מילה ופריעה).
What is Milah? and what is Periah? How should it be done?...
For generations, the two were done in two separate steps...
A number of years ago, a new method was introduced, whereby both the Milah and Periah are done simultaneously.."
Saturday, October 24, 2015
Mamzer: Maharsham's solution of annuling the proxy by Rabbi J. David Bleich
The following is an excerpt from an article which appeared in Tradition. Go to the Tradition website to read the full article. Tradition
Rabbinic authorities have always sought ways and means of alleviating the
plight of unfortunate individuals stigmatized by mamzerut in order to permit
such individuals to marry within "the community of God." Their
efforts consisted of examining the loopholes which would have the effect of
removing the onus of bastardy. Perhaps the most famous of these proposed remedies
is a tentative suggestion advanced by Rabbi Shalom Mordecai Schwadron in his Teshuvot
Maharsham, I, no. 9.
The Mishnah, Gittin 32a, states that in former times a
husband could appoint a proxy to deliver a bil of divorce to his wife and yet retain
the prerogative of annuling the proxy and thereby invalidating the divorce.
Originally the husband was not required to inform the proxy of his change of
heart. This practice was later banned by Rabban
Rabban Gamaliel the Elder in order to promote "the better ordering
of society" (tikkun ha-olam). In defining the concept of tikkun haolam, R.
Yochanan maintained that the measure was designed to prevent the proliferation
of mamzerim. A messenger, unaware of the fact that his authority to deliver the
bill of divorce had been nullfied, might in good faith present the bil of
divorce to the woman in question. The woman, equally unaware that the proxy had
been annulled and her divorce nullifed would feel free to remarry. Under such
circumstances any issue of a subsequent union would be momzerim in the eyes of
Jewish law.
R. Yochanan states that it was to prevent such unfortunate
occurrences that Rabban Gamaliel forbade annulment of the proxy other than in
the presence of the messenger. In the event that the husband transgresses the
injunction of Rabban Gamaliel and annuls the proxy other than in the presence
of the messenger, R. Simeon b. Gamaliel ordained that the act of annulment itself
be null and void so that the bil of divorce may retain its validity. In
discussing Rabban Gamaliel's decree the Gemara raises an obvious objection. It
is axiomatic that a bil of divorce which is invalid according to Biblical law
cannot be validated by rabbinic decree. In response to this objection the
Gemara enunciates the well known dictum: "Everyone who betroths (a wife J
does so in accordance with the intention of the Sages, and they annulled his betrothal."
The import of this statement is that while the Sages have no
power to validate a bil of divorce which is not valid under biblical law they
do have the power to annul the marriage itself retroactively. Since they do not
acquiesce to the marriage under such circumstances the stipulated condition has
not been fulfilled and the marriage itself is null and void. The status of the
woman in these circumstances is not that of a divorcee but that of a single
woman who had been consorting with a male without benefit of a nuptial ceremony.
Accordingly, as a result of Rabban Gamaliel's decree, annulment
of a proxy other than in the presence of the messenger and sub. sequent
delivery of the get to the wife become the occasion for the retroactive
annulment of the marriage. Tosafot points out that Rabban Gamaliel's decree
could be utilied in furthering certain ends which Rabban Gamaliel would
certainly not have sought to promote. By invoking this decree acts of adultery could
be legitimized with the cooperation of the husband and both the adulterer and
the adultress might be enabled to escape punishment.
This could be effected by having the husband draw up a bil of
divorce, appoint a proxy to deliver it to his wife and subsequently annul the
proxy other than in the presence of his messenger. The resultant effect would
be annulment of the marriage ab initio which would then mean that subsequent intercourse
with another male was in the nature of fornication rather than adultery. Ri, cited by Tosafot, maintains
that this procedure is perfectly legal.
Maharsham, quoting Tosafot, points out that a mamzer could
also be legitimized retroactively in precisely the same manner. If the husband is
yet living and willng to cooperate he could simply appoint a proxy to deliver a
bil of divorce to his wife and then proceed to annul the proxy other than is
the presence of the messenger. Since the marriage is annulled retroactively the
liaison between his wife and another man does not constitute adultery and hence
the issue of that union are not mamzerim.
The innovative suggestion of Maharsham has been the subject
of several recent articles of note. The proposal was brought to the atten. tion
of readers of TRADITION by Rabbi Dr. Louis Rabinowitz, Spring 1971, pp. 5.15.
Moriah (Elul 5730-Tishri 5731) featured an article by Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach,
eminent Israeli halakhic authority, containing a lengthy and exhaustive
analysis of Maharsham's position. In Panim el Panim of Shevat 2 and I Adar 13, 5733
the Israeli sèholar and jurist Professor M. Silberg discusses practical proposals
to eliminate inci. dences of mamzerut. Professor Silberg's views are
challenged by Rabbi Judah Dick (Panim el Panim, I Adar 13, 5733), a New York
at. torney and Talmudic scholar who has espoused the cause of the agunah both
in legal proceedings before civil courts and . in a determined effort to find
halakhic redress for her unfortunate plight.
Maharsham's language, "Had you
consulted me before the bil of divorce was executed by the first husband I
would have made a suggestion le-halakhah vo-lo le-ma'Qseh (according to
theoretical halakhah but not for practical application)" clearly indicates
that Maharsham viewed his innovative proposal as relegated to the realm of theory
and not for actual implementation. Maharsham's use of the subjunctive phrase
"had you consulted me" demonstrates that his answer even at that time
would not have been intended for practical application. Rabbi Auerbach presents
numerous reasons, many highly technical, in explaining why practical
implementation of this proposal is precluded. The most salient of these
considerations are the following:
1. The major argument against implementation of Maharsham's proposal
is that Ramban, Shita Mekubetzet and Me'iri, in their commentaries on Ketubot
3a state , clearly that any children born of an adultrous relationship prior to
the retroactive annulment of the marriage are mamzerim by virtue of rabbinic
decree. According to these authorities the rabbinic decree providing for
annulment of the marriage was accompanied by a de. cree declaring such issue to
be legitimate precisely because the Sages did not want the decree regarding retroactive
annulment of the marriage to serve as a tool in the hands of evildoers. This
opinion is followed by many latter-day authorities. (See Ketab Sofer, Even ha- Ezer,
no. 51; Oneg Yom Tov, no. 169; and R. Shlomo Kluger,H a- Elef Lekha Shlomo,
Even ha-Ezer, no. 34. Pitchei T eshuvah, Even ha- Ezer 144: 1 also cites Berit
Avra. ham, Even ha-Ezer, no. 49, sec. 5. See also Rashba, Ketubot 3a and Isaac
Elchanan Spektor, Ein Yitzchak, I, Orach Chaim, no. 28, sec. 23.) Oneg Yom Tov
states explicitly that "It is for this reason that this solution is not
mentioned by any authority."
2. Retroactive annulment of the marriage renders all
preceding acts of coitus acts of fornication. An individual is not permitted
retroactively to transform his actions into transgressions and certainly should
not be advised to do so and abetted in such a course of action by a B-it Din.
3. It is not certain that when the husband is counseled by a
Bet Din to annul the proxy the marriage itself is in fact annulled
retroactively. The phraseology employed by the Gemara in explaining why such
annulment was legislated is "He acted with impropriety. . . ." When
acting upon the advice of a B.-it Din the husband can hardly be said to have
acted with impropriety and hence there are no grounds for annullng the
marriage.
4. A number of early authorities, including Ramban, Re'ah
and Rashba, maintain that in point of fact the original marriage is never annulled.
According to this interpretation, the husband, cognizant of the statutory
provision for such annulment, recognizes that annulment of the proxy is of no
avail and hence never actually intends to annul the proxy. P'nei Yehoshu'a, Ketubot
3a, offers a different interpretation in agreement with the basic premise that
in actuality no annulment takes place. Both Dr. Rabinowitz and Professor Silberg
assert that the late Chief Rabbi Herzog did in fact invoke Maharsham's proposal
in practice. Rabbi Herzog does indeed discuss Maharsham's responsum in his
Heikhal Yitzchak, II, nos. 17- 19. However, Rabbi Herzog's ruling in the
specific case brought to his attention was based on different grounds. As is is
often the case in halakhic responsa, considerations which are themselves
insuffcient to warrant the conclusion advanced are adduced as a usnit" or
secondary line of reasoning in order to strengthen the ultimate decision.
Rabbi Auerbach reports that dayyanim in Israel have on numerous
occasions refrained from following Maharsham's suggestion precisely because the
latter stated explicitly that his words were not intended for practical
implementation. Apart from halakhic objections which have been advanced, the
proposal as formulated by Maharsham suffers from one practical drawback, viz.,
it requires the active cooperation of the original husband. Needless to say the
cooperation of an estranged husband is often difficult to obtain. [...]
Friday, October 23, 2015
Why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation of children
Julie Lythcott-Haims noticed a disturbing trend during her decade as a dean of freshmen at Stanford University. Incoming students were brilliant and accomplished and virtually flawless, on paper. But with each year, more of them seemed incapable of taking care of themselves.
At the same time, parents were becoming more and more involved in their children’s lives. They talked to their children multiple times a day and swooped in to personally intervene whenever something difficult happened.
From her former position at one of the world’s most prestigious schools, Lythcott-Haims came to believe that mothers and fathers in affluent communities have been hobbling their children by trying so hard to make sure they succeed and by working so diligently to protect them from disappointment, failure and hardship.
Such “overhelping” might assist children in developing impressive résumés for college admission, but it also robs them of the chance to learn who they are, what they love and how to navigate the world, Lythcott-Haims argues in her book, “How to Raise an Adult: Break Free of the Overparenting Trap and Prepare Your Kid for Success.”
“We want so badly to help them by shepherding them from milestone to milestone and by shielding them from failure and pain. But overhelping causes harm,” she writes. “It can leave young adults without the strengths of skill, will and character that are needed to know themselves and to craft a life.” [...]
“Our job as a parent is to put ourselves out of a job,” she said. “We need to know that our children have the wherewithal to get up in the morning and take care of themselves.” [...]
Thursday, October 22, 2015
Israeli suspects in court for Eritrean beating
Israeli
police say four men will appear in court in connection with the beating
of an Eritrean man during an attack by an Arab citizen at a bus station
that killed an Israeli soldier and wounded several people.
A
private security guard shot the Eritrean, thinking he was an attacker.
As the Eritrean lay on the ground, a mob of people cursed him, kicked
him and hit him with objects. The Eritrean later died.
Rosenfeld says it is not clear if the men will be charged.
============================
Some 2,000
people, mainly asylum seekers from Eritrea, gathered in Tel Aviv’s
Levinsky park on Wednesday for a memorial service for Habtom Zarhum, the
Eritrean asylum seeker who died after being shot and assaulted by a mob
at the Be’er Sheva bus terminal on Sunday night. [...]
Some of the mourners wept and told Haaretz they
did not believe Zarhum was killed accidentally. “I’ve never seen such a
thing, only in the Sinai or in the Islamic State,” said Eden, an asylum
seeker from Eritrea, referring to the video clips of Zarhum’s killing.
“If they had shot him once it might have been a mistake, but shooting
him again and again is not a mistake. People trampled on him and threw
things at him. The police were there. Why didn’t they stop it?” she
said. [...]
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Mamzerim: When a woman remarries without a Get from the first husband - Rav Sternbuch
Rabbi Dovid Katz wrote an important article dealing with attempts to deal with the problem of mamzer by using a shifcha. It is available here www.aishdas.org/avodah/faxes/mamzerShifcha.pdf. This is page 13 and 30 of the article
==============================================
Minchat Yitzchak: V 47: In the aftermath of the Holocaust, many displaced persons were unaware of the fate of their spouses and loved ones. Families had become separated, and in the period immediately following the end of World War II, there were cases where survivors believed that their families had perished when in reality they had survived. It thus happened a number of times that a woman, believing herself to be a widow, married another man after the war, had children by him, and subsequently discovered to her horror that her first husband had never died! The chaotic conditions prevailing in those years, especially in the DP camps and Eastern Europe, led many people to marry without consulting a rav or Bet Din, so many people were not even aware of the ramifications of their status.
R. Yitzchak Weiss, author of Minchat Yirzchak, was consulted about such a case. R. Tzvi Elimelech Kalish, Rabbi in Munkatch and subsequently in Bnei Brak, was faced with the situation of an entire group of young men who were the children of mothers who had remarried after the war, only to find out later that their first husbands were still alive. As the offspring of second "marriages" which in the eyes of Jewish law were adulterous, these young men were mamzerim. Two decades after the war, these young men, who had grown up in Hungary, wished to marry. R. Kalish therefore asked whether it was actually possible to convert gentile woman as shefachot kna'aniyot in the twentieth century.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Teshuvot Vehanhagot I 764, R. Moshe Sternbuch describes how he was faced with a situation in South Africa of a woman who had had an Orthodox marriage, but had remarried without benefit of a get, a halachic divorce. Her husband had been relucant to give her a get, so she remarried in a Reform ceremony. Obviously, the children from her "second marriage" were mamzerim because in the eyes of Jewish law she was still married to her first husband at the time she had children by another man. Some years later, the woman became a ba'alat teshuva (repentant), sought and obtained a get from her first husband, and even sent her children to Orthodox day schools. She was nevertheless faced with the consequences of her second marriage: her children were mamzerim .
In Teshuvot Vehanhagot I 764, R. Moshe Sternbuch describes how he was faced with a situation in South Africa of a woman who had had an Orthodox marriage, but had remarried without benefit of a get, a halachic divorce. Her husband had been relucant to give her a get, so she remarried in a Reform ceremony. Obviously, the children from her "second marriage" were mamzerim because in the eyes of Jewish law she was still married to her first husband at the time she had children by another man. Some years later, the woman became a ba'alat teshuva (repentant), sought and obtained a get from her first husband, and even sent her children to Orthodox day schools. She was nevertheless faced with the consequences of her second marriage: her children were mamzerim .
In seeking a solution to this tragedy, R. Sternbuch likewise reasoned that it ought to be possible for a gentile woman to become a shifcho even in modern-day South Africa inasmuch as the entire process would be a legal fiction to which the state would not take exception. In the end, however, R. Sternbuch concluded that if such great authorities as the Minchat Yitzchak and Chelkat Yaakov were unable to sanction such a procedure, in the one case on account of halachic objections and in the other on account of a reluctance to rule absent support from other poskim, then such an option was not practicable nowadays. R. Sternbuch had no choice but to advise the mamzerim to marry converts, knowing, however, that their children would also be mamzerim down to the end of time. As he put it:
ועל כל פנים אין לנו לפרוץ גדרים בייחוס שלא שמענו מאביתינו כן מעולם אף שהיה יכול להציל פסול זרעו לעולם
In any event, we ought not to "break fences" [i.e. make radical innovations] in matters involving family relations. We have never heard of our ancestors [resorting to such a procedure] even though [the mamzer] would be able to save his progeny [from the taint of mamzerut] forever.
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Talk Therapy Found to Ease Schizophrenia
NY Times More than two million people in the United States have a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and the treatment for most of them mainly involves strong doses of antipsychotic drugs that blunt hallucinations and delusions but can come with unbearable side effects, like severe weight gain or debilitating tremors.
Now, results of a landmark government-funded study call that approach into question. The findings, from by far the most rigorous trial to date conducted in the United States, concluded that schizophrenia patients who received smaller doses of antipsychotic medication and a bigger emphasis on one-on-one talk therapy and family support made greater strides in recovery over the first two years of treatment than patients who got the usual drug-focused care.
The report, to be published on Tuesday in The American Journal of Psychiatry and funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, comes as Congress debates mental health reform and as interest in the effectiveness of treatments grows amid a debate over the possible role of mental illness in mass shootings.
Its findings have already trickled out to government agencies: On Friday, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services published in its influential guidelines a strong endorsement of the combined-therapy approach. Mental health reform bills now being circulated in Congress “mention the study by name,” said Dr. Robert K. Heinssen, the director of services and intervention research at the centers, who oversaw the research.[...]
Experts said the findings could help set a new standard of care in an area of medicine that many consider woefully inadequate: the management of so-called first episode psychosis, that first break with reality in which patients (usually people in their late teens or early 20s) become afraid and deeply suspicious. The sooner people started the combined treatment after that first episode, the better they did, the study found. The average time between the first episode and receiving medical care — for those who do get it — is currently about a year and half.[...]
The more holistic approach that the study tested is based in part on programs in Australia, Scandinavia and elsewhere that have improved patients’ lives in those countries for decades. This study is the first test of the approach in this country — in the “real world” as researchers described it, meaning delivered through the existing infrastructure, by community mental health centers.[...]
In the new study, doctors used the medications as part of a package of treatments and worked to keep the doses as low as possible — in some cases 50 percent lower — minimizing their bad effects. The sprawling research team, led by Dr. John M. Kane, chairman of the psychiatry department at Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, randomly assigned 34 community care clinics in 21 states to provide either treatment as usual, or the combined package.
The team trained staff members at the selected clinics to deliver that package, and it included three elements in addition to the medication. First, help with work or school such as assistance in deciding which classes or opportunities are most appropriate, given a person’s symptoms. Second, education for family members to increase their understanding of the disorder. And finally, one-on-one talk therapy in which the person with the diagnosis learns tools to build social relationships, reduce substance use and help manage the symptoms, which include mood problems as well as hallucinations and delusions.
For example, some patients can learn to defuse the voices in their head — depending on the severity of the episode — by ignoring them or talking back. The team recruited 404 people with first-episode psychosis, mostly diagnosed in their late teens or 20s. About half got the combined approach and half received treatment as usual. Clinicians monitored both groups using standardized checklists that rate symptom severity and quality of life, like whether a person is working, and how well he or she is getting along with family members.
The group that started on the combined treatment scored, on average, more poorly on both measures at the beginning of the trial. Over two years, both groups showed steady improvement. But by the end, those who had been in the combined program had more symptom relief, and were functioning better as well. They had also been on drug doses that were 20 percent to 50 percent lower, Dr. Kane said.[...]
Monday, October 19, 2015
Mother of three battling MS takes own life at Dignitas assisted suicide clinic in Switzerland
A mother of three from Bury who battled a debilitating illness for
nearly two decades has ended her life at an assisted suicide clinic in
Switzerland.
Rachelle Linz, 50, known as Shelley, fought with
multiple sclerosis for nearly 20 years. She died after taking a fatal
dose of barbiturate at a Dignitas clinic in Zurich two weeks ago.
She
leaves behind husband Jonathan and three children - Joshua, 24, Hannah,
22, and Jason, 20. All four were by her side when she passed away.
Mr Linz, 51, from Whitefield,
who was by his wife’s bedside said the family had always hoped a
miracle cure for MS could be found, but his wife had feared she would
ultimately die from the condition and made the decision after her health
badly deteriorated.[...]
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)