Scientific American Is sleep good for everything? Scientists hate giving unqualified
answers. But the more sleep researchers look, the more the answer seems
to be tending toward a resounding affirmative.
The slumbering brain plays an essential role in learning and memory,
one of the findings that sleep researchers have reinforced repeatedly in
recent years. But that’s not all. There’s a growing recognition that
sleep appears to be involved in regulating basic metabolic processes and
even in mental health. Robert Stickgold, a leading sleep researcher based at Harvard Medical School, gives a précis here of the current state of sommeil as it relates to memory, schizophrenia, depression, diabetes—and he even explains what naps are good for. [...]
So what is sleep for?
Memories are processed during sleep. But sleep doesn’t have just one
function. It’s a little bit like listening to tongue researchers arguing
about whether the function of the tongue has to do with taste or
speech. And you want to say: ‘Guys, c’mon, it’s both.’ There’s very good
evidence now that sleep, besides helping memory, has a role in immune
and endocrine functions. There’s a lot of talk about to what extent the
obesity epidemic is actually a consequence of too little sleep. [...]
What are implications of sleep for psychiatric disorders?
If you take an adult who has both sleep apnea and depression, you’ll
find that they are very tightly linked. If you have depression, there’s a
fourfold increase in your likelihood of apnea and if you have apnea,
there’s a fivefold increase risk of depression. If you take someone with
both depression and apnea, and treat the apnea with CPAP [continuous positive airway pressure], you can get their depression scores to drop below clinical levels.
If you take kids comorbid for sleep apnea and ADHD—in the case of
children the apnea is usually caused by enlarged adenoids and tonsils—if
you remove the tonsils and adenoids you’ll get a larger reduction in
the ADHD symptoms than if put them on Ritalin.
If you take people with bipolar disorder and sleep deprive them, you’ll flip them into the manic state.
If you look at depressed people, REM sleep comes much earlier in
night. When treatments for depression fail to reverse this effect, the
likelihood of recurrence of the depression is much higher. And
depriving depressed patients selectively of REM sleep can produce a
dramatic reduction in their symptoms, although they return as soon as
the deprivation is stopped . [...]
Saturday, December 21, 2013
Thursday, December 19, 2013
Bnei Brak man arrested for alleged sexual abuse
Kikar HaShabbat
גבר חרדי כבן 33, תושב בני-ברק, נעצר על-ידי המשטרה בחשד לתקיפה והתעללות בגיסתו. הבוקר (חמישי) מובא החשוד לבית משפט השלום בתל-אביב.
לפי הפרטים שנודעו ל"כיכר השבת", לפני תקופה התלוננה נערה חרדית בת 16 כנגד החשוד, קרוב משפחתה, כי התעלל ופגע בה ובשתי אחיותיה הנוספות בנות 14 ו-15.
לטענת הצעירה, החשוד ניצל את עובדת היותו בעלה של אחותן ופגע בהן בשעה שהתארחו בביתם כשלפעמים אף הפעיל כוח כנגדן.
במשטרה
עירבו את הרבנים והעסקנים ופתחו בחקירה שהעלתה כי בעבר נחשד האיש במעשים
דומים אולם לדבריו "הפסיק עם זה" וכעת התלונות כנגדו עוררו מחדש את החשדות
נגדו.
Reform Judaism ‘reboots’ to focus on youth
Times of Israel What do you get when
you bring together 5,000 of the Reform movement’s faithful for a
conference in sunny San Diego in mid-December?
For pep, there were the spirited prayer
services, the morning-till-night stream of musical performances and
Rabbi Rick Jacobs, the president of the Union for Reform Judaism, or
URJ, who compared the challenges facing the movement to giant waves,
crying “Surf’s up!”
“Big waves require more skill and courage to
ride, but if ridden artfully they enable us to go faster and further
than ever before,” Jacobs said, a giant screen projecting a swell behind
him.
For the intervention, there was session after
session devoted to the challenges facing the movement, especially the
question of how to engage young adult Jews who, by and large, are
steering clear of Reform synagogues.
“I think the Reform movement needs to remember
that no matter how much we double down on great programming, it might
not increase the likelihood that those young people are going to walk
in,” Rabbi B. Elka Abrahamson, a Reform rabbi who is president of the
Wexner Foundation, said in a conference session focused on the recent
Pew Research Center survey of US Jewry.
“I think that’s really hard for this gathering
to keep in mind because we are the people who love what we do, and we
just think if we do more of it and do it better and do it more often and
do it faster that they’re going to come,” said Abrahamson.[...]
Reform membership is dwindling, synagogues are struggling to secure
their bottom lines and, as Jacobs noted at the last biennial, 80 percent
of Reform Jews are “out the door” by the end of high school. Many never
return: Fewer than half of Reform parents have their children enrolled
in some kind of Jewish youth, camp or educational program, the Pew
survey showed.
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Scarves and Halacha by Rabbi Yair Hoffman
Five Towns Jewish Times It is cold weather season, and the coats, gloves and scarves are
coming out. Scarves are definitely “in” and constitute a billion dollar
industry with such top designers as Burberry, Prada, Missoni, Alexander
McQueen, Cole Haan, Chanel, Etro, Lanvin, Hermès, Nicole Miller,
Ferragamo, Emilio Pucci, Dior, Fendi, and Louis Vuitton. These
designers manufacture square scarves (mostly for women), triangular
scarves, and the most common, rectangular scarves.
It is said that the scarf originated in ancient Rome, where it was
called the “Sudarium” – perhaps the origin of the Talmudical term
“Sudar.”
Scarf lengths and widths vary greatly as well. Most scarves are over
five feet long and often are very wide. And while there is no question
that our practice is not to wear Tzitzis on a scarf, the question arises
as to why exactly we don’t.
The Mishna Brurah (16:4) rules that the minimum shiur for a garment to be obligated in Tzitzis is a length of 3/4ths
of an Ammah in length and ½ an Ammah in width. There are various
halachic opinions about the Amah too. Rav Chaim Noeh (1890-1954) zt”l
posits an Ammah of slightly more than 18 inches, Rav Moshe Feinstein
(1895-1986) zt”l proposes an Ammah of 21.25 inches, and the Chazon Ish
(1878-1953) zt”l proposes almost 23 inches. [...]
As far as the other two reasons cited in the Bais Yoseph, it could be
that the Vilna Gaon and Mogain Avrohom rejected the first ideaof
ha-alah being an exempt type of wearing from the words of Tosfos in
Menachos 41a “Tcheiles.” Tosfos writes that this would also necessitate
the wearing of Tzitis. As far as the second reason, that the scarf is
considered a head-garment not a body garment, in the more northern
countries, where it is rather cold, we do actually use it on the neck
and not on the head.
There may be another rationale to be lenient, and not round off a
corner as the Chofetz Chaim seems to recommend. When one does wear a
scarf that is more than nine inches wide, the scarf is often folded in
half – width-wise. If that is the case, there may be another reason to
be lenient because it could be that the minimum requirement necessitates
that the garment be worn that way as well.
Ostreicher has escaped from Bolivia and is in U.S.
NY Times In an odd twist to a serpentine tale, two discrete stories emerged on
Tuesday about how a Brooklyn businessman who was jailed in a squalid
prison in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, for 18 months, then placed under house
arrest, managed to escape and make his way to the United States.
At a press conference in La Paz, Bolivia, Justice Minister Cecilia
Ayllón described a remarkably lax house-arrest arrangement with little
supervision and suggested that the businessman, Jacob Ostreicher, had
been gradually testing the boundaries of his confinement, including
trips to La Paz, until he simply slipped away “clandestinely.”
“We now see that the only purpose of all of this was so that in a given
moment he could flee the country,” Ms. Ayllón said.
Mr. Ostreicher, who is in his mid-50s, went to Bolivia several years ago
to manage a rice-farming enterprise he had invested in. He ended up
being accused by the Bolivian authorities of laundering drug money, a
charge he denies. Prosecutors never formally charged him, but in June
2011 he was jailed in Palmasola prison, a notorious complex with 3,500
prisoners that is ruled internally by an inmates’ committee. Mr.
Ostreicher claimed that he was assaulted and humiliated until he paid
off functionaries of the committee.[...]
Rabbi Moti Elon won't serve prison time for sexual crime against minor, court rules
JPost Prominent national religious figure Rabbi Moti Elon, who was convicted in August of
two counts of indecent assault by force against a minor, will not serve
time in prison, the Jerusalem Magistrate's Court ruled Wednesday
Although the state attorney had requested he get 8-18 months in
prison, he was given a six month commuted sentence to be served in
community service. He also was given three years probation and ordered
to pay the complainant NIS 10,000.
The rabbi’s defense team had asked that he be given community service instead of a jail term.
Sagi Ofir, of the Jerusalem State Attorney's Office said that he hoped the sentence will serve to deter future sex crimes.
He did not say if the state intends to appeal the sentence. [...]
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
About Happiness by Rabbi Dovid Eidensohn
Guest Post by Rabbi Dovid E. Eidensohn/Jewish Outreach Congregation,
Monsey, NY
We discuss here a major reason for
family and marital problems: good intentions! In fact, the worst thing a person
can do is to destroy their children. But children suffer terribly in a bad
marriage. But each parent says, “That awful spouse of mine. It is a mitzvah to correct/punish
him/her.” And there is no end.
Once a Jew did something so
terrible it was unheard of for a Jew to do it. A Rov was asked to explain this.
He replied, “I don’t know why he did it. But one thing I know. He did it for
the sake of heaven.” The Rov explained that all of us have evil inclinations
that pressure us constantly to sin. But we know that the idea is evil and so we
are limited in how much sin we do. But if a person decides that he is doing a
good deed with his evil, what is there to stop him or limit his evil?
The Talmud says that a father sees
his child misbehaving and hits him. The son can get so angry that he hits the
father back. The father is punished for causing the son to sin. Thus, even when
we do something for the sake of heaven, to teach our children how to behave, we
have to make sure of the bottom line, that it be positive and not a disaster,
chas vishalom.
There are good intentions that
create bad deeds. And then there are good intentions that create good deeds,
but too much of them, until evil results.
The Chofetz Chaim as a youth
learned so much and slept and ate so little, that he became very sick and could not learn for a
long time. Doctors could not cure him. Finally, Reb Yisroel Salanter prayed for
him and he got better. For the rest of his life, the Chofetz Chaim taught
people that we pray daily that HaShem should “remove the Satan from before us
and behind us.” What is wrong if the Satan is behind us? asked the Chofetz
Chaim. But when the Satan sees that a person is really serious about being a
Tsadik, the Satan tells him to do good things, but to do good things that will
in the end become destructive and thus evil, as with the Chofetz Chaim who lost
much time in learning because he learned too much and slept too little.
When I was young in Yeshiva someone
began learning so strongly that everyone predicted a lovely future for him as a
great Torah scholar. Indeed, he became a teacher of Torah in a prominent
Yeshiva, but his extreme devotion to learning eventually destroyed his ability
to learn seriously, and he went to work.
The Chofetz Chaim was a short
person. He ordered everyone in his Yeshiva to go to sleep on time, but many
students felt fine staying up late. So the Chofetz Chaim would stand on a chair
and reach up to the light switch and turn it off. But this didn’t solve the
problem. Thus, when people are sure they are doing the right thing, they even
defy the Chofetz Chaim!
Therefore, the wise parent or
teacher, considering punishing somebody “for the sake of heaven,” finds someone to refer questions to.
In the past generations one of the
very wisest of the sages was Rabbi Mayer Chodosh, famed as the Mashgiach of
Chevron Yeshiva and perhaps the major talmid of the Alter of Slobodka. Once, a
child in a Yeshiva profaned the Sabbath. Another child was caught stealing. The
teachers involved in the case wanted to humiliate and punish the children in
the worst way, but knowing that they must ask a truly wise person first, they
came to Rabbi Mayer Chodosh. He told them, “Is a teacher a Rabbinical Court
entitled to punish people? A teacher has a function of producing a successful
student, not destroying the student with punishment and humiliation.” He warned
them not to deviate from his advice, and made a program for the children who
eventually turned out to be fine Torah people. Had they been punished and
publicly humiliated, the pain and shame would never have left them, and who
knows what would happen to them.
Another time somebody came to Rabbi
Chodosh with his very young son. The son began pulling on the tablecloth and it
seemed as if the dishes would fall on the floor. The father rebuked the son,
but after a while, the son did it again. The father became upset at the son,
and then Rabbi Chodosh intervened: “Your son is not being wild when he pulls on
the tablecloth,” said Rabbi Chodosh. “Your son noticed that a cup is upside
down. He pulled the tablecloth to get at the cup and fix it. Now, you fix the
cup, turn it over, and your son will not pull on the tablecloth anymore.” And
so it was.
Had the father hit the child or
yelled at him, the child would not understand. Who knows what the child would
think of his father?
Another father with a young child
came to another great Mashgiach, Rav Eliyohu Lopian. It was Shabbos and the child
began to play with stones, which are muktseh. The father told the child to stop
playing with the stones. But a while later, the child went back to playing with
the stones, and the father rebuked him,
with a sharper tone. Rav Lopian told the father: “Your son is too young to
understand about the laws of Shabbos. You are not teaching him how to keep
Shabbos. You are teaching him to disobey you.”
Our task is to make our children
happy, and not see in their childish actions excuses for yelling at them. Indeed,
the Torah teaches, “Serve HaShem with joy.” “Its ways [the Torah] are the ways
of peace.” Somebody busy criticizing and scolding can turn children and others
off, and end up making more problems than solutions.
A sage in Israel who is known for
his wisdom about family and marriage told me the following: Everything depends
on the children learning to do mitsvose with joy. If the child is trained to
appreciate the joy of doing a mitzvah, he/she will enjoy obeying the Torah. But
a child raised to fear the Torah as something painful may reject the Torah.
The same idea was taught by HaGadol
Reb Moshe Feinstein zt”l. Commenting on
the huge loss of Jewish children in the early generations of America, Reb Moshe
explained that in those days keeping Shabbos meant losing a job. Shabbos thus
became associated with pain and suffering. People don’t want a life of pain and
suffering. Sometimes, even today, keeping the Torah may be hard. But a clever
parent finds a way to make a child want to do the mitzvah.
Friday afternoon is perhaps the
hardest part of the week. Everyone is rushing and under pressure. My son Yaacov
Zelig with some family members made a Friday afternoon learning program in
America and Israel whereby parents write in or call in that their child learned
on Friday fifteen minutes, and the child goes into a Goral lottery. There are
various prizes, sometimes fifty dollars and sometimes more. Hundreds of
children are busy learning, and one father said, “I should pay you when my
children learn, because it saves our household Erev Shabbos!.”
The Holy Shelo was one of the
greatest rabbis who ever lived, and is one of the very few people honored with
the appellation “the holy one.” This holy man teaches that we must bribe our
children at every stage of their lives. Little children get what little
children want, and when the child comes of age we “bribe” him by telling him
that if he learns a lot of Torah, he will find a nice shidduch!
Now somebody may refuse to do this
because does the Torah not tell us to serve HaShem without ulterior motives? So
how can we raise children with bribery? But the Talmud clearly says, “Let us
learn Torah even not for pure motives, but for ego, etc., because from impure
motives one will come to pure motives.
And then there is the great mitzvah
to make one’s wife happy. The Zohar and Rashi explain that the mitzvah in the
Torah “and he should make his wife happy” means, “make her happy, not
himself.” But of course, if the husband makes the wife happy, the wife will
make the husband happy. Making someone happy is not a selfish mitzvah. But the
greatest happiness awaits when you cause another to be happy.
When parents seek to make each
other happy, the children learn from this how important making another person
happy is. And the whole family learns the joy of happiness.
The great enemy of happiness in the
family is when somebody decides that a punishment is needed because somebody
did something bad. When punishment becomes a great mitzvah, the Satan then uses
this “great mitzvah” to destroy families and children.
If someone has a comment or a
question, you can write to me at writeus1@verizon.net.
And if it is urgent, I can be reached at 845-578-1917.
Weiss Dodelson: Dodelson supporter says Weiss supporter lied about settlement details
Guest post by emes vshalom (a Dodelson supporter) responding to the post - "Negotiation documents reveal the minor gap between the two sides" by a Weiss supporter. I don't see why the Dodelson supporters need to use such nasty abusive language instead of simply asking for an explanation.
There really is only one issue that needs to be clarified after reading emes vshalom's rebuttal. Why didn't the Weiss's agree to the settlement - assuming that emes vshalom's facts are correct. Dodelson's claim that it is simply because the Weiss's don't want to give a get. That is rather absurd after what has gone on. My laymen's understanding is that by giving the Get before the agreement is approved by the court - there is no guarantee that the deal will be binding on the Dodelson's and it will end up that Gital has the Get and the Weiss's have nothing.
The simple question is does Rav Shalom Kaminetsky understand the facts the way the Dodelson's do? If he does then that would mean he is a fool to continue negotiations. But since we all know that he is obviously not a fool and yet he is continuing the negotiations - he apparently doesn't agree with the Dodelson's view. I am also not sure he is insisting that everything be done at once - as emes vshalom claims.
====================
To me, as someone who is admittedly biased, as I am a supporter of Gital's, it's very confusing that the Weiss family & their allies seem to continue to lie & misrepresent the truth. The fact is that when you have complete knowledge of the facts, it looks as though the Weiss's never were prepared to give a Get (to me anyway). When R Sholom Kamenetzky (whom the Weiss's commissioned to continue these negotiations) worked out a deal that should have been amenable to all sides, the Weiss's refused to sign on. It included all of the concessions that the Dodelsons made in that email, plus an agreement to have the remaining issues be subject to binding arbitration by R Sholom. Oh, and by the way, it included a 6 digit monetary payment from the Dodelsons to Weiss. R Sholom had (and it is my understanding that he still has) one condition; that everything be taken care of at one time. Meaning the Dodelsons give Weiss the money, Weiss gives Gital the Get, and both parties sign the arbitration agreement at one meet.
Dodelson agreed to this, Weiss did not.
I'll let you decide for yourselves why.
Also, I won't be responding to any comments, as I think this post speaks for itself. If you think any if the facts are untrue, feel free to reach out to R Yisroel Weiss, as he published his email in a previous post. He should be able to confirm these facts.
Weiss Dodelson: Negotiation documents reveal the minor gap between the two sides
Update(rebutal by Dodelson supporter) http://daattorah.blogspot.co.il/2013/12/weiss-dodelson-dodelson-supporter-says.html
=========================
There has a lot of belittling of Rabbi Greenwald's heroic efforts in negotiations by the supporters of the Dodelson's. They have also been strident in their denigration of the seriousness of the Weiss's commitment to giving Gital a get - falsely claiming that the Weiss's are constantly changing their position. In fact there has been a lot of lies and false accusations against the Weiss and Feinstein family as well as a massive corruption and abuse of rabbinic authority as seen in the invalid seruv and the halachic joke of the Kol Koreh. In fact the issues that the Dodelson's abandoned Rabbi Greenwalds carefully negotiated settlement and went to the NY Post are trivial. The reality is that Gital could have had her Get a long time ago - without all the disgusting chilul hashem.
=========================
There has a lot of belittling of Rabbi Greenwald's heroic efforts in negotiations by the supporters of the Dodelson's. They have also been strident in their denigration of the seriousness of the Weiss's commitment to giving Gital a get - falsely claiming that the Weiss's are constantly changing their position. In fact there has been a lot of lies and false accusations against the Weiss and Feinstein family as well as a massive corruption and abuse of rabbinic authority as seen in the invalid seruv and the halachic joke of the Kol Koreh. In fact the issues that the Dodelson's abandoned Rabbi Greenwalds carefully negotiated settlement and went to the NY Post are trivial. The reality is that Gital could have had her Get a long time ago - without all the disgusting chilul hashem.
In order to set the record straight, the following are the actual documents of the negotiations- judge for yourselves.
Monday, December 16, 2013
American Roshei Yeshivos opposed to division of Hadera
Kikar Hashabat The division of the Chadera Yeshiva has aroused the opposition of major American talmidei chachomim.
מכתב עליו חתומים שמותיהם של ראשי ישיבות בארה"ב, מבטיח כי המסייע לפילוגה של ישיבת 'חדרה' "לא ייצא נקי". עוד נכתב: "פשוט שזה עוון חמור מאוד לסייע להרוס הישיבה"
הפילוג בישיבת 'חדרה' הליטאית: מכתב שמופץ בימים האחרונים, מבטיח כי המסייעים לפילוג הישיבה הוותיקה - לא ייצאו בצורה נקייה מהסיפור. על המכתב החריג, חתומים שמותיהם של מספר ראשי ישיבות מארצות הברית, כשניסוחו של המכתב מיוחס לרב ישראל יצחק קאלמנווויץ.
את הדיווחים על פילוג הישיבה, מגדירים ראשים הישיבות במכתבם כ"שמועה לא טובה", וכ"מהומה הנעשית בתוך כותלי בית המדרש". מנסח המכתב כותב כי "מתוך שאנו ידידים טובים זה רבות בשנים, הרהבתי עוז לכתוב לכם מחשבת הדיוט כמוני".
Rav Hertzog: 3 Oaths and establishment of Jewish State
Guest post by R' Yechzkel Moskowitz I am only posting the relevant part of the article and restricted printing and copying due to copyright considerations. Article appeared in Techumin vol 4
Click here for others views
Click here for others views
3 Shvuos Rav Hertzog Techumin 4 - 7 of 13 Pages
Stanley Levitt: Rabbi Yaakov Hopfer's letter to take proper precautions
From:
On Behalf Of Shearith
Israel
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:19 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Important Information!
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:19 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Important Information!
The letter below (language
is below - PDF document with picture is attached) was originally sent by
the Rav to all Rabanim of the city in August of 2012.
As Zusia Levitt davens in
our Shul, the Rav wants all of us to take the proper precautions. Never
let a child be alone with him in any circumstance.
**********************
17 Av, 5772
August 5, 2012
Lichvod Rabbanim Chashuvim,
shlit”a,
Stanley (Zusia) Levitt –
pictured below – has faced multiple accusations that he molested young children
in both Philadelphia and Boston.
He recently pled guilty to
some of these charges. This of course warrants our being cautious about
him.
As such, I am sending you this
letter with his picture. If you should see him in your shul I would
encourage you to take steps to inform your congregants in order to
ensure communal safety.
Rabbi Yaakov Hopfer
What to do if the marriage is over - but one party refuses to end it?
Guest Post by Dan EisenbergDecember 16, 2013 at 3:57 AM
@ DT- Thank you for responding at length. While many were critical of my assumptions and questions I don't think you addressed the issue at hand. As a psychologist I am sure you realize more than most, that not every marriage can be saved. There exists the possibility that one comes t the conclusion that the marriage is over before their soon to be ex-spouse. If the person is leading a religious lifestyle they will in consult with pastoral as well as psychological counsel. Everyone wants shalom bayit, but not every marriage was made in heaven. I find it hard to believe there is a magic formula to heal every marriage. I also think it is irresponsible to force every spouse back to their partner. Once a person availed themselves to pastoral and therapeutic services and through their competent guidance seeks divorce should he/she remain trapped? Really? If the child is young should the mother not take the child to live with her. ( I am not advocating for denial of visitation / joint custody) however child support is for the child and should be maintained by the B"D if they use it for binding arbitration.
As to the challenges made that this isn't halachically tenable approach because it is modern it must be wrong.--There are many times that times changed and the Chachamim made takanot to address the problems they faced from antiquity to modern times. At some point we as a society realized slavery is wrong, polygamy is not for us and we don't engage minors. There are so many more examples but the point is obvious. This isn't about picking and choosing "chafing," or any other disparaging comment "Dvar Torah" feels the need to insult people who might disagree with him/her.
In this regard the rabbanim of the BDA, the largest B"D for gittin in the US supports takanot like the halachik pre-nup. Before you jump down my throat, please let me know of one case that the BDA gave a p'tur, even with a get that was assisted by ORA and/or the husband felt pressure to give the get and the p'tur was not recognized. While many may critizize R'Stern or R' Shachter, l'maaseh the gittin are kosher and the women are able to go on with their lives and their future kids are able to marry.
Lastly, the idea that a husband automatically gets full custody of a boy over six is equally preposterous. Every case is unique and should be decided on it's own merits.
As i asked before what is your solution? You told me what you are not prepared for- quickie divorces. I did not advocate that position. When is a marriage over? How many psychologists do they need to see? Which rabbi do they need to consult? Is there a list? once one side consulted with a competent rav, and they agreed that the marriage was over and encouraged going to B"D is that not enough. I don't believe there is a simple solution to such complex issues. If you do, i look forward to reading about it.
As to the challenges made that this isn't halachically tenable approach because it is modern it must be wrong.--There are many times that times changed and the Chachamim made takanot to address the problems they faced from antiquity to modern times. At some point we as a society realized slavery is wrong, polygamy is not for us and we don't engage minors. There are so many more examples but the point is obvious. This isn't about picking and choosing "chafing," or any other disparaging comment "Dvar Torah" feels the need to insult people who might disagree with him/her.
In this regard the rabbanim of the BDA, the largest B"D for gittin in the US supports takanot like the halachik pre-nup. Before you jump down my throat, please let me know of one case that the BDA gave a p'tur, even with a get that was assisted by ORA and/or the husband felt pressure to give the get and the p'tur was not recognized. While many may critizize R'Stern or R' Shachter, l'maaseh the gittin are kosher and the women are able to go on with their lives and their future kids are able to marry.
Lastly, the idea that a husband automatically gets full custody of a boy over six is equally preposterous. Every case is unique and should be decided on it's own merits.
As i asked before what is your solution? You told me what you are not prepared for- quickie divorces. I did not advocate that position. When is a marriage over? How many psychologists do they need to see? Which rabbi do they need to consult? Is there a list? once one side consulted with a competent rav, and they agreed that the marriage was over and encouraged going to B"D is that not enough. I don't believe there is a simple solution to such complex issues. If you do, i look forward to reading about it.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)