https://www.thepinknews.com/2022/01/07/the-times-corrections-trans-misinformation-rape-chestfeeding/
In the story, Massie claimed: “We pretend that women can — and do — commit rape… In England and Wales 436 male-bodied sex offenders were classified as women from 2012 to 2018.”
In the correction, The Times said: “In fact, under English law, accessories to a crime are charged as principal offenders, and therefore women can be charged with rape.
“How many female defendants were ‘male-bodied’ is not recorded. We are happy to make this clear.”
Following the correction, The Times has now re-published the piece, removing the explicit claim that all recorded female sex offenders are trans.
However, at the time this article was published, it continued to claim that “436 rape defendants were classified as women”.
So now your source of emes is Pink news?
ReplyDeletehttps://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-without-exemptions-to-protect-women-in-prison-gender-identity-laws-are-unconstitutional
ReplyDeleteSure, sure, no women are being raped by trans-rapists, the Hunter-Biden laptop wasn't even a laptop and Chernobyl was an isolated incident that endangered nobody.
Are you claiming without sources that you always no best because you rely on unfounded rumors?
ReplyDeleteJust that you have some elasticity when it comes to finding reliable sources
ReplyDeleteYou mean they disagree with your authoritative rumors?
ReplyDeleteProbably most of your readers are repulsed by your Pink source
ReplyDeletetypical ad hominum defense
ReplyDeleteAnd Jews are not really a danger to Mankind
ReplyDeleteWhat other claims do you want to make with only conspiracy theories and no evidence?
of course your made-up claim must be more accurate since you don't care about facts
ReplyDeleteAnd you aren't elastic because you make up claims without evidence
ReplyDeleterepulse by the source or that it refutes your claim?
ReplyDeleteSource
ReplyDeleteYou dismissed the article I posted
ReplyDeleteSo anything LGBT is authority, simply because it has a gay hechsher?
ReplyDeleteNope!
ReplyDeleteBut a gay citation of facts is more believable than someone repeating unfounded rumors or making up claims
Um, everything I cited has evidence, especially the laptop (which you've been reduced to defending with "Nyah, nyah, no it's not!") and Chernobyl.
ReplyDeleteWhen you don't have real new sources you take what you can get.
ReplyDeleteIt's the usual. My crappy news source is worthy because I agree with you. Your similarly crappy new source isn't because I don't
ReplyDeleteThat must be why it is in the top 10 of posts read this week
ReplyDeleteExcept when the British chief rabbi got some advice from feiglach, he was placed in virtual cherem.
ReplyDeleteLol , what a convincing argument.
ReplyDeleteGay ben-hinnom
ReplyDelete