https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20210423/covid-study-deaths-months-after-infection
Long-haul COVID-19 patients face many health threats -- including a higher chance of dying -- up to 6 months after they catch the virus, according to a massive study published in the journal Nature.
A second study, released by the CDC on Friday, also found lingering symptoms months later among COVID-19 patients who originally had mild symptoms.
For the Nature study, researchers examined more than 87,000 COVID-19 patients and nearly 5 million control patients in a federal database. They found COVID-19 patients had a 59% higher risk of death up to 6 months after infection, compared to non-infected people.
Wuhan lab leak 'now the most likely origin of Covid', MPs told
ReplyDeleteDr Alina Chan says there is also a risk that Covid-19 is an engineered virus
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/12/15/wuhan-lab-leak-now-likely-origin-covid-mps-told/
This has always been the rebuttal to "Yeah, only 1% die!" "Yeah, but 10-15% never fully recover and another 10-15% have lingering symptoms."
ReplyDeletenothing new!
ReplyDeletehttps://nypost.com/2021/11/04/letter-confirms-wuhan-lab-virus-study-was-funded-by-taxpayers/
Yes, but the point is that when Trump said those things, liberals and this blog mustered countless "fact checks" to "prove" that these things couldn't possibly be true. And now...
ReplyDeleteexamples?!
ReplyDeleteyou have a comprehension problem
ReplyDeleteThe objection was not to the seriousness of the virus but calling it the Chinese virus
I agree it is a messy thread above. Garnel was responding to my Chinese virus claim.
ReplyDeleteSo yes. We hijacked your thread. Apologies. But bedieved, that's what I understood you as asking examples for. Were you asking for something else? My apologies
No, you were attacking the "China caused it" news because Trump endorsed it.
ReplyDeleteIt was "the Chinese virus", it was "Kung Flu" and Kamala Harris definitely didn't trust Pfizer's vaccine while Trump was in power.
examples or you simply are claiming you are a mind reader and know better than I what I "really" meant
ReplyDelete