Sorry not watching/looking at your posts. See https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-at-mount-rushmore-11593978913?mod=opinion_lead_pos1
“Divisive? Mr. Trump’s speech was certainly direct, in his typical style. But it was only divisive if you haven’t been paying attention to the divisions now being stoked on the political left across American institutions. Mr. Trump had the temerity to point out that the last few weeks have seen an explosion of “cancel culture—driving people from their jobs, shaming dissenters, and demanding total submission from anyone who disagrees.” Describing this statement of fact as “divisive” proves his point. Newspaper editors are being fired over headlines and op-eds after millennial staff revolts. Boeing CEO David Calhoun last week welcomed the resignation of a communications executive for opposing—33 years ago when he was in the military—women in combat. The Washington Post ran an op-ed this weekend urging that the name of America’s first President be struck from Washington and Lee University. Any one of these events would be remarkable, but together with literally thousands of others around the country they represent precisely what Mr. Trump describes—a left-wing cultural revolution against traditional American values of free speech and political tolerance. And he called for Americans not to cower but to oppose this assault:”
With the Black Lives Matter riots in America, do I have a chance at Mo.No.2020-352 June 29,2020? Allow me my letter today:
“1.I request permission to submit these papers concerning my motion number 352 return date June 29, 2020. I'm attaching an affidavit of service proving I mailed by UPS a true copy to Susan and to TIAA. I attach Exhibit A: Susan June 19, 2017 with Rigler September 12, 2000 attached. 2.My motion here is for the Court to stay all sanctions against me and then to dismiss my leave to appeal June 29, 2020 Mo.No. 2020-352 Aranoff v Aranoff because of my motion here. Exhibit A: Susan June 19, 2017 with Rigler September 12, 2000 attached:In jemzura v.New York State Elec.& Gas, 225 A.D. 2d 860 (3d Dept.) lv.to appeal denied, 88 N.Y.2d 807 (1996), the appellate court held that an increase in sanctions was warranted where the pro se litigant made another frivolous attack on an order after being warned that future meritless litigation may result in additional increased sanctions. 3.I don't want to trouble the court to reopen a Garson case. I ask only for a stay on Garson and Rigler sanctions amounting to $25,000. Sanctions are steps judges take to punish a litigant for disobeying a law or rule. I know that courts are reluctant to do police work. The police are charged with the responsibility for finding and bringing to court evidence of criminal activity. I maintain that from inception Susan falsely charged me in July 1991 with “he abandoned me.” I maintain that there are phony/false documents in my case: the March 7, 1995 Rigler Order of Separation. I'll drop all my complaints if I can have my pension 100% from August 1, 2020 on.”
Sorry not watching/looking at your posts.
ReplyDeleteSee https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-at-mount-rushmore-11593978913?mod=opinion_lead_pos1
“Divisive? Mr. Trump’s speech was certainly direct, in his typical style. But it was only divisive if you haven’t been paying attention to the divisions now being stoked on the political left across American institutions. Mr. Trump had the temerity to point out that the last few weeks have seen an explosion of “cancel culture—driving people from their jobs, shaming dissenters, and demanding total submission from anyone who disagrees.”
Describing this statement of fact as “divisive” proves his point. Newspaper editors are being fired over headlines and op-eds after millennial staff revolts. Boeing CEO David Calhoun last week welcomed the resignation of a communications executive for opposing—33 years ago when he was in the military—women in combat. The Washington Post ran an op-ed this weekend urging that the name of America’s first President be struck from Washington and Lee University. Any one of these events would be remarkable, but together with literally thousands of others around the country they represent precisely what Mr. Trump describes—a left-wing cultural revolution against traditional American values of free speech and political tolerance. And he called for Americans not to cower but to oppose this assault:”
With the Black Lives Matter riots in America, do I have a chance at Mo.No.2020-352 June 29,2020? Allow me my letter today:
ReplyDelete“1.I request permission to submit these papers concerning my motion number 352 return date June 29, 2020. I'm attaching an affidavit of service proving I mailed by UPS a true copy to Susan and to TIAA. I attach Exhibit A: Susan June 19, 2017 with Rigler September 12, 2000 attached.
2.My motion here is for the Court to stay all sanctions against me and then to dismiss my leave to appeal June 29, 2020 Mo.No. 2020-352 Aranoff v Aranoff because of my motion here. Exhibit A: Susan June 19, 2017 with Rigler September 12, 2000 attached:In jemzura v.New York State Elec.& Gas, 225 A.D. 2d 860 (3d Dept.) lv.to appeal denied, 88 N.Y.2d 807 (1996), the appellate court held that an increase in sanctions was warranted where the pro se litigant made another frivolous attack on an order after being warned that future meritless litigation may result in additional increased sanctions.
3.I don't want to trouble the court to reopen a Garson case. I ask only for a stay on Garson and Rigler sanctions amounting to $25,000. Sanctions are steps judges take to punish a litigant for disobeying a law or rule. I know that courts are reluctant to do police work. The police are charged with the responsibility for finding and bringing to court evidence of criminal activity. I maintain that from inception Susan falsely charged me in July 1991 with “he abandoned me.” I maintain that there are phony/false documents in my case: the March 7, 1995 Rigler Order of Separation. I'll drop all my complaints if I can have my pension 100% from August 1, 2020 on.”