Longtime conspiracy theorist and propagator Alex Jones has apologized
to the Washington, D.C. pizzeria Comet Ping Pong and its owner James
Alefantis for his show's role in promoting the false "pizzagate"
conspiracy theory involving a child sex-abuse ring.
Jones, the host of the radio and web show bearing his name and the owner of the website Infowars, said from a prepared statement
that to his knowledge, "neither Mr. Alefantis, nor his restaurant Comet
Ping Pong, were involved in any human trafficking as was part of the
theories about Pizzagate that were being written about in many media
outlets and which we commented upon."
He continued: "I want our viewers and listeners to know that we
regret any negative impact our commentaries may have had on Mr.
Alefantis, Comet Ping Pong, or its employees. We apologize to the extent
our commentaries could be construed as negative statements about Mr.
Alefantis or Comet Ping Pong, and we hope that anyone else involved in
commenting on Pizzagate will do the same thing."
Jones' apology Friday came the same day
a 28-year-old man pleaded guilty to charges related to a December
incident when he brought an AR-15 rifle and other weapons into the
restaurant and fired shots inside. Edgar Maddison Welch, of Salisbury,
N.C., said he drove from his home to the Washington restaurant to
"self-investigate" the conspiracy theory.
False rumors on the
Internet included allegations that a child sex ring was operating out of
the restaurant's nonexistent basement and that it involved Hillary
Clinton and her former campaign chairman John Podesta. Employees of
Comet have received many threatening phone calls and have been the
targets of online harassment and death threats.
The Daily Beast reported that Welch was a Facebook fan of Jones and Infowars, and Welch told The New York Times he had listened to Jones' radio show.
Multiple times in the statement,
Jones says that "many media outlets" were reporting on the theories; it
could be seen as an attempt to minimize the role his show played in
their promotion.
Despite Jones' claim that the reason for the apology is because "we
think it is the right thing to do," it may have more to do with the
perceived threat of legal action from Alefantis, who wrote to Jones in
February asking for several retractions. The Washington Post's Paul Farhi explains:
"Under Texas law, the Austin-based Jones had to retract or apologize for the stories by Friday — one full month after receiving Alefantis's letter — to avoid exposing InfoWars to punitive damages in a libel suit."
It's rare for Jones to make a public apology. The Infowars website has a correction section. There are only two entries, of which the Comet apology is one.
Infowars
describes the mission of Jones and the website as "seeking the truth
and exposing the scientifically engineered lies of the globalists and
their ultimate goal of enslaving humanity."
NPR's David Folkenflik noted other conspiracy theories Jones has discussed:
"Jones has claimed the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were an inside job, that the deadly shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School was a hoax, and that President Obama would round up people into concentration camps."
Jones was not the originator of "pizzagate," however, which has spread on social media and on sites like Reddit. [...]
Social psychology professor Viren Swami of Anglia Ruskin University told NPR's Michel Martin
that it's hard to change someone's belief once that person accepts a
conspiracy theory. "We look for evidence that fits what we already know
or what we already believe, and we try to avoid information or evidence
that we either disagree with or that we know doesn't fit with our
perspective," he said. "And if someone comes along and says, here's the
evidence, your natural tendency's actually to rehearse arguments against
that evidence."
He's at the forefront of a growing genre: meta-news!
ReplyDeleteIts forefather? Rush Limbaugh.
it's hard to change someone's belief once that person accepts a conspiracy theory. "We look for evidence that fits what we already know or what we already believe, and we try to avoid information or evidence that we either disagree with or that we know doesn't fit with our perspective," he said. "And if someone comes along and says, here's the evidence, your natural tendency's actually to rehearse arguments against that evidence."
ReplyDeleteDo you believe that this is only applicable to Alax Jones, Rabbi Greenblatt and others, but that you are above this? Do you believe that you cannot err?
I have no problem saying I erred. It simply isn't so in this case
ReplyDeleteI don't know if you can publish this comment, DT, seeing as it may well be overly inflammatory, but I'm wondering--just in general, mind you, using this as an example--if there's grounds for striking (i.e., not-approving) this comment (and others like it) based on mere stupidity?
ReplyDeleteAssuming his sevara here made any sense (i.e., that your criticizing conspiracists somehow implicates you in supposing your own infallibity)--which, of course, it doesn't--how on earth does your posting an MSM article make you answerable for every sentence in it? He asks as if you drew those conclusions yourself that you're merely posting, and that just seems too absurd to have to abide -- again, even on the supposition that his question, apart from that, made sense, just on purely logical grounds.
So if it's just doubly stupid, isn't that, well, just trolling?
What in the world is your proof that it has anything to do with Trump???
ReplyDelete1) Were the one thousand bomb threats that he made against airlines and others motivated by White Supremacy or Trump? Is there any plausible reason to say that his most recent threats had very different motivation than all his previous threats, which were many times more than what he did over the last two months? He's been doing these calls for two years.
2) Is there any reason to say the bomb threats made by Juan Thompson, who is a politically left, black and Muslim, were made due to white supremacy or Trump?
Why can't you accept that you were mistaken or wrong?
1) Stupidity.
ReplyDelete2) Doesn't make any sense.
3)Absurd
4) Doubly stupid.
5) Trolling.
6) No Sanity-coherence-decency
Were someone to turn this screed on it's head and turn it back against the person who wrote it, there is plausible reason to say that the blog owner would object to it and say so clearly. The question is why.
A very insightful article.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/227833