Tuesday, November 8, 2016

Anti-Semitism unleashed by Trump followers chills Jewish voters


Jewish Americans have never been ones to sit out an election, whether it comes to voting, political fundraising or dinner table punditry. But even for a community grown used to the political fray, the 2016 campaign was different.

The stakes are so high, the differences so stark, the language so overwrought that Trump vs. Clinton seems to overwhelm everything else.

But there is also a specific Jewish component to this election that some voters are sensing, one that has them reassessing their view of what it is to be Jewish in America.

Rabbi Daniel Bogard, 33, of Cincinnati, said he had never personally encountered anti-Semitism until this election cycle. He has now been called a Christ killer twice on social media — once each from the right and the left, when he was defending Israel.

“There’s been permission that’s been given to say these things we didn’t used to say,” said Bogard, who with his wife, Rabbi Karen Kriger Bogard, was installed recently as an associate rabbi at Adath Israel, a Conservative synagogue.

That has led him to radically alter a view he once held that the established Jewish community was too quick to charge others with anti-Semitism.[...]

Donald Trump, the Republican nominee who has made broadsides against Muslims, Hispanics and other minorities a part of his campaign — recklessly, say his critics; unintentionally, say his defenders — has drawn into the light racists and anti-Semites who once occupied the margins of American life.

In turn, that has coaxed out of the closet an otherness that some Jews, especially millennials, had never sensed or thought they would experience.

The Anti-Defamation League has warned about anti-Semitic imagery among Trump’s followers throughout the campaign, and implored the candidate to renounce the purveyors, with occasional success. Over the last couple of days, the Trump campaign released a closing television ad about an “international global power structure” that the ADL and other Jewish groups said trafficked in classic anti-Semitic themes.

Jordana Merran, 28, a foreign policy consultant in Washington, DC, said she had been blithe about warnings from her parents’ generation that Jews could again face the privations of what seemed a distant past.[...]


“We are still a minority in this country, and that position of comfort and being at home can’t be taken for granted,” she said. “Seeing that vitriol against Jews is so shocking and disheartening. It makes you wonder, ‘Are we lucky today? What does the future hold?’”

What the future holds is not a theoretical question to some voters raised on stories of their parents or grandparents fleeing persecution.

“My sister and her son didn’t have passports, but I pushed her to get them this summer,” said Suzanne Reisman, 40, a New York City-based writer who has been harassed by anti-Semites on Twitter. “My grandparents were Holocaust survivors. I hope it won’t come to it, but if we have to flee, we are ready.”[...]

But there are also Jewish pundits on the political right who are worrying about the darker forces being unleashed by Trump’s intentional or collateral appeal to anti-Semites.

Jews should not “ignore the rekindling of right-wing anti-Semitism simply because its next-of-kin — left-wing anti-Zionism — remains so potent on college campuses and in progressive political circles,” wrote Bret Stephens, the Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Wall Street Journal and a critic of Trump. “The GOP’s conversion to being a powerfully pro-Israel and philo-Semitic party is a relatively recent development. No law dictates that it is destined to be a lasting one.”

For its part, the Trump campaign insists that the campaign is neither anti-Semitic nor trying to appeal to the racist far right, as a top aide said Sunday in response to ADL’s criticism of the “global power structure” ad.

“Mr. Trump’s message and all of the behavior that I have witnessed over the two decades that I have known him have consistently been pro-Jewish and pro-Israel and accusations otherwise are completely off-base,” Jason Greenblatt, the top attorney for the Trump Organization and the co-chair of the campaign’s Israel advisory committee said in a statement Sunday to CBS News. “The suggestion that the ad is anything else is completely false and uncalled for.”[...]

Some older Jews said they recognized the patterns from events they had seen fresh in their youths.

The tell for Norman Gelman, 87, a retired consultant on public policy who lives in Potomac, Maryland, was that “white supremacists and neo-Nazis quickly recognized [Trump] as their champion. His demeanor and his narcissism quickly reminded me of Mussolini.”


William Berkson, 72, a writer who lives in Reston, Virginia, said that if anything, Trump posed a greater danger than earlier demagogues because he had as a tool the instant delivery guaranteed by social media.

“Today, leaders can have even more of a catalytic effect on followers because of the magnifying power of social approval,” Berkson said. “When a leader says something is OK, millions of followers can reinforce one another with the same message on social media.”

Micah Nathan, 43, a writer who lives in Newton, Massachusetts, said Trump was shocking only because he was saying plainly what Republicans had been insinuating through code for years on topics like immigration, the Muslim community and the threat from globalization.

“Trump didn’t create his base. He gave them a unified voice, minus the softening rules of public discourse,” Nathan said.[...]

21 comments :

  1. Revolutions sometimes involve social upheaval. A social revolution, even more so. So I feel sorry for the less observant Jews who are tasting antisemitism due to Trumpism. I've been eating the dirt of the liberal antisemitism for quite a while. And I don't mean the rantings against the "zionist entity" on campuses. I mean the promoting of the LGBTA agenda which is anti-G-d and thus anti-Jew because G-d, His Torah, and the Jewish nation are one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How does he have your back? He said he is quitting if he doesn't win the elections.

    In what sense is Trump or his program godly? His attitude towards women, marriage, the disabled, racism, government institutions.

    sounds like you are putting your faith in a man - a rather problematic man - to solve societies problems. How is that g-dly. Is it any different than relying on Hertzl or FDR?

    Perhaps what disturbs me most is how intelligent and sensitive people seem to lose their ability to think when they view him as the solution to the genuine problems that exist today.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why did he ask me to monitor my polling place if he's quitting if he loses? Clearly, he's preparing for a post-election battle if he loses.

    Mr. Trump is the solution to my problems. He's unleashed the power of political incorrectness. Before: talking about something like expelling Arabs hostile to Jews from Eretz Yisrael exposed me to ridicule. Now: I can still be ridiculed, but I can also point out how popular it is in the U.S. to openly discuss expelling hostile elements from the country.

    My faith is in G-d. I thank G-d for sending us a Trump. For the first time in my life, I'm energized to vote on Election Day.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's not a specific issue of Jew hatred. Trump is tapping into any movement that uses hatred of "the other" for support. That's why both white and black supremacists support him. Jew hatred is part of the platform for both, unwanted baggage that comes with the votes they bring.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If the elections is clearly against Trump he will walk away from politics. His fighting will only be if it is close

    how do you know that it was G-d that sent Trump?! Maybe it was one of His assistants?

    ReplyDelete
  6. He will not quit, even if he doesn't win. Because in essence, he will at least win 45% of the vote. Check out Charles Krauthammer.
    https://m.youtube.com/?#/watch?v=o2n4CVuS4Cw

    On Thursday and forward, will you still continue to cover Trump on your blog? If so, may I respectfully suggest and request that you consider running two blogs? One would be for Trump, Hillary, the trustworthiness of the media (who asked Hillary's campaign for questions to ask Trump and Cruz...), and all similar types of politics. The other blog would be the type of blog you have been running until this election cycle. I mean this in all seriousness.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Maybe Bernie is an anti Semite, too. (He isn't, but the same argument.)

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/11/07/why-i-cant-join-the-condemnation-of-trumps-allegedly-anti-semitic-ad/

    ReplyDelete
  8. if the loser concedes than I don't have plans of continuing covering either Trump or Clinton - unless it is something of direct concern

    ReplyDelete
  9. Definitely troubles me, but so does the anti-Israel anti-Semitism on the progressive side.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Well yes, but not necessarily the change you want.

    ReplyDelete
  11. A prominent Rosh Yeshiva of the previous generation when asked for his preference in a general election responded" "Von is bed; de udder is verse, and I don't know vitch is vitch."

    Our choice in this election are similarly beyond horrific. To me it seems like having to choose between accepting stage 4 cancer-or congestive heart failure. Either candidate would be morbidly detrimental to the welfare of the United States, each in their own loathsome fashion.

    But America is a great country, and as Winston Churchill once said,."You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else." - We as Americans can survive anything that either Clinton or Trump can throw at us over the next 4 years and come back even stronger. The threats they pose, however injurious, are not existential.

    So how should the American Jew vote in this election, and based on what? The above article taken from the "Times of Israel " is very long on quoting statements made by a number of individuals expressing alarm at the current state of affairs, but comes up short on providing compelling objective evidence that the Trump campaign is significantly more anti-Semitic than the Clinton entourage.

    We should however take note of one glaringly obvious fact: Donald Trump proudly parades his Jewish daughter and son in-law on stage with him, and Ivanka and Jarred Kushner occupy significant advisory positions on his staff. Marc Mezvinsky, Hillary Clinton's Jewish son in-law, on the other hand, is nowhere to be found on the Clinton campaign trail. Instead, Huma Abedin, her de facto aide-de-camp of whom Hillary declared to be "like a second daughter to me", is constantly at her side. Now Abedin, notwithstanding the fact of her marriage to Anthony Weiner, a Jew, is in fact a practicing Muslim, although admittedly not particularly devout. True, while there is not a shred of evidence to suggest that Abedin harbors any ill-will towards Jews, there is also no logical reason to believe that she will be more supportive of Jews than of her Muslim brethren.

    Should the fact that Trump embraces his Jewish family, while Clinton eschews her Jewish relatives in favor of a Muslim, be interpreted as a Trump administration would be more favorable to Jewish interests than a Clinton one? Perhaps not, but it is the only objective fact that we know to be true.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The link does not seem to be to Krauthammer.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Things like this will keep him fighting - http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016/11/08/some-problems-reported-as-voters-head-to-polls/
    Obvious voting fraud, today, in PA.

    ReplyDelete
  14. He is being interviewed. It just worked for me.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's happening in several places in Pennsylvania. Mind boggling.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Point taken. I don't know with any degree of certainty. The only thing I'm sure of is that I have spent way too much time following this election.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Which Jewish voters does he chill? Rabbi Karen? Shame on you Eidensohn!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Why are you not covering Clinton's refusal to accept the elections? Is this a double standard, where you planned on covering it if Trump didn't accept it, but now that Clinton is challenging it on crazy grounds, I don't see it being covered? Is there a difference? Is her participation in this right?

    ReplyDelete
  19. She did accept the elections. She did not initiate the call for a recount. But for you - why if Trump is claiming without any evidence that 3 million illegals participated in the election and that is why he lost the popular vote - isn't he continuing his song about the elections being rigged and support an honest recount?

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.