Sunday, October 23, 2016

Kaminetksy-Greenblatt Heter: The rabbinical leadership is greatly embarrassed and hopes for collective amnesia

Over Yom Tov I have made inquiries about the deafening silence regarding the Kaminetsky-Greenblatt heter for adultery. The consensus seems to be that a horrible error in judgment was made by the Kaminetskys and Rav Greenblatt. But since they refuse to acknowledge it the only alternative is to forget about it and pretend it never happened. 

A relative who learns in Lakewood told me that everyone is aware of the issue - but the majority deliberate avoid learning the details. "If my rabbeim felt there was something I should know about or do they would have told me. Every time someone puts a notice about this on a bulletin board it is immediately torn down.  I don't know the details but don't you think that Rav Shmuel Kaminetsky knows more than you do? How can you question a gadol? Especially when no one else is?" 

My response was that the major poskim of our generation have publicly said there is no heter and that this is clearly not even a machlokes haposkim. It is simply that the rabbonim of our generation do not want to hold Rav Kaminetsky accountable for promoting adultery and hope the issue will be forgotten. They view that preserving Rav Shmuel's status as gadol hador is more important that stopping adultery or the damage done to emunas chachomim.

I heard from other sources that it is not just the avreichim of Lakewood who have their heads stuck in the sand and don't want to know the details - but the gedolim in our generation are doing the same thing.

In short, the Kaminetskys and Rav Greenblatt have played a game of chicken with the rabbis of our generation and the rabbis were the one's who blinked and conceded defeat.  Or put another way, collectively the brilliant dedicated wonderful Torah teachers, role-models and  leaders  of our generation have regressed to the mental status of a baby and think that if they close their eyes and pretend they don't know about adultery the problem will go away. They think that  have succeeded in training their students only to think when given permission. Unfortunately for everyone - there is a significant minority who are well aware of all the facts and this has destroyed their emunas chachomim. 

This is not a machlokess of halacha - it is a monumental example of cowardice and failure of nerve - which I know of no historic precedent. They have covered up their failure by claiming that only gedolim can deal with this issue and at the same time they refuse to deal with it! The damage will be for all future generations who will not recover from this betrayal.

Is there anyone still surprised why our children are going off the derech? Why we have so much bad news? (Hint - it is not because of the Internet nor the bloggers who simply reveal the elementary truth.)

Please show this letter to your rabbis and ask them to defend their inaction in the fact of the perversion of halacha and the promoting of adultery by the gadol hador. If they want documentation tell them it is in the upper right hand corner of my blog. It contains links to all the major documents in this case.

53 comments :

  1. I'd like to present a possible defense of the inaction of various rabbis.

    ‏תנאי האיסור:

    המלים הקריטיות הן "בידו למחות". חיוב מחאה רק קיים כאשר המחאה עשויה להשפיע.‏
    גם כן פטור של מקום הפסד אף על פי שחייב אדם למחות בעוברי עבירה, וכל מי שאינו מוחה, ובידו למחות, נתפס
    באותו עון, מכל מקום אין אדם חייב להוציא ממונו על זה. ולכן נהגו להקל מלמחות בעוברי
    עבירה, שיש לחוש שיהיו עומדין על גופנו ומאודנו" (שו"ע)‏

    ReplyDelete
  2. “Kaminetksy-Greenblatt Heter: The rabbinical leadership is greatly embarrassed and hopes for collective amnesia”
    Right. The rabbinical leadership is greatly embarrassed over Mendel Epstein et al. In this I support the FBI contrary to http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-ally-aids-campaign-of-fbi-officials-wife-1477266114
    Only the FBI stopped 30+ years of knocking teeth out etc of recalcitrant husbands. The FBI support Hillary. I’m a Trump supporter. I agree with what the FBI did to Mendel Epstein et al. Why? “ORA, feminists etc takes the wife’s claim I cannot endure you [lit. to receive, accept] and are ready to compel the husband to divorce---merely on her say so or merely on an obvious phony psychiatry report. In the Mishnah there is a physical problem such as boils etc hindering the woman from having sex with her husband. Mere hating with no physical problems and with no halachic problems such as Kohen to a Gerusha is never enough to compel divorce.”

    ReplyDelete
  3. Adam - you are a late comer who walks in and starts spouting all the things that "must" be done as well as your ridiculous attempt to explain my psychological state.

    All these issues were fully discussed. And yes gedolim were informed of the issues as well as the readers of the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. “Kaminetksy-Greenblatt Heter: The rabbinical leadership is greatly embarrassed and hopes for collective amnesia”
    Inaction of various rabbis --- gives hopes for collective amnesia, true. Sorry to say, but we need more convictions, especially of activist females in the knocking out teeth, robbing, etc of men. See http://www.wsj.com/articles/former-pennsylvania-attorney-general-gets-prison-term-1477340509

    ReplyDelete
  5. Who are you quoting? It is probably the reasoning of some. Others have a similar reasoning which also includes a fear of losses. Seeing that RSK and RNG are not backing down and it is believed that they never will, they fear that an all out war will break out in the forum world, which has the potential to cause harm.

    I do wonder how they don't see the tremendous harm caused when so many see that injustice is perpetrated and supported by rabbis. Then they still get all types of honor, which gives more power and opportunities to perpetrate more injustice. Our wonderful newspapers continue and further this injustice. Kayin fell because of what he felt was injustice - as did so many others. How many people -especially youth - fall when they see this type of corruption of power within our communities..... Hashem yerachem

    ReplyDelete
  6. Adam has a stupid little blog that he trying to restart, which is against you. He has been here before.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You've been dealing with this issue for a long time and you have strong complaints against many of the greatest talmidei chachomim of our time such as Rav Dovid Feinstein and Rav Hillel David. They have already expressed their disagreement with the heter and even Rav Kaminetzky has agreed that it is wrong.

    All these rabbonim and many other great Rabbonim seem to feel that they have done all that is necessary for dealing with this issue. Rav Sternbuch has also expressed his strong opposition to the heter. However, none of them are making a constant issue out of it and trying to invalidate the status of the rabbonim involved.

    You apparently feel that you are right but you don't seem to have any rabbinical backup for your point of view. Is there any significant Rov that you can name that agrees to your approach?

    ReplyDelete
  8. “Kaminetksy-Greenblatt Heter: The rabbinical leadership is greatly embarrassed and hopes for collective amnesia”
    No, it’s not hope for collective amnesia. Rather it’s hope for collective adoption of irreligious Judaism positions by leading rabbinical leadership. Gil Troy writes today in Jpost http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Center-Field-In-this-crazy-election-most-American-Jews-are-acting-normal-470850
    “American Jews’ deep loyalty to the Democratic Party since Franklin Roosevelt’s presidency in the 1930s has mystified conservatives since Ronald Reagan in the 1980s – leading to repeated predictions of a rightward shift. And while in New York, the greatest demographic growth is in conservative- leaning Orthodox and Russian Jews, most American Jews remain proud liberals.”
    The rabbis of Silver Spring supposedly “are against a person who won't give his wife a get - even if it is not needed.” They’re adopting an irreligious Judaism position popular today in America. Likewise---Rabbi Schacter, Rabbi Ralbag, Rabbi Goldfein, and oh, yes, indeed, Rabbi Mendel Epstein etc. All these rabbis support knocking the teeth out etc of “a person who won't give his wife a get - even if it is not needed.”
    I’m a Trump supporter. I sent in my vote yesterday by mail for Trump along with votes for Trump by 3 of my daughters.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Restart? If you mean the blog called daistorah..., I assure you that I have nothing whatsoever to do with that blog. In fact, I am not a big fan of the harsh style he employs.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What is your point. Do you agree that Tamar is committing adultery right now? Do you agree that if you hold the heter is no good there is an obligation to tell Tamar to separate from Adam? Do you agree that if you have the ability to stop adultery you have an obligation to do so? Is there any doubt in your mind that if Rav Shmuel told Tamar to separate that she would tell him that it was none of his business?! Do you have any doubt that if Rav Shmuel told Rav Greenblatt that he holds the heter is wrong and that the evidence doesn't support it that he would retract?

    As a minimum because Rav Shmuel created this mess by getting Rav Greenblatt to give a heter - he has an obligation to tell Tamar to separate now that he officially says he accepts that Rav Dovid said that the heter is no good. The fact that he has stated his has not and has no plans to tell them to separate says that Rav Shmuel feels that Tamar can rely on the heter because Rav Greenblatt has not retracted it. Thus asking Rav Dovid Feinstein was simply a fig leaf to hide behind. It changed nothing.

    Instead of guessing - please tell me the names of Rabbis and reasoning of those who feel that I have no halachic justification for publicizing this matter

    In the year that this matter has been discussed there is has not been a single valid halachic defense of the heter or Rav Shmuel Kaminetsky and Rav Nota Greenblatts refusal to condemn the heter.

    Regarding rabbinical backing - there are significant rabbis who agree with what I am doing - but they are not willing to publicly state it for fear of the retaliation they will receive

    ReplyDelete
  11. lol
    http://daat-torah.blogspot.com. You forgot to erase this from your profile. Oooopps!

    ReplyDelete
  12. No need to quote anybody. The halachic facts stand on their own.

    I have no defense for the alleged heter, however I can defend the inaction of rabbis despite the perversion of halacha which is being perpetrated.

    RDE is ideally suitable for protesting this situation. He is self-employed, and has no job that he would need to be afraid for that his contract won't be renewed.

    His protest serves as the collective voice and mouthpiece of all those who don't have an alternative forum to express their outrage, and serves to educate the public about the realities in the Jewish world. If anyone disagrees with the veracity of the facts, as presented by RDE, he will always allow them to post a valid defense.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I understand your point. I think that we are talking past each other.

    I do not think that the reason Rav Dovid Feinstein is keeping quiet has anything to do with money. He was not intimidated in the Dodelsohn chillul Hashem, when RSK encouraged ORA's shameful attempts to harm MTJ. (That was also when RSK kept on ignoring RDF's phone calls - regardless of how the Yated will spin to deny that.)

    Rav Feinstein wanted to save RSK's reputation. He felt that since he did so much good, for so long, this terrible indiscretion should not destroy him. (As an aside, we can be impressed that RDF not only doesn't hold grudges against those who sought to destroy his yeshiva in their shameful get advocacy - he went out of his way to save their reputation when their advocacy blew up in their faces in form of this nasty heter and adultery.)

    RDF is aware that R. Shalom kamentzky made a mockery of his attempt to save his father's reputation, but he won't make a public protest - as he is against public protests. That's my point. Some people have different reasons as to why they're keeping quite.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I believe that Rabbi Greeblatt's heter is bigeder טעה בשיקול הדעת and not טעה בדבר שמנה and therefore the din is not automatically invalid. Rabbi Greenblatt is a מומחה לב"ד and so his din stands if the people involved don't want to reject it and the other Rabbonim,are not obligated to force her to reject Rabbi Greenblatt's psak. Therefore, they have registered their disagreement and feel that nothing more can be done. Although they feel that the psak is wrong, Tamar and her husband are probably aware of the universal disagreement with the psak and are not mechuyav to ignore it since Rabbi Greenblatt has not reversed himself.

    There is an inyan here of a severe zilusa to bais din and Rabbonim chashuvim by unwarranted shaming of their valid position of non public condemnation of the psak.

    Although the marriage is wrong in the majority opinion, I believe that the damage is contained in that a psak like this is unlikely to be repeated and further activity and discord weakens bais din and kavod Hatorah

    ReplyDelete
  15. you are trying to turn this into a machlokess haposkim - it isn't. It isn't wrong in the majority opinion. It is wrong! There is no minority view

    you are overly optimistic - there is no basis to assume that everyone has learned their lesson and it unlikely to be repeated. It is clear that the obvious pervision of halacha by gedolim provide a huge break in the protective wall of halacha.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think most Rabbonim see it my way and that is why no one else has protested.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "If they want documentation tell them it is in the upper right hand corner of my blog. It contains links to all the major documents in this case."

    Some people, especially those who defend RSK, have a simplistic opinion about the internet-- everything on it is false till proven true, Traif till proven kosher, guilty till proven innocent. To a large degree this opinion is encouraged by gedolim, but now it created a terrible side effect.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I do know several rabbonim who do not see it your way. They feel that what is going on is terrible. They just feel powerless to do anything constructive about it.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Interesting. The similarities between your comment and those that supported silencing victims of CSA for the greater good are too great to ignore. It is really scary that you've ignored the inconvenient fact that there's a first husband (and father) in this picture who is totally bound up in this mess.

    It seems to me that this is one of the challenges of our current era: the יצה״ר has somehow convinced large segments of the frum populace that some type of concept of כבוד התורה allows us to ignore the shedding of Jewish blood. When people look back at this time, they will marvel at the ability of frum Jews to be caught up in the need to save the rabbis ... by killing the lay people.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The free publicity is appreciated, but I thought the first word of my comment was pretty clear that I was commenting about your use of the word "restart".

    ReplyDelete
  21. Some people....., have a simplistic opinion about the internet-- everything on it is false till proven true

    Are you suggesting that you have a sophisticated opinion in where you consider anything on the internet to be true until proven false??
    I like the simplicity of the American justice system where one is innocent until proven guilty.
    As a Jew, I especially value, accept and appreciate G-d's directive of leaving people in their chazakah, until proven otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It is clear that both silly blogs are written by the same person.
    Again, why are you being hypothetical. Allow us to assess your biases by giving us full, verifiable, disclosure of who you are. It is clear that you are being illogical.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Why don't you name the notable poskim you claim feel that Tamar may rely on Rav Greenblaat's spam in this case. They just don't exist.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Not true. The leading world Posek R. Moshe Shternbuch wrote that we need to protest more and publicize it. His letter is on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I guess you're not concerned about the bizayon to genuine talmidei chachomim such as Rav Dovid Feinstein and the loss of kavod hatorah and influence of the Torah on the Rabbim because of your personal view of Torah justice. I'll follow daas talmidei chachomim over daas hamon am every time.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Your question is wrong. The rabbonim also feel that the psak is wrong and not a taus bidvar mishne but bizayon of the posek and of the influence of bais din is worse.

    The treatment of Rav Dovid Feinstein and his group has not been with sufficient kavod.

    ReplyDelete
  27. You are claiming that it is worse to insult a gadol/posek by pointing out that he not only made a mistake but refuses to acknowledge it - than any possible error that the gadol/posek did.

    Please cite sources that that is in fact the halacha

    ReplyDelete
  28. How do you understand the halacha that taah bishikul hadaas the din does not change but the dayan has to pay from his own funds. Why isn't the halacha reversed? Why isn't there an chiyuv to be machriz the taus and to shame the dayan? A mumche libais din is potur. Why?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Fine. Please tell me where it is.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I'm trying to understand how your response addresses my comment (other than restating it).

    Try and remember: a husband has rights in a marriage too. Aside from the עריות concerns created by the heter, this is absolutely not a victimless crime.

    So again, when the weak are oppressed, it is positively unjust to hide behind a mantle of כבוד התורה or כבוד חכמים. And there are countless references in all of תנ״ך to support that fact.

    ReplyDelete
  31. "Are you suggesting...."

    No.

    ReplyDelete
  32. 1) Those close to Rav Dovid Feinstein will tell you that it was R. Shalom Kamenetzky who, by far, was the one who was mevazeh Rav Dovid. He lied and didn't keep his commitment and the commitment of his father.

    2) You are being silly and hypocritical. The influence and the institution of Beis Din was severely hurt by the actions of RSK - x2 - in ignoring and bullying the respected Baltimore Beis Din. That is the Beis that Tamar willingly signed onto. Furthermore, they hurt the influence and the institution of Beis Din by their "siruv" which was issued in violation of halacha! And then their clandestine "beis din" that "permitted" their shameful beating, was an even further destruction of the honor of Beis Din.

    3) Name the possek who think that it is acceptable for her to now still rely on Rabbi Greenblatt's heter. When you do this, you will be able to ask me for names of some of the many rabbonim who disagree, but are quiet as they feel powerless to effect a change.

    ReplyDelete
  33. What is the goal at this point? If it's to break up Tamar's new marriage, even if you could get a team of rabbis to tell her she should, she wouldn't change as long as Rabbi Greenblatt keeps his current position.

    If you want to change Rabbi Greenblatt's mind, what has not been done that should accomplish that? All the major Rabbonim have disagreed with his psak and he is surely aware of this.

    Do you believe that pressuring Rabbi Kaminetzky to speak to Rabbi Greenblatt would make a difference even if he spoke to him?

    Is the goal now to disgrace Rav Shalom Kaminetzky to prevent future invalid pesakim? Do you believe that Rav Shalom felt he was pushing a heter which is really invalid?

    What is the current goal?

    ReplyDelete
  34. How do you want to accomplish this? What is going to make Rabbi Greenblatt reverse? What do you want the rabbonim to do that would have any effect?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Do you ever listen to what I say? Do you ever listen to what others say?

    ReplyDelete
  36. You are asking a different question now, which resides in the realm of rabbinic politics. Does this mean that you now agree that your initial concern of זלזול ב״ד does not outweigh the multiple עוולות that have been perpetrated through this supposed heter?

    ReplyDelete
  37. As I have indicated, I don't understand what you're driving at and it's not at all clear to me what you want. What do you really want to happen in simple straightforward terms? Do you want some massive asifa?

    ReplyDelete
  38. 1) Rav Kaminetsky needs to to make a public announcement that the Heter that he and his son engineered is no good. It is not sufficient that his son write a letter saying he agrees with Rav Dovid Feinstein. Rav Shmuel needs to make it clear that he agrees with the many poskim that it never was any good because the facts used in the Heter are simply not true and even if they were they don't justify a heter according to Rav Moshe Feinsein. He needs to state that this is not a machlokess haposkim but is universally agreed.

    It would be helpful if he clearly state that this type of heter is not appropriate unless there is clear, verifiable evidence presented to the truth of the allegations and that the evidence clearly meets Rav Moshe Feinstein's requirements. A full beis din of internationally recognized poskim needs to sign the psak which should be made public. The experts who testify need to be clearly and publicly identified and their evidence needs to be based on direct contact with the parties. The beis din must hear both sides from the husband and wife.

    A handwritten letter will suffice - though it would be nice if a video was made public

    2) He needs to state unequivocally that he has told Tamar and Adam to separate and that he has told Rav Greenblatt that the evidence he and his son presented him is not valid and that Rav Greenblatt needs to retract his psak

    3) He needs to publicly apologize to Aharon Friedman for the grief that he has caused him and that he had no right to try and override the authority of the Baltimore Beis Din.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Rabbi Eidensohn clarified what he thinks should be done and I need some more time to think about it.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Who knew that a bunch of dirty laundry could be such a beautiful sight.
    Now i feel that i could even be a rabbi or better yet- a blogger. Thank you very much for the self esteem boost. Yasher Koach.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Elderly men relying on hearsay misjudged an evaluation of personal status. Not a crime.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Thank you for the excerpt from Rav Shternbuch.

    I am not saying that I disagree with Reb Doniel but why aren't any rabbonim publicly protesting this now including Rav Shternbuch? That's the mystery to me.

    ReplyDelete
  43. This clearly is a Taa bidvar Mishneh, wih the provision that those facts about Ahron are true and not a Ta'a beshikul hada'as, Rav Feldman of BBD also said the same. When a Dayan rectifies his mistake by paying the pwerson wronged, something not shayich by issur Arayos. NO such thing as ma sheassui assui!!!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Rav Moshe Feinstein z"l was matir mekach taus so it clearly is not taah bidvar mishne from that point of view. The argument is that it doesn't fit the requirements of Rav Moshe's psak. If that is true, then it is a taah bidvar mishne. I don't think it's clear what Rabbi Greenblatt considers valid proof of AF's state at the beginning of the marriage and why Tamar's staying with him should't invalidate any mekach taus.

    Rabbi Greenblatt owes the olam a clear explanation of his psak or a reversal of it.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I disagree - it is very clear. He has stated that what he has been told by the Kaminetsky's is what he totally relied for the facts of the case. They said he was totally crazy so he based his heter on that false premise and that the believed that Rav Moshe's heter applied and he didn't make an independent check to verify their claims. Saying to do so was question the words of a gadol and that was chutzpah. In short he was a rubber stamp for whatever the Kaminetsky's said.

    I agree with you totally that Rabbi Greenblatt owes an explanation why he did this and why he is not retracting his psak in the light of the letter from R Shlomo Kaminetsky saying that he has his father accept the psak of Rav Dovid Feinstein that the heter is garbage

    ReplyDelete
  46. One of the 3 conditions for mekach Taus is that she must depart immediately upon discovery of which she did not, otherwise it becomes a savra vekibla. If that happens to be the case and argues that svira hoyisi that I can live with it but cannot, the mishnah clearly states that she is need of a *GET* and that is no mekach Taus, now that's where RNG went wrong VETA'A. How is it that such a Bar Samcha, one the biggest mumche of Gittin in US should not be aware of this dvar mishna? How is it that RNG didn't ask RSK right then and there, did she move out immediately upon discovery? All he did say was, *IF* it is bedome to R' Moshe , instead of asking *IS IT* bedoime in all 3 ways (~ she departed immediately), there is nothing chutzpedig about asking such. It is part and parcel to inquire since he was procuring a Psak. We yet haven't touched upon the documentation of the Doctors report where the Dates would talk volumes for itself of what actually took place and when. The more RNG discloses, the worse it gets by a transformation from an alleged Mistake to a Conspiracy.

    RNG relinquished responsibilty by saying that it is the K's obligation to tell the Adam's family to depart, since the K's mislead him with the information on the Report.

    The Gedoilim have exhausted their bullets as seen here by dozens of Kol Kore letter's on this blog, venaasse melachtan al yedei acherim. And that is happeneing right here on R' Doniel's blog as per R' M Shternbuch's plea. Just so that others shall not repeat this FIASCO again will not do, they must retreive, repent, ask publicly for forgiveness from all parties concerned to clean up this mess.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Rabbi Miller complained that R Dovid's psak that the HETER is worthless is only half of the truth. He should also order the couple to depart. From what I have read here from various reports, that R' Dovid has already told them so.

    ReplyDelete
  48. From what I have heard Rav Dovid has not said anything to the couple

    ReplyDelete
  49. From memory, it might have been someone asking R' Dovid whether they are obligated to depart, and rerplied in the affirmative. Chaval that the *Search this blog*, is not operable for some time.

    ReplyDelete
  50. To one blogger that asked me about RSK's yeshiva has been banned. See:
    Sunday, January 17, 2016

    Rav Avraham Yehoshua Soloveitchik: Condemns the Kaminetsky-Greenblatt heter

    Update: audio recording click on link

    מדברי מחאה של הגאון ר' א. י. סולובייצ'יק שליט"א

    ראש ישיבת בריסק

    נפל דבר בישראל

    באמריקה התירו אשת איש לשוק רח"ל בלא גט -

    זהו נבלה ממש

    וחוץ מעצם הענין שאין רצוני ליכנס בזה שהוא באמת חמור מאוד

    הרי אף במקום שצריך ליכנס להתיר עגונות ישבו רבותינו האחרונים שבעה נקיים עד שהוציא פסק

    וגם בזה לא היה להם די והתנו ההיתר בהצטרפות עוד גדולים

    וכאן עושים כאילו הוא דבר של מה בכך

    ורשעים במחשך מעשיהם התירו ולא התירו

    כאן בארץ ישראל כשרצו להתיר שני ממזרים הפכו את העולם

    חובה גמורה על הרבנים וראשי הישיבות באמריקא לזעוק צעקה גדולה על זה

    והרי זהו אחריות עצומה על כל המשך הדורות באמריקה כי זה פתח לכל מיני רבנציקעש שיוכלו לעשות ככל העולה על רוחם

    הכל בא מהקולדז וכו'

    *ואסור ללמוד אצל ראש הישיבה כזה וכמבואר ברמב"ם על הרב שאינו הולך בדרך טובה*

    ReplyDelete
  51. Here are some interesting findings.

    Thursday, March 31, 2016

    R Shmuel Kaminetsky- welcomed with open arms by Rav Steinman and Rav Kaniefsky after publicly disowning the Kaminetsky-Greenblatt heter....

    ...גר"ש קמינצקי חזר בו מההיתר וביקר אצל גדולי ישראל

    ראש ישיבת פלדלפיה הגאון רבי שמואל קמינצק, הודיע לאחרונה כי הוא חוזר בו מההיתר להפקעת הקידושין וכי האישה אשת איש, בעקבות זאת ביקר היום אצל מרנן הגראי"ל והגר"ח (חדשות חרדים)

    סערת ביטול הקידושין בארה"ב ממשיכה להסעיר את הציבור החרדי בארץ ובתפוצות. לאחר תקופה ארוכה של דין ודברים ומשא ומתן הלכתי ארוך, הודיע בשבוע שעבר הגאון הגדול הגר"ש קמינצקי ראש ישיבת פלדילפיה וממנהיגי היהדות החרדית באמריקה, כי הוא חוזר בו מההיתר שנתן לאשה לבטל את הקידושין וכי הוא סומך את ידו על פסק ההלכה של הגאון רבי דוד פיינשטיין הסובר כמו כלל גדולי ישראל שהקידושין תקפים והביטול לא חל.

    במכתבו כותב הגר"ש קמינצקי "זה עתה קיבלתי פסק הבית דין בראשות הג"ר דוד פיינשטיין ובאתי בזה להודיע שוודאי כאשר הורו כן יקום וכמו שכתב אאמו"ר שליט"א וכבר מסרתי פסק הבי"ד לבעל הדבר שאין תוקף לביטול הקידושין כלל וכלל ולשומעים ינעם ותבוא אליהם ברכת טוב וה' יגדור פרצות עם ישראל.

    בכך חוזר בו הגר"ש קמינצקי מהוראתו להתיר את ביטול קידושי בני הזוג ומצטרף לדעתם של כלל גדולי ישראל מהארץ ומהעולם, שטענו כי אין להפקיע קידושין ובראשם מרנן שר התורה הגר"ח קנייבסקי, הראב"ד הגר"מ שטרנבוך והגר"מ קוטלר שכתבו בלשונות חריפים כנגד ההיתר.

    לאור ההסדר והחזרה בו מדבריו הגיע היום הגר"ש קמינצקי לביקור מיוחד בבתיהם של גדולי הדור בבני ברק וביניהם מרנן ראש הישיבה הגראי"ל שטיינמן,שר התורה הגר"ח קנייבסקי, והגרי"ג אדלשטיין.

    יצויין, שעל סמך אותו היתר של ביטול הקידושין בשל בעיות נפשיות אצל הבעל התחתנה האשה לאחרונה וכעת היא נשואה לבעל אחר.

    האשה מסתמכת עדיין ככל הנראה על ההיתר שהעניק לה הפוסק רבי נתן גרינבלט, שהפקיע וביטל את הקידושין הראשונים ועדיין נשאר איתן בדעתו שכך היה עליו לעשות.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.