Rav Dessler (Michtav
M’Eliyahu 4:116): Free-will of men and women and its relationship to Adam being
created with two faces (partzuf). It states in Eiruvin (18b) in the
beginning Adam and Eve had a single body (guf) except they had two faces
(partzuf) and later they were separated. The term “guf” is refering to lower
part of the nefesh (as I explain elsewhere). That is where man has free-will.
This that originally that Adam and Eve had a single “guf” that means that
originally woman was only created as a means that Adam could reproduce but not
that each one of them had separate free-will. Rather their free-will i.e.,
“guf"
was the same. It is clear
that Adam was a very wise person as we see that his comprehension was in truth
great because he gave names to all the animals. His
ability to give names means that he perceived the essence and true purpose of
each creature. In addition the Torah says that the name he gave was in fact its
name i.e., his understanding of the animals agreed with that of G‑d (Chizkuni).
Adam himself never sinned in any matter and in fact it never occurred to him to
sin to the slightest degree.
This can be seen from that he
did not eat from the Tree of Knowledge [to transgress G‑d command] but simply
to listen to his wife. Because his understanding was so great when there was
only one decisor it was impossible for Satan (devil) to seduce him. In other words, originally his good
inclination was not equal in strength to his evil inclination [but was greater].
Therefore G‑d separated the woman from him. That means He gave her independent
free‑will. By doing so it strengthen the power of the evil inclination and thus
equated the power of the good inclination to that of the bad inclination. (It
is to be understood that all of this is referring to the level of Garden of
Eden as we discuss in volume II page 137). The reason why man was originally created as one entity and then
separated in order that there should be no entry for at all for the evil inclination – was in order to
establish the foundation of the good aspect and that man should have his
awareness of truth strengthened. This would provide significant help for him
after he was seduced by his evil inclination. In the original condition the
woman was simply an appendage for the an without any independent free-will of
her own (as we mentioned previously). In true also now after the separation - that
the woman’s free-will is to be an instrument for the man. As it says in
Sanhedrin (22a), A woman is unformed matter (golem) and she does not establish
a covenant except with the one who made her a utensil. The nature of a women is
that a women experiences her honor and importance in the honor and importance
of her husband. That is because the purpose of the woman is from the aspect of “the
mitzva is a candle” while that of her husband is from the aspect of “the Torah is light”
(See Zohar Terumah 161a). In other words the free will of the woman is to
correct the material aspect of existence regarding mitzvos and good deeds and
to prepare the candle (the material means i.e., the home). While the free will
of the man is to ascend in Torah and to light the candle with the light of
Torah in order that the light of the spiritual Torah fill the home. This is
similar to the fact that a candle without a flame is nothing and so is a flame
without a candle can not provide illumination (Zohar there). In other words the
free will of the man and that of the woman complement each other. [ see here for the Hebrew text ]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
does any of this make sense? does it in anyway correspond to reality?
ReplyDeleteSo why is the consent of the bride necessary for a wedding? since the husband is the one who knows what has to be done, he should just choose a wife and take her, without asking first.
ReplyDeleteI suspect that requiring consent of the wife is not torah-true, but a later, modern addition.