Angels and religion

 Yoma (19b) There was a Sadducee who had arranged the incense without, and then brought it inside. As he left he was exceedingly glad. On his coming out his father met him and said to him: My son, although we are Sadducees, we are afraid of the Pharisees. He replied: All my life was I aggrieved because of this scriptural verse: For I appear in the cloud upon the ark-cover. I would say: When shall the opportunity come to my hand so that I might fulfil it. Now that such opportunity has come to my hand, should I not have fulfilled it? It is reported that it took only a few days until he died and was thrown on the dungheap and worms came forth from his nose. Some say: He was smitten as he came out of the Holy of Holies. For R. Hiyya taught: Some sort of a noise was heard in the Temple Court, for an angel had come and struck him down on his face to the ground and his brethren the priests came in and they found the trace as of a calf's foot on his shoulder, as it is written: And their feet were straight feet, and the sole of their feet was like the sole of a calf's foot.

Religious Medical Research

 I'm reading "Religion and Medicine: A History of the Encounter Between Humanity's Two Greatest Institutions" by Jeff Levin, Stephen G. Post and wanted to share this quote with you.

."In 1988 an unusual study appeared in the Southern Medical Journal. San Francisco cardiologist Randolph C. Byrd published results of a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of distant intercessory prayer for hospitalized patients in the coronary care unit at San Francisco General Hospital.1 Between 1982 and 1983, 393 cardiac patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated list to either a treatment or control group, the former receiving prayer from Christian groups outside the hospital. Each patient received prayer from three to seven intercessors. Blinding meant that neither doctors and nurses nor patients, nor even Byrd, knew what group each patient was assigned to, and intercessors received only the first name of a respective patient and his or her diagnosis. Pray-ers included born-again Christians and religious Roman Catholics active in a church or fellowship. What was the result? According to Byrd’s analyses, prayer worked. At follow-up, analyses showed that prayed-for patients had significantly less congestive heart failure, pneumonia, and cardiopulmonary arrest; required fewer antibiotics and diuretics and less intubation/ventilator assistance; and received a lower severity score based on a measure of the course of their postentry hospital stay.2 In the acknowledgments at the end of his paper, Byrd humbly added the following: “In addition, I thank God for responding to the many prayers made on behalf of the patients.”3 Publication of Byrd’s study created a firestorm of comment and critique.4 Fallout included denunciations from secular skeptics5 and devout Christians6 alike. But there was also an emerging apologetics from secular physicians and proponents of a more welcoming role for spirituality in healthcare.7 Notably, the response from readers of the SMJ was mostly positive, with one exception—a letter to the editor accusing the journal of an “attempt to return medicine to the Dark Ages” by publishing a study that sought “to undermine reason.”8"

Start reading this book for free: https://a.co/fd3uXDn

"Tefillin and cardiovascular function. A controlled study of twenty Jewish men, conducted at the University of Cincinnati, found that use of tefillin (nonocclusive leather straps attached to the arm during morning prayer, also known as phylacteries) appeared to have an ischemic preconditioning effect.173 Long-term daily use among Orthodox Jews was associated with an anti-inflammatory response (decreased levels of circulating cytokines and attenuated monocyte chemotaxis and adhesion), while acute use in both religious and nonreligious Jews was associated with improved vascular function (greater brachial artery diameter and flow volume) after thirty minutes of use. I must admit that I am not sure what to make of these results, but as a practicing Jew I find the possible implications fascinating and encouraging."

Start reading this book for free: https://a.co/6RXdNdN

--------------

Read on the go for free – download Kindle for Android, iOS, PC, Mac and more

http://amzn.to/1r0LubW

Kaminetsky-Greenblatt Heter: Rav Tzadok "defends" their perversions of the Torah

update: I just modified the title of the post because some people were mistakenly taking it literally.
=========================
As noted many times, the Kaminetsky-Greenblatt Heter is a blatant perversion of halacha. In addition it is based on lies. I have also asked many times for someone to defend not only the creation of this phony heter but also the refusal to tell the couple to separate from an adulterous relationship.

However much to my astonishment this Shabbos I was shown a clear justification for their action. Rav Tzadok is talking about a tzadik or gadol and clearly had the Kaminetsky's and Rav Greenblatt in mind when he wrote the following words. [As a side point - this Rav Tzadok was used to justify R Berland's purported sexual perversions by his son-in-law. Rav Tzadok seems to think that a real tzadik can violate any halacha and it is not considered a sin]..

Rav Tzakok HaCohen (Tzedkas HaTzadik #198 page 76): ... David violated the halacha without any justification - but just because he wanted to. And he relied simply on the fact that because he wanted to violate the halacha that this was truly G-d's Will and thus no sin was done in the violation. And this was even though there was absolutely no reason to justify it because Will is not dependent on reasons... 

שהוא עשה שלא כהלכה בלא שום טעם רק מפני שרצה בכך וסמך על מה שהוא רוצה כך הוא אמיתות רצון השם יתברך ואין בו עבירה. ואף על פי שאין בו שום טעם כי אין טעם לרצון

I am not aware of any non-Chassidic writings that state such a thing - so it might be a problem for Litvaks such as the Kaminetsky's and R Greenblatt to rely on this heter. But maybe one of their defenders can send me a non-Chassidic source that gedolim can violate the Torah anytime they want - because it is G-d's Will.

FURIOUS Navy Commander SPEAKS OUT on Trump BATTLESHIP SCHEME

5 takeaways as MTG unloads to NYT Magazine, dishing scathing criticism of Trump

 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/takeaways-mtg-unloads-nyt-magazine-dishing-scathing-criticism-trump

Outgoing Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene indicated to the New York Times Magazine that President Donald Trump, lacks "faith" and does not reciprocate loyalty. 

She also said that she disapproves of "MAGA Mar-a-Lago sexualization," and indicated that she expects the U.S. to engage in "more war" as the president seeks to maintain his grip on power.

Greene, a once ardent Trump supporter who had a dramatic falling out with the GOP juggernaut this year, is dishing out scathing criticism of the president she once lauded.

Wall Street Journal: Latest stolen election conspiracy theory ‘nonsense’

 https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5665452-wall-street-journal-trump-2020-election-fraud-georgia/?tbref=hp

“Elections are supposed to run by the book, and Fulton County’s blunder is bad for public confidence,” the Journal wrote. “Yet so are Mr. Trump’s constantly shifting claims that the 2020 election was stolen, with every irregularity claimed as supposedly proving history’s biggest fraud.”

Trump, the Journal wrote, will likely “never admit his 2020 claims were partisan nonsense.”

Who is calling the shots for a napping President Trump?

Trump Loses STUNNING Money Judgment in E. Jean Carroll Case

Pascal's Wager

  I'm reading "The Things We Make: The Unknown History of Invention from Cathedrals to Soda Cans" by Bill Hammack Ph.D. and wanted to share this quote with you.

"Pascal gathered his scratch paper notes to create his great work Pensées (“Thoughts”), in which he proposed his famous “wager.”8 He wrote, “Either God is or he is not. But to which view shall we incline?” He assigned probabilities to God’s existence or onexistence: “a coin toss is being spun which will come down heads or tails.” It is, he implied, a fifty-fifty shot, although he later admitted that the probability of God’s existence might be smaller. He assigned utility and value to the outcome of believing or not believing—a yet more sophisticated version of the plus-and-minus system of the āšipu. Following the prevailing Christian beliefs of seventeenth-century France, to believe in an existing God granted an eternity in paradise after death, while disbelief damned one to hell. Belief in a nonexistent God, however, only compelled one to live according to religious standards based on a misconception with no eternal reward. Disbelief in a nonexistent God gave one more freedom in life while being left to the same fate after death as the believer. Following the āšipu’s model, belief in an existing God provided essentially ultimate, infinite benefit, and disbelief in God provided infinite loss. If God didn’t exist, belief provided finite loss, while disbelief provided finite benefit. Given the stats, the best one can get from belief is eternal bliss, whereas the best disbelief offers is a marginally better life on earth. The worst one suffers from belief, on the other hand, is a life inconvenienced by religion, while with disbelief comes the possibility of eternal damnation. So Pascal concluded that a risk analysis compels belief in God. Although the theology, even logic, of Pascal’s wager has been debated for centuries, he shows us a turning point in probability theory: the idea that the mathematics of games of chance can be applied to a wide swath of life, that probabilities can be developed into an art of conjecture, a way to think about future events with some enumerated degree of confidence that we can use to make informed decisions to mitigate risks and solve problems."

Start reading this book for free: https://a.co/g9T8XHk

--------------

Read on the go for free – download Kindle for Android, iOS, PC, Mac and more

http://amzn.to/1r0LubW

Recognized by the rabbinate, Orthodox converts trapped in legal limbo over Israeli citizenship

 https://www.jpost.com/judaism/article-881417

Orthodox converts in Israel – fully recognized by the Chief Rabbinate – are living in legal and social limbo, denied citizenship, as they face systemic bureaucracy and discrimination at the Interior Ministry, despite a lifetime of religious observance.

In response to why the Interior Ministry rejects the aliyah applications of recognized converts, a spokesperson for the ministry's Population and Immigration Authority told the Post:

"There is a difference between the act of registering a marriage based on halachic considerations and the definition of a Jew for the purposes of the Law of Return, because these are two different laws with different criteria. A marriage certificate is a 'public document' that indicates a marriage and on the basis of which one is registered in the Population Registry as married. The certificate is valid for this registration only. However, the certificate does not constitute proof for the purpose of religion and nationality details and, therefore, is not evidence for checking eligibility for return."

Petah Tikva declared 'red city' for measles outbreak, six-month-old children to be vaccinated

 https://www.jpost.com/health-and-wellness/article-881644

Petah Tikva has been designated a red city due to a rise in measles cases in recent weeks, the Health Ministry announced on Monday.

As part of the declaration, residents are asked to bring their children for an additional vaccine dose starting at six months of age, which will not count toward the routine vaccination schedule. When the children reach one year of age, they will receive another dose of the vaccine, in accordance with updated guidelines.

Trump SCAM REPORT Quickly FALLS APART as Reality HITS HARD

MAGA panic over 2026: 'Trump SLUMP,' Epstein nightmare lives, Kimmel DUNKS on Trump

Joe Rogan Rails Against Trump’s ‘Crazy’ White House Plaques

 https://www.newsweek.com/joe-rogan-donald-trump-presidential-walk-of-fame-white-house-plaques-11274772

Rogan repeatedly described the plaques as "crazy" and said that historians should be writing these kinds of plaques, rather than the current president.

He said that somebody "needs to tell him like, ‘Hey, this is not good. You can’t do that, because other people could do that too, and then the White House stops being the White House,’ and it becomes whoever is in its house, where he could just go crazy and say everybody else is a crook."