Thursday, July 24, 2025

Like Trump, Obama Has Immunity

 https://www.wsj.com/opinion/donald-trump-barack-obama-presidential-immunity-2847d7a1?mod=hp_opin_pos_4

In a White House outpouring Tuesday, President Trump accused President Obama of “treason,” calling him the “ringleader” of efforts by U.S. intelligence officials to steal the 2016 election. On Sunday his Truth Social account posted a fictitious video depicting FBI agents handcuffing Mr. Obama in the Oval Office, to the tune of “YMCA,” while Mr. Trump looks on and laughs.

The impetus was a batch of documents that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released and handed to the Justice Department, so it can deliver what she called “accountability.” She claims they show “a treasonous conspiracy” to subvert Mr. Trump’s win in 2016. “It’s time to go after people,” the President said. “Obama’s been caught directly,” and what happened was “criminal at the highest level.”

Trump reportedly was told he’s in the Epstein files by US attorney general

 https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-reportedly-was-told-hes-in-the-epstein-files-by-us-attorney-general

White House initially calls WSJ report ‘fake news’ before official doesn’t deny the US president’s name appears in investigative documents related to the convicted sex offender

 US Attorney General Pam Bondi told President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared in investigative files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.

The disclosure about Trump’s appearance in the Justice Department’s case records threatened to deepen a political crisis that has engulfed his administration for weeks. Some Trump supporters for years have fanned conspiracy theories about Epstein’s clients and the circumstances of his 2019 death in prison.

The White House sent mixed signals following the story. It released an initial statement characterizing it as “fake news,” but a White House official later told Reuters the administration was not denying that Trump’s name appears in some files, noting that Trump was already included in a tranche of materials Bondi assembled in February for conservative influencers.

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files

 https://www.wsj.com/politics/justice-department-told-trump-name-in-epstein-files-727a8038?mod=hp_lead_pos2

Bondi also told president at the meeting that Justice decided to not release more Jeffrey Epstein documents because of the presence of child pornography and the need to protect victims

When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a “truckload” of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump’s name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials. 

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Epstein brother: White House claim ‘blatant lie’

 https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5415258-epstein-brother-white-house-claim-blatant-lie/

Mark Epstein, the older brother of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, refuted the White House’s claims that President Trump never visited the disgraced financier at his office. 

“That’s just another blatant lie,” the older Epstein said during a Tuesday appearance on CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront.” 

“Because he was there. People that worked for Jeffrey in his office, they could testify that they saw Trump in Jeffrey’s office on numerous occasions,” he continued, “So for him to say he wasn’t there, all I can say is that’s just just another lie.”

Divorce Crisis - Guest Post

 Remember when they used to tell us to never say the word "divorced" in your home, it's terrible for a marriage?

Of course they meant not to throw the word around when you're arguing with your wife because it's very mean and makes her worry that it is, indeed, the end. But what we as kids took away from it was the idea that we shouldn't talk about misfortune and that would somehow protect us from it, like some sort of secret forcefield against harm. Similarly, we say " machala" to somehow insulate us from getting sick. And now, as adults, we subconsciously avoid divorced people. Tell me, this isn't true? You don't approach them. Don't ask how they're doing or if they need anything. Don't get involved. You're "staying safe".

Perhaps you're afraid you'll plant the seed of divorce into your home by having a divorced person over for a Shabbos meal. Perhaps your wife might get some ideas from a divorced female after hearing the joys of attending singles events and speed dating. Perhaps your wife might get ideas from a divorced male at the table, ideas of how exciting it might feel to have a different  kind of man in her life. Perhaps your wife is afraid you'll be inappropriate with the divorced single mom while her back is turned. So the divorced neighbor learns to meditate and perhaps figures out how to make Shabbos meals for themselves, sometimes getting together with other singles, other times just staying home. Shabbos is long and they're lonely and disconnected, feeling shunned. Perhaps they had a bad experience in beis din and forfeited getting any support in order to be released from an abusive man, leaving them literally destitute with no food in their fridge. Perhaps they're currently being dragged through court by the ex husband who's trying to alienate the kids and keep her half of the house that he bought while she raised his kids, did his laundry and served him supper for decades. Perhaps her own parents think she embarrassed them and don't speak to her anymore. Perhaps the man suffers from bipolar and misses his family who put up with it for 25 years until it was too much. He ruminates. Perhaps the phones come out on Shabbos. Perhaps they start making friends outside of the community. Perhaps they checked out of Judaism altogether and put on the requisite clothing in order that their kids can have some dignity and so that they can still work in the community.

You probably shouldn't have even read this far. You're getting ideas. What if it happens to you? Nah, you know what you're doing, and she would never leave you anyway, especially not with all these kids in tow. Sure, you haven't really been nice to each other in a few years. You push eachother's buttons and avoid each other as much as possible. Sometimes you fight but she gets over it, right? And you have a cute secretary so you're not feeling such a lack of human connection; you can survive. She wants you to go for couples counseling. You think you know what they're gonna say, that you should probably get divorced or perhaps make major changes and who needs to be scolded and threatened? So you refuse. The rabbi might suggest you see someone but those therapists are all the same and you saw something about this in the Lakewood Voice and the therapist was just a big fat yenta who told everyone about the person's private matters so you tell the rabbi to forget about it.

What if one day your wife demands a Gett? Are you gonna be shocked? How did she pull it off? Where's she gonna go? How's she gonna pay for stuff?

What if she's smarter than you and already put all your money in another account and hired a lawyer who's not going to let you see the kids more than every other Shabbos? How's that feeling now?

Maybe it's good for families to see divorced people. Perhaps you can be nicer to your wife. Perhaps she can be a bit more nurturing to you. Perhaps you can benefit from a good couple's therapist? Perhaps reality is that  divorce isn't some " loser option", but rather a gift from God to remind us to cherish what we have and to be thankful for our spouse? And to allow us to move on and find someone else if it's no longer possible to serve Him with joy with that person?

Marriage is a metaphor for our relationship with God

 https://rabbisacks.org/archive/marriage-is-a-metaphor-for-our-relationship-with-god/

Marriage is not just living together, a temporary partnership for mutually beneficial ends. Heaven help us if that is all we see in it. It is the point at which the “I” of self meets the “Thou” of another, transforming us into something larger, more spacious, more generous and tender than we could ever be on our own. In marriage at its best you see humanity at its best, and in a loving home you can almost touch the Divine Presence.

Gabbard’s Russian interference claims directly contradict what other Trump officials have said

 https://edition.cnn.com/2025/07/22/politics/tulsi-gabbard-russia-trump-obama-analysis

When President Donald Trump sided with Vladimir Putin over his own intelligence community on the topic of Russia’s interference in the 2016 US election, then-Sen. Marco Rubio sharply rebuked Trump.

The Florida Republican said in 2018 that the intelligence community’s “assessment of 2016 is accurate. It’s 100% accurate. The Russians interfered in our elections.”

He added: “I think it was not a good moment for the administration, obviously. Hopefully, something like that never happens again.”

But seven years later, it just keeps happening — over and over again — as Trump and his most loyal allies seek to sow doubts about that 2016 episode and punish their political enemies. That’s now taken the form of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard threatening criminal referrals and even floating allegations of treason for key officials in the Obama administration.

Her argument is full of holes, as even critics of the Russia investigation such as the National Review’s Andrew McCarthy have noted. (Basically, the whole thing conflates Russia’s attempts to influence the 2016 election with nonexistent attacks on election infrastructure that changed votes. )

But just as notable is that Gabbard’s move to cast doubt on Russia’s 2016 interference is wholly at odds with several top Trump administration officials, most especially Rubio, along with a pair of congressional investigations spearheaded by Republicans.

“The Committee found that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian effort to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign for president,” the report said. “Moscow’s intent was to harm the Clinton Campaign, tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration, help the Trump Campaign after Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, and undermine the U.S. democratic process.”

The Lunacy of Lawfare Against the Fed

 https://www.wsj.com/opinion/jerome-powell-anna-paulina-luna-lawfare-federal-reserve-donald-trump-be289db7?mod=hp_opin_pos_1

Criminalizing a spat over interest rates is an Argentina-level mistake.

Agitators within the Trump Administration for weeks have flogged a Federal Reserve office renovation as a pretext to harass Chairman Jerome Powell. Now comes the lawfare, with a criminal perjury referral against Mr. Powell to the Department of Justice from a Member of Congress. How low can this crowd go?

The complaint in MAGA quarters is that the multiyear renovation of several office buildings in the Fed’s Washington, D.C., campus is running way over budget—the cost is said to total some $2.5 billion now, up from a $1.9 billion estimate when the refurbishment started.

Forced conversion

 Ramban (Devarim 21:12): The reason for all the rules and procedures required for the Yofas To’ar (beautiful captive) is that she is being converted against her will. She is not asked if she wants to leave her religion and become Jewish as is done with other converts. She is told by her captor that she must keep the Torah whether she likes it or not and must abandon her religion. That is why the verse says she must cry for her father and her mother because she is forced to leave her people and deity. This is the derasha of R’ Akiva that “her father” refers to idolatry as it says in Yermiyahu (2:27), “They say to the tree ‘you are my father’ and to the rock “you gave birth to me.’ ”  In sum, she is mourning over leaving her religion and becoming part of another nation. It is plausible that the court forces her to immerse in a mikveh and is done with slaves. Consequently since she is not becoming Jewish in the normal way the Torah distances her during this time. Our Sages say that the reason for having her mourn and and cry is that she should become repulsive and her captor will lose his lust for her. The Ibn Ezra says it is out of respect to her parents who died in the battle. In contrast the Rambam(Moreh Nevuchim 3:41) says it is to be merciful with her so that she can come to grips with her new situation because it is known that crying and mourning ultimately bring tranquility. The Rambam says during this period of mourning she is not forced to leave her religion and he is not to have sexual relations with her. However in my view this time is not to show kindness to her. Rather it is to uproot the name of her deity from her mouth and her heart as well as remove the pain of separation and loss of her father and mother and her people. That is because it is wrong to have sexual relations with a woman who is being forced and is in mourning as our Sages (Nedarim 20b) prohibited concerning a women that the husband has already decided to divorce her. So obviously in this case where she is crying in her heart to her deity to save her and return her to her people and deity (Ruth 1:15). Therefore when she is informed that she is being forcibly separated from her people and her land and being converted to Judaism, she is also told that she should give up any thought about her father and mother and her land because she will never see them again. She is told that now she will be the wife of her captor following Jewish custom (daas Moshe and Yehudis) (Kesubos 72a) Judaism. At this point she is given time to cry and mourn in order to calm down from her anguish and hopes. Mourning eventual brings acceptance and tranquility. During this time she will come to grips with the reality of conversion and this will partiall uproot idolatry from her heart as well as concern for her people and nation. She will let go of them and attach herself to this man (who captured her) as she becomes accustomed to him. That is why the Torah says that she is to be brought into his house… in the hope that she will accept her lot. All the above is only relevant when she is converted through force. However if she willing converts before a beis din according to the normal procedure for conversion – she is permitted to her captor immediately or to his father or brothers. This is stated explicitly in Yevamos (47b), “She shall cry for her father and mother for a month.” However this is only true when she doesn’t accept Judaism willingly. However if she accepts Judaism then she immerses herself in mikve and she is permitted at once. It is possible that this procedure is done with all female captives of war. In other words everyone is knows that they will be subject to this procedure – if they don’t agree to convert. Therefore because of fear of this procedure she will agree to convert from the beginning to avoid the procedure. That is why Devarim (21:14) says that in the end of he doesn’t want her she is set free – that she is free to return to her religion and she is not forced to observe the Jewish religion. That is because only the person who willing accepted conversion to Judaism is forced to observe it. Therefore only if she accepted Judaism willingly and yet violated Shabbos she is subject to stoning and if she ate pork she is subject to lashes. In other words the willing convert who ends up violating Jewish law is treated as any Jew who violates Jewish law. to send her. Furthermore if she converted willingly without being forced – she is not sent free if her captor rejects her. Because if she is viewed as being motivated to  convert out of fear - she still has the status of a full Jew. This is stated in Yevamos (24b) that in cases of questionable motivation that they are still considered full Jews.

Trump 'surprised' Jerome Powell was appointed by Biden , but called Fed chair 'smart' at 2017 appointment when appointed by Trump - Senility?

Trump falsely claims his uncle taught the Unabomber at MIT - Senility?

Tuesday, July 22, 2025

Marriage - Pele Yo'etz

 Pele Yoetz (Love between husband and wife):The love between a man and his wife is something that of necessity must be strong. We will start with the love that a man should have for his wife because the statement of our Sages(62a)is well known that a man is obligated to love her as he loves himself and to honor her more than himself. . This seems unnecessary to say because he will not withhold his love for her in his service of G-d. Our Sages (Avos 1:5) also cautioned us. Don’t have a lot of superficial chatter with women and they said this about one’s wife. Because whoever has excessive chatter with women causes evil to himself and is idle from the study of Torah and will result in going to Hell. Our Sages (Bava Metzia 59a) also said, One who follows the advice of his wife will fall into Hell. Consequently all intelligent men should develop a balance as they says (Sanhedrin 107b) also say that it should be that the weak left hand pushes away while the stronger right pulls closer. The main love is spiritual love and therefore he has the responsibility to direct her gently and pleasantly regarding proper modesty and keep her away from lashon harah and anger and cursing as well as saying G-d’s name in vain. the finer details of mitzvos, prayers and berachos, Shabbos observing. and other similar things. It would also be a nice idea to teach her mussar and statements of our Sages that are relevant to her. If this is done she will develop a sensitivity to these things greater than that of a man It is unnecessary to say that someone who has an intelligent wife, a gift from G-d, has a good wife. Certainly a thread of grace is upon her and she is beloved to her husband. In contrast a man with a bad wife needs to be very careful. He needs to see this as a Divine test and he needs to strengthen his resolve to deal with her peacefully and with friendship to respect the Divine Presence. These are subjects of ancient wisdom. A person should be aware that even among eminent men the "fire has fallen". To the extent that our Sages noted (Yevamot 63a), "… It is enough that they save us from iniquity and raise our children to Torah." A person should also be aware of the saying of our Sages (Shabbos 33b), "The minds of woman are light." People say, "A woman's hair is long and her mind is short." Therefore, intelligence must originate with him. If she violates his will and angers him, he must control his emotions so that he does not become angry with her, and it need not be said to shame, curse, or strike her, G-d forbid!  This is the practice of boors and frivolous and rash individuals – in actuality he hurts himself! Only chastise her with sweet and gentle words. In any case he should bear the yoke and be insulted rather than insulting, and accept upon himself the judgment of Heaven with joy – because each woman is sent to a man from G-d. According to what our Sages (Eruvin 41b) say, "Someone who has a bad wife will not see Hell", therefore it is even proper to want to have a bad wife, if he can withstand the test to avoid the severe judgment of Hell. If he passes the test, then he will not inherit two Gehinoms (one in this world and one in the World to Come)! Rather he should accept her with love and he will receive a good reward for his efforts. He also needs to arouse and strengthen his love for her in order that their children not be one of the nine categories "children of a hated one", Heaven forbid, and according to his efforts will be his gain.  One of the ways to prevent arguments in his house is not to be so seriously concerned with every penny of household expenditures because harsh as the grave is the jealousy of one woman to another. Therefore, each man according to his material blessing must increase the honor of his home at the proper time, and by doing so, appease his wife. For blessing does not reside in a man's home except for the sake of his wife (Baba Metzia 59a). So great is domestic peace that the holy name of G-d was allowed to be erased for it (Nedarim 66b). Therefore, even by sheer force must a man stand up to and remove evil from his house so that the Divine Presence will rest upon his home. Included in this love is that a man should not frequently travel far away.[..] How great is the obligation of a wife to love her husband, to honor him as a king to fear him, and to fulfill his will and desire with all of her strength. […]. Besides the need for a woman to be modest – “All the honor of the daughter of the king is within herself (Tehilim 45:14) – she must not cause men to sin with her eye and her heart. She needs to beautify herself for her husband and be cautious in regards to cleanliness, purity, and financial expenses, so that her husband does not go astray and place his eyes upon another woman. […] Just as a woman is careful in regards to Nidda, challah, and the lighting of candles, so too she must be diligent in regards to respect for her husband, as such is the command of the King unto her. Our Sages said, “There is no finer wife than the one who does the will of her husband.”[…] Therefore, all women should respect their husbands, be they great or small. There are senseless women who make issue with their husbands over their inability to provide for the needs of the house. It is tremendous folly in any case! If the husband is truly poor and he does not have adequate means, his pain, depression, shame, and embarrassment at having to reveal to his wife his deficiency is clearly sufficient anguish. The woman needs to be wise and should not add grief to his pain.[..]  Likewise, a woman needs to consider that when her husband gets angry at her for seemingly no reason, perhaps he suffered some disappointment in the marketplace, and in his overwhelming frustration and anger he spoke to her unbecomingly. As people are wont to say, “Whether he is able or not, a man will quarrel with his wife”. She needs to forbear, not to anger him, or cause him any more grief. This is a general rule – when there is an argument between people or between husband and wife, and one of them initiated the conflict by stepping out of bounds and opening his mouth without justification, the other individual must be strong enough not to respond at all – neither good nor bad – in the time of his anger. She must wait until his antagonism has passed, and, after a day or two, reprove him gently with soft speech. She should say to him, “Why did you do that to me? What are my crime and my wrongdoing that you pursue me with exceeding rage for no apparent reason? [..] A woman who has fallen in her lot unto an evil man – one who hits, curses, tramples, and violates her privacy, should accept upon herself the judgment of Heaven and suffer, never tiring of atoning for her soul, since great will be her reward in the World to Come. A woman of valor and profound intelligence will not reveal to others the disgrace of her husband, his bad character and nature, and her cry will not be heard. She thus saves her husband from disgrace, and he will not hate her more for having exposed his shame. Otherwise, his anger would smolder and his wrath would burn within him. He would strike her even more harshly than before. All the more so, she should not reveal to her father, mother, or siblings anything of her pain, oppression, and plight. [..] Therefore, if her father, mother, and relatives possess intelligence and understanding, even if her very difficult situation was told to them, they should pretend that they know nothing and greet him with a pleasant countenance for her good. Even if they want to voice their objection and to admonish him, they must seek a strategy to make it seem as if their information came from the neighbors who heard it by the window, etc. The best thing is that she should not reveal it at all, as we said, in order not to pain them and so that they will not hate him in their heart.[…] She should tell them that all is well in her home. It will be considered a meritorious act, for she will gladden her father’s, mother’s, and relatives’ hearts and she will be deserving of the ultimate good. It would be even better if she, herself reproved her husband at a favorable time with a pleasant, congenial, and kind voice. It will surely yield positive results, because, in truth, “Soft speech can break a bone” (Mishlei 25:15). She should pour out her soul before G-d day after day. Perhaps G-d will be gracious and answer her prayer to return her husband to the good path; and she, too, will find peace. Included in the love of a woman for her husband is that she should pray on his behalf to G-d. Since the heart of a woman is sensitive and her tears are near, if she prays to G-d from the innermost part of her heart, certainly her prayer will have an effect. A woman must also pray for her children, because in the well-being of her husband and children she will find peace. Who will have pity on them more than she?[…] A woman must be careful and vigilant not to cause Heavenly prosecution of her husband or to cry tears because of him. Granted that he is supposed to be more sensitive than she, as our Sages said (Baba Metzia 59a), “A husband must always be cautious in regards to hurting his wife, because since her tears are near, so is her pain. Quick is retribution to come upon one who causes her anguish and sorrow. ” Nevertheless, she too must consider that if evil befalls her husband, G-d forbid, she shares a primary responsibility and it is her life that is at stake.[…]She should be very careful in regard to the honor of her husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, and cousins for the honor of G-d who commanded her to be attentive to the honor of her husband. To the extent that she is respectful towards her husband’s relatives, she provides contentment to her husband and will find favor in his eyes: It will be considered a mitzvah for her.[...]

Psak Halacha Rav vs Sanhedrin

 Igros Moshe (YD III #91) Question: Publishing a sefer with translations and final halacha from the Igros Moshe Answer I heard that someone is publishing a sefer in English citing the rulings from my Igros Moshe. It is clearly forbidden even if the translation is accurate.. Today there is no one who is able to publish halachic rulings without a clear explanation and sources. People have previously requested from me for permission to do this. I replied to them that I will not give permission. In addition I am concerned that it my words will not be described properly. There are many ways to err or to cause others to err. Even to translate the entire teshuva, it is obviously problematic to give to the unlearned masses material to make incorrect deductions and comparisons. I therefore strongly protest with the strongest protest against this. 

The background to the tshuva. 

Rabbi Rakefet had written an index to the first 5 volumes which he summarized in English in the Introduction. Rav Moshe found out about it and mistakenly thought he was making a summary of the Igros in English or a new shulchan Aruch based on Rav Moshe's teshuvos. R Rakefet's index was never published except for his introduction in his pamphlet for Russian Jews [Rakafot Aharon page 58-71]. In fact this English introduction briefly summarized the Igros. Later a Sefer on Hilchos Shbbos was published which took the psakim of Rav Moshe summarized in English with those of the Debreciner and it had the written haskoma of Rav Moshe. Rabbi Goldberger wrote Rav Moshe asking him to explain his lenient attitude towards the latter and his extremely harsh attitude to the former (Rav Moshe had stated he was willing to go to court to stop its publication). The resulting tshuva was actually a composite tshuva - according to Mordechai Tendler. A reply to Rabbi Goldberger's question and a general discussion about psak and in particular his own in the Igros Moshe.

Igros Moshe (YD IV #38.1) Question What is psak halacha Rav vs Sanhedrin? A clarification of what was written in Igros Moshe YD III #91) Answer I had written that I did not want that there be published a sefer consisisting of my final halachic rulings from Igros Moshe without explanation and sources. The reason for this is that I am fully aware of my insignificance. Despite my knowledge of the entire Talmud both the Bavli and Yerushalmi and in addition the words of all the Poskim and surely the words of explanation and innovation of our Rabbis because there are also those which I have not seen. However I have relied on what I was able to clarify and conclude based on my own ability and that is the essence of poskening. As I have written in the Introduction to my Igros Moshe. In addition as I wrote there I have have written the reasoning which was the basis of my conclusion. Thus I am serving simply as a teacher of halacha not as a decider of halacha since the reader can study the material and decide for himself. I also cite in the Introduction the words of Rabbi Akiva Eiger because I am always afraid to make a final ruling. It is enough that I must reply to those who ask me. I am worried about the statement of our Sages not to be one of those who is capable of making halachic rulings and doesn’t. Nevertheless I rely on the possibility that the questioner will study the matter and my reasoning and decide himself even though I know that there are those who rely totally on me and my conclusions because they weren’t able to study the material. However if they don’t have the time it is possible to rely on my conclusion for the time being and study it later and thus if they don’t agree they can retract their ruling. They can rely on me in an emergency since most of my rulings are definitely correct and study the material later. Since they have the have the ability to study the material that allows them to rely in the mean time on the rulings in my sefer. Thus this is not actually accepting my rulings just because he has my sefer. Aside from this I take no responsibility. However to completely rely on my rulings that I have published in my sefer so that I am the Posek, I am doubtful whether I have that ability. The permission to make halachic rulings is only for the actual case that is brought to the Posek and not for others that seem similar in other places It is in fact permitted for another talmid chachom to rule differently than what I have written if he reasons differently. This is true even if a person was given explicit permission to make rulings for the entire world. There is no vadility in such universal rulings. Only the Sanhedrin can make rulings which apply to cases that don’t come before them. All other rulings merely serve as possible precedents for a Rav for his ruling on a case that comes before him and thus serve as study material

Translating the Igros Moshe or summarizing it

Igros Moshe (YD III #91) Question: Publishing a sefer with translations and final halacha from the Igros Moshe Answer I heard that someone is publishing a sefer in English citing the rulings from my Igros Moshe. It is clearly forbidden even if the translation is accurate.. Today there is no one who is able to publish halachic rulings without a clear explanation and sources. People have previously requested from me for permission to do this. I replied to them that I will not give permission. In addition I am concerned that it my words will not be described properly. There are many ways to err or to cause others to err. Even to translate the entire teshuva, it is obviously problematic to give to the unlearned masses material to make incorrect deductions and comparisons. I therefore strongly protest with the strongest protest against this.

The background to the tshuva. 

Rabbi Aharon Rakefet had written an index to the first 5 volumes which he summarized in English in the Introduction. Rav Moshe found out about it and mistakenly thought he was making a summary of the Igros in English or a new shulchan Aruch based on Rav Moshe's teshuvos. R Rakefet's index was never published except for his introduction in his pamphlet for Russian Jews [Rakafot Aharon page 58-71]. In fact this English introduction briefly summarized the Igros. Later a Sefer on Hilchos Shbbos was published which took the psakim of Rav Moshe summarized in English with those of the Debreciner and it had the written haskoma of Rav Moshe. Rabbi Goldberger wrote Rav Moshe asking him to explain his lenient attitude towards the latter and his extremely harsh attitude to the former (Rav Moshe had stated he was willing to go to court to stop its publication). The resulting tshuva was actually a composite tshuva - according to Tendler. A reply to Rabbi Goldberger's question and a general discussion about psak and in particular his own in the Igros Moshe.