Thursday, July 16, 2020
CNN anchors trash Trump over photo-op with Goya products
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-jake-tapper-anderson-cooper-chris-cuomo-trump-goya
CNN's most prominent anchors took turns trashing President Trump on Wednesday for expressing his support for Goya products amid the boycott fueled by prominent Democrats.
Conservatives
have been rallying behind the iconic food company after its
president Bob Unanue received backlash for praising Trump at the White
House last week, saying the country is “truly blessed” to have a
president like Trump.
Democrats like New York Rep. Alexandria
Ocasio Cortez and former Obama HUD Secretary Julián Castro were among
those who called for a boycott of Goya products.
Trump’s approval rating on the economy tanks in new poll
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/15/trumps-approval-rating-on-the-economy-tanks-in-new-quinnipiac-poll.html
Key Points
- President Donald Trump’s approval rating on how he’s handling the economy has dropped dramatically in the last month, according to a new poll.
- The poll, from Quinnipiac University, shows that only 44% of people approve of the way Trump is handling the U.S. economy, compared with 52% from the month before.
- The results come just after the release of what Trump called a “spectacular” jobs report, which revealed that the economy in June added 4.8 million jobs, a figure that surpassed projections.
Fact check: Peter Navarro's claims about Dr. Anthony Fauci are misleading, lack context
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/07/15/fact-check-trump-adviser-navarro-claims-fauci-misleading/5443826002/
Peter Navarro, a senior trade adviser to President Donald Trump, has taken aim at Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert and a member of the president's coronavirus task force.
Navarro
wrote an opinion piece in USA TODAY that was initially published
Tuesday night – and then the next morning in print – as an "opposing
view" to a newspaper editorial that hailed Fauci a “national treasure” and that said efforts by President Donald Trump or his team to muzzle Fauci would be hazardous.
Bill
Sternberg, USA TODAY's editorial page editor, said
editors approached Navarro about writing the opposing view. The
newspaper has a tradition of offering opposing views to its
editorials. Some of the comments Navarro made echoed ones he had made
earlier about Fauci.
Brad Parscale replaced as Trump's campaign manager
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53426285
Facing a tough re-election campaign, US President Donald Trump has replaced his campaign manager.
Mr Trump said he had substituted Bill Stepien, a field director for his 2016 campaign, in place of Brad Parscale.
Mr
Parscale - who was reportedly blamed by Mr Trump's inner circle for a
poorly attended rally in Oklahoma last month - will stay on as senior
adviser.
Opinion polls show the president is trailing his Democratic challenger Joe Biden ahead of November's election.
Mr
Trump's statement on Wednesday evening said: "Brad Parscale, who has
been with me for a very long time and has led our tremendous digital and
data strategies, will remain in that role, while being a Senior Advisor
to the campaign."
Wednesday, July 15, 2020
IDF Targeting Girls in Non-religious Schools
BS"D
Israeli Army Draft Office Flagging
Girls in Less Religious Schools for Religious Interrogation - Wholesale
- With Apparent Cooperation of Some Rabbanut Rabbis
-- Traditional & National Religious Girls Bearing Brunt of Recent Escalation; Human-Trafficking Concerns Rise
23 Tammuz, 5780 °° July 15, '20
Parshas Matos - Masei
By Binyomin Feinberg
feinbergbinyomin@gmail.com
"... And if someone, like Pinchos, is one among a multitude, and every man is against him when he dares to speak out for truth and to fight for the Law -- the more lonely his stand, the greater the number of his adversaries, the more powerful is his word, the mightier his deed."
-- Rav Shamshon Raphael Hirsch OB"M (1808-1888), (in "Judaism Eternal," vol. 2, p. 293)
.....
Update link for the month of Tammuz to check in case we post during the week between our regular Wednesday/ Thursday posts:
https://docs.google.com/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As reported previously, in a major development over the past several weeks, the Draft Office of the Israeli Army (operating under the entity "Meitav") is flagging teenage girls who study, or studied in less-religious or non-religious schools - summoning them to a "Rayon Dat" (a military "Religiosity Interview," or, more often, interrogation). These girls are now receiving this order even without stepping into the Draft Office. Until now, it was generally only after entering the Draft Office that such girls would be identified, and only then confronted with a summons to the Draft Office. Now, girls are facing this formidable challenge earlier in the process, as young as about 16-1/2 years old, soon after they obtain their religiosity verification from the Rabbanut (Israeli Rabbinate). Apparently, there's a new Army protocol in place to flag all such girls on a wholesale basis.
Moreover, the Rabbanut itself - primarily in Jerusalem - has lately reported to have been asking multiple girls where they study, in a seemingly innocent, but potentially catastrophic departure from Rabbanut protocol. Coincidentally, girls asked that question are finding themselves suddenly summoned to the Draft Offices. Is the Rabbanut sharing that information with the Draft Office? Are we to assume it's merely coincidental that these same girls are shortly thereafter being ordered to appear before a military panel for religiosity interrogations?
Even
if the Rabbanut is in fact not providing that information to Army
headhunters, it's apparent - to volunteer women assisting these teenage
girls - that the recent Rabbanut shift in policy (questioning girls about their schooling while they are simply seeking religiosity documentation) is indicative of some form of Army-Rabbanut coordination.
Activist volunteers with "Chomosaich" report that about NINE such girls now are now facing Rayon Dat interview appointments - despite having followed proper procedures to avoid that. A lawyer active assisting the girls is running up against a brick wall.
Thus, these girls will likely need either a more expensive lawyer, or face the prospects faced by other female religious objectors, including threat of arrest, incarceration, and abuse by police, prison, and judicial authorities, as recently experienced by Hadasah Margolit Yakovov (20 y/o daughter of a Chareidi Bucharian immigrants), released after almost a month in Military Prison Four in wake of her refusal to enlist (see last week's post http://daattorah.
One
example is the current Army pursuit Hodoyah E. Noteworthy is that in a
written response this week to her attorney, Meitav conveniently neglects
to address the recent Rabbanut directive to provide Corona-period
extensions to girls requiring Rabbanut assistance, as raised in a letter
the attorney sent on behalf of Hodoyah in June.
Furthermore,
whatever explanation the Army may proffer to explain this needs to be
seen in context of timing. They're embarking on this new policy just as
Corona is resurgent. Does the risk of not drafting a few girls actually
justify the risk of endangering yet more people within the Army and in
the civilian population?
Volunteers
with "Chomosaich" observe that if this latest Army escalation against
traditional and Mizrachi girls is left unchecked, then soon - G-d forbid
- the only girls guaranteed their religious service exemption
entitlements will be Chareidi girls of politically- connected affiliations
Anthony Fauci has been wrong about everything I have interacted with him on: Peter Navarro
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/todaysdebate/2020/07/14/anthony-fauci-wrong-with-me-peter-navarro-editorials-debates/5439374002/
Dr. Anthony Fauci has a good bedside manner with
the public, but he has been wrong about everything I have interacted
with him on.
In late January, when I was making the case on behalf of the president to take down the flights from China, Fauci fought against the president’s courageous decision — which might well have saved hundreds of thousands of American lives.
When
I warned in late January in a memo of a possibly deadly pandemic, the
director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
was telling the news media not to worry.
Trade adviser Peter Navarro tears into Fauci in blistering op-ed: ‘Wrong about everything
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trade-adviser-peter-navarro-tears-into-fauci-in-blistering-op-ed-wrong-about-everything
White House trade adviser Peter Navarro tore into Dr. Anthony Fauci in
a stunning op-ed on Wednesday, saying the National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases director, who has been a leading voice on the
Coronavirus Task Force, has been “wrong about everything.”
“Dr.
Anthony Fauci has a good bedside manner with the public, but he has
been wrong about everything I have interacted with him on,” Navarro
wrote in a blistering op-ed for USA Today.
All the Ways the Influential Hydroxychloroquine Study Was Crap
https://gizmodo.com/all-the-ways-the-influential-hydroxychloroquine-study-w-1844378680
A controversial, highly influential study touting the drug hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for covid-19—one that helped launch months of research and failed clinical trials—has now been sharply criticized within the pages of the same scientific journal that published it. The new post-publication peer review highlights a variety of serious flaws in the study and concludes that the authors were “fully irresponsible” in how they presented their findings.
The original paper, authored by a team of researchers in France, was published in late March in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. It was said to involve 20 hospitalized patients with confirmed covid-19 who were treated with hydroxychloroquine, some of whom were also given the antibiotic azithromycin. Compared to a control group of patients, the study claimed, people on hydroxychloroquine had lower levels of the virus on average or cleared the infection more quickly; the addition of azithromycin was associated with even faster recovery.
Though there had been earlier, promising trials of hydroxychloroquine to treat covid-19 elsewhere in the world, the French study sparked massive scientific and political interest in the drug. President Trump himself tweeted about the study the day after it came out, heralding the combination therapy as a “game changer” for the pandemic. Soon after, the U.S. government and others, including the World Health Organization, announced that they would start large-scale trials to test out hydroxychloroquine and the related drug chloroquine.
But it wasn’t long before other scientists began to raise questions about the study, how it was carried out, and the scientists who conducted it, particularly the senior author, a physician and microbiologist named Didier Raoult. Though Raoult had genuinely contributed to important research in the past, he and his lab were also previously accused of glaring errors and misconduct in their published work, with one episode leading to a year-long ban from a prominent microbiology journal. Once his hydroxychloroquine study began making waves, researchers unearthed other alleged examples of data fakery in some of his earlier research.
Rosendaal’s scathing review echoes many of the same criticisms made by outside scientists following the study’s publication. In particular, he condemns the decision by Raoult’s team to exclude from the study’s final results six patients who took hydroxychloroquine, including four whose condition worsened, one of whom eventually died during the study period (none in the control group died). There were also other inconsistencies, such as supplemental material mentioning that a number of asymptomatic patients were included for study while the study’s actual language claimed that it was an examination of hospitalized patients (people without symptoms are unlikely to have been hospitalized for covid-19).
Ex-Harvard Medical School faculty member warns COVID-19 herd immunity is ‘wishful thinking'
https://www.foxnews.com/health/clay-ackerly-coronavirus-herd-immunity-wishful-thinking
A Washington D.C.-based internist and former Harvard Medical School faculty member has claimed the idea that herd immunity may slow the coronavirus pandemic is "wishful thinking" after a 50-year-old patient was infected for a second time with COVID-19.
"During
his first infection, my patient experienced a mild cough and sore
throat," Dr. Clay Ackerly explained in an opinion piece for Vox. "His
second infection, in contrast, was marked by a high fever, shortness of
breath, and hypoxia, resulting in multiple trips to the hospital.
"It
is possible, but unlikely, that my patient had a single infection that
lasted three months," Dr. Ackerly added. "Some Covid-19 patients (now
dubbed 'long haulers') do appear to suffer persistent infections and
symptoms.
"My patient, however, cleared his infection — he had two
negative PCR tests after his first infection — and felt healthy for
nearly six weeks."
Subscribe to:
Comments
(
Atom
)
