In other words: If some jurors believe that Trump falsified business documents solely to cover up a tax crime, while others believe that he falsified business documents solely to cover up an election crime, the jury can still convict Trump on the felony-level falsifying-documents charges, despite disagreeing on the predicate crimes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
So convict first, then figure out the crime. How delightfully Soviet.
ReplyDeleteDon't bother with facts or read the posts that contradict your fantasies
DeleteIt's exactly what the article says.
DeleteIt's like modern Chareidi psak - first forbid something, then find a bunch of sources for support.
Nope that is not what it says!
DeleteIn Pesak we have a similar concept regarding calculating Rov Shittos for Halacha Limaasa. Even if two Shittos give contradictory sevaros, we count both in determining what most opinions hold.
ReplyDelete