Tuesday, December 7, 2021

A Letter From A Mother of a child abuser - the perspective from the other side


It takes courage to write my story. I am not a young woman anymore and I feel compelled to put my family’s story on paper to give us a voice when we have none. I hope that by sharing our painful story, other parents can learn from our mistakes and that we will ultimately be able to open a dialogue about judgment and forgiveness – for ourselves and others. What follows is story of a regular family and a tragedy that unfolded while we were not looking. In that, ours is a cautionary tale for every parent.

It all began with a phone call. I was on my way to work when a woman called saying, “Do you know that your son Yisroel [a pseudonym] sexually abused my son in camp several years ago?” So shocking was this accusation that at first, I didn’t quite take it in. In the few seconds it took me to assimilate the information, I blurted out, “No. I don’t know anything about it, but I will find out and do whatever has to be done.”

I can’t really explain the effect this call had on me. I wondered if it could be true. This wasn’t the introverted, gentle son I knew – could he have done this terrible thing? Then, as any parent would, I started searching for any hint that I could’ve missed; what didn’t I see? And I searched my heart, wondering what I had done wrong. This child had been born at a chaotic time when I was overburdened with family troubles. My mother had cancer, and I had been turning the world upside down in a futile search for the doctors and treatments that would save her. Sadly, my efforts were too little and too late, and I was left grieving and feeling guilty. The next few years brought the death of my father and other medical crises, but despite it all, our family life seemed normal. In all the hours of soul-searching that followed, I wondered if this child, who perhaps needed the most attention of all my kids, didn’t get all that he needed. I know we had struggled to do the best we could.

Yisroel had been diagnosed with ADHD and had difficulty making friends at school. He was bullied and became sullen and withdrawn, and he seemed to lack social skills needed to make close friendships. We sought advice from a child therapist but nothing helped. When he finally made what seemed to be a good friend, a neighborhood boy a couple of years older than him, I was so happy. But my impression was terribly wrong. My son was being sexually exploited and I was totally oblivious. These events took place many years ago, and in those more innocent times, such things were unimaginable to most people. This older boy was “frum” and from our own Orthodox neighborhood, and I felt very comfortable. In fact, I saw this new relationship as a “bracha” for my child who was so bereft of friends. [...]

By the time the distraught mother called me with the accusation, Yisroel was 22 years old and immersed in Torah studies. I immediately confronted him and told him about the call. I won’t lie; I hoped with all my heart that he would be shocked and deny it. I hoped it would wind up being untrue, a mix-up – that it was not my son; that it didn’t happen. But my son just looked at me with an expression I couldn’t interpret and was silent. Heartsick, my husband and I took him to see a therapist, a specialist in the treatment of sexual abuse recommended by an Orthodox referral service. A battery of tests confirmed that he had been abused himself and also had abused his camper. My husband and I, together with our other children, were enlisted in Yisroel’s treatment plan, charged with enforcing his attendance in therapy and monitoring his comings and goings, but he was anxious to cooperate in the treatment and continued willingly for six years.

Life went on almost normally. Eventually, Yisroel met and began dating a young woman. Concerned about whether he was ready for marriage, we consulted his therapist, who assured us that he was healthy and posed no danger to the community since he had received treatment early and had never repeated his offense. He gave my son his blessings for the marriage, and we were thrilled that our son was finally reentering life, albeit with a heavy burden.

It was three years after his marriage and almost 10 years after the abuse incident that another surprise phone call upended our lives again. This time, the former camper himself called and accused my son of molesting him. Yisroel readily admitted his guilt, apologized profusely and explained that he was still in therapy. But, unbeknownst to my son, there was a police detective listening in and recording the conversation, and in a classic sting operation, he arrested my son based on his admission.

Life has a way of forcing us to learn many lessons that we would rather never know, and so, we began our tutorial on the legal system that would occupy such a dominate place in our lives to this day. We became aware of the various classes of felonies: since the statute of limitations had passed, the state would have to apply the higher-level offence, which subjected our son to a mandatory sentence of five to 25 years. We learned that our only option was a plea bargain which required an admission of guilt, 10 years probation and being registered as a sex offender, and mandatory therapy through the court system, although he had already had six years of specialized therapy. We learned that in some respects, the law is unfair to the victim, instituting an unreasonable time frame for charges to be brought, and to the perpetrator, in that all offenders are lumped into one undifferentiated bunch. There was little we could do other than agree to the terms we were offered. We live with enormous guilt and anguish knowing that our son so grievously hurt another child and caused tremendous suffering to the victim and his family. To undo the damage is impossible, and we made the only reparation we could, paying unstintingly for the victim’s therapy, which ran into six figures.

32 comments :

  1. "since the statute of limitations had passed, the state would have to apply the higher-level offence, which subjected our son to a mandatory sentence of five to 25 years."
    Can anyone please explain this? If the statute of limitations had passed, how are charges brought?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The rest of the article is just as profound, it's a shame not to post a little more of it

    ReplyDelete
  3. The mom also brings research from juvenile offenders (that are involved in abuse, after receiving appropriate therapy, do not reoffend any more than the regular population), while her son abused another child at the age of 19.
    I understand the parallels she's trying to bring, but she undermines our argument by bringing in information thats not relevant to her case.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When is Moshiach coming already?! We need him so so desperately!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Different offenses have different statutes. The one for the lesser charge had expired, so the prosecutor brought a more severe charge the statute to which hadn't expired.

    If the burden of proof is not commensurately increased with the statue of limitations or punishment at stake, that does seem an inherent difficulty with the system -- an interesting one, which personally I wouldn't have thought of.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Like this: The staute of limitations for a lower-level offense, which might have been the more fitting charge, had passed. Therefore, if they were going to charge him at all, it had to be for a higher-level offense, for which the staute of limitations had not yet passed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yechezkel HirshmanMarch 1, 2017 at 2:48 PM

    This is definitely mesira of the highest degree. I wonder if there is any teshuva for the "victim"/moser.

    http://achaslmaala.blogspot.com/2017/01/mesira-xviiib-concise-guide-to-laws-of.html

    The "victim"/moser is very lucky that the recovering molester was able to avoid jail time or he would have "gonev ish u'mecharo" on his shoulders as well.

    http://achaslmaala.blogspot.com/2016/06/mesira-xiii-thinking-like-jew.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. It seems to me that this is a key point from a Halachic perspective. Since the perpetrator and his family admit there was guilt, and that they are ready to pay to set things right, the only Halachic basis for involving the civil authorities is to make sure the police and courts are aware that there is an individual in the community who poses a potential danger.

    But if there is low likelihood of a repeat offense, is there a Halachic basis for being registered as a sex offender?

    That registration makes finding housing and work onerous.

    ReplyDelete
  9. are you saying that there should rabbinic involvement to give permission to go to the police?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yechezkel HirshmanMarch 1, 2017 at 8:16 PM

    There should not be any permission to go to the police.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with the premise, however, the research she brings specifically mentions juveniles. This individual was not

    ReplyDelete
  12. So if exposing a thief or embezzler makes him unemployable and poor - than you would also say that his crimes should not be revealed and the police should not be notified?
    What about a murderer who killed his wife because she burnt the cholent - and it is unlikely he will kill anyone else. Also keep quiet?!

    Collateral damage is not a reason for not stopping crimes

    To make it more real - revealing the fraud of the Kaminetsky-Greenblatt Heter has caused significant damage to a number of important people while if you and I had kept quiet only Aharon Friedman would be hurt - so why reveal it?

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm all for the death penalty. But I'm against the living-death penalty. The offender registry may be great, or it may be a wash-out. But it's across the board application is destroying lives. My point is, if it can be established that someone is not likely to re-offend, and they are willing to pay for the damage they did, then it may not make sense to kill them socially: make it difficult for them to find and keep housing and a job.

    I think this should be discussed. Thieves, embezzlers, murderers who are truly repentant can move to a new place and get a fresh start. An offender has to register wherever he moves and face harassment from strangers.

    ReplyDelete
  14. truly repent - what does that mean?
    Would you hire a convicted embezzler, wife-beater? ponzi scheme creator? adulterer. An ex-con does not have an easy time getting a job or being accepted in society

    What punishments would you accept for criminals that do not cause collateral damage? And since all punishments seem to have collateral damage would you abolish punishment?

    ReplyDelete
  15. We can't tell how sincere a person is when he looks remorseful. The Torah punishments don't ever take such things into account. But it says kayvan shenikla achicha hu, and we don't say to a baal teshuva zecor maasecha harishonim. So if we would know how to administer punishments and teshuva requirements that work to rehabilitate, we would not need an offender registry and it would be wrong to have one. But since we don't rehabilitate, the offenders are out on the loose, so we have no choice but to keep them stigmatized.

    ReplyDelete
  16. but that is not so. Regarding most sins we don't treat him as if he has a clean slate. There is a problem of chazaka. So while he might be achicha - it doesn't mean you should be stupid and pretend that he is a safe person to have around. Read the halachic literature regarding abuse. Even an embezzler who has been punished - there is no obligation to ever trust him with your money again.

    We don't have a reliable way to declare a sex offender as rehabilitated - there are just differing degrees that is less likely that he will re-offend.

    ReplyDelete
  17. True that it's unexpected, but I meant to agree with you, not to disagree. I'm saying that since we don't have reliable rehabilitation, your concerns are correct. I only said that The Torah does give effective measures for punishments, which do rehabilitate. I say this because the entire purpose of bais din's punishments are for yishuv hamedini. While you could say that it means only to fear committing crimes, I think it also means rehabilitating. The fact is that it is assur to tell a baal teshuva zechor maasecha harishonim. That refers to someone who has done appropriate teshuva as prescribed, not just bowed his head in presentation of martyrdom.

    ReplyDelete
  18. But there is no registry of embezzelers.

    Or a registry / database of molesters of adults. Not for teaching employment purposes, or for shidduch dating purposes.

    (How about a database of brothers of molesters?)

    ReplyDelete
  19. My perspective is formed by my knowledge of specific cases. In one case, the person pleaded guilty when he was likely innocent; there wasn't even a victim.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I know of a case of someone on the list, and am convinced he was given a raw deal, and I would trust him around children I was responsible for. An ex-convict can actually be pardoned by a Governor or the President. Good luck to someone getting off this registry he should never have been on.

    ReplyDelete
  21. And therefore that means that it is a good idea?
    I thought criminal records were available on line?

    ReplyDelete
  22. And so therefore justice is imperfect. what about the many children who in fact have been protected by the registry? Finding examples of someone getting a raw deal is not in itself a justification for throwing out the registry

    ReplyDelete
  23. I think executing one child molester would do more to protect children than forcing a thousand men to register.

    ReplyDelete
  24. That's a totally different issue.

    ReplyDelete
  25. you cant rely on a pardon.

    in NY, the policy for several decades has been no pardons no matter what (rockefeller drug law cases was an exception). the only exception is a pardon to avoid deportation, which i understand is pretty regular. very very few others.

    ReplyDelete
  26. very difficult to get on line.

    have to run a complete background check (which you should for anyone handling company money, anyway.)

    a friend of mine had his secretary handle his escrow account for thirty years. one day (when the real estate market turned down, ten years ago) the account was short money.

    turns out, she was gambling the money in atlantic city for years. he kept his license by the skin of his teeth.

    the solution -- a fidelity bond, costs $10.00. so cheap, brokers dont want to sell it.

    ReplyDelete
  27. An admirable woman! She has been honest and she acknowledged her child's misdeeds. How painful for her as a mother. How many times do we hear of the parents and families of abusers who do not and will not own up to what their child has done. How many parents so stupidly and wrongly defend and support their offspring for bad behaviour bullying or abuse instead of tackling it.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Charges are almost never brought in the way portrayed in the article, as a result of an expiration of the SOL. Your question has actually uncovered another semi-slick detail that the article tried to pass through.

    Either there's sufficient evidence to indict for the felony (presumably with a longer SOL) or there isn't. Your point is therefore well taken.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Joe, you're missing the point of the registry, I think. This particular type of crime thrives in the shadows. Moreover, it's well established that abusers are able to cultivate an endearing persona as they move forward with their hunt. Society has a right to shine a bright light on people who are already muchzak for this crime.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Ok. Great! But considering that the registry only represents a fraction of those seriously abusing, it becomes apparent we've got a looong way to go before society is protected properly.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.