https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-joins-musk-to-poke-fun-at-massive-war-plan-leak/
The president and his “first buddy” appeared unbothered by the shocking leak of confidential military plans.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-joins-musk-to-poke-fun-at-massive-war-plan-leak/
The president and his “first buddy” appeared unbothered by the shocking leak of confidential military plans.
More specifically, the official doing the texting of the war plans to a journalist appears to be Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who was confirmed by the Senate despite serious questions about his lack of official experience – Hegseth’s most recent job before taking charge of the US military was as a Fox News host.
The story features all of the bold-faced names in charge of national security for Trump.
Somehow, Goldberg appears to have been added by national security adviser Mike Waltz to a group chat on the private, encrypted messaging platform Signal.
The group included profiles that seemed to be associated with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House adviser Stephen Miller, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and others.
A spokesman for the National Security Council later confirmed that the message chain appeared to be real and said they were investigating how Goldberg’s number was added.
Senior Trump administration national-security officials held detailed discussions of highly classified U.S. plans to launch airstrikes against Yemen’s Houthi militants using a nongovernment messaging service and mistakenly included a journalist in the conversation, U.S. officials said Monday.
President Trump claims to run the most transparent Administration in history, but maybe not like this. His team somehow added a journalist to a high-level Yemen war-planning chat conducted over Signal, the commercial messaging app, with operational details about targets, weapons and attack sequencing.
A National Security Council spokesman confirmed the accuracy of the story in the Atlantic on Monday: “This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain.”
The news is that the characters played to their public type. National-security adviser Mike Waltz was a voice for U.S. leadership—and for carrying out the President’s policy. Vice President JD Vance was a voice for U.S. retreat even when Mr. Trump directed otherwise.
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-847461
Founded by Theodore Herzl 128 years ago, the congress has influence over Israeli policy on immigration, land use and religious affairs through its control of institutions such as the Jewish Agency and the Jewish National Fund. It also distributes about $1 billion a year to Jewish causes.
Haredi Orthodox Jews, meanwhile, are also divided over whether to turn out and vote for a slate promising to represent their interests.
For nearly all of Zionist history, there was no haredi slate. In Israel and in the United States, haredi rabbis have historically regarded Zionism as a secular movement that clashes with traditional notions of God’s role in restoring Jews to the Land of Israel. They’ve allowed participation in Israeli democracy for the protection of their religious rights and state services, but viewed support for the World Zionist Congress as a capitulation to secularism.
But a rebel faction emerged ahead of the 2020 election with the creation of a slate called Eretz Hakodesh, meaning “the holy land.” Championing “classical Jewish values of Torah,” the slate shocked the Zionist world by placing third out of 15 slates with about 20,000 votes. Many voters, it turned out, were willing to swallow the bitter pill of voting in their fight for haredi interests.
Top U.S. officials mistakenly texted war plans to one of the president’s most-hated journalists, The Atlantic revealed Monday—a shocking oversight by those in Donald Trump’s administration.
The bombshell report showed screenshots of a lengthy thread on the messaging app Signal, which included should-be-clandestine texts from Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and others.
Those messages were about the logistics of—and apparent need for—a military strike on Houthi targets in Yemen on March 14. That strike, to “send a message” and to help clear Middle East shipping lanes, was ultimately carried out and killed 53 people.
The messages, which a White House National Security Council spokesperson said Monday appeared to be “authentic,” gave unprecedented insight into how the Trump Administration communicates behind closed doors.
Among the dozens of texts viewed by The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, included Vance expressing reservations with the strike requested by Trump—a break from the VP’s unwavering public backing of seemingly all of the president’s decisions.
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5211030-us-houthi-attacks-yemen/
Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, was apparently included in a Trump administration group chat on Signal in which top officials debated and then discussed details of attacks against Houthi rebels in Yemen.
The initial invite to the group apparently came from national security adviser Mike Waltz. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly sent the group details including weapons used, targets, and timing — two hours ahead of the attacks, which began March 15.
Others in the group were Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.
In the stunning report, Goldberg claimed Waltz connected with him on Signal on March 11 and, two days later, he was invited to join a chain called the “Houthi PC small group,” in which they discussed strikes against the Houthi militant group in Yemen — seemingly unaware of the journalist’s presence in the group.
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-administration-elon-musk-live-updates-2049479
Nazis were treated better by the United States during the Second World War, than Venezuelan migrants are by the Trump administration, a judge told an appeals court on Monday.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is currently hearing whether President Donald Trump can use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport individuals it suspects to be part of a Venezuelan gang without due process, after it sent more than 200 to El Salvador earlier this month.
"There were plane loads of people. There were no procedures in place to notify people," Judge Patricia Millett said.
"Nazis got better treatment under the Alien Enemies Act."
Igros Moshe (OC I Introduction) This book (Igros Moshe) consists primarily of answers that I have written according to what I ruled is the actual practical halacha to those who wanted to know my views. Even though it might have been better to refrain from answering with prescriptions of what to do as we see that many great Torah scholars refused to answer practical halacha because of the warning of Rav (Sotah 22a) What means that which is written: ‘For she hath cast down many wounded’ — this refers to a disciple who has not attained the qualification to decide questions of law and yet decides them However the gemora concludes ‘yea, all her slain are a mighty host’ — this refers to a disciple who has attained the qualification to decide questions of law and does not decide. It was because of this that Rabbi Akiva Eiger is quoted by his sons in the Introduction to his volume of responsa, “I definitely needed to respond to all those who asked about the halacha so as not to violate the concern of being one who is capable of poskening but didn’t.” However those who refrain from poskening do so because even today the posek needs to posken correctly just as in the days of Rav. While it is true that the quality of poskim varies between generations as to what constitutes being qualified to pasken but it is only contemporary poskim who can render psak and the requirement is for them to pasken fot their generation. Anyway it is impossible to find contemporary poskim of the same quality of previous ones. Thus the meanining of “attaining the status to be a posek” can not mean that they are the same high level as in previous generations and nevertheless they are obligated to pasken like Rabbi Akiva Eiger. Nevertheless the poskim still need to be concerned that perhaps their psak is wrong. Consequently there are those who conclude that because of the possibility of error they won’t pasken and Rabbi Akiva Eiger is not typical because of his greater self knowledge. Therefore some minor figure such as me who lacks proper Torah and wisdom should obviously refrain entirely from paskening and surely not to publish them which is like pasening for the whole world. . In spite of this my justification not only for poskening but publishing them in a book is that the scholars of each generation not only can but must pasken even though they are not on the high level of “attaining the status to be a posek” of the time of the gemora and thus there is a genuine concern that they might be wrong. from the perspective of Heavenly Truth. In fact it has been stated that the truth of psak is not in Heaven but on Earth. That means that the validity of psak is sufficient if it appears to a tamid chachom after proper study to clarify the relevant gemoras and poskim according to his ability done with seriously with appropriate fear of Heaven. It is sufficient that if he is satisfied that the psak is correct he is obligated to pasken, even if in Heaven he is clearly wrong. In fact not only is this legitimate psak but it is also described as “the words of the living G-d” since it appears to be correct and nothing contradicts it. He will be rewarded for his psak even if it is wrong as is seen from the gemora (Shabbos 130a). Thus the true psak is that there is an obligation to pasken and that one is rewarded fot doing it is simply that which the talmid chachom understands after diligent study with his full ability – even if his conclusion is not true in the absolute objective sense. In fact this understanding applies to all the rabbinic disputes including that of the Rishonim and Achronim in which some conclude something is prohibited while others say it is permitted. As long as the halacha has not been conclusively decided like one position everyone is free to decide which view applies in their place and each is viewed as being true even though they contradict each other and only one view can be objectively true. Both sides are rewarded for their psak. Thus we see that there are many disputes between different communities even involving the most serious sins as some follow the Rambam and Beis Yosef while others follow the differing views of Tosfos and Remah. Both views are seen as the word of the living G-d even though the objective halacha in Heaven is only in agreement with one side. We see in Sanhedrin that a judge might be afraid to making a ruling because he might err in judgement and will be punished for his error. Therefore the Torah says that G-d will be with you in judgment. That means the dayan is only responsible for what he sees, soif he did his best he will not be punished for errors. The requirement to pasken and judging is even when it is not actually true. Consequently according to this definition of the true psak such is also found in the present generation and thus we also are required to posken and judge. The warning found in Bava Metzia that the accidental errors of a tamid chachom are considered intentional sins only means if he did not try hard to determine the truth but when he exerts himself fully he is obligated to pasken for which he will always be rewarded. This is what I relied on to pasken and respond to questions. I responded with what seems to me in my humble opinion after I clarified the matter with great effort to determine my answer. In addition I have written the reasons I came to that conclusion and therefore I am merely like a tutor to the person who is asking the question since he can retrace the process himself and thus decide for himself and I am not serving as a posek at all just as Rabbi Akiva Eiger said in his introduction. It seems from the gemora about Dovid serving as a posek that there is an obligation for a posek to answer all those who ask questions and it is forbidden to send them to another posek. That is why I answered all those who asked me . I have therefore decided to print my answers since I am merely serving as one who clarifies and explains the halacha and not as a posek. Other talmidei chachomim and poskim can readily understand my reasoning and decide for themselves whether to agree with my conclusions. It is easily seen that I did not blindly accept the views of others even that of the great poskim. In fact |I carefully examined with all my ability to try and understand whether they were correct as is commanded by Rabbi Akiva Eiger in his Introduction. Therefore I ask all those who study my sefer to carefully examine everything I said before deciding what the actual halacha is. This also very beneficial in knowing how to clarify the halacha. Thus my sefer will serve to teach the halachic process
“My clinical emphasis on the importance of attaining a positive self-concept and avoiding self-flagellation may have had its origin in an anecdote about the Chafetz Chayim (Rabbi Israel Meir HaCohen) which Father repeated many times. One time the Chafetz Chayim was riding home to Radin and had the driver stop to pick up a man walking along the road. Along the way, the man mentioned he was journeying to visit the Chafetz Chayim, to which the Chafetz Chayim replied that. he didn't see why the man was going to such effort because the Chafetz Chayim wasn't so special The man then slapped the Chafetz Chayim in the face. Later in Radin the man met the Chafetz Chaimand and immediately bowed down, asking for forgiveness. The Chafetz Chaim said there is no need for this, as the man was defending him. "But I did learn something new trom this experience I have always pointed out how wrong it is to belittle others. Now, I know it is also wrong to belittle oneself.” [Twerski Generation to Generation pp 90-91]
https://matzav.com/rav-yitzchok-berkovits-on-the-wzo-elections-it-is-not-about-us-becoming-zionists/
Rav Yitzchok Berkovits, rosh yeshiva of Yeshiva Aish HaTorah and rosh kollel of the Jerusalem Kollel, has issued a strong statement regarding the current World Zionist Organization (WZO) elections, emphasizing the critical importance of participation for the Torah community.
“The election is not about us becoming Zionists,” Rav Berkovits clarified. “They are to prevent the Reform from siphoning off money and using it to bring Reform to Eretz Yisroel. They openly say it is about undoing all the accomplishments of [Eretz HaKodesh].”
https://mishpacha.com/stand-up-and-be-counted-2/
Can you imagine what they would do with another $5 billion?
The leftist groups running in this election are more left and more liberal than ever before — and they’re busy gathering many tens of thousands of votes to advance their agenda.
A group of Torah askanim met recently to assess this situation, and discussions with gedolim in Eretz Yisrael (who live with the results of Reform and left-wing influences) and in the United States led to encouragement of the plan to create a Torah slate to run in these elections, in order to try to limit the influence of the liberal Jewish community. Although the Torah community has traditionally not involved itself in the WZO, circumstances and situations are now different. Today it’s become an eis la’asos — a timely obligation to stand up for Torah values.
To that end, Eretz HaKodesh, an American initiative to protect and uphold true Torah values in Eretz Yisrael, was created, putting together a slate of delegates that represent the yeshivah, chassidic, Sephardic, and Israeli Torah communities of the United States.
Eretz HaKodesh has the backing of numerous rabbanim, including Rav Elya Brudny, who explained the position of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah of Agudath Israel of America at the recent Agudah national convention. Rav Asher Weiss of Jerusalem expressed in a video how important he felt it was for every Torah Jew to vote in this election. Both videos can be seen on their websites.
The WZO elections, held every five years, play a pivotal role in determining how billions of dollars are allocated across Eretz Yisroel. The Eretz Hakodesh party was formed with the goal of securing representation in the World Zionist Congress and redirecting funds to support Torah institutions and yeshivos. The initiative has received backing from many gedolim and was endorsed in the previous election by Harav Chaim Kanievsky zt”l.
However, not all gedolei torah agree with this approach. The speakers at the Asifa strongly opposed any participation in the election, arguing that any affiliation with the Zionist movement—even for the purpose of supporting yeshivos—is treif. They expressed deep concerns about the potential risks of engaging with a system they believe to be inherently opposed to Torah values.
Igros Moshe (OC V 43.6 p146) Question: The practice of praying at the graves of our ancestors and tzadikim at times of trouble is this prohibited as darash el ha meisim (making requests from the dead)?. There are those who are against this while others such as the Bach say it is not prohibited Answer We find that there are piyutim and selichos in which the angels are requested to –pray for us. It seems that this is a major unresolved dispute. The ones who composed the piyutim were also great Torah scholars and we see that they accepted this as a valid practice. In contrast many others of our great rabbis prohibited this practice The Chasam Sofer cites the Maharal as protesting the practice of selichos directed to angels while the Chasam Sofer himself said those selichos with the congregation or said tachanan while the tzibor was saying the disputed section Some omit the section of Shalom Aleichen asking the angels for a blessing (Berchuni l’shalom). A possible explanation for those great rabbis that permit this which includes Rishonim that since the angels were appointed by G-d to plead for us. Even though G-d obviously is more aware of any defense an angel might make than any angel. It could be that in addition to the defense they were to also pray for us as messenger from G-d. It is not prohibited to ask the angels to pray. In contrast those who prohibit say one should not ask angels to pray even for that which G-d gave them permission to do, rather all prayers are only to G-d. In sum everyone agrees that it is prohibited to ask angels to do something as free agents for us. The dispute is concerning those things that G-d appointed angels to do. In contrast to ask a live person to pray and bless us is something proper and desirable not only the prophets in Biblical times but also to Torah scholars in each generation in every location to pray for the sake of the sick and other needs. In contrast regarding the dead, it is not relevant to ask hin to pray but his soul in Heaven can pray for the living. The question is that those who prohibit praying to angels do they also prohibit asking the dead? Even those that permit asking angels it is only for things that they were appointed to take care of which does not apply to souls so it might be a problem even for those that permit asking angels. It is possible that souls are a lesser problem The souls after death no longer have an obligation for mitzvos and thus have no requirement to pray and so it would be prohibited for us to ask them to pray and bless us.But it would be permitted for their sons to pay to G-d to answer them in the great merit of the tzadikim who even in death are pained by the suffering of their children and others (Berachos 18b). But to ask them to pray would be forbidden as it would be to pray to angels since they were not appointed by G-d. But angels are already aware of the suffering of man and thus it would be permitted to ask them to pray to G-d for us to remove the suffering. But maybe the angels don’t feel the pain as strongly as the souls of the dead. In sum there is an unresolved dispute. .