YNET The committee, formed in 2012, was first headed by now Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon,
and concluded its inquiry recently under the chairmanship of Yuval
Steinitz. The report itself focuses on the controversial September 2000
France 2 broadcast – in which the boy is seen hiding behind his father
while the two were under IDF gunfire – and conclude that al-Dura was
still alive at the end of the video.[...]
According to the
Steinitz-Ya'alon committee findings, in contrary to what had been
published before, there was no evidence that the boy or his father were
even injured at the time the video was shot.
In addition, the committee noted there was reasonable doubt whether
the IDF was responsible for the bullet holes seen in the wall behind the
two.
Furthermore, the Israeli report points a blaming finger at the France 2 news report.
[...]
NY Times
The new findings published on Sunday were the work of an Israeli
government review committee, which said its task was to re-examine the
event “in light of the continued damage it has caused to Israel.” They
come after years of debate over the veracity of the France 2 report,
which was filmed by a Gaza correspondent, Talal Abu Rahma, and narrated
by the station’s Jerusalem bureau chief, Charles Enderlin, who was not
at the present at the scene.
The Israeli government review suggested, as other critics have,
that the France 2 footage might have been staged. It noted anomalies
like the apparent lack of blood in appropriate places at the scene, and
said that raw footage from the seconds after the boy’s apparent death
seem to show him raising his arm.
“Contrary to the report’s claim that the boy is killed, the committee’s
review of the raw footage showed that in the final scenes, which were
not broadcast by France 2, the boy is seen to be alive,” the review
said. “Based on the available evidence, it appears significantly more
likely that Palestinian gunmen were the source of the shots which appear
to have impacted in the vicinity” of the boy and his father.