Monday, November 24, 2014

Multiple Personality Hoax - or How psychiatrists messed up the lives of thousands

NY Times   The notion that a person might embody several personalities, each of them distinct, is hardly new. The ancient Romans had a sense of this and came up with Janus, a two-faced god. In the 1880s, Robert Louis Stevenson wrote “Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,” a novella that provided us with an enduring metaphor for good and evil corporeally bound. Modern comic books are awash in divided personalities like the Hulk and Two-Face in the Batman series. Even heroic Superman has his alternating personas.

But few instances of the phenomenon captured Americans’ collective imagination quite like “Sybil,” the study of a woman said to have had not two, not three (like the troubled figure in the 1950s’ “Three Faces of Eve”), but 16 different personalities. Alters, psychiatrists call them, short for alternates. As a mass-market book published in 1973, “Sybil” sold in the millions. Tens of millions watched a 1976 television movie version. The story had enough juice left in it for still another television film in 2007.

Sybil Dorsett, a pseudonym, became the paradigm of a psychiatric diagnosis once known as multiple personality disorder. These days, it goes by a more anodyne label: dissociative identity disorder. Either way, the strange case of the woman whose real name was Shirley Ardell Mason made itself felt in psychiatrists’ offices across the country. Pre-"Sybil,” the diagnosis was rare, with only about 100 cases ever having been reported in medical journals. Less than a decade after “Sybil” made its appearance, in 1980, the American Psychiatric Association formally recognized the disorder, and the numbers soared into the thousands. [...]

As retold in this latest video documentary from Retro Report, part of a series exploring past news stories and their consequences, the phenomenon burned most intensely for roughly a decade, from the mid-1980s to the mid-'90s. Then it faded from public view, partly the result of lawsuits brought successfully against some psychiatrists, who were found by the courts to have used dubious methods to lead their patients down the path of false memories.[...]

Dr. Wilbur did not write up her findings in some dry professional journal. Instead, she went looking for a large audience, and enlisted a writer, Flora Rheta Schreiber, to produce what became a blockbuster. But as the years passed, challengers began to speak up. One was Herbert Spiegel, a New York psychiatrist who said that he had treated Ms. Mason when Dr. Wilbur was on vacation. Dr. Spiegel described his patient not as a sufferer of multiple personality disorder but, rather, as a readily suggestible “hysteric.” A harsher judgment was rendered in the 1990s by Robert Rieber, a psychologist at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, a New York City school where Ms. Schreiber taught English. After listening to tape recordings that he said Ms. Schreiber had given him, he concluded that “it is clear from Wilbur’s own words that she was not exploring the truth but rather planting the truth as she wanted it to be.” Debbie Nathan, a writer interviewed for this Retro Report documentary, piled on still more skepticism in her 2011 book, “Sybil Exposed.” Perhaps inevitably in a dispute of this sort, counter-revisionists then emerged to denounce the doubters and to defend “Sybil” as rooted in reality.

Overwhelmingly, those receiving a diagnosis of the disorder have been women. They typically had rough childhoods. A pattern to their stories — Ms. Mason fell squarely within it — was that they endured horrific physical and sexual abuse when they were little. More than a few claimed to have been the victims of torture at the hands of satanic cults. In many cases, their memories were brought to the surface through hypnotism or with injections of so-called truth serums like sodium pentothal. But were those recollections real? The “Sybil” phenomenon went arm in arm with a reassessment of certain psychiatric techniques. Some studies concluded that people may have become less inhibited with pharmacological intervention, but not necessarily more truthful. Other research found that hypnosis sometimes creates false memories. Those who dismiss Dr. Wilbur’s work as hokum say that induced false memories lay at the heart of her work with Ms. Mason. [...]

3 comments :

  1. No question I have multiple "personalities". I don't mean this in any scientific sense. One simple illustration. I've lived most of my life in Maryland. When I speak to Goyim who have a Maryland "accent", I find myself naturally talking to them with a tinge of that accent. (It's not quite a drawl, it's more of a soft "slur" -- for example, "Mary-land" becomes "MEHrruh-linn'.) This is not an affectation. It's like part of me comes to the fore that's been buried deep inside of me otherwise. I have many other "personalities". I've noticed this in others, too. My mother, A"H, grew up Brooklyn and when she spoke to relatives and friends from there, sometimes somehow an "r" became appended to some words ending in an "ah" sound.

    And it's not just the accent that changes in me; it's my whole way of feeling. Even what might be termed small changes can trigger large changes. I write a lot in journals. My style of writing changes depending on the pen, ink, and paper I'm using. Even the app on my iPad I'm drafting this comment in influences how I express myself.

    Again, this is not just a manifestation of a gloss on my core being; to my shock, I've come to realize that I'm a company of people. Through my study of Mesilas Yesharim by the Ramchal I've become able to integrate my diverse, and sometimes at odds, personalities. And again, I've got much evidence this occurs in others, too.

    You can find this kind of behavior in the animal kingdom, too. The whole concept of an animal in captivity going "feral". I don't pretend any of this is scientifically presented. Just something for all of us -- and by that, I mean all the different "me's" -- to think about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Addendum:

    At 11:10 Dr. Spiegel makes a similar point:
    "Were different people at a party -- hopefully -- then when we're at work."

    This topic is something that's been touched on before in this blog, and I think bears revisiting. When Jewish kids are brought up "Modern" they can develop two distinct "personalities", a Jewish personality and a non-Jewish personality. Up until about sixty years ago in the U.S., the American mainstream culture and Jewish values were not so divergent. Marriage meant a relationship between a man and a woman. A "gay old time" meant sitting in front of the TV watching the Flinstones. Contrast that with the emails I've been getting through the local listserv inviting people to join a "...group...for Orthodox Jewish parents with lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender children seeking peer support. We will also discuss ways to help parents and families navigate in their communities and be advocates for their children."

    This is a tacit statement that it is not possible to integrate "Modern" and "Orthodox" and the approach should be "just accept our kids as they are, darn it! Be they thieves, homosexuals, Shatnez fetishists, (you name it). After all, we have PROFESSIONALS who tell us its 'genetic', so they just can't help themselves."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hieronymous PseudonymousJanuary 15, 2015 at 2:21 AM

    And then there are Tumblr's "multiples" and "otherkin"...

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED!
please use either your real name or a pseudonym.